From the E-Mailbag…

My old pal Don Markstein writes, referring to the O'Brien/Leno tango…

Nowhere, in all this blather, do I see any mention of honorability and decent behavior. Maybe those terms just don't apply to the TV business. But the only reason the network (NBC, right?) is able to get out of its contracts simply by throwing money at the situation is because their contracts are designed not to include any real commitments.

Bottom line: smart or stupid, the network had a commitment that still had years to run. They weaseled out of it, and nobody seems interested in the fact that honorable, decent people live with their commitments even if it costs them. I'm tellin' ya, this business sure isn't making me want to stay up late.

As uncomfy as I am defending a network, I don't think that's the proper way to view this. All such contracts operate on the same presumption of continuance that all marriages have when the couple says "'til death do us part." The couple knows that divorce will always be an option and may even have a pre-nuptial arrangement to cover that contingency…but they still say "'til death do us part." In the business deal, there's a financial commitment that may even be as explicit as a pre-nup in covering who gets what in case of separation. But I'm sure the lawyers and managers for the parties involved in the NBC mess all expected buy-outs and settlements were possible and planned accordingly.

A contract is not a sacred decree which neither side can modify. It's an agreement to do business under certain terms and either party can propose modification at any time. I doubt Conan O'Brien had a clause that committed NBC to airing The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien at 11:35 for X years even if the ratings were abominable. I doubt anyone has ever had a deal like that, and certainly not when they were occupying such a choice piece of real estate. I'm sure Conan and his crew feel that they should have been given more time than they were. I doubt they expected to be on the air every day of the contractual term if the show underperformed.

Today's Video Link

Here's a Halloween clip from The Garfield Show, seen several times a day on the Cartoon Network. I am the Supervising Producer on this show and I have no idea what the title means since I do pretty much the same things I did on the old show where I was Co-Producer, which was the same thing I did on that show before I was a producer of any kind…

VIDEO MISSING

Today's Political Rant

Did you see the Q-and-A that Barack Obama did the other day with House Republicans? Here's a link to a transcript and video and I recommend you experience one or the other. It was a remarkable discussion if only because of the sudden reappearance of the guy some of us voted to put in the White House. He stood his ground and at least tried to establish a healthier working relationship with the opposition party. I dunno if anything can make that happen but this was sure a noble effort.

He also demonstrated that though he may use a TelePrompter a lot, that's just to tidy up his sentence structures. The thinking was all there in an utterly ad-lib setting. Anyone think George W. Bush could have done that in a hall full of House Democrats? Or would ever have tried?

A lot of folks are noting a couple of exchanges where Obama, with great diplomacy, engaged certain reps on specific facts. I thought a key moment was when he told them that all the demonizing they were doing of his Administration was making bipartisanship impossible — for themselves…

I mean, the fact of the matter is is that many of you, if you voted with the administration on something, are politically vulnerable in your own base, in your own party. You've given yourselves very little room to work in a bipartisan fashion because what you've been telling your constituents is, "This guy's doing all kinds of crazy stuff that's going to destroy America."

He said it gentler in the State of the Union speech when he itemized a number of tax cuts that his Administration has made and then noted that Republicans, who claim to love tax cuts, weren't applauding them. They couldn't…because they were Democratic tax cuts. (I also think they weren't applauding because a lot of the cuts were for lower and middle-class folks. Republicans in general love all tax cuts but the ones in Congress only really like the ones for rich people.)

Once you tell your constituents that everything Obama does is evil, you can't meet him halfway on anything without appearing to be compromising with evil. You can't even support him when he does things you like. I think that's a lot of our problem right there.

Late Night Dreams

It may be time for me to stop following the Leno/O'Brien mess as closely as I have been. I actually had a dream about it last night, and I rarely dream about things that are occurring in reality unless they're really, really close to me. This matter isn't and shouldn't be, though I have spent some time the last few days talking to folks who are living with it, mostly over at NBC. The discussions have been fascinating as spectator sport, and in trying to understand better the bizarre manner by which networks operate. If it doesn't make sense to you from afar, take some comfort in this: There are people who know a lot more about this than you and I could since they're in the thick of it…and it doesn't make complete sense to them, either. Such confusion is, by the way, not unprecedented in network television.

The conversations have also made me aware how so many who are outraged over this silly bit of network bungling simply have the basic factual recital wrong, and how many of the hysterical insults of Jay Leno are way out of scale even if he committed all the treachery they ascribe to him. Apparently, not giving Conan O'Brien a strong lead-in at 10 PM or taking back a job you didn't want to leave in the first place is now a capital offense. Well, I guess I can see that.

Some of the differing perspectives are, I suppose, a matter of personal experience. Those who are furious that NBC made some bad calls seem to be expecting a level of perfection at the executive level that I sure have never seen. Not there, not anywhere…and certainly not with regard to any show I ever worked on. While it's obvious some very bad decisions were made, it's not so obvious what the right ones might have been. Even armed with hindsight and the knowledge of how the ratings would go, no one seems able to say, "Everything would have been peachy if Jeff Zucker had done X, Y and Z." At best, they seem only able to come up with scenarios for a series of lesser disasters.

I also have been around Leno enough to see that he's a decent guy with some unusual, but not at all unethical notions of how to handle the business end of his business. They work for him and he generally gets what he wants, much to the angst of competitors and the many peers he bypasses. In this case, it's all led (unfairly, I think) to a lot of vilification…which is not to say I fret for his future or reputation. One moment when I really liked the guy occurred back when he was getting slammed by TV reporters and critics who saw it as inevitable that Letterman would drive him from the airwaves and back into the comedy clubs. Leno was asked if he wasn't crushed by all the bad press and he said to the fellow who asked him this, "Hey, tell you what. I'll give you my paycheck and I'll call you a moron. See if you can handle it." When he gets slammed, he keeps it in perspective and somehow endures.

Life is seriously askew when anyone feels sorry for any of the characters in this psychodrama. I cringe inwardly and outwardly when someone rails on about the injustice of poor Conan O'Brien having his dream yanked away from him after a mere seven months. Conan, Dave and Jay are all guys who've gotten about 95% of everything they ever could have desired in their chosen line of work — and to put that percentage in context, you have to remember that this is an industry where the average player is lucky to achieve 2%. These guys are at the level where on the extremely-rare occasions that they don't get what they want, the consolation prizes are in the tens of millions of dollars. Conan himself said it well in his classy closing speech.

All I really remember of my dream last night is that it was about people yelling about Jay and Conan, Conan and Jay, all out of scale with what is basically a series of S.O.P. network business decisions. They may be wrong decisions. I mean, I think Conan's ratings would have gone up if NBC had left him at 11:35 for a few more months…and I have a friend who thinks they shouldn't have cancelled Ugly Betty. Somewhere out there, there's someone who thinks the NBC guys are brain-dead for not bringing back Phenomenon and stripping it five nights a week at 10 PM.

One or more of us may be correct, just as Armchair Quarterbacks are sometimes right when the guy on the field is wrong. TV programming is, to at least a significant degree, a hunch business. Yes, there's research and test audiences and focus groups and going with proven winners…but every time a network puts on a show that gets quickly cancelled, it means someone played a hunch and it didn't work. Or at least, it didn't work quickly enough. That happens all the time so it's silly to get emotional about it, especially when it really doesn't impact your life much. Those who make their lives in and around the networks learn how to roll with the inexactness of the science. A friend of mine who was briefly the Vice-President of Comedy Development at NBC — I think he held the post for about three hours — once said to me there was one surefire way to be right most of the time in a network job: "You merely predict that every single decision anybody makes, including you, will prove to be wrong."

Ultimately, I am more bothered by the incivility than anything done by the principal actors in this Kabuki. One friend of mine who has never liked Leno is going all Glenn Beck on this, twisting facts and ratcheting up the invective to no good purpose. I have an awful feeling we are one phone call from the end of that friendship.

March 1, Jay starts his new show. Most of those who said he'd irrevocably destroyed his career with his sinister machinations are now backpedalling to allow that, well, maybe he will start winning the time slot again. Even if he doesn't, no one seems to be wagering that he won't do better in March than Conan would have. I still think Leno's success will have a lot to do with whether he can fix one of the main things that was wrong with his 10 PM show — above and beyond the fact that it was on at 10 PM — which was the weakness of the material. I'm eager to see what he'll do but I'm even more eager for this all to be over. When it starts invading your sleep, something's wrong. I don't think I've ever dreamed about a show I was working on. Why this?

Follow-Up

My pal Bob Claster thinks that Ross Bagdasarian was singing live to a pre-recorded track on the Sullivan show, not lip-syncing. He may be right but that would still give Mr. B. the problem I described of figuring out when to stop moving his lips as the track faded. Anyway, you can decide for yourself if he's singing live…if you care.

A number of folks wrote to ask me if the lady in the clip was either Noel Neill or Phyllis Coates, both of whom played Lois Lane on the Superman TV show of that era. I don't think so, and not just because they were both based in L.A. and Ed's show was done in New York. I don't think it looks that much like either one, though I see the resemblance to Ms. Neill that causes some to wonder. I think it's Jack Benny dressed as a waiter.

Today's Video Link

As we all know, songwriter-singer Ross Bagdasarian had a monster hit when under the name David Seville, he recorded "The Chipmunk Song," the record that introduced Alvin, Simon and Theodore to the world. That was in late 1958. Some folks don't know that that wasn't the first record or even the second he did employing the "sped voice" trick. The first, released earlier in '58, was also a huge success. It was called "Witch Doctor" and it was a number one hit for a few weeks there. He quickly followed it with another tune with a sped-up voice called "Bird on My Head." That was not a hit. Then came the Chipmunks…and thereafter, Mr. Basdasarian-Seville pretty much did nothing else on vinyl but Chipmunks for the rest of his life. They re-released some of his earlier records but he was too busy with Alvin, Simon and Theodore to do other things.

Here he is on Ed Sullivan's show in '58 doing a lip-sync to "Witch Doctor." Performers usually sang live on Ed's show but obviously that wasn't possible with the sped-up voice in there. I always think it's funny when a performer lip-syncs on TV to a record that has a fade at the end. They never seem to know when to stop moving their lips and you often see them stop, then realize they should still be flapping their gums. Here, Sullivan's live orchestra chimes in with a finale note and you can see a little look of relief on Mr. Bagdasarian's face that, as rehearsed I'm sure, they came in at just the right moment to get him out of that predicament. I will not pretend I understand the visual imagery they cooked up for this presentation but I think they got that way out of sync.

VIDEO MISSING

Coming This April!

Online registration is now open for the WonderCon, which will be held April 2-4 in San Francisco. WonderCon is kind of a "little sister" to the monster Comic-Con International in San Diego, run by the same skilled folks. Some call it Comic-Con Lite because it's only huge, as opposed to HUGE!!! I will again be a Special Guest and — who knows? — I might even moderate a panel or two. Or three. Or eight.

On those panels, you may even find folks like Stan and Hunter Freberg, Joe Kubert, Murphy Anderson and Sergio Aragonés. And in the hall, you'll find loads of other talented people, as well as things to buy, things to buy. I always have a great time at these and as far as I can see, everyone else does, too.

While we're at it: On April 5, the day after the con closes, I will linger in S.F. to teach a class in Cartoon Voiceover work at Voice One, a fine studio/school in that fair city. Here's the info. If you're interested in the field, you might want to give it a try.

Curtain

Sad to hear that the Pasadena Playhouse is in dire financial trouble to the point of closing and perhaps reneging on subscriptions. It's a great little theater with a rich heritage…and facilities that were always available to those with worthy charity events. I dunno how many benefits and fund-raisers I've attended there for important causes. I suspect its main problem was merely that it was in Pasadena…not easy to get to from much of Southern California. And it didn't have the support of a surrounding bank of great restaurants and other attractions. I hope someone can get something going with that building. It would be a shame to tear it down and open another CVS Pharmacy. (I hear they don't have one anywhere on that block.)

Today's Video Link

How to make matzo balls. I wish my Aunt Dot could have seen this video. She used to make the steel-belted radial version. I think I still have a few of hers around from 1965.

One year — this part is true — she made them for a family dinner we had on Christmas Day. After struggling gamely with them, I had to go deliver presents to some neighbors and as I walked outside, I saw Fred MacMurray getting out of his car, on his way to visit one of those neighbors. My immediate thought was that he'd come to get some of Aunt Dot's matzo balls to use as Flubber.

Here's the right way to do it. At least, according to this lady. You may have to watch a brief commercial to get to her…

VIDEO MISSING

O, Jay

Jay Leno was on with Oprah Winfrey this afternoon for a chat. Ms. Winfrey has the habit of pressing her guests to discuss their lives and feelings in her terminology and in very simple terms…the kind of pop psychology wherein you can summarize a human's complete emotional profile in one sentence. Which is fine if that's how they see their lives or if they can distill it all down to Oprah shorthand. I felt like on the deeper, personal questions — why Jay didn't walk away at certain points or express hurt or anger — she and Leno didn't connect. I don't think Leno was being evasive or obtuse. I think the guy just doesn't view his world in those terms. His attitude is that you bury hurt feelings and you don't look for love or sucking-up from your employer; you just take the opportunity you think will work best and go with it.

On the matters of who did what and promised what, Jay laid out his case pretty well. If you're inclined not to like the guy, you won't buy it…but he said it about as well as he could, considering that he couldn't really emphasize the point of how weak Conan's ratings were. That's the heart of this whole problem but Leno would have looked bad for making an issue out of how, for example, O'Brien's Tonight Show went from first place to third in about a week. (One thing Jay could have mentioned, if only because Oprah didn't seem to know this, is that this did not happen with The Jay Leno Show as its lead-in. Jay's 10 PM show didn't come on for several months. Conan lost with the same kinds of lead-ins that Jay had when he was in first place.)

A much better case for Leno was made by Oprah herself in a post-show discussion group that I think is only available on the Internet at this link. It's about 40 minutes and some parts of it are kind of silly. Oprah's main goal seems to be to get the Leno-detractors in her audience to admit that the interview she conducted with Jay changed their minds. Most in her little focus group don't know anything about the TV business or the players in this drama so it's a little frustrating to hear their opinions on both. But then there is Oprah, who does know the industry (and Jay and Dave…), explaining how things are and how she doesn't see how Jay could possibly be the Bad Guy in it all. I suppose that's the best endorsement Leno's likely to get until he's back on The Tonight Show and all of America votes on whether they still like him.

Over on Huffington…

My one-time writing partner Dennis Palumbo has some wise words for writers about the virtue that is known as Patience.

And my pal Bob Elisberg, thanks to this blog, uncovers a bit of seeming plagiarism. You'd think, in the age of the Internet, people wouldn't try this kind of thing.

If I Loved You…

Last evening, Carolyn and I attended opening night of the new Reprise! production of Carousel up at the Freud Playhouse at UCLA. Reprise!, as you may know, revives classic musicals and stages them with a minimum of production values and a maximum of talent. This was true of Carousel, which is expertly sung and danced and performed. It would all be impressive if they had unlimited rehearsal time but as it happens, they throw these things together in like a week or ten days.

The cast features Robert Patteri as Billy Bigelow, Alexandra Silver as Julie Jordan, M. Emmet Walsh as the Starkeeper and Jane Noseworthy as Carrie, with other roles filled by James Leo Ryan, Victoria Strong, Andy Taylor, Eydie Alyson, Seth Belliston, Bradley Benjamin, Jessica Carter, Blake Ewing, Christopher Guilmet, Chris Holly, Tracy Lore, Kim Mikesell, Gregory North, Candy Olsen, Allison Paraiso, Jo Patrick, Sean Smith, Leslie Stevens, John Todd and Scott Weber. The show was directed by Michael Michetti, choreographed by Lee Martino and it features musical direction by Darryl Archibald.

So all that's great. I have nothing but praise for the cast and creative talent and everyone there. And yet, I'm trying to think…I know there was something I didn't like. I'm trying to remember what it was…

Oh, I know! I didn't like the show.

By that, I mean I didn't particularly like what Oscar Hammerstein II and Richard Rodgers did…and yes, I know it's a classic. The original production ran on Broadway forever and came back several times. The show has been revived and restaged, and it's performed constantly all around the world. I seem to remember seeing it once before and I didn't like it but I thought, "Oh, this must just be a bad production." Well, last night I saw what was obviously a good production and apart from about four grand songs, I sat there thinking, "I don't care about this story…I don't care about these people." Most of them are not very bright and several are not very nice…and I've never seen the play it was based on, Liliom, but I have to wonder what it has that the musical version doesn't. There must be something to make up for the absence of those four songs.

There's something very cold for me in all the Rodgers and Hammerstein shows I've seen. (I haven't seen them all.) The characters and their problems always seem distant to me. I didn't care if Anna fell in love with the King of Siam. I didn't care if Nelly Forbush fell in love with Emile de Becque. And last night, I didn't care what happened to Billy Bigelow and Julie Jordan. There were emotional moments in all those shows but they were in the songs, not in the context.

I guess this is still a recommendation for the Reprise! production, which is there through February 7. I mean, if you ever want to see Carousel, this may be as fine a version as you'll ever see…and there is much to enjoy in the sheer performances. Putting that many talented people on stage with good music is never a waste of time. Here's a little preview that will show you how lovely it all is when they're not talking…

From the E-Mailbag…

Gene Popa writes to ask a couple of things…

Why does NBC seem to be convinced that returning Jay to 11:35 will make the show #1 again? He basically did the same shtick at 10:00, and had a hard time drawing flies. Much of the audience at 11:35 have turned their loyalties to Letterman, Nightline, and elsewhere…so why such a firm belief (and an expensive one at that) at the network that Leno will be the king of late night again?

I don't think the belief is firm that he'll dominate the way he once did…and if they're saying that, it's wishful thinking and ad hype. I think the belief is pretty firm that he'll do better there than Conan did…and I haven't even seen the biggest Leno detractors say that won't happen. I agree his 10 PM show wasn't good but, heck, if he got that same audience at 11:35, he'd clobber both Dave and Nightline. Basically, their confidence is based on his track record.

And beyond that, what happens if Leno flops at 11:35? He's up against entrenched competition, and if Conan returns to the time slot on another outlet in September, that can only further erode the audience. Is NBC prepared to keep Leno in the TS chair for the length of his contract, even if the show isn't drawing viewers?

If Jay can't budge The Tonight Show out of third place, then the problem will be exactly the same as if they'd left O'Brien there and he was in third place. It's "Okay, now who do we get to host that show?" I don't know how long Jay's contract is for…but as we saw with Conan, contracts can be settled before they expire if it seems necessary. Obviously, NBC doesn't think the competition is all that entrenched.

(And if I were booking the Letterman show, on the first night of Leno's return to late night, I'd book Coco as Dave's only guest for the night. It could be his Hugh Grant moment.)

I think the importance of Hugh Grant to Leno's success is wildly exaggerated, as if his appearance on that show caused America to thereafter forget that Dave was even on. Jay's ratings were climbing before Hugh Grant. He would have passed Letterman a few weeks later if the Hugh Grant moment hadn't happened. Mr. Grant just moved the passing date up a bit.

More significantly: Not one person in America watches a late night show because they had something memorable happen last night, last week or years ago. Even while losing to Jay in general, Dave has had certain events that got him a massive tune-in for one night: His return from heart surgery, the night he had Hillary Clinton on, etc. The next day, viewing levels invariably return to where they were before. The only time something of that sort might make a difference is if the program that got the big audience was an unknown quantity. Maybe a few folks who watched Jay on Hugh Grant Night went, "Oh, this show is better than it was year before last." But at this point, pretty much everyone's decided how much they like Dave and his act doesn't change all that much from Late Show to Late Show.

If he had Conan on, either the first night Jay's back or soon thereafter, that would get a huge rating. Some of the coverage suggests that O'Brien can't do that because of terms in his settlement but even if he can, I think he'd be nuts to appear with Dave. He avoided a lot of Jay bashing on his last shows because that's a "no win" situation for him. No one who already likes him is going to like him any more…and folks who are on the fence are just going to think he's bitter. He'll probably save the attention he'd get appearing with Dave for that moment when he has a new show about to debut and needs to promote it.

Today's Video Link

This is a clip from a Bob Hope special in which he showed a clip from The Tonight Show. Don Rickles is the guest host, Hope does one of his famous "surprise" walk-ons…and is joined by two other friends. I don't know how much of this was planned in advance but I do know that true surprises are verboten on today's talk shows.

VIDEO MISSING