Here's another solo-four-part-harmony version of Billy Joel's "For the Longest Time." This is Zach Timson and since he recorded this during the COVID lockdown, we forgive him for changing the words…

Kamden Spies wants to know…

While I know a lot about comics, I don't know a lot about the magazine distribution end of the industry. Throughout comics history, lots of titles transition from one to another. For example, a title like Wacky Duck at Timely in 1947 ended with issue #7 but its numbering continued as Justice, a crime comic. Moon Girl, A Romance at E.C. became Weird Fantasy. Why are titles of the books changed instead of cancelling them and starting the numbering from scratch? Also did this make a difference to the subscribers of these titles?

Once upon a time, comic books sold a fair amount of their press runs via mail subscriptions. Most charged the same price — $1.20 for twelve issues of a comic that sold for a dime on newsstands — and some of those offers came with a bonus prize of some sort, especially on Dell Comics. Walt Disney's Comics and Stories sold a huge number of copies that way.

Such deals were possible because the post office offered a discount rate for magazines. They called it Second Class Mail but now it's called Periodicals. To qualify for Second Class Mail, comic book publishers had to do certain things…like there was some odd ruling that your publication wasn't a magazine unless it had at least one page of text in it. That's why comics of that era all had one-page text stories in them…and that requirement was later filled with a letters page since it cost less to print letters than to pay someone to write a text story. At times, a comic didn't qualify as a magazine if it was all full of one feature so that was why, for example, the Uncle Scrooge comic book always featured a short story of Gyro Gearloose.

And the publisher had to pay a deposit for each publication that had Second Class mailing privileges. The problem with that was that if you canceled a comic, you'd have to wait a few months for the postal folks to refund your deposit. So some publishers tried to sneak a new magazine in under an old deposit. They'd continued the numbering and claim that, in one of the examples you cite, Justice wasn't a new comic but rather a continuation of Wacky Duck.

(To answer a question someone will ask if I don't say this here: Nowadays, we know that a #1 issue will often sell especially well because some folks will buy extra copies in the expectation that those issues will be more valuable someday. But back then, there was no such speculation and a #1 issue often sold less because if was a first issue. Some retailers were hesitant to give a new comic adequate display on their racks. So continuing the numbering of a canceled comic as a different book also helped get around that obstacle.)

The tale of Moon Girl was even more convoluted than you describe. It started as Moon Girl and the Prince. Then they made the slight change to calling it just Moon Girl. Then they decided that maybe a crime comic would sell better so they renamed it Moon Girl Fights Crime. Then they decided that maybe a love comic would sell better so they dumped Moon Girl completely and called their new love comic A Moon…A Girl…Romance. Each time, they tried to trick the post office into viewing the new book as a modification of an old one so no new deposit was required.

Finally, they decided to drop that one and start a new book called Weird Fantasy but they kept the numbering going in the hope that the post office wouldn't notice. In this case, they did…and a new deposit was required.  Sometimes, they got away with it and sometimes, they didn't.

I don't know how often subscribers complained. I guess it depended on how much they liked or didn't like the new comic they were suddenly receiving. I know when I was a kid, a relative offered to buy me a subscription to any Dell comic. I selected Looney Tunes but due to some processing error, I began receiving Tom & Jerry. I didn't mind much. If they'd sent me issues of Annie Oakley then, I might have minded.

And now, here's Sam Robson singing solo-four-part-harmony on Billy Joel's "For the Longest Time." Or maybe this is eight-part harmony. Or nine.  Or ten…

The second the shooting of those legislators in Minnesota was reported, we had people all over the news and the Internet trying to blame it on whoever they considered the opposition party and its leaders. You'd think they'd wait until at least a little was known about the alleged shooter but I guess they never figure there's time for that. FactCheck.org looks into some of the wilder leaps to false conclusions.

Daniel Dale of CNN lists some of the not-true things Donald Trump said at G7.

And Steve Benen looks at some of Trump's claims to be able to "end all wars" and bring peace to the entire world. Those claims aren't aging well.

Back here, we were talking about the various specials and programs featured on an anthology series called ABC's Wide World of Entertainment. I said, with regard to the concept of rotating shows, "I suppose that worked somewhere at some point on one of the three networks we had then but no example springs to mind." A lot of you wrote in to remind me of The NBC Sunday Mystery Movie, a series which featured in rotation, McCloud, McMillan and Wife, and Columbo…and then in its last season, Hec Ramsey.

I suppose that series was a hit but what I was thinking of what ABC's Wide World of Entertainment was two out of four weeks — a series which featured all sorts of different programs, many of them one-shots, in no predictable pattern.

Some of you also reminded me of one of the one-shot specials on ABC's Wide World of Entertainment. It was this special on the history of the game show — which was never on ABC — What's My Line? It's mostly made up of Mystery Guest segments…

Not that anyone needs any further proof that Mike "MyPillow Guy" Lindell is a few feathers short in the head-stuffing department but…

Late Monday, a Colorado-based federal jury ruled that he defamed Eric Coomer, a former employee of Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems and ordered Lindell to pay $2.3 million bucks in damages. Mr. Lindell immediately sent a text message to Rolling Stone that said, "Awesome win! MyPillow 100% innocent!!!!"

He learned this at the feet of The Master, D.J.T.: When you lose, just insist that you won!

So it's like 36 days until this year's Comic-Con International in San Diego…time for my way-overused joke about how if you're going and you'll need a parking space, leave now.  To answer the two most-asked questions I'm getting right now about this stellar annual event: No, my best friend Sergio Aragonés will not be at the con and no, I can't help you find a hotel room.

Well, let me elaborate: Sergio is in good health.  He's just choosing to not attend.  As for hotel rooms, I'm not an expert on this stuff as it's been a long time — thirty years at least — since I've booked my own room for one of these. I will suggest that if you can't find lodging close to the San Diego Convention Center (or can't afford what you can find), you may need to widen your search area and then figure out how to get to the con each day. A friend of mine reported that it was cheaper for to him to book far, far away and figure on paying for Lyft each day than to pay for the only room he could locate within walking distance of the festivities.

My schedule currently has me moderating or appearing on seventeen panels…and yes, I know that's crazy. Fine. It's crazy. I sometimes do crazy things. It comes from reading too many comic books. Stop trying to bring me to my senses. I abandoned them a long time ago and haven't missed them a whole lot since then.

The convention prefers I not post my schedule until they post the whole schedule…which they'll do two weeks before each day of the con. That is to say the schedule for Thursday of the convention will be online two weeks before Thursday of the convention, the schedule for Friday of the convention will be online two weeks before Friday of the convention and so on. If you are attending, I urge you to study it carefully and jot down what you want to attend…and what you'll attend if you can't get into your first choices.

I also suggest you just forget about attending anything in Hall H. Just get that kind of nonsense out of your head right this minute. If you're even thinking of trying that, read this about what that involves. And yes, I know that a guy who's doing seventeen panels has no friggin' business telling anyone they're doing something foolish.

It's probably safe though to tell you that I'll be doing all of my usual panels — in the same time slots they're always in and in the same rooms they were in last year. This includes two Cartoon Voices panels and the famous/infamous Quick Draw! game.

Are you perhaps interested in some stats? This will be the fifty-fourth of these conventions I've attended. If you'd like the whole list, let me refer you to this list I compiled last year.

Counting both Comic-Con Internationals and WonderCons, this year will be our 29th Quick Draw! game. I recently made up this list of all of them and who was on each one.

And counting Comic-Con Internationals, WonderCons and the ones I did online during the worst of COVID, the two Cartoon Voices panels we do this year will be #61 and #62 for me. I also recently made up this list of all of them and who was on each one. (I am still doing research and making changes on this list. If you have anything to offer, please let me know…but I think it's pretty complete and accurate now.)

Lastly, someone's going to ask this if I don't address it now. In 2018, I hosted sixteen panels and appeared on one other. That's my record to date. This year, I'm hosting thirteen panels and appearing on four others. So you can decide for yourself if that's tying my old record or not. Either way, it's crazy. Like I said, I sometimes do crazy things.  Later today, I may even read some news and try to understand what's happening in this country.

And now, here's Dan Wright singing solo-four-part-harmony on Billy Joel's "For the Longest Time"…

Jon Stewart tonight on The Daily Show…

Here's a little over an hour of the anchors of The Daily Show talking about their program at a recent event at the TV Academy. They do these to perhaps impress Emmy voters and to maybe — just maybe — beat out John Oliver…

Yesterday, I linked you to Billy Joel's music video for his big hit, "For the Longest Time." It's inspired a lot of cover recordings and many of them are…well, I don't know quite what you call them. They're videos where one or two guys sing four-part harmony with themselves. Here's one I featured here before in 2014. It's a gent named Julien Neel, who has dozens of these online featuring just himself, teaming up with Sgt. Sonny, who also has dozens of these online of just him vocalizing with himself… The song is Billy Joel's "For the Longest Time"…

Sorry to hear that Billy Joel is having medical issues and has had to cancel all future live appearances. I've always liked his music and also what I've seen of him when he was just talking, not performing. He's widely loved and I'm sure not the only person hoping he has a full recovery, safe and soon.

I don't know if I have a favorite Billy Joel song but in the Top Ten, I'd surely place "For the Longest Time," which he first recorded back in 1983. Here's the official music video he made of it…

It's Father's Day so I've decided to rerun this column which will tell you what kind of father I had. As you'll see, I was very, very fortunate in that department…

I've been posting stories here for some months now about my mother. It's Father's Day so I've decided to write about my father.

My father, as I've mentioned here many times, worked for the Internal Revenue Service. It was a lousy job he took on a "just for now" basis while he looked for something better to do…and he wound up staying with the I.R.S. until he retired. He simply did not have any particular skill that would have allowed him to pursue any of his fantasies: Opera singer, baseball player, newspaper reporter or comedy writer. He was about as proud as a human being could be that I wound up realizing one of his dreams.

And he'd never pushed me in that direction, not one bit. Matter of fact, he tried several times to warn me away from the profession for two reasons. One was that the one time he'd made a serious attempt at it, things had not gone well. This was back in Hartford in the early forties, not long after the military had rejected him for most of the same reasons he never became a baseball player. He had a friend who had an "in" to someone at a local radio station. My father and the friend wrote up several pages of comedy material, took it to the guy at the radio station…and received a devastating turndown. It was so insensitive and heartbreaking, he said, that he never tried again. Many a time, he cautioned me how writing could break your heart.

So that was one reason he was wary of me doing what I've now been doing for 44 years. Another was that as a Revenue Officer, every professional writer he ever met was in deep financial trouble. This included some "name" authors and prolific screenwriters you'd think would have had a buck or two. That they rarely did made him worry when I went that route. It was important to him that I do something I loved but being a Depression-era kid, it was also important to him that I be able to make a real living at it.

He had a little trouble with the way I was paid in my profession: Nothing for weeks and then a big check, then nothing or a month or three. It didn't bother me but it bothered him. After I moved out of the family home and into my own apartment, he'd come by to visit me once or twice a week — he was joyously retired from the I.R.S. by then — and he'd say, trying to be casual about it, "So…any checks lately?" That was his way of saying, "Please…reassure me you're doing okay." That was especially important any week in which my name didn't appear onscreen on a TV show.

He died when I was 39 and right to the end, he was a world-class worrier. He worried about the oddest, most unlikely things — and never about himself; only about other people. If I was due at the house around 5 PM, he'd start worrying at 5:02 that maybe I'd been in a terrible auto accident. Once, I walked in at 5 on the dot and he said, "Oh, thank God. I was worried you'd had an accident or something." I pointed out that I was right on time. He said, "I know. But I had the feeling you were going to be early."

Usually, people like that tend to shout a lot and lose their tempers. Not my father. He almost never got at mad at me or anyone. He just plain didn't see the point of it. When I was in my early teens, I had a best friend named Rick. When I went over to Rick's house for the day, I would literally hear Rick's father yell at him more than I heard my own father yell at me in those 39 years. I could probably list every time he raised his voice at me during those 39 years in about three Twitter messages.

I'll tell you one story right now. At what was for him enormous expense, my father arranged for me to get braces when I was thirteen. The orthodontist was a colorful man named Dr. Nathan M. Seltzer who was based in Beverly Hills and who did a lot of work on kids who went into show business. You've seen many a Dr. Seltzer smile on TV and movie stars who are roughly my age. At one point, I was supposed to wear this ghastly retainer at night — a terrible contraption that Josef Mengele would have condemned as cruel and unusual punishment. If Dick Cheney had known of these, he would have done away with Waterboarding and threatened prisoners with Dr. Seltzer Night Retainers. And believe me, those guys wouldn't have just talked. They'd have yodeled.

One morning, I awoke with bleeding gums. My mother and I phoned Dr. Seltzer and he said, "Stop wearing it until your appointment next week and I'll adjust it." So I didn't wear it the next night. Somehow, we neglected to tell my father about this.

The next morning, he casually asked me if wearing the retainer had interfered with my sleep last night. I told him I hadn't worn it — and before I could tell him why, he exploded. He was paying a lot of money for that orthodonture and I damn well was going to wear it. I don't think I ever saw him as furious as he was at that moment and it was a long time before I could get a word in, not even edgewise but between his sentences, to tell him about what Doc Seltzer had said. When I did, he said he didn't believe me. He was even angrier at me for concocting such a feeble lie. Then he stormed out of the house to go pick up my mother at the market. Shortly after that, Rick arrived.

Thirty minutes later, Rick and I were playing croquet in the backyard when my father came out of the house in tears, hugged me and apologized about eighty times. My mother had told him what Dr. Seltzer had said. I was crying, too…and I remember thinking it was embarrassing that Rick was seeing my father and me crying. But as my father headed back into the house and I turned towards Rick, I saw that he was crying more than either of us. I asked him why. He said, "My father isn't always right but he would kill himself before he'd apologize to me for anything."

I'd seen Rick's father in action and he was right. It was one of those moments when I realized how very special my father was.

Another came a few years later. It was my father's unfortunate job to go to people who were seriously in arrears in their taxes and say, "We need to negotiate a payment schedule." He hated it. No, that's not strong enough. He hated, hated, hated it. He especially hated it when the people were desperate and in trouble.

Not all were. Some of them were very rich guys who just felt it was beneath them to pay taxes. When my father called on one, he'd walk into a mansion in Bel Air or Beverly Hills. Most of them had on their walls one or more framed photos of themselves with Ronald Reagan and/or Richard Nixon.

My father knew what that meant. These guys would never pay their taxes in full and probably not at all. He'd be lucky to get five cents on the dollar out of them. And he'd be real lucky if his boss didn't call him in and say, "We got a complaint from someone in Washington about you harassing this fine, patriotic gentleman." My father was about as menacing as Wally Cox with a broken fly swatter. In the meantime, the boss would order him to get every cent plus penalties out of the poor woman in Venice whose husband had never paid their joint taxes, then had deserted her and the six kids she now couldn't afford to feed.

The woman in Venice was a real person. My father came home pale from the afternoon he called on her. She owed more money than she could ever possibly come up with and since she was not a Reagan donor, she was expected to actually pay it. She had six kids who were all running around her little dilapidated home barefoot.

My father had a thing about "barefoot." No matter who the person was, if they didn't have shoes on and weren't on the beach or en route to a swimming pool, he felt sorry for them. It was from his upbringing, I guess, that he associated shoelessness with stark, life-threatening poverty. After I was six or seven years old, I was discouraged from it.

We used to get a lot of these mailings that asked us to "adopt" an orphaned child in some third world country — one of those deals where you send the kid five bucks and he can somehow eat for nine months. They would include what looked like trading cards of these impoverished children and ask you to select one or two and send money for them. My father would always send money for any child who was barefoot. If a kid had shoes on or if the photo didn't show his or her feet, no bucks…but he was very generous with the others.

He asked the woman in Venice why the kids who were old enough to be in school weren't there. She had a chilling answer: "The school won't let them attend without shoes and I can't afford to buy shoes for them." This was the person my father had been ordered to get thousands of dollars out of.

For days after his first meeting with the woman, my father was haunted by the image of those kids scurrying about sans footwear, unable to go to school and better themselves. Finally, one night about 3 AM, he woke my mother up and said, "I need to do something I probably shouldn't do but I have to do it." My mother knew what he was thinking and she said, "Do what you have to do," kissed him and rolled over and went back to sleep.

The next day, my father went to a Stride-Rite shoe store in Santa Monica and made arrangements with the manager. The woman would bring in the six kids and he would pay for one pair of shoes for each. Children's shoes cost a lot of money and working for the I.R.S. didn't pay well so it was a big, significant expenditure…but he had to do it. I think that year we didn't go on summer vacation because of it but I sure didn't mind. I did ask if I could somehow get the free March of Comics comic books that Stride-Rite gave out when you purchased shoes at their stores.

He also went to bat for the woman with his superiors, finally getting them to settle her case for considerably less than the full amount. She was so grateful for that and for the shoes, she found out who my father's boss was and wrote him a letter, praising Bernie Evanier for his kindness. She meant well by it but my father was scolded. People were supposed to be afraid of an I.R.S. man, he was reminded. They were not supposed to think he'd tear up most of their bill and buy their kids shoes. Not unless they were a pal of Nixon's, at least.

He was still glad he'd done it. He did things like that all his life, often anonymously. I think I need to write more about my father here…and not so much for your benefit as for mine.

Yesterday as I'm sure you know, the top Democrat in the Minnesota House, Melissa Hortman, and her husband were shot dead in what's being described as a "politically motivated assassination" and Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife were shot by, they're saying, the same person. This is a dreadful thing which ought to horrify even human beings who oppose Democrats. Ordinarily, we don't bother with fact-checks of posts on "X" but there was an instant flurry of them trying to pin this on Governor Tim Walz and Politifact is telling us why that's insane.

The New York Times — which doesn't do fact-checks as often as The New York Times should — goes through some of the nonsense the guy in the White House is spewing about the protests in Los Angeles.

And Senator Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) has been accusing the Congressional Budget Office of being wrong all the time and he cites bad predictions they made in the 1930s and the 1960s. Steve Benen points out how wrong Scott is when he cites what he claims are correct numbers. He also notes that the Congressional Budget Office can't have been wrong with projections in the thirties and sixties since it was founded in 1974. The Washington Post has more on this amazing feat of time travel.

Well, a lotta folks online seem to be very happy that (a) the "No Kings" protests yesterday were wildly successful and (b) that Donald Trump's military parade and birthday celebration was not.  We're just starting to see the revisionism that these two things were not as they appeared but that's just denial of reality.  It's just like when any Trump staffer is asked "Why did this endeavor of yours fail?", the only answer they're allowed to give is "It didn't fail."  But we (and they) know what really happened.