True or False

Neal Gabler laments that none of Donald Trump's followers seem to care that he's a serial liar. Here's my question: How often do Americans ever change their minds about a politician because he or she says things that aren't so? Lies are something that are only bad when the other guy tells them. When your guy fibs, it's for a good cause or it's a misunderstanding or he was misinformed by his staff.

If you loved Reagan and hated Bill Clinton, "I did not trade arms for hostages" was not a lie but "I didn't inhale" was solid proof that "Slick Willy" was a congenital prevaricator. And when Al Gore said he invented the Internet, that was proof he was a liar (even though he didn't say that), whereas George W. Bush and Dick Cheney never misrepresented anything about Iraq.

One other thing: Gabler says "If you look at Politifact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning site that examines candidates' pronouncements for accuracy, 76 percent of Trump's statements are rated either 'mostly false,' 'false,' or 'pants on fire,' which is to say off-the-charts false." That's true but misleading. A more correct way to put it would be "If you look at Politifact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning site that examines candidates' pronouncements for accuracy, 76 percent of the Donald Trump statements they chose to analyze are rated either 'mostly false,' 'false,' or 'pants on fire,' which is to say off-the-charts false."

I think Politifact is pretty good and pretty fair but they do pick and choose what to scrutinize. They don't evaluate everything anyone says in public.

Previous Post

Okay, I guess I posted a second post about Trump this weekend…and this would qualify as Numero Tres. But if he can flip-flop on everything else, I can flip-flop on that.

Dear Readers…

Whether you're panicking or gloating, please stop sending me links to polls that show Trump winning or coming close to winning in November. In case you haven't noticed, it's not November.

In every single presidential election in recent memory that has not involved an incumbent — and even some that have — there were polls months earlier that showed the candidate who eventually lost clobbering the candidate that eventually won. Before Election Day, there will be plenty that are not to be taken seriously.

We don't even know half of each presidential ticket and already, people are sure they know how those tickets will fare.

Polls this early are pretty meaningless as to who'll win. They arguably may tell us something significant about the mood of the electorate at this point in time but just at this point in time. You know, when pollsters get rated — when someone looks to see how accurately they predicted any given election — they're judged by the closeness of their projections the day before the election, not on how they did in May.

I do think that the Democratic nominee will enjoy a tremendous advantage in the Electoral College. That's not a prediction. It's just recognizing that some states are almost certain to go to one party or another, and the ones that are almost certain to go Democratic total a lot more electoral votes than the ones that will go Republican. That's how the real game is scored.

While I'm at it: I have one pro-Bernie friend who keeps e-mailing everyone, including me, side-by-side photos of Sanders rallies with huge turnouts and Clinton rallies with smaller crowds. He thinks this proves Sanders will win. I think it proves my friend is good at finding photos of some Sanders rallies that look more populated than photos of some Clinton rallies. He wouldn't have to send these things out if he could send out actual delegate counts and projections that look more promising for the Sanders campaign. And I say that as a person who would not be unhappy if Bernie did somehow pull it off. Yeah, crowds matter but numbers matter more.

City Celebration

lathenandnow01

Last evening, I attended the premiere of a new musical revue. If you live in or near Los Angeles — and especially if you grew up in or near Los Angeles — you're going to want to go see this. I was born and raised in Los Angeles and while that's not a prerequisite to enjoy this show, it sure helps.

It's called L.A. Now and Then and basically, it's songs and sketches about Los Angeles, mostly past and a little bit present. There are segments about disco, the old wrestling matches down at the Olympic Auditorium, partying on the Sunset Strip in the sixties, kid show hosts on L.A. television, The Black Dahlia, the 1962 Dodgers, Walt Disney, Helms Bakery trucks and more.

The show was conceived and directed by Bruce Kimmel, who wrote much of the material with contributions by Michele Brourman, Grant Geissman, Paul Gordon, Karen Gottlieb, Shelly Markham, Wayne Moore, Adryan Russ, Doug Haverty, David Wechter, Bruce Vilanch and the Sherman Brothers (Richard and Robert).

I'll tell you more about the show in a minute but first, let me tell you about the venue and the cast. This production was assembled under the auspices of the Los Angeles City College Theater Academy and it's on the L.A. City College campus in an intimate theater there. This is the same place where Bruce Kimmel staged that superb production of Li'l Abner that I raved about here.

A few of the cast members are experienced pros like Robert Yacko, who I've seen for years in theater and on TV, or past graduates of the L.A. City College theater department. Most of them are current students there — and there's a nice touch of irony that, for example, the three ladies singing about Helms Trucks were born well after the last one had disappeared from L.A. streets.

I'm going to list the entire cast here because (a) they deserve it and (b) at least one or two of these folks are going to go on to notable careers and someday, someone will Google their names in connection with some movie or TV show and they'll be directed to this site.

Here they are, alphabetically: Apri Audia, Jenny Bacon, Sarah Barnett, Paolo Fregoso, Alexis Jackson, Bedijou Jean, Prisca Kim, Michael MacRae, Kole Martin, Shawna Merkley, Lamont Oakley, Kasper Svendsen, Elle Willgues and I've already mentioned Robert Yacko. Most are current students. Here's a short video of them in action…

I'm a bit hesitant to single performers out because, being a lousy reporter, I'm not completely certain which name to put with which performer in some cases.

Still,  I'm pretty sure Kole Martin was the guy who did the great physical comedy as a Travolta wanna-be who longs for disco to return and who also scored as an effeminate wrestler in the Olympic Auditorium sketch. I think Alexis Jackson was the stunning lady who did the great dance moves throughout and especially in a musical salute to shows like Shindig and Hullabaloo.

I'm confident in stating that Michael MacRae was the Uber driver in a very funny sketch written by Bruce Vilanch. (The character drives for Uber but is also a member of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association so he's also one of the tiny handful of people who vote for the Golden Globe Awards.) April Audia, Sarah Barnett and Elle Willgues were surely the ladies who sang so well about the Helms trucks and April delivered a touching, slightly outraged monologue about the demise of the old Pan-Pacific Auditorium.

Other folks were great too but I'm not as certain of their names.

Oh — and I'll mention one particularly wonderful moment. There's a song in Act One called "The Whimsy Works," performed expertly by Mr. Yacko. It's about Walt Disney and it was written for this show by one of Walt's two favorite songsmiths, Richard M. Sherman. The tune is great and I hope there will soon be some other place where you can hear it…and as it was performed, there were projections of photos from the Disney lot back in Walt's day. One was of the Sherman Brothers back then and when it came on, the audience broke into loving applause not just because of the sweet sentiment but because they knew that Mr. Sherman was with us in the audience. (He sure seemed to have a good time and not just during the two songs he worked on.)

But let's get down to the crucial question: How can you see this show? Well, you may have to hustle. The next performance starts in about an hour and a half but there's an 8 PM show tonight. Then there are two shows on Thursday, one next Friday, two next Saturday and then I think that's it. The tickets are real cheap and you may still be able to get a pair on this page. If they're sold out there, try this one.

If you can see it, try to see it as it will make you feel good twice. You'll enjoy it and then, one of these days, you'll see some new star on the screen and you'll be able to boast to your friends, "Hey, I saw him [or her] in a play they were in back in May of 2016!"

Darwyn Cooke, R.I.P.

Photo by Luigi Novi
Photo by Luigi Novi

Very sad news: Comic book and animation writer-artist Darwyn Cooke passed early this morning, losing his battle with what his family called "an aggressive form of cancer." Earlier in the day, a press release had shocked his friends and fans, announcing that he was receiving palliative care, which if you're unfamiliar with the term usually means that doctors see no way to save the life and are merely attempting to make what remains of it as comfortable as possible. Darwyn was 53 years old.

I seriously doubt that there is anyone who knew Darwyn or his work who isn't feeling a tremendous sense of loss at this news. A great guy and a great talent. I first met him in the halls of Warner Animation around 1996 when he was working on Superman: The Animated Series. He was a key storyboard artist as he had been on Batman: The Animated Series, which had preceded that program. He introduced himself and told me at some length how he had become an artist largely due to his love of Jack Kirby's drawing. Later, on panels about Jack, he would repeat the story of how he had learned so much by slavishly tracing every large-sized Kirby drawing he could get his mitts on.

There was little in his own style to suggest that inspiration. When he began drawing comics (mostly for DC), he didn't draw like Jack…or any of the other great talents that had influenced him. He drew like Darwyn. But like so many Kirby fans, he had developed an exciting sense of storytelling. There was something fresh and energetic about his work and his peers envied the light sense of humor and the simplicity of design. He especially dazzled with a 2004 mini-series, DC: The New Frontier, which would later become an animated feature. Everything he wrote and/or drew is well worth checking out.

Did I make clear what a nice man he was? At conventions, we often talked — mostly about Jack — and you could always feel the passion he had, along with the urge to draw better and better. We were all quite satisfied with what he had done but he never was. It's so awful to lose someone like that.

Today's Video Link

Michael Feinstein is (of course) a fine musical performer and historian. Earlier in his life, he was the archivist for Ira Gershwin. Here's an hour of him discussing and performing the works of George and Ira…

Recommended Reading

Jonathan Chait summarizes something I have long believed about House Speaker Paul Ryan. Ryan talks a lot about how his main goal in government is to reduce the size of the deficit but his actions make it clear that's not so. His Number One Goal is for the rich to pay little or nothing in taxes and for the poor to get little or nothing in the way of government support. And there is no Number Two Goal.

Butts in Chairs

Paul Worthington, who describes himself as a "long time reader/first time correspondent" writes to ask…

As you have often noted in your writing posts, a key requirement for career success is simply doing the hard work. As many other writers I follow say, it's putting your butt in the chair, and writing every day.

My question: How do you build up this self-discipline? It seems you've always had it. Is that the case?

I have been lucky to have a successful journalism career, but it was based on innate talent (which I was gifted with, not that I earned or deserve) much more than regular hard work. Now I am attempting to write novels, and that simply requires much more regular effort than I've ever maintained for a long time.

It's something of a chicken/egg quandary: These days it's become business/career conventional wisdom to point out that the key to success is grit. Determination. Follow-through. Self-discipline. But it seems to me, an admittedly lazy coaster, that if you don't innately have grit, you can't simply develop it — because the discipline to develop it requires grit in the first place!

I'm not the guy to answer this, Paul, because I came to my career from the opposite direction. I became a writer because I loved writing. Even when I had no audience and no glimmerings of a paycheck, I had zero problem putting my smaller-than-it-is-now butt in the chair and writing every day. I have always looked askance at the Dorothy Parker quote, "I hate writing but I love having written." I always think, "If you hate writing, you'd be nuts to choose that for your life's work."

So no, I didn't have to build up much self-discipline. There are occasionally times when I don't like what I have to write — or don't like having to write it in the limited time I have before the absolute deadline — but those are small problems. And to me, the key to dealing with a small problem is to treat it as small problem and not over-dramatize it into a big one. (When friends come to me for help with what they think are Big Problems, my first advice is usually to tell them that what they have is a Small Problem and shouldn't treat it as anything more than that.)

Basically, writing comes down to this: Do the job or don't do the job. Just don't decide to do the job and then complain about having to do the job. No, it's not always easy. It's not supposed to always be easy. Neither are most things in life that you may decide are worth doing.

Mushroom Soup Thursday

mushroomsoup216

We're going Mushroom Soup today — and for those of you who don't know what that means, it means this: The proprietor of this blog is very busy and unlikely to be posting at his usual pace. It means that barring some unexpected, can't-wait obit, this may be the extent of the new content here today. Why is this denoted by Mushroom Soup? No one knows and no one cares.

No, I'm not worried that Donald Trump is going to beat Hillary Clinton, nor do I think recent polls really point in that direction. It's 179 days until Election Day. Much will happen that will render as irrelevant everything that seemed relevant in May. Donald said the other day he's going to carry the state of New York. You know New York: The state that has gone two-for-one for the Democrat in the last half-dozen presidential elections? Yeah, that New York.

And hey, how long is it going to be before everyone catches on that Trump statements have a shelf life of three days max? He says it on Monday and by Thursday, even he doesn't think it exists anymore. Heck, lately he's been saying things like that the U.S. can default on its debts and his own staff is walking it back within the hour. It's all just noise to get coverage today and his supporters — so far — don't seem to care that he reverses positions like a porn star.

What else can I write about here before I get back to paying work? I'm liking Stephen Colbert's show a tad less since their new showrunner did some revamping. I don't see that it's made any difference in the ratings yet.

manwithxrayeyes01

This evening, Turner Classic Movies is running X – The Man with the X-Ray Eyes, the cheapo 1963 Roger Corman horror movie with Ray Milland, Don Rickles and Harold J. Stone. One day many years ago, I found myself watching it on TV with Mr. Stone in the room. His character dies about ten minutes into it and he said as we watched that scene, "I guess I was lucky. I didn't have to be in the rest of the movie." At the time, this film made a lot of money because moviegoers thought (wrongly) they were going to see a lot of nudity. I'm surprised no one has remade it today when they could.

That's all for now. Back soon.

Today's Video Link

David Axelrod, who was Chief Strategist for Barack Obama's presidential campaign, has a podcast. Here's a video of the show he just did with Jon Stewart. This is for those of us who really, really miss Jon Stewart…

Recommended Reading

The folks over at fivethirtyeight.com think it's pretty unlikely that there's going to be a third-party presidential candidate this year. That's not counting the ones from the organizations already set up like the Green Party and Libertarian Party. But those parties might get a little bump this time from folks who just plain don't want to vote for Trump or Hillary.

Kat Guy

Andy Hoffman has a question…

Did you ever meet or work with the surrealist cartoonist and drawer of cats, B. "Hap" Kliban?

In one of Sergio's Groo introductions, he drew a signed Kliban illustration hanging on the wall of his studio.

There's also the 1977 fanzine that includes a letter you wrote and a cover by Kliban called Where the Beer and the Cantaloupe Play.

I've been reading your blog for years and have found no mention of him. There is very little information available on Kliban, so it would be great if you had any to share for all the fans of his work.

Meet? Yeah, a few times at Comic-Con Internationals back when they were called by other names. We had lunch one time and he was on a couple of panels I moderated. Here…I have this photo of the two of us from one of those panels…

mekliban01

I'm afraid though I didn't get a lot of info about the man from the limited time we spent together. He seemed like a private kind o' guy who was pretty much willing to talk about any topic but himself or cartooning. He had some pretty firm views on morality and censorship and especially about women. A few of them made me uncomfy but not to the point where I couldn't get along with him.

The disinterest in cartooning seemed oddly appropriate to me, coming as it did from a person whose approach and style seemed largely divorced from anything that had come before. I think that was one of the things that was so impressive about his work. He didn't seem to be doing a variation on something you'd seen before. His drawings were highly organic and natural and usually very funny. He had suddenly gotten very popular and seemed a tad embarrassed that he was making more money off merchandising than he was from the cartooning itself. When I mentioned that I had a Kliban Cat shower curtain in my home, he winced and muttered something like "I wish you hadn't told me that."

He was besieged a lot at those cons for sketches. This was back when a lot of artists did free ones at conventions and the main reason to not do them was that if you got started, you might spend your entire convention doing nothing else. I asked him, after he'd done about a dozen in quick succession for attendees, if he was sick of people asking him for sketches. He said, "Not half as sick as I am of people asking me what the 'B' stands for. I heard, though not from him, that it stood for Bernard.

Here's a photo I took of him doing a sketch for somebody. And I didn't ask him for one but when he saw I had a sketchbook that I was passing around for others to draw in, he grabbed it up and inserted an unsolicited pussycat…

bkliban01

I didn't really work with him on anything but…well, here's the story. Around '83, I was writing for an animation producer who called me in one day and told me he'd acquired the rights to do a prime-time cartoon special based on the Kliban Cats. ABC, he said, had already said they wanted it, subject to the studio coming up with an acceptable script. "They're so hot on it," he told me, "this could easily become a weekly series."

I was a bit puzzled as Mr. Kliban's cats had never appeared in any sort of story continuity, nor did they seem to have names or established personalities or much consistency from drawing to drawing. The producer told me, "You'll have to invent all of that." I was not the first writer he'd had take a stab at this. Another one — someone I didn't know at all — had written an outline which everyone thought went way, way off in the wrong direction. "I'm not even going to show it to you," he said. "I want you to start clean."

I told him I knew Kliban and asked if I should contact him or if we were going to have meetings or anything. The producer said no, that wouldn't be necessary. "We're licensing the rights to do whatever we want with the material. He doesn't want to be involved." I was handed a Xeroxed packet of Kliban cat drawings. There were about seven cats who were to form the core cast of this special. For each of the seven, there were a few Kliban sketches of the cat from various angles, plus the writer before me had named each cat. The names were about the only thing he'd done that everyone liked so we were going to keep those. Everything else was up to me.

My agent firmed up a deal with this producer's lawyer for me to write a special/pilot for The Kliban Cats and I began work on an overview. I gave each cat a personality and a modus operandi and a way of relating to the other cats and I figured out where they lived, what they did, etc. ABC okayed it all with minor notes and I had just been sent off to write the actual pilot script when a San Diego Comic Convention occurred. When I told the producer I'd probably be seeing Kliban there, he said, "Great! Fill him in a little on what we're doing."

I ran into B. the first day of the con and he greeted me warmly. I told him I was working on the TV show based on his characters. He said, "What TV show based on my characters?" I told him all about the project. He knew nothing about any such deal and ran off to his hotel room to call…well, someone — his agent or his lawyer or his publisher or…I don't know who he called.

An hour or two later though, he said to me, "I'm glad you told me about this." As near as we could figure out, here's what happened: He was against doing this kind of thing, at least for now. His reps thought he should so when they got the inquiry from the producer's lawyer, they said in effect, "Yes, the rights are available. Give us your best offer and we'll present it to our client." They were thinking that a huge offer might change his mind. If it didn't, no harm done. And then, since no firm offer was made, they never told him at all.

B. said he didn't really want his characters animated, at least for television at that time and certainly not for the kind of money that a studio like that was talking about. He definitely wasn't about to make the kind of deal the producer had told me they'd made, where he just sells the rights and lets the buyer do whatever they want with it. He thanked me repeatedly for letting him know about it and apologized that the steps he and his reps were about to take — calling the studio, reminding them there was no deal and there would not be one — would cost me some money. That did sorta happen but that didn't bother me. I mean, it was his work. He had not only the legal but also the moral right to control what was done with it.

Sure enough, the Monday after the con, the producer called me and said to stop work on the script. His lawyer, he said, had screwed things up somehow, telling him the deal had been made when it hadn't been. Apparently, the attorney was wrongly certain a deal would be made with Kliban's reps and that it was safe to start on the development. This kind of thing happens more often than one might think.

I am not sure why but often in Hollywood, the parties come to a verbal understanding on some transaction, work starts based on the belief that "we have a deal" and then the paperwork that enshrines that deal follows, sometimes weeks or even months later. Occasionally, getting that paperwork drafted and signed requires additional negotiation. I was once halfway through writing a screenplay for a movie when the two sides began arguing over the terms they'd settled on months earlier and the whole thing was called off. And a year or two after the whole Kliban project I'm telling you about, the exact same thing happened to me at another studio regarding another famous property that the studio was sure they'd acquired. But they hadn't.

Think that's impossible? Wait. A few years earlier — in 1978 — Filmation Studios produced a Saturday morning series for NBC called The Fabulous Funnies. It featured animated versions of popular newspaper strips of the day such as Broom-Hilda, Alley Oop, Nancy and Tumbleweeds. The Monday after the first episode aired, Filmation's lawyers heard from Tom Ryan, creator and owner of Tumbleweeds. It seems each of the lawyers thought someone else in their office had made a deal with Ryan for the rights…but no one had.

Once Kliban's attorneys shut things down, the producer I was working for decided to try and salvage the project. ABC liked what I was writing and as brilliant as B. Kliban was, he didn't own the concept of a band of cats. The decision was made to remove everything Kliban did own by designing different cats that looked nothing like his. A new cartoonist redesigned the cast in a completely different style and his work was so good that ABC said they'd still buy the special, not for prime-time but for Saturday morning. That meant a new production schedule, one that was so tight that I had to call in another writer to help me finish the script on time.

Voice actors were auditioned, selected and recorded, then animation commenced. I think they were about halfway through animating the show when a new problem popped out of nowhere, as new problems tend to do. An Associate Producer at the studio was cleaning out his office when he came upon a set of the Kliban cat drawings that had started the whole endeavor. The drawings were the same ones that had been given to me but on mine, the names of the characters — the names that had been supposedly bestowed upon them by the writer who had preceded me — were typed. On this set, they were handwritten in — in the handwriting of B. Kliban. How, the A.P. wondered, did that happen?

A hurried internal investigation yielded the answer: Kliban, not the writer I replaced, had named the cats. And those names were heard in the dialogue that had been recorded for the show that was now well into production.

New names were chosen for them — names with the same number of syllables. Then about half the voice actors had to be called back in so the lines in which the characters' names were mentioned could be replaced. That meant those actors had to be paid for another day's work even though most of them just did one or two lines — or in one case, just yelled one name. The studio was so happy to have to spend that money, he said sarcastically.

Finally, the special was finished and it aired and no one said anything about turning it into a series. It didn't turn out badly but I suspect its roots as a kind of bastard concoction made it feel like a less-than-inspired notion.

The following year down in San Diego, I told Kliban the entire story. He laughed and said, "You know, I realized later on that maybe what I should have done was to let them animate it and then sue them for a whole ton of money." Then he added, "If you'd agreed to testify that you never told me about it, I would have cut you in on the deal."

Today's Video Link

The other day, President Obama delivered a commencement speech at Howard University. It ran 45 minutes but you might want to watch it because it's a pretty good speech…

It was not, as some might have expected or even hoped, 45 minutes of Trump-bashing or even Republican-bashing. Much of it was critical of those on the left who demand immediate revolution. A lot of it will strike his critics as self-serving but as one who agrees with his main thesis — that America is a much better place than it was when he graduated high school — I don't see any way he could say that without implying a few victory laps.

How did this happen? Well, here's a lift from Obama's speech that strikes me as true…

If you think that the only way forward is to be as uncompromising as possible, you will feel good about yourself, you will enjoy a certain moral purity, but you're not going to get what you want. And if you don't get what you want long enough, you will eventually think the whole system is rigged. And that will lead to more cynicism, and less participation, and a downward spiral of more injustice and more anger and more despair. And that's never been the source of our progress. That's how we cheat ourselves of progress.

I suppose some will take that as a swing at Bernie Sanders supporters. Some of the ones who've written me could stand to learn a message that Obama repeats several times in this speech: "Passion is vital but you've got to have a strategy." I would be quite happy to see Bernie Sanders as our Chief Exec but I'm kinda repulsed by the belief, expressed by those who think Trump will destroy America, that Trump would be preferable to not getting Bernie. It reminds me a lot of the folks to whom Jon Stewart has occasionally said, "You're confusing not getting everything you want with an attack on your religion."

After I started writing the above, I noticed that Jonathan Chait, a political writer I like, had noted Obama's speech and he wrote this about it. I'm not necessarily in agreement with the parts about "political correctness." That term is being used so widely with so many disparate definitions, that I think it's become largely useless. Clearly, what a lot of people think it means when they use it is not what a lot of others mean when they use it. But I do agree with Mr. Chait (and I guess, the President) that establishment politics is working in this country. It's not working as fully and quickly as some would like but the other kind ain't working at all.