Garry

I'm not sure what I want to write about Garry Shandling here. I knew him but I didn't know him that well.

I certainly knew his work. He did a series called It's Garry Shandling's Show that was very funny and much-admired in the business. A few years after its completion, he announced he was coming back to TV with a new situation comedy and the "buzz" in the industry was that it was a likely flop. No one had seen it yet but it stood to reason: How could this new series, The Larry Sanders Show, possibly equal his first series? Well, it didn't. It was better. In fact, it was one of the best sitcoms ever…and they wisely ended it before it stopped being that.

His stand-up comedy was also outstanding. I wrote some material for him and so did several friends of mine…but I don't think any of us would claim much (if any) credit for his success in this area. From what I could tell, he came up with most of his best stuff himself and when others wrote for him, he rewrote to make it better. That's not true of all stand-ups who buy jokes but it seems to have been true of Garry.

garryshandling02

The bios will tell you he was a successful situation comedy writer but that after seeing much of his material being rewritten, he decided to stop writing for others and do his own act. That's not quite true. He only sold a couple of sitcom scripts, the last one (I think) being his one script for Welcome Back, Kotter. That script was indeed completely rewritten — every word of it. And I oughta know because my then-partner Dennis Palumbo and I did the rewriting.

It wasn't Garry's fault. What happened was that he was hired by one set of producers and he wrote a script as per their directions and preferences. What he handed in was perfectly fine by their approach to the show…but before it could be produced, those producers were let go. The network and the star (Mr. Kaplan) were not happy with their approach so new producers were hired to change the direction. Dennis and I were handed Garry's script and told to rewrite it as per the new direction. We managed to save a semi-colon on page eight but that was about it.

Garry understood why the surgery was necessary and didn't hold it against us. In fact, every time I ran into him after it began rerunning, he'd grin and say, "Hey, I just got another $3.50 residual check from your script."

He turned to stand-up and it wasn't long before he became one of those comics whose career was made by a successful spot on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show. Ordinarily, it would be quite some time after that before he'd even be considered as a guest host but not long after his third or fourth stand-up appearance, he got to sit in Johnny's chair as a last minute fill-in.

Another comedian — I want to say it was Albert Brooks — was set to guest host one night but he had some quarrel with Carson's producer Fred DeCordova over a guest booking or a sketch or something. I'm a little fuzzy on the specifics but I'm pretty sure Garry stepped into the host position with about eighteen hours notice. And he told me once that when he arrived at the studio that day, he was sure someone was going to tell him, "Oh, you're not hosting after all. We found a real guest host."

But he did it and did it well. Later, when Joan Rivers was abruptly terminated as Johnny's guest host, a lot of folks at The Tonight Show wanted Garry to replace her — and he did for a few nights. But at the time, there was an immediate problem: Garry was doing It's Garry Shandling's Show and hadn't the time or energy to do that plus fill-in on Johnny's frequent nights off. It was announced that he'd switch off with Jay Leno but soon after, Garry bowed out and Jay became the sole guest host.

Later on when David Letterman left NBC for CBS, Shandling was offered the slot after Leno and he declined it. A friend of mine who knew Garry a lot better than I did said, "Garry will never host a nightly talk show. He doesn't have the stamina for it. He spends two hours polishing every joke and then later, three hours wondering if it was all right." That's probably true but it's still a shame he never did that kind of series.

And of course, it's a bigger shame that now he'll never do any kind of new series…or movie or stand-up appearance or anything else. He really was a very talented guy. He seemed perpetually paranoid that whatever he was doing wasn't good enough…and all those jokes about him worrying about how his hair looked or if his ass seemed large were true. He really did worry a lot about things like that but so what? I really liked him, on-camera and off. We have plenty of comedians in this world but we don't have nearly enough as good as Garry Shandling.

WonderFul WonderCon

WonderCon starts tomorrow at the L.A. Convention Center. Here is an updated list of the panels I'm doing there — and please note that The Sergio and Mark Show is now at 1:30 PM instead of 12:30. You can find the complete programming schedule online but these are the events you really want to see…

Friday, March 25 – 1:30 PM to 2:30 PM, Room 502A
THE SERGIO AND MARK SHOW

Spend an hour — or about as much time as it takes Sergio to draw an issue of Groo the Wanderer — with the folks who bring you that comic book, the award-winning team of Sergio Aragonés and Mark Evanier. They'll tell you all about Groo and other weird things they've done or are planning to do, plus you'll also get to meet the hardest-working man in comics, Tom Luth, who has to color it all, as well as the letterer, Stan Sakai, creator of Usagi Yojimbo.

Saturday, March 26 – 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM, Room 403AB
QUICK DRAW!

It's one of the most popular panels at Comic-Con each year but it was born years ago at WonderCon! Three cartoonists! Lots of paper and Sharpies and silly ideas! Watch the battle of wits and markers as amazing cartoons are created right before your eyes by Sergio Aragonés (MAD magazine, Groo the Wanderer), Scott Shaw! (The Simpsons, The Flintstones) and Kyle Baker (Why I Hate Saturn, The Bakers). Your moderator Mark Evanier throws the challenges at them, many suggested by the audience. So maybe you'd like to be part of that audience.

Saturday, March 26 – 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Room 403AB
CARTOON VOICES

Talk about super-powers! Here's a panel with heroes who can put voices into the mouths of your favorite animated characters. They'll tell you how they do it and there will be an unrehearsed reading to show how they do it! With Maurice LaMarche (Pinky and the Brain, Futurama), Candi Milo (Curious George, Jimmy Neutron), Townsend Coleman (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, The Tick), Amanda Troop (Batman Unlimited), Chuck McCann (Duck Tales, The Fantastic Four) and others! Your host is Mark Evanier (The Garfield Show).

Sunday, March 27 – 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM, Room 502A
COVER STORY

Some of the greatest artistry in comics today can be found not in the books but on the outside. What goes into designing a memorable, magnificent cover? This topic is discussed with examples by folks who've done it: Russsell Dauterman (The Mighty Thor, Nightwing), Paolo Rivera (Daredevil, The Valiant), Bill Sienkiewicz (Stray Toasters, Elektra: Assassin) and Annie Wu (Black Canary, Hawkeye). Presiding over the discussion is Mark Evanier.

Sunday, March 27 – 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Room 502A
JACK KIRBY TRIBUTE

They call him the King of the Comics and his influence is unescapable around the industry and around this convention. 22 years after he left us, there's still so much to say about him and some of it will be said by Steve Sherman (former Kirby assistant), Charles Hatfield (Author of Hand of Fire: The Comics Art of Jack Kirby), Paul S. Levine (attorney for the Rosalind Kirby trust) and your moderator, Mark Evanier (former Kirby assistant, author of Kirby: King of Comics) and another special guest or two.

Everything is subject to change at a moment's notice, including times, room numbers, panelists and certain audience members' underwear. If you see me around, don't be afraid to say hi and I'll be glad to discuss just about anything except religion, politics and cole slaw.

Garry Shandling, R.I.P.

garryshandling01

Memories to come later. Such a clever, funny, totally screwed-up man.

Today's Video Link

Hank and John Green, aka the Vlogbrothers, are Internet Superstars. A few years ago, that accomplishment would have been like being the Most Valuable Player at a potato race but these days, it's very meaningful. Each week, Hank and John each make a video addressing the other on some topic and here we have John explaining how it works in this country with pledged and unpledged delegates selecting our presidential candidates. It really is as screwy as he makes it sound and everyone seems fine with it when their candidate benefits and outraged when theirs doesn't.

Anyway, I like these videos a lot. Does anyone here know Hank Green? He's a Guest of Honor (as am I) at this year's Comic-Con International and I want to get him to be part of one of the panel's I'm hosting. I can't go through the convention committee right now because they're all busy running WonderCon this weekend but if any of you are in touch with Hank, ask him to please drop me an e-mail or something. The only online contact info I have for him involves pathways via which I suspect he gets thousands of messages a day and I don't want to get lost in that throng.

Now, here's John explaining the unexplainable…

Today's "Trump is a Monster" Link

Donald Trump recently did an interview with the editorial board of The Washington Post. It really is a marvel of incoherent rambling and non-answers and a recurring theme is that Donald Trump can get something done because he's Donald Trump, no further explanation necessary. I keep expecting some interview with him any day now to include an exchange like this…

TRUMP: I will make it so World War II never happened because I will have a time machine so we can go back and kill Hitler.

INTERVIEWER: But no one has ever figured out how to go back in time. How will you be able to do it?

TRUMP: I will do it because I am Donald Trump.

Part of my distaste for the guy is his lack of seriousness about anything he says. He doesn't answer questions. He bullies his way through with questionable "facts" and superego. Things will be great because he'll do them. We will win because he's tougher. Long before I'd ever heard of Trump, I had a visceral dislike of people who talk tough…which as I've learned over the years is an entirely different thing from actually being tough. In fact, the folks I've encountered who talked the toughest were almost all bluffing because they didn't want to have to follow through and prove they could deliver. "Don't mess with me" is usually uttered by someone who's afraid you'll create a situation where he has to mess with you.

But I also really don't like people who blather on over serious matters without relating them to reality. I wrote this before here but every time the Writers Guild is on strike, we have members who are dissatisfied with the WGA leadership and who insist the impossible is possible if only we're tougher…

HIM: Our committee should get in there and negotiate!

ME: The producers refuse to negotiate.

HIM: Then we should insist they negotiate.

ME: The producers refuse to negotiate.

HIM: Then we should get in there and be real tough and demand they negotiate.

ME: The only weapon we have against them is to strike.

HIM: Don't strike! Negotiate! Demand they negotiate! If I were on that committee, I could force them to negotiate!

ME: How would you do that?

HIM: By being tougher than they are!

It is, of course, easy to say stuff like that when you're never going to have to actually do it. You know, I'd be a much better James Bond than Daniel Craig and if I got in the ring with Lucas Browne (I think he's the current Heavweight Champ), I could knock him on his ass in three minutes.

Hey, you can't prove that isn't true. Just as you can't prove that Trump's or even Ted Cruz's economic plan would grow the economy by 5% every year. Personally, I'd bet on me versus Browne before I'd bet on anyone promising 5% growth, especially if the way they're going to achieve it is by slashing taxes for the rich and social services for the poor. But read the interview with Trump. It'll make you feel Sarah Palin wasn't so bad…

Recommended Reading

Keith Olbermann has some things to say about Donald Trump but mainly about the news coverage of Donald Trump. I don't think the problem is what the media gives the public. I think the problem is the way in which we reward the media for giving us this stuff.

My Latest Tweet

  • Jeb Bush endorses Ted Cruz; says he's qualified, serious and, most importantly, not Donald Trump. Politifact all three as "half true."

Mushroom Soup Tuesday

mushroomsoup209

I just looked at all I have to get done today and decided to declare today another of those days when I might not be blogging at the usual pace. Also, I have a ton of these soup can graphics I made up so why the hell not? This one has, for no particular reason, a background of jelly beans. You like it?

I woke up about 90 minutes ago and my iPhone was giving me a headline about the terrorist attack at Brussels Airport. In my dazed state, I thought, "I think I'll go back to sleep until a majority of the people running for president explain how this would never happen on their watch. I got up ten minutes later.

Could someone invent a plug-in for my browser that will filter out ads that feature photos of human deformities? I really don't need to see most of those. A few years ago, there was a commercial that ran incessantly on TV — a public service spot to get people to quit smoking. It showed diseased lungs and tracheotomy scars and people who could no longer speak without one of those freakish artificial speech aids…and I get it. Yes, yes…some folks might be repulsed enough and rattled to stop. But why should I, who has never smoked, have to view this stuff?

Also, one of these days when I click on a headline that says "Smith destroys Johnson in Debate," I would like it to take me to a video wherein Smith does more than land just one glancing blow that causes Johnson to look slightly annoyed.

I watched The Daily Show with Trevor Noah last night, wondering all the time why this show is no longer "must" viewing for me the way it was under Jon Stewart. That it isn't is proven by the fact that I have twelve unwatched episodes on my TiVo and when I watch one, it's kind of with the attitude that since it's The Daily Show and it's already recorded, I should watch it. Some of the writing is as sharp as anything that appeared on Mr. Stewart's version and Mr. Noah is quite professional and appealing. But the new correspondents haven't impressed me and the whole program just feels like a knock-off of the old show, not a continuation.

Some of it, I know is that there are so many others out there now: Colbert's still doing smart political humor on his show and so at times is Seth Meyers. You've got your John Oliver and your Samantha Bee (both great) and of course Bill Maher. When something happened in politics, I was eager to see what Jon Stewart would do with it. I'm not so eager to catch Trevor Noah's take even though it will probably concur with and reinforce mine. I think I'd be more likely to care about Noah's if it didn't.

I may or may not be back here later today. Depends how this script goes and how many times the phone rings. And it began ringing even as I typed that…

Recommended Reading

Again, Nate Silver's crew turns to the question of whether Donald Trump will arrive at the Republican Convention with the 1,237 delegates he needs to lock up the nomination. They don't know but they seem pretty sure that we won't know for sure until the results of the June 7 primaries are in.

I hate to break this to you all but that's 77 days from today. This phase of the election may not be over 'til then.

So here's what I'm wondering: If Trump arrives with 1,230 or even 1,236 and then somehow doesn't get the nomination, what happens then? He's certain to have more delegates than anyone else. Forget for a moment that it's Trump. Say it's some other candidate who gets almost enough delegates to win but is denied the nod in favor of someone he trounced in the primaries. Or even someone who didn't win any delegates in the primary. How does that not look like Grand Larceny? How does that line up with the will of the voters? Even folks who are praying for Trump not to be the nominee will say he wuz robbed. How do you bind a party together and rally behind its nominee then?

Because I do not want to see Republicans do well this year — and not just in the presidential race — I would love for that to happen. But I'd also like to see it just because…well, in a reality show, you want these kinds of twists and turns that make people really, really mad and which destroy past alliances. It may or may not be good for the country but it sure makes for fun television.

Today's Video Link

Here's a terrific documentary about a terrific comic actor, Marty Feldman…

Recommended Reading

Donald Trump needs 1,237 delegates to win the G.O.P. nomination in Cleveland in July. Will he have them or will he fall short, meaning there's room for another candidate to slip in and grab the prize? Over at Nate Silver's website, they can't say for sure. He might get it or it might be close. And if it's close, it might be close enough that he could persuade, bribe or arm-twist enough of the uncommitted delegates to make up the difference on the first ballot there. This is sounding more and more like a reality show.

Further Recommended Reading

And in the same publication, Frank Rich says that it's a myth that the Republican Establishment is trying to stop Donald Trump. The current Republican Establishment, Rich says, is or will soon be the folks backing Trump. And the folks we used to think of as the Republican Establishment are surrendering to him as Chris Christie did. I'm not sure I completely buy what Rich is saying but he may be right.

Recommended Reading

Jonathan Chait has some thoughts about the remainder of Barack Obama's term. It does seem like some Republicans are so busy hating Hillary Clinton (and in many cases, their own probably nominee) that they have no disdain left for Obama.

Today's Video Link

I gave up candy bars and similar sugary treats about eight years ago but I'm still fascinated with how things like that are made. Here's a short video on how they make "fun size" Snickers bars — and I was always glad they made them in that size. I remember how it wasn't fun at all to eat the larger ones…

Highly Recommended Reading

Eric Levitz reminds us what this presidential election is really about. The forces currently driving the Republican Party believe fervently that if you slash taxes for the super-wealthy and trim social services, the economy will soar and create a financial utopia for all. Every single time this has been tried, it has failed spectacularly, mostly notably with recent disasters in Kansas and Louisiana. But they won't give up on this idea and are itching to try it for the entire country.