POVonline

Saturday, July 2, 2011

More on The MAD Show...

I am informed that the run at the York Theater in New York is not three performances. It's five performances in three days.

And many folks have reminded me that Stephen Sondheim did not, as I stated, exactly write a song for The Mad Show. He wrote the lyrics to a tune supplied by his friend, Mary Rodgers. In fact, Douglas McEwan mentions this in an e-mail he sent me. Here — I'll let you read it so you can see for yourself...

I saw The Mad Show when it came to L.A. I was, I believe, 17 at the time, seated in the front row. The first time I ever saw Jo Anne Worley was when the curtain came up and the cast, singing the opening number, came out into the house, and Jo Anne plopped herself down on my lap and began singing as loud as she could, which was Ethel Merman loud (may still be). Six months later, Jo Anne came and saw me perform in Little Mary Sunshine. It was a nice turnaround. Though I made my entrance from the audience in that show, I managed to refrain from sitting in Jo Anne's lap.

Loved the show. Still have the cast CD (Replacing my long-lost cast vinyl record). Along with Sondheim, some of the sings are by Mary Rodgers, daughter of Richard Rodgers, and co-writer of the songs for Once Upon a Mattress. Nice to see I'm not the only person left who remembers it.

Jo Anne Worley, who I seem to see at every theater-related event I attend in Los Angeles, has had an amazing career. She was at one point — some people may not know this — Carol Channing's understudy for Hello, Dolly. The story goes that when she was hired, Ms. Channing took her aside and said, "I'm sure you're very talented but you're never going on." And she never did. Channing never missed a performance.

• Posted at 6:10 PM · LINK

Great Photos of Buster Keaton

Number sixty in a series...

• Posted at 4:24 PM · LINK

My Latest Tweet!

I'm a little tired of hearing "the government has never created a single job" from people with government jobs.   [Follow me on TWITTER]

• Posted at 10:06 AM · LINK

Recommended Additional Reading

And here's Ezra Klein to provide a little more context for the info in the previous item posted here.

• Posted at 9:49 AM · LINK

Recommended Reading

How could Congress get the deficit under control? Well, according to this, they could do it by just going home and not doing anything. There's only a real problem if they insist on doing things like renewing the Bush tax cuts or passing more unfunded expenditures.

• Posted at 9:18 AM · LINK

Extremely Off-Broadway

The Mad Show was an off-Broadway revue based on guess-what-magazine that opened in New York on January 9, 1966, racking up a pretty impressive 871 performances. It later came back for a brief run not because of audience demand but because (reportedly) MAD publisher William Gaines had a bet with a friend as to how well it would do if he did bring it back. Mr. Gaines did that kind of thing. The show was written by MAD writers Larry Siegel and Stan Hart with music by a couple of folks, one of whom (he contributed one song) was Stephen Sondheim hiding behind a fake name.

Revues tend to get remembered because of the talent that came out of them. In addition to Mr. Sondheim, there was the show's on-stage piano player...a gent named Joe Raposo who was murdered every night during the performance but still somehow went on to write some of the most memorable tunes for Sesame Street and The Muppets. And on stage you also had Linda Lavin, Jo Anne Worley, Paul Sand, Richard Libertini and MacIntyre Dixon. Ms. Worley was later in the L.A. company with Alan Sues, not long before both turned up on the somewhat-similar Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In.

It's rarely revived but it's being revived for three performances — July 29, 30 and 31 — at the York Theater in New York. The only person I know who's in the cast is my supremely-talented friend Christine Pedi, who's also heard daily on the Broadway channel for SiriusXM Radio, but she's reason enough to go if you're in the area. I, alas, will not be in the area so please attend so I can live vicariously through you. Details and tix here.

• Posted at 9:07 AM · LINK

Today's Video Link

Hey, what do you say we watch the theatrical trailer for Diamonds Are Forever? It's one of those trailers that makes you (well, me anyway) think, "Hey, I don't have to see this movie. I've seen it all in the trailer!"

• Posted at 1:25 AM · LINK

19 Days Until Comic-Con...

Hard to believe it's less than three weeks away. Everyone I know who's attending is, first of all, asking "Didn't we go to the last one, like, two months ago?" And secondly, they're looking forward to it. I sure am. For those of you wondering, the programming schedule will be up soon and on it, you'll find thirteen events either hosted or co-hosted by Yours Truly. They include the annual Jack Kirby Tribute Panel and one in memory of the late Gene Colan. There's Quick Draw! (Saturday morn at 11:45) and two of our gala Cartoon Voices panels (Saturday at 1 PM, Sunday at 11:30 AM), plus a longer-than-last-year panel Sunday afternoon about how to break into the field of cartoon voicing. Marv Wolfman and I are co-moderating spotlights on Paul Levitz and Roy Thomas and there are a number of other fun events.

Early warning: There will be no Golden Age Panel this year. I kinda doubt there will ever be one again. To those who complain about this, I have a simple reply: "Fine. You find me 4-6 people who will be at the convention and who worked in comics before around 1960." If there are such folks, I don't know about their presence at the con. At the moment, I'm only aware of two...and two is not a panel, especially since one of them (Jerry Robinson) will be the subject of his own spotlight interview on the schedule. (The other, before anyone asks, is Ramona Fradon.)

The annual Golden Age Panel used to be a treat. In fact, the thing that was once wrong with it was that it had too many Golden Agers on it. Someone had the idea that the Golden Age Panel should include everyone at the con who'd worked in comics during that glorious era so they just put everyone on it. The first of those panels I was asked to host had, I think, about eighteen panelists...and since two of them were Julius Schwartz and Gil Kane, sixteen great writers or artists didn't get much chance to say anything.

One of the things I learned early about running panels on any topic is that you have to keep the number down. Six is a good number. Five is okay. You can get along just fine with four if a couple are decent talkers. Seven is pushing it.

If you get up around seven or above, you don't just lose the audience. You lose the panelists, especially if they don't have an awful lot in common with one another. They go so long between opportunities to speak that even they don't pay attention...and if the bodies on the stage aren't paying attention, the audience sure won't. So the year after I got stuck with that 18 (or so) member gang bang, I told the programming folks that I'd take over the panel on an annual basis and even program it if they'd let me whittle it down to a manageable roster. This was done and there was much happiness, even from potential panelists who thus were excluded some years.

The one exception? Julie Schwartz. He kvetched something awful whenever we had a Golden Age Panel without him on it. He'd sit in the front row and participate unofficially to the point where I'd just give up and invite him up onto the dais. One year when he couldn't attend the convention due to a problem with his legs, he called me several times in the weeks before the con to ask why he couldn't appear on the panel via phone from New York. Today, I'd take him up on it.

But that was then, this is now. A bittersweet aspect of those panels flowed from the fact that the average panelist was in (approximately) his or her late seventies. We had a few panelists in their nineties. Each year when I went to assemble the Golden Age Panel, I'd note that someone on the previous year's dais had passed and several others were no longer well enough to fly out...or interested. There are more Golden Age writers and artists alive than you might think but very few who journey far to conventions.

When the talent pool began to get shallow a few years ago, we quietly changed the event to the Golden and Silver Age Panel so as to incorporate folks who'd worked in comics in the sixties. For your information, I define a Silver Age creator as anyone who was in comics before me. That's a joke but it concides approximately with how others would define it. I started in 1970 and most would say the Silver Age ended between 1968 and 1970. Alas, I decided that extending the cut-off into the Silver Age would still not yield a decent panel this year so I made the decision not to have one. Before a certain person I know starts blaming the convention, let me make clear that this was my recommendation. The con actually cleared room on the schedule for a Golden Age Panel and we're instead using the time 'n' space for the Gene Colan Tribute. That same day though, we will have a panel of comic creators who broke in during the seventies.

I'll be telling you more about the programming — my hunk of it, anyway — in the weeks to come and I'll let you know when the full schedule is online. I highly recommend taking the time to browse it and make a list of panels and presentations you might like to see. Several will be scheduled opposite each other...but you won't be able to get into everything anyway. Last year I mentioned that there were some folks who'd taken to just following me around. I thought they were avid fans who'd discovered that was a great way to see the best program items at the convention. Now I'm starting to wonder if they aren't just Homeland Security agents who think I'm up to something.

• Posted at 12:06 AM · LINK

Front Page

NEWS from me

NEWS Archives

NOTES from me

Hollywood

Broadway

Las Vegas

Animation

Comics

TV & Movies

Comedy

Miscellaneous

I.A.Q.

Links

ABOUT me

BUY me

Info/E-MAIL me

SEARCH

© 2012 Mark Evanier

Hosted by Dreamhost