Friday Morning

I just read this on — well, it doesn't matter what website…

A Rasmussen poll released Friday found that a large number of Americans surveyed are still undecided on whether George Zimmerman should be found guilty of murder in the killing of unarmed Florida teenager Trayvon Martin. The survey said 46 percent those surveyed were still not sure. Meanwhile, 30 percent said he should be found guilty and another 24 percent said he acted in self defense.

Here's my take: I think 54% of the people who responded to this survey don't know enough about the case to make those judgments.

And I wonder what percentage of the 54% who think they do are actually weighing the "facts" (which may not be facts) that have been reported in the press and what percentage is just reacting to the idea of a white guy killing a black guy.

Go Listen! Quickly!

Throughout the Magic Kingdom some of us call Earth, my friend Jim Korkis is one of the foremost authorities on Walt Disney. So when he recommends a BBC radio documentary on The Man…well, that's something I want to hear. Here's the link and here's the catch: It's only online for two more days. Hurry. And ignore the three or four minutes of news that starts the audio clip. BBC radio links are like that. Thanks, Jim.

Recently Tweeted by me

  • Sheldon Adelson, the Vegas tycoon who backed Newt is building a casino in Spain and another in Macau. Note he has no plans for the Moon. #
  • Someone spilled 10,000 lbs of pet food on a freeway in L.A. The four feral cats in my backyard could polish that off by rush hour. #

Go Read It!

I thought I'd linked to this the other day but I didn't. Neal Kirby, son of Jack Kirby, writes a nice remembrance of his father.

Today's Video Link

Oh, look: Here we have a trailer for a forthcoming documentary about voiceover artists. This would appear to be something I'll want to see…

It's That Time Again…

Each year at Comic-Con, we present an honor called The Bill Finger Award For Excellence In Comic Book Writing. The award, which was conceived by Mr. Finger's friend Jerry Robinson, is for a body of writing work by an individual who has not received a fair amount of recognition and/or reward. In fact, we present two awards each year: One to someone who is still with us, one to someone posthumously.

I'm hereby asking for suggestions and nominations as to who should be this year's honorees but before I do, let me remind you of the past recipients. The ones not marked deceased were alive at the time the award was bestowed though sadly, Mssrs. Drake, Schwartz and Connell have since left us…

  • 2005: Jerry Siegel (deceased) and Arnold Drake
  • 2006: Harvey Kurtzman (deceased) and Alvin Schwartz
  • 2007: Gardner Fox (deceased) and George Gladir
  • 2008: Archie Goodwin (deceased) and Larry Lieber
  • 2009: John Broome (deceased) and Frank Jacobs
  • 2010: Otto Binder (deceased) and Gary Friedrich
  • 2011: Bob Haney (deceased) and Del Connell

Please, if you're going to suggest a worthy candidate, notice two things about the list. These are all men who were primarily writers. A few were also editors but they all had a large body of work as writers.

For some reason, every time I solicit nominations here, a lot of folks send me the names of their favorite comic book artists and when I point out that this is an award for writers, they either complain we're discriminating against artists (yeah, the same way the Best Actor Oscar discriminates because they don't give it to camera operators) or they say of their artist nominee, "Well, I think he did write a couple of scripts once so technically, he qualifies as a writer!" Perhaps…but he doesn't have a body of work as one.

And the other thing to note is that the above winners are all folks who did not receive a lot of recognition or reward during their careers. Some didn't even get their names on most of their work. I have great admiration for so much of what Stan Lee has done but each year, a lot of people submit him and ask, "How can you have an award for writing comic books and not give it to Stan Lee?" To which I ask back, "How can anyone think that Stan Lee has been overlooked?" He may well have accrued more fame and maybe even more fortune than all the other writers who've ever worked in comics combined.

(Next week, I've been invited to attend the world premiere of that big documentary about him — which I'm in, by the way. If you want to argue Stan is under-recognized, meet me there at 7 PM when I'm supposed to be on the red carpet. We can debate the topic between pre-screening interviews about him.)

With all that in mind, is there someone you think the Blue Ribbon Committee should consider? We have a number of names to bat about but one thing about an award for being unnoticed: It's real easy to not notice those people. Please help us honor the insufficiently-honored and drop me an e-mail if you have a name in mind.

A Word to Lonely People

If you ever want to get a lot of e-mail and you don't care how angry some of its senders are at you, tell the world that you like Shemp more than Curly.

Recently Tweeted by me

  • Mitt Romney upon hearing Santorum is out: "Is it time to move to the center yet?" (No, he really didn't say that…I assume.) #

Discount Dick

Buddy Sorrell wants YOU to get a bargain. For the rest of today (or until they run out), Amazon is selling The Dick Van Dyke Show – The Complete Series for $67! That's a great bargain on a great series. If you don't have this, act fast. You probably won't find a better price for a long time, if ever. Order your DVD DVDs by clicking here.

This is such a good offer that I'm sitting here at 5:07 in the morning posting it on my blog. If you miss out on this, you'll tear your hair out and Buddy will start doing baldy jokes about you.

The Spirit of Comics

I probably don't have to tell anyone who'd come to this page that Will Eisner was a master storyteller of comics; that when I dined with him and Jack Kirby, as I did on a couple of occasions, I was eating with the two men most responsible for the invention of most of what made comic books different from newspaper comic strips. Will passed away in 2005 and we still talk about him all the time…and probably always will.

Thursday evening, we'll be talking about him at a meeting of the Comic Art Professional Society, the Southern California group of people who write or draw comics. There's a panel and I seem to be the Moderator, as I found out when I read the ad currently on the CAPS website. As it says there, I'll be chairing a panel with Batton Lash, Jackie Estrada, Charles Hatfield, Pat McGreal and Scott Shaw! (It says there Sergio Aragonés will be there but he won't be. Still catching up on work now that his back is better.) I believe admission is restricted to professionals or friends of members but if you qualify in either category, you might like to attend. I'm going to try and steer things in the direction of discussing Will's tireless streak for innovation; how even in his eighties, he was somehow managing to do newer things in comics than artists a fourth his age. But we'll talk about all sorts of things. There's plenty to say about Will Eisner.

A Blood-Curlying Confession

Since everyone's talking these days about the Three Stooges, I think it's time I owned up to something. In over 45 years of blogging here, I have posted no more scandalous, controversial opinion than the one I'm about to confess to you: I like Shemp. Matter of fact, I think I like Shemp more than I like Curly.

Now, I have to qualify that. I generally like the shorts with Curly more than the shorts with Shemp. If I ever took the time to list my ten favorite Stooge shorts, most if not all would contain Curly…but that's judging the films, not the Third Stooges in them. The history of the Three Stooges shorts is pretty much an ongoing question of "How cheap can we make them for this year?" The Stooges starred in 190 short comedies for Columbia between 1934 and 1959. During those years, the popularity of two-reel short comedies declined to the point where most studios eventually abandoned the form completely. Laurel and Hardy, for example, stopped making shorts in 1935, getting out just as the Stooges got in.

As more and more studios gave up on two-reelers, the Columbia shorts department filled whatever marketplace remained, not just with the Stooges but with a lot of comedians whose careers were on the downside like Buster Keaton, Charley Chase, Andy Clyde and Harry Langdon. Eventually though, it was just Moe, Larry and the current Third Stooge. Their budgets got lower and lower with fewer (eventually, no) exteriors, less elaborate visual gags, smaller casts and — most of all — increasing reuse of old scripts and old footage. Some of the last Stooge shorts were actually shot in one day, filming a few minutes of new stuff to edit into an old film so they could pass it off as a new one.

When I first discovered the Stooges, it was on a local Los Angeles channel — KTTV, Channel 11. A man named Don Lamond, who happened to be Larry's son-in-law, hosted an afternoon show that fluctuated in length. Sometimes, it was an hour and they'd run three shorts in an hour. Sometimes, it was a half-hour and they'd cram in two, which required serious editing since most of those shorts were originally 16 minutes long.  By the time they hacked out room for the commercials and for Mr. Lamond, the 30-minute Three Stooges show was running two ten-minute episodes.  The films seemed to be selected at random and once in a while, I'd find myself watching a film that contained a long sequence that I'd just seen in the film before it. Once, back to back, they ran Corny Casanovas (with Shemp) and Rusty Romeos (with Joe Besser), which are basically the same film. They made it with Shemp in 1952 and then in 1957, they just reshot Shemp's scenes with Joe and issued it as a new film.

So there was this decline in budgets and shooting time and everything and that's one reason I think Shemp doesn't get his due though he was a better comedian than Curly. Matter of fact, I think Joe Besser was a better comedian, too. They both had to work with weaker material than Curly. They both had to work at a faster pace, shooting many more pages per day. But I think they elevated those films by having a wider range of reactions. Curly was fine in short doses but he had about three expressions and six noises and once he'd made all those expressions and noises, he was done for me. Part of the reason for his popularity I think is that he was the Third Stooge who got to appear in the shorts that weren't made for eleven dollars.

Today's Video Link

Famous stars in their first screen roles…

VIDEO MISSING

Today's Political Speculation

Okay, so Rick Santorum's getting out the race, lest he look like a big loser in his home state of Pennsylvania. It's amazing he stayed in this long. I guess one should not underestimate the feelings of Republicans who don't like Mitt Romney and/or moderates and will vote for anyone else.

This may be mind-reading from afar but I've long had the feeling that neither Santorum nor Gingrich thought they had a shot at the nomination when they got into the race; that each, having been out of politics, thought it would be a good way to renew their names with right-wing voters in order to reap other rewards — speaking fees, book sales, maybe a show on Fox News. I think they got in the way Pat Buchanan used to get in…as a means of personal promotion. This could also be said of some others. Could Herman Cain really have believed he had a good shot at being the Republican nominee? Could Trump?

I further speculate that Rick and Newt each had a largely-delusional moment when they turned to their spouses or someone and said, "Hey, you know I could really win this!" They have since come crashing down to reality…but both have probably achieved their original goals.