Category Archives: Uncategorized

This article in the L.A. Times [might make you register] discusses how the Disney folks are trying to resuscitate the popularity of Kermit, Miss Piggy and other Muppet characters. They'll be in two new commercials on Super Bowl Sunday.

The reporter probably didn't intend it as such but there's a sentence in the article that may nail the problem. It's the one that goes, "Every division at the company is contributing ideas to the renewal project." I have no inside info on what's going on over there but I do have some experience of seeing great characters get battered about in intra-corporate custody battles. The main problem those characters face is that they will never have another person as creative as Jim Henson guiding their fortunes. Even if someone that brilliant did come along, he'd never get the kind of authority and control that Henson had.

Speaking of Muppets: You may recall that last December, we noted here that the Internet Movie Database said that I had played the role of Ernie in his brief cameo in The Muppet Movie. I sent the folks there a message that said quite clearly that I had nothing whatsoever to do with that fine film and that the puppet (which did not speak in the movie) was operated by my friend, Earl Kress. Well, I'm pleased to note that the Internet Movie Database has changed their listing. Unfortunately, they've changed it to say that I just did the voice while Earl operated the puppet. In light of this, I'm going to do what any reasonable, sane person would do in such a situation. I'm going to give up.

Hey, we haven't checked lately to see if Abe Vigoda is alive.

The following message is from Bob Rivard. I'll meet you on the other side of it and reply.

I'm curious why the lack of commentary in support of the Danish cartoonists now hiding in fear for their lives from Islamofascist butchers? I know that threats of beheading and torture aren't quite as "chilling" as when conservatives merely criticize Doonesbury, The Boondocks, or Tedd Rall, but maybe the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund could divert some resources from protecting America's fearless cartoonists from Chimpy W. Hitler and offer support? I seem to recall your speaking up on behalf of cartoonists every once in a while, or is that some other website I'm thinking of?

Did I miss school the day the Danes invaded Iraq, supported Israel or suppressed Palestinians? Surely those notorious Danish imperialists brought this on themselves? Or maybe…just maybe…there really is, embedded in almost every country now, a death-welcoming fanatical murdering cult out there. One whose fundamental precepts, as they themselves express them, are really…get ready for a four letter word…evil. A cult which cannot be appeased, ignored, or convinced to accept diverse co-existence. One whose fundamental belief asks us to convert, supplicate, or die.

Does this make it any more clear what we might be fighting about in the middle east? Or 5 years ago in Manhattan?

In response to your first paragraph, there are two reasons I haven't posted anything yet about the Danish cartoonists. One is that I've been awfully busy with non-blogging concerns, including a script that's due and some personal and more pressing matters. I've had time to post fluff but not to really read up on the threats against these cartoonists and then — and here comes the second reason — to figure out what, beyond the obvious, I could add to the dialogue. I mean, we're all smart enough to operate computers. Don't we know that beheadings and torture, and threats thereof, are always wrong? They're wrong when used against cartoonists. They're wrong when used against non-cartoonists. Do you really need a guy who writes a weblog about possums in his backyard and Groo the Wanderer to come out against beheadings and torture? That's really going to make a difference.

And if you think I've discussed anyone's criticisms of Boondocks or Tedd Rall (isn't it Ted?) then yes, I think you're thinking of some other weblog. I have suggested that people who believe Doonesbury skews exclusively liberal are overlooking its savaging of Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy and others but that's not at all an issue of government censorship. (I also didn't get around to writing anything about the Joint Chiefs of Staff of this country protesting a recent political cartoon by Tom Toles. If I had, it would have been that I think they have every right to protest such things but that all they're doing is looking thin-skinned and making a hero out of Toles.)

Frankly, I've never found your four-letter word very practical for discussing real-world problems and their possible solutions. Something motivates people who commit terror and atrocities and it isn't that Satan gives them marching orders and sends them out to destroy lives for no reason. I think my attitude is more like, "Okay, they're evil. Now let's move past that and figure out what to do about them."

No, I'm afraid it doesn't make it any clearer what we might be fighting about in the middle east. In fact, I'm finding that with each passing week and every Bush and/or Cheney speech, I'm less clear on what we're hoping to accomplish in Iraq and I see even less connection to 9/11. It isn't that I don't think there aren't folks out there — more than ever, I'm afraid — who pray for more American deaths. It's that I'm losing the thread of why what we're doing over there is making things better. Judging from the polls, I'm not alone.

I'll write more about this when I get more time. Which may not be for a while.

I was intrigued by Paul Davidson's identification of Danny Teeson as the dancer who played Mr. Six, the elderly gent in the Six Flags commercial, and I decided to do a bit of Internet sleuthing on my own. The top picture above is a cut from the website of Professional Vision Care Associates, which is a firm here in California that specializes in unusual contact lens sets and other eye-related special effects for movies. On their site, they have a Client List and as you can see, it says that they did some work for Mr. Six in a Six Flags commercial. Okay.

The second picture above is from the Google cache of that page, meaning that it's what Google saw on the site a few days ago. As you can see, in the exact same place, the client is identified as Danny Teeson. (The colors on the various words indicate that those were the search words I used to find the page.) Here's a link to the cache page, though it will probably be gone very shortly.

There are a couple of possibilities here, one being that some expertly-crafted hoax is at work here…though I can't imagine why. But it sure looks like Mr. Six was played by Mr. Teeson and also that someone had the Professional Vision Care people change their website in the last few days to remove his name. And that's all the detective work I have time for now. Good night.

This fine specimen of possumhood was caught nibbling cat food on my back steps not ten minutes ago. Nice of the neighborhood cats to leave him some of their dinner, don't you think?

Hey, remember those commercials for the Six Flags amusement parks that featured an extremely-senior citizen dancing his heart out? The character's name was Mr. Six and at the time, there was a colossal mystery as to who was playing him under all that make-up. Six Flags seems to have dumped the campaign but blogger Paul Davidson was determined to find out who portrayed the spry Mr. Six…and he claims to have the inside info.

The schedule is up for programming at this year's WonderCon, which commences a week from tomorrow in San Francisco. Here's the list for Friday, here's the list for Saturday and here's the list for Sunday…but you needn't click on any of them. If you're attending, you'll only want to attend my panels. You can get a list of them by clicking below.

Today on our sister site, Old TV Tickets, we offer up one from The Danny Thomas Show. And that seemed like as good a reason as any to post the covers to the two Danny Thomas Show comic books published by Dell. The great Alex Toth was hired to illustrate the one at left and, he says, that meant taking the artwork over to gain the approval of Mr. Thomas, himself. Though Danny had made a lot of money mocking the size of his own nose, he complained (Alex says) it was too large in the comic…but grudgingly allowed it to go to press as Toth drew it. The second and final issue was drawn by Russ Manning.

Please note: These are real covers of real comic books that were actually published. I did not whip them up in Photoshop.

Some of the Broadway shows that have opened in Las Vegas haven't done well but more are heading to Nevada. Meanwhile, The Producers is a big hit in Israel.

Note to self: Remind your blog readers that the first lady of animation voicing, June Foray, is on The Ellen DeGeneres Show on Wednesday, February 8.

Message before last, I said that George W. Bush has — and I quote myself — "…this tendency to announce things and then forget about them." This brought two incensed, outraged e-mails from Bush supporters informing me that Bush is a man of convictions, that his word is like gold, that he has the integrity to do what he says, yadda yadda yadda. To these folks, I offer this news item that appeared on the wires less than 24 hours after the State of the Union address. Here's the first paragraph…

WASHINGTON – One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic adviser said Wednesday that the president didn't mean it literally.

That's one of the problems I have with Bush: He rarely means anything literally. When he said during the 2000 elections that he was against "nation-building," he didn't mean it literally. When he pledged money to rebuild Manhattan after 9/11 or New Orleans after Katrina, he didn't mean it literally. Not long ago, when he said that wiretaps require a warrant, he didn't mean it literally and when he signed a bill that outlawed torture, he immediately issued a "signing statement" that asserted his right not to follow the bill he'd just signed. He even hides behind the tactic. At one point, he and his administration very much wanted us all to believe, as they apparently did, that there was a provable link between Saddam Hussein and the guys who hit us on 9/11. When this turned not to be provable, the administration fallback was that they really didn't mean it.

I sometimes debate about this man with friends who say they like him because he takes bold action and he's a man of conviction. Personally, I think "bold action" is a negative unless it's coupled with some qualifier…like, say, the right "bold action" or the smart "bold action." And as for being a man of conviction, I'm sorry. I just don't see it. I see a guy who was told our country was under attack and sat and read My Pet Goat for seven minutes. I see a guy who announces Big Plans, like building a space station on Mars…and then he lets them wither away and anonymous aides have to go around and say, "He didn't mean that literally."

I don't hate the man. Dismissing someone as a "Bush-hater" is a too common way of trying to not deal with legitimate criticisms of a guy we elected to do an important job. I don't wish him ill or failure or anything negative because, as far as I'm concerned, he's driving the bus we're on and if he drives off the road, we all crash and burn. He just keeps failing to convince me that he knows where he's going or how to get there.

Nevertheless, he is our president and he has my support. Of course, I don't mean that literally.

Fred Kaplan on the State of the Union address.

Mark is very busy for the next day or three so don't expect a lot of wonderment on this page. If you're starved for something media-related to read, I have some new posts up over at my Old TV Tickets site. Read all about Saturday Night Live With Howard Cosell, The Newlywed Game and other classics.

I caught some of the State of the Union address and agree with those who say these things are always boring and that there's a strong level of phoniness regarding what the assemblage does and does not clap for. With George W. Bush, there's an extra layer of artifice because he has this tendency to announce things and then forget about them. How's that hydrogen car program going?

You get the feeling that Bush's poll numbers are pretty much frozen at about a 39%-41% approval rating? That nothing short of dragging Bin Laden in with his bare hands is going to help him much? No one seems to want to say that because the right-wing media doesn't want to believe it and the non-right-wing media is trying too hard to prove they're not the left-wing media. And hey, what's with Chris Matthews and a few other reporters, who seem to flip a coin before each on-camera appearance and decide if Bush is in trouble or making a spectacular comeback? Make up your mind, people, and cite some real evidence to support whichever position you take. A lot of this seems to me like trying to pretend there's important political news when there isn't any.

Back to deadlines…

I'm still sifting through e-mails in response to my question about tipping. But I thought it was worth posting and replying to this message I received from Mike Guerrero…

Even though this is only slightly related to your question, I hope either you or your readers can help me out. Are we as a society at the point where we can't question the act of tipping? [or have we been here all this time, and no one told me about it?] Should I just stop asking why I have to subsidize the service economy?

If a plate with Filet Mignon weighs about the same as a plate of spaghetti and meatballs, why do I have to tip more?

At the very least, I'd like to know where the boundary line between what the employer's paying for, and what my tip is paying for. In the example you gave, isn't the bellhop supposed to handle your baggage for you? Unless I'm mistaken, he was likely hired by the hotel to do just that, among other things. If we're talking about asking someone in the next room to carry your bags, that's a different story.

Is the tip a plea so your bags won't get thrown down the stairs, or rifled through by the staff? Or is it a bribe so they'll do it to someone else's? And what if they did it anyway? "Wow, that meal was great. And, because I said no pickles and there were no pickles, I'll throw in another 8%"

I will admit, so far in my life I've yet to work in a field where tipping was a part of my livelihood, so my perspective might be skewed.

Look, Ticketmaster sticks you for a "service charge." Why can't other places do it too? At least you won't have to wonder what formula to use, or you could choose to avoid places that have them.

I think there's a pragmatic answer to this and a philosophical one. The pragmatic is that there's a well-established economic model here and it presumes there will be tipping. Yes, the hotel pays the bellhop to carry guests' bags but they pay them a salary which is insufficient on its own and only becomes a living wage when tip money is added in. With some jobs where tipping is assumed, the Internal Revenue Service not only withholds part of the employees' salary but a portion of some rough estimate of their tips, as well. I've known people who essentially lived off tips. If they gave me lousy, insulting service, I might be able to justify not tipping. But I wouldn't want to cost them part of what they need to pay their rent just because I don't like the inconvenience of tipping.

I used to struggle with how much to tip in certain situations, and think like you do; that it would be great if they'd just institute fixed service charges. That way, the waiters and valet car parkers and everyone could take home the same pay and I'd be relieved of the responsibility to figure out who gets 15% and who gets 20% and whether you tip everyone who assists you in some venues or just the last guy. Eventually though, I learned what to do in most (not all) situations and I came to see it as a nicetie and not a hardship. Which brings us to the philosophical answer.

My "tipping policy" is something I stole from Bill Gaines, the publisher of MAD. His philosophy was to give standard, non-exorbitant gratuities to service employees he didn't expect to ever see again, and to tip lavishly in places to which he'd probably return soon. So I tip 15% in a strange restaurant and somewhat more in my regular places. It's a matter of establishing a bit of relationship with the folks who work there; of telling them you appreciate them. Some customers are enormously rude to food servers, car parkers, cleaning ladies, etc. I'd like to make it clear I'm not one of those rude people. Over the years, there have been many occasions where tipped employees have done way more than the minimum and helped me out, so it's been a wise investment. But that's not why I do it. I do it because it's a less impersonal way of saying "thank you" than paying a fixed service charge. And, speaking of tips…

You've been hearing that Jack Abramhoff is a very bad man. Here, in the Jewish Journal, a writer-friend of his presents a different view. I don't think I buy it but on this site, we sometimes link to something just because it offers a unique way of looking at someone or something.