More Book Rapport

Today, I heard from three people who received an e-mail from Amazon telling them their copy of Kirby: King of Comics had just shipped…and they received the book the same day they received this e-mail. One got the book yesterday and the e-mail today. In any case, since this morning's post, Amazon has changed the listing and they now say they have it in stock. So click right here and buy your copy.

I'll be signing copies at the Wizard World Los Angeles convention March 14-16 and at the New York Comic Con April 18-20 and at a number of bookstores which I'll announce here.

Also: I should have mentioned (but didn't because I didn't know) that the photo of Jack I posted on the message before last was taken by James Van Hise. Thanks, Jim.

Jump for Joy

The last few years I've attended the Comic-Con International in San Diego, I've stayed at the Manchester Grand Hyatt, a fine hotel.

There are many things to do there. However, if I stay at the Hyatt this year, I don't think I'm going to do this.

Book Rapport

This morning, I heard from two different folks who'd received their copies of my new book, Kirby: King of Comics. One had pre-ordered from Amazon and the other had pre-ordered from Barnes & Noble. So I guess it's out.

As of this moment, the Amazon listing still says "Usually ships within 2 to 5 weeks," which may mean they have copies on hand and no one has gotten around to changing the listing. Or it may mean that they've only received enough to fill pre-orders and are waiting for more before they switch it to say "In Stock." I am told that a second printing will be on the presses, probably early next week. For it, we're fixing two insignificant typos and one significant one (Jack did sixteen issues of The Demon, not eighteen) plus I rewrote two captions that could have been phrased better.)

But at least one person who ordered from Amazon has their copy in hand…so order with confidence. It is possible to actually receive your copy in this lifetime.

I'm pretty darned happy with how the thing came out. Naturally, there are things I wish I'd done differently — when are there not? — and with a topic as vast as Kirby, you often think of more points that should have been made, more details that should have been included. But of course. Fortunately, I have that other book on Jack in the works and I can put all that stuff in there.

Hope you like it. Hope you buy it. More importantly, I hope Jack and Roz would have liked it.

Go Read It!

Author David Holzel wrote a real good article on one of my favorite performers, Allan Sherman.

And I'm sorry I haven't posted more lately here, folks. This "paying work" stuff gets in the way of blogging and I need to do something about it.

A Quote

Today, I was over at U.S.C. teaching the class I teach there. I noticed that on a wall, someone had posted a quote from Bertrand Russell that said…

The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.

…but I'm not all that sure about it.

Late News

I haven't written lately about the late night TV situation. As this article in the New York Times explains, various other networks and syndicators are preparing to empty the vaults to secure the services of Jay Leno as soon as he becomes a Free Agent. Regardless of whether you like Jay or not (I do), you might get some jollies at the thought that darn near every "expert" prediction that has ever been made about this guy failing has been spectacularly wrong.

At various times since he got the job of replacing the legendary Carson, network biggies, ad agencies, TV pundits and others have forecast his demise, especially against the might of Letterman. And while it's true that Dave dominated for a while, Jay's ratings were never all that bad. The guy stayed in the game and kept at it…and he's now about to become one of the wealthiest, most powerful souls in show biz, thanks to NBC betting against him and engineering his replacement by Conan O'Brien. Not all that long ago, entertainment reporters were writing that the decision to install Leno instead of Letterman behind the Tonight Show desk was one of the dumbest moves in the history of the industry. I think it may work the other way around: Hindsight will show it as a wise notion, and the ouster of Jay will be seen as the dumbest.

Not that O'Brien won't do well in that slot. He might or might not, and the "might not" may have a lot to do with factors beyond his control. Is Jimmy Fallon really going to be going in at 12:35 after him? Lead-ins matter to some extent but so do lead-outs. There are some folks who watch Leno now because the Jay/Conan parlay interests them more than Dave/Craig. Fallon seems to me a little too low-key to command America's attention at bedtime and I'm curious as to why NBC might think otherwise.

More significantly, we may have Dave, Jay and Conan carving that 11:35 audience three ways. That was what NBC was trying to avoid when they opted to nudge Leno aside rather than allow O'Brien to hopscotch over to Fox for a competing show. If Jay winds up with an 11:35 show (or even, on Fox, an 11 PM one), NBC probably won't be very happy with the results. Not happy at all.

Told Ya So!

On February 16 on this site, we predicted that the Writers Guild contract would be approved by 93% of the voting membership.

Final vote total: 93.6%.

How To Improve The Academy Awards

I didn't pay a lot of attention to the Oscars this year…and as far as I can tell, neither did anyone else. As I think we discussed here, the nominees turned out to be a lot of folks and films that might have achieved excellence but didn't generate the kind of emotional moments and issues where we really cared who or what won. To me, the biggest surprise of the evening was that they included Dabbs Greer in the "In Memoriam" montage and left out Joey Bishop. Jon Stewart, I thought, did an okay job of hosting, meaning he got some laughs and never really slowed up the proceedings. The clips from old Oscar telecasts were nice but there were times when you got the feeling someone had said, "Hmmm…we'd better remind the world what it was like to care about this event."

At least, those were my impressions after leapfrogging through the entire show in under an hour via TiVo. If you sat through every blessed minute of it, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Someone wrote to ask me what I'd do to make the Oscars interesting. Here's another one of Evanier's free brilliant ideas that no one will ever do: Leave the show exactly as it is but telecast an alternate version. Over on the ABC Family channel or some other network, run the exact same show with a live commentary track. Get together a couple of comedians — Kathy Griffin, for sure…maybe Lewis Black or Gilbert Gottfried…maybe four or five of them. Get someone who can make catty remarks about the gowns but who isn't Joan Rivers or Mr. Blackwell. Get someone like Leonard Maltin…no, on second thought, get Leonard Maltin. You need to have at least one person in this who knows about and cares about movies. Then let these people heckle the Academy Awards…or they can comment, annotate, discuss, whatever. So it's like you're watching the telecast at a real great party full of witty people.

Viewers who don't want their Academy Awards despoiled could watch the regular broadcast. Those who don't wish to see that — and they were not few in number this year — could switch over and watch the party version. I suspect there'd be a lot of them. In fact, let's find out with another one of our frighteningly unscientific polls. This one closes in one week…

poll02

Recommended Reading

I'm going to send you to two good articles by Michael Kinsley. In this one, he explains why "The Surge" has only been a success if you define success in some very odd ways. Then in this one, he comes up with what is to me, the definitive view on this story about John McCain maybe/perhaps/possibly having some sort of affair which might not have actually happened with a lobbyist.

Absolute Proof

This may interest someone. One of my favorite movies is The Odd Couple with Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmon. One day in the early seventies, I was in a movie memorabilia shop in Hollywood browsing through several boxes of miscellaneous, unsorted old stills which they sold for something like a quarter apiece. Two of three of the boxes, as it turned out, contained not stills but proof sheets — and maybe in this day and age, I need to explain what those are.

When someone shoots 35mm negative film — which some photographers, amazingly, still do but which once was the norm — they usually have them processed and then turned into proof sheets, which are tiny prints (about an inch by an inch and a quarter) of the negatives. They're too small to use for much of anything except to figure out which shots are good enough to turn into…or at least, they used to be close to useless.

In the boxes that day, I found about twenty proof sheets from stills that were shot on the set of The Odd Couple. I didn't find the stills, themselves and they wouldn't have been in the quarter box, anyway. But I found all these proof sheets and they were of so little value that the storeowner gave them all to me for two bucks. I stuck them in a file folder and forgot about them.

This afternoon, I came across them and on a whim, had my assistant scan them at 1200 dpi, just to see how well they'd enlarge. Pretty well, it turns out. Modern technology makes it possible to get some pretty sharp images off these teensy photographs. Here's a low rez detail of the above frame…

I don't have anything in mind for them but suddenly, I have a whole mess of Odd Couple images I didn't have before. Also, somewhere in this house, there's a crate with other proof sheets. Some are ones I bought like the Odd Couple proofs but some are from my own work with a camera. I lost some negatives of photos I shot in the seventies, as well as the photos, themselves…but I may still have the proof sheets. That would sure be interesting. In the meantime, I just thought I'd mention this here because it may make someone think, "Hey, I've got old proof sheets squirreled away here. Maybe there are some images on them that can be scanned and put to some use."

Flying

In fairness to United Airlines (which wasn't very fair to me on Friday), our trip back from San Francisco was flawless. The plane wasn't crowded, it left on time, it got in early…and our suitcases were the first ones down the chute at Baggage Claim. Then again, my Friday problem with the company wasn't so much that things had gone wrong…it was that when something did go wrong, there was no mechanism to put it right. It all ties in with a mounting trend in a number of industries to treat Customer Service as some annoying obligation that they must handle in the cheapest, least-likely-to-serve-the-customer manner.

I have the same annoyance with computer and software companies that won't give you a Tech Support number (or worse, charge you to use it) and tell you that if you have a question or problem, send an e-mail. That enables them to hire someone cheap who may have very little to do with the company and who just sits there, checking e-mail every so often and responding with the most appropriate of several stock, pre-written replies. The stock, pre-written replies never seem applicable to my question or problem. If I have additional questions or don't understand something, that means additional e-mails…and a problem that might have been solved by a three minute phone conversation becomes a week of pen-palling with some stranger.

Several folks e-mailed me to tell me either their own airline horror tales or just the opposite. I heard from three different folks who have great experiences with United even when things go wrong. Why them and not me? Because in all three cases, they are not just Frequent Flyers but Incessant Flyers, with zillions of miles on United for business trips. One guy wrote that his company spends upwards of ten million bucks a year on airfare, most of it on United. For this, he gets services unavailable to me…including that if he isn't on a flight (his fault or theirs), he's on the next flight without question. He does not go onto the standby list with chumps like me. He gets a confirmed seat even if they have to bump someone else who has one. He also has a special Customer Service phone number that's answered in this country by someone who can actually do things for him and yes, I'm envious.

Preferential treatment? Absolutely…and I have no problem with that. If I ran United, I'd do cartwheels for passengers like that and give back rubs. I just think I'd be a little more caring about the customer who wasn't in that category.

It's like with these computerized phone-answering deals that tell you to press "1" if you want to make a payment, "2" if you need to check your balance, "3" if you'd like to order a pizza with black olives, etc. That can make things go quicker at times but too often lately, I find myself in need of an option they don't have: None of the Above. My problem is simply not on their menu. There's someone at that company who can help me and they've made it impossible (or at least, difficult) for me to get to that person. In some cases, it feels as if the system designer just plain didn't consider all contingencies. In others, you think that's the whole point of it…to avoid dealing with problems. That's sure how I felt on Friday sitting in the United terminal.

Home Again, Home Again…

Jiggety-jig. Bad flight up and much trouble with the Internet connections at the hotel…but I have nothing but good to say about this year's WonderCon, held this past weekend in that city where Tony Bennett left his heart. Also: Carolyn and I ate almost every meal at the Canton Seafood Restaurant over on Folsom, a few blocks from the Moscone Center, and had great food. (So did all the friends from the convention we dragged along with us.)

The convention itself was so nice that I especially regretted missing Day One. I won't list all the folks I talked with because that gets boring but it was the kind of con where every time you turned around, there was someone you wanted to meet. And if you were just there to shop, the exhibit hall probably didn't let you down. I never made it to some aisles but the ones I walked were teeming with goodies. (Hey, here's a free thought that might make someone a nice piece of cash: Has anyone at a large con ever set up a booth for shipping? It would be like, "Make your purchases elsewhere, bring 'em to us and for the cost of postage/FedEx plus a small fee, we'll take care of shipping them to your home." I saw lots of stuff I might have bought but I didn't want to deal with lugging it all around the convention all day, then back to the hotel — in the rain, no less — and cramming it into my already-crammed suitcase, which was already near the airline weight limit.)

Mood of the con? Hard to say. As usual these days, there may be more interest in upcoming movies about comic books than in the comic books, themselves.

Hey, I'll make a prediction here and you can check back in a year or so and see if I'm right. My prediction is that very soon, the major companies — the ones that own or control characters of which a lot of folks would say "I loved that when I was a kid" — are going to experience a very real, impossible-to-ignore revulsion at some of the more warped interpretations. There was a time when DC, Marvel and others that took their leads from those companies were probably a little too fierce about the idea that there was one way to draw Superman, that there were certain things that Spider-Man shouldn't do or which shouldn't be done to him. Now, it feels like the pendulum has swung too far towards the notion that uglifying a character or building a mini-series out of some aberrant change in his or her mythos or life is saleable.

I'm not talking about regressing anything back to the way it was in 1964 or whenever. It is certainly possible to rethink an old concept and come up with the 2008 version, and some properties probably should exist in the "now." But what makes a great property great is a certain set of creative choices and constants…and if you make every single one of those subject to interpretation (or just plain inversion for the sake of a "stunt"), you dilute the basic concept down to the point where it loses its impact. Often, it's interesting to wring an interesting variation on the norm but if you wring enough of them, it can sometimes become difficult to even know what the "norm" is.

That's one of the things that struck me as I looked at some displays in the exhibit hall. Another was that I don't have the storage space for all the fine, hardcover art and strip reprint books I'd like to own. Yet another was that some industrious folks are producing some amazing books and art pieces and merchandise that I only see at conventions…which I guess brings me back to my idea about a service that would ship your purchases home for you.

So, all in all, a great WonderCon once we got there. I hope you got there, too. If you didn't, try to get there someday.

Sunday Morning WonderCon Bar Blogging

WonderCon, once you get to it, is a fun and joyous experience. It's a great con and when I get more time, I'll tell you about Saturday. The hotel's pretty good too, except that the High Speed Internet Connection in our room was apparently installed by United Airlines. It don't work so well so I'm currently in the bar in the lobby, blogging via a wireless connection that only works down here. The bar is packed with folks from the comic book business and every now and then, one comes by and says, "Wow, I read your blog but I never thought I'd see you actually working on it!"

Let's see who's around here. Image co-founder Jim Valentino just ambled past, and Batton Lash (creator of a fine comic called Supernatural Law) is pointing at me and grinning. Master comic book shop operator Joe Ferrara is hovering about and a somewhat tipsy Marvel artist who shall remain nameless, and who seems unaware of how loudly he's speaking, is hitting on a lady who looks about as likely to prance off to his room with him as I am to book my next few flights on United. Over in the corner, I see someone who's either Bruce Timm or the winner of a Bruce Timm look-alike contest and this isn't very interesting, is it?

Okay, so I'll tell you a little more about Saturday. Packed hall. Big stars. Lots of people in great costumes. We had a great Jack Kirby Tribute Panel with Herb Trimpe, Mike Royer, Darwyn Cooke, Kurt Busiek and Paul Dini. Then later, I did a one-on-one with Herb…a fascinating, gifted man who talked about working at Marvel "in the days when it was fun." I sometimes get the feeling it hasn't been that way at very many comic companies for a long time.

I signed a lot of copies of Kirby: King of Comics for folks and would have sold more but the one dealer who had them, Comic Relief of Berkeley, sold out rather quickly.

I need to get out of this bar and go back upstairs to write in peace 'n' quiet so I'll wrap this up. More later, if and when I get a working Internet connection.

How I Spent Friday

I've decided to start an airline. I'm going to start an airline where we fly people around in the cargo holds of planes that transport steer manure. The flight attendants will be obese bulldykes who pass through the coach every twenty minutes to taser everyone and pass out live gophers as snacks. All flights will depart a minimum of three days late and will arrive under medical quarantine but without your luggage. As an added feature, my pilots will all be chronic alcoholics and they'll select their destinations at random. If you want to go to a certain place, you'll have to just get on some jet and hope it goes where you want to go. That, of course, presupposes you will get there at all, which often will not be the case.

That's the working plan for my new airline and I know…some of you are thinking, "That won't stay in business for long." To which I respond, "Hey, United Airlines is still in business." Given the option of theirs or mine, mine should be your airline of choice.

As you might guess, I had an unpleasant experience with them. Carolyn and I spent most of Friday at L.A. International Airport in the United Terminal…not, as intended, at the WonderCon in San Francisco. What happened was that we missed…well, we didn't exactly miss our flight to S.F. We got to LAX later than advisable but we still should have been on the flight.

Problem #1 in an endless series was that there were long, long lines to check one's baggage if you wanted to do so with an actual human being doing the checking-in. We could not have done that and made the flight, even if we'd arrived when they tell you to arrive. The only alternative was a bank of computer check-in kiosks…all part of United's ongoing and serious campaign to enable them to operate with a minimum of people to whom one can talk and ask questions and complain.

I'm rarely late for flights. Once in a while, it happens…and what usually occurs is that I can make the flight itself but there's some question as to whether my suitcase can. The person who checks my luggage warns me it may not travel when I do, and I elect to take that risk. The worst that can happen (in theory) is that once I arrive at my destination, I sit around at that airport and wait for the next flight, on which will be my bag. That, of course, would waste no more of my life than just waiting for the next flight on the departure end of things and — who knows? — I might get lucky and my Samsonite will get on the same plane. Sometimes, it does.

The computer check-in doesn't work like that. It won't accept luggage less than 45 minutes before the scheduled departure even (apparently) if the plane will be taking off late. By the time we got through the lines and to the computers — and the computers located our reservations, which took longer than it should have — we were 43 or 44 minutes from take-off time.

This should not have mattered. The policy at United, as it states on the ticket folders, is that your seat may be given away if you don't get your Boarding Pass a half hour in advance. We had ours the night before thanks to printing them out online. You also have to be at the departure gate 20 minutes before the flight leaves. We could have made that but we never had the chance.

What happened at the computer is a bit blurry but the computer system announced it could not check our baggage…and the next thing we knew, we were no longer on the 8:25 AM flight at all. We were suddenly flying standby on the 9:33 flight…and that might have been an acceptable alternative had there actually been a 9:33 flight. It was cancelled with an explanation something along the lines of "The plane for this flight from L.A. to San Francisco originates in Uruguay, and it's sleeting in Uruguay." One of those deals.

But it was okay, we were told, because we were automatically "rolled over" (they used that term and I had to admit I did feel "rolled over") to the standby list for the 10:03 flight. The problem with that was that all the folks who'd had confirmed seats on the 9:33 flight went onto that standby list — ahead of us. I think we were #152 and #153, which didn't look promising since the plane only held 138 people in the first place and already had 137 confirmed reservations. One person from the standby list made it on and we weren't among that one. I think this was the flight via which our suitcases travelled but we didn't.

It was like that all day. We didn't get on the 10:50 flight. We didn't get on the 11:57 flight. Flight after flight, we were standing by for a lottery we could not win. The order of the standby list kept changing — apparently, folks with a lot more United Mileage Plus points were given preference — but at no point were we within even the realm of "faint hope." A check of other airlines suggested no workable alternatives and, besides, our luggage had already flown United and would be waiting — we could only pray — at the other end.

Granted, airlines sometimes have to cancel flights but you'd think they'd have a better grasp of this situation since it only happens every hour or three. At any given time, the terminal is full of lost souls who arrived there thinking they had confirmed seats. There were a couple hundred of us trying to get to San Francisco via United and what I think annoyed me most was the utter disinterest in our predicament and the startling lack of anyone to talk to about it. I meant what I typed earlier about a conscious plan to limit the number of human beings with whom we get to interface. It's seemed to me quite deliberate, like someone at United said to someone else, "Hey, you know what wastes a lot of money? Having to deal with passenger problems! Let's stop doing that!"

I tried talking to various employees at various gates and encountered one or both of two problems. One was how every one of those folks seemed to be doing the job of about eight people. They were all frantic, rushing to get other people onto and off flights. One harried lady who looked like Cloris Leachman practically yelled at me, "I don't have time to deal with your situation." But the ones who might have had time didn't deal with my situation, either. The subtext was like, "Well, we're not responsible for the weather and we certainly aren't responsible if you were late…so you'll get there when you get there and it really isn't our problem!" The most I could get out of any of them was a directive to go to Customer Service, a misnamed department if ever there was one.

The line at Customer Service was not short and it was difficult to stand in it long enough to get to the front and to simultaneously be at the various gates where standby passengers were being called for possible openings. When I did get to speak with someone there, I got a lot of that "it's not our problem" attitude from a person who seemed to know less about the workings of United than I did, and who seemed to have picked up their brains at the Duty-Free Shop. Cloris Leachman had told me that if I didn't get satisfaction there, I should demand to speak with a Supervisor. When I didn't get satisfaction, I told the lady who wasn't satisfying me that I'd like to speak to a Supervisor, to which she replied, "He's just going to tell you what I told you." I said, "Well, I'd like to hear it from his lips." So a Supervisor was called over and before I said anything, before he even knew what the problem was, he announced, "Whatever she said is how it is." I asked to speak to the Supervisor's Supervisor but apparently, the Supervisors at United are all unsupervised.

What that woman told me there was confusing and useless. It pretty much came down to, "Just hang around until you get on a flight." I asked if there was anything I could do to make that a reality and she said something about buying First Class tickets if any became available (she couldn't be bothered to check and see if any were) and $700. I'm not sure if it was $700 each or $700 for the both of them but I was not inclined to give United Airlines that kind of money for any reason.

Thinking I was cleverer than I actually was, I tried phoning United Customer Service. This is not easy to do because no one at the airport would tell me the number and it was just about the only United number that wasn't on the ticket folder. I finally called the number for reservations and wormed it out of someone there. Upon dialing, I reached a fellow with a thick accent whose only interest seemed to be in repeating talking points that extolled the glories of the United Mileage Plus card. He had no idea what happens to passengers stuck in Standby Hell and no clue what to do about it. Finally, I asked him, "Where are you located?" and he told me he was in New Delhi. I asked him what he could possibly do for me from there and he said, "I could fill out a complaint and send an e-mail to someone in Chicago." Obviously, that wasn't going to change anything and I guess that's the whole point of it. You don't have your Customer Service phones answered by some guy in India if you want to actually provide Customer Service.

After way too many approaches to United staffers who hadn't the time or interest in our dilemma, one semi-sympathetic employee (there are always a few) told me that if I went back to Customer Service (yet again), I could pay an extra $50 per ticket and we'd be guaranteed seats on the next flight that had openings. Why no one had told me this earlier is a mystery but it may have something to do with the fact that so few people would even talk with me at all.

It was, in effect, buying our way to the top of the standby list and it seemed unfair but this was no time for contemplations of that variety. I waited another half-hour at Customer Service and paid $100 and they told us that we'd definitely be on the 5:15 flight. (When they told me that, I asked, "5:15 PM?" Because the way it had been going, you couldn't assume anything.) That was, of course, assuming that there even was a 5:15 PM flight. Carolyn and I spent a few more hours sitting in the food court eating Wheat Thins and Bugles and chasing them with that delicious $2.50 airport Aquafina water. And we actually — wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles — did get out on the 5:15 flight.

As you may have heard, United has announced that beginning later this year — in May, I think — passengers will have to pay to check more than one suitcase. A lot of people I know have announced that because of it, they will never fly United Airlines again. I think they have the right idea but for the wrong reason.