Here's something I find annoying. This is on the L.A. Times website this morning…

Wet Christmas Eve in the forecast for Southern California

Christmas Eve will see a 70% chance of rain as a series of new winter storms moves through the area.

Sunday will experience possible showers in the morning but will clear by the afternoon, according to the National Weather Service.

Another storm will move in Monday, but officials said the rain could move out by Monday night.

Cloudy skies are on tap for Christmas Day, and another storm is expected later in the week.

The weather service said snow levels will be around 5,500 feet.

The storms will be stronger along the Central Coast and lose some of their power when they get to Southern California, officials said.

The headline and lede are wrong or at least misleading. Christmas Eve might wind up being wet in Southern California but that's not what the National Weather Service is predicting. Here is a quote from the actual forecast that was issued this morning at 4:36 AM and which has not changed. (The Times piece was posted at 8:14 AM.)

Steady rain with the next system will arrive on the central coast this afternoon… and will reach the Los Angeles basin around midnight. This will be another fairly fast moving system… and rain will end in most areas Monday morning. Dry conditions are forecast for Christmas eve night and Christmas day.

See? The forecast is for the rain to be over Monday morning in most areas and for Christmas Eve night to be dry. But if you read the Times paraphrase, you'd think the N.W.S. was predicting rain for most of Monday with a chance of it ending by Monday night. The difference could matter a lot if you're planning a party for tomorrow evening…as many are.

The L.A. Times is a pretty good paper but like most, it has this idea that reporters have to report, not quote. Instead of just copying the National Weather Service report — which is written in plain, perfectly-understandable English — they have some Times staffer read the exact same bulletin that any of us could find on the web, then rephrase it for no good purpose. This person probably thought of the term "Christmas Eve" as denoting the entire day, which I suppose is technically correct. There is a forecast for rain on Monday, December 24 but most folks will look at the phrase "Wet Christmas Eve" and not understand that the N.W.S. isn't, at this time, predicting rain in the evening.

Sorry to hear of the passing of Larry L. King, one of my favorite authors. Judging from his many autobiographical writings, I don't think I'd have liked the man a lot in person but it sure was fun and enlightening to read him, especially when he wrote about writing. About a third of his works were on that topic and it was always interesting to observe how his mind worked…and how at times, it didn't. He did a book called None But a Blockhead that won't teach you how to write except in the sense that reading anything well-written teaches you a little about writing. But I found it helpful in coming to some realizations about what I did for a living and what it meant, socially and personally. He did a book called The Whorehouse Papers which was a diary of the making of The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas, a musical he co-authored. He also wrote some very fine books and articles about politics and about folks in that arena he knew well like Nelson Rockefeller and Bobby Baker.

Few of his books seem to be in print at the moment. This may be the only one and it's not his best work. But he's not hard to find via the used book market, especially if you remember that there have been at least four different Larry Kings (and one Larry L. King) who have written books but are not him. If you come across one cheap, grab it and see if you like him as much as I do.

Here's the New York Times obit on him and in case you've used up your quota of stories you're allowed to read there for December, here's a link to the L.A. Times obit.

As I seem to not have mentioned here in a week or more, my favorite musical comedy is A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum and I go see almost every production of it I can. This means I've seen some ghastly productions of A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum but I've also seen some wonderful ones. The wonderful ones more than made up for the bad ones…and I will say this: Even a bad one always manages to get at least one huge laugh that I've never heard in any other production. The show is very malleable within certain limits and it leaves a lot of room for its actors to invent new stuff.

I am not going to see the new production which stars Geoffrey Rush but that's only because it's in Melbourne, Australia. I'm sure Melbourne is a lovely place with much to offer but I can't think of a single thing I'd enjoy so much that it would be worth fifteen hours on an airplane. I recently turned down being Guest of Honor at a big comic convention in India and its promoter wrote me and asked, "What can we do to make you reconsider?" I wrote him back, "Move it to Santa Monica." I don't think he's going to do this.

About six hours on a plane is my limit…my loss. Because I'll bet this is a wonderful staging of a great show. Here's a snippet…

Fred Kaplan on the nomination of John Kerry as Secretary of State. I must admit that while I assume Kerry will do a good job, I'm so sick of elections that I don't like the creation of a new one — the campaign to select his replacement in the Senate — that we will all have to care about.  Wasn't there anyone else?

If you're discussing Gun Control with someone and don't yourself know a lot about firearms, you might want to read this Idiot's Guide to them.

The most-read thing I've ever put on the Internet was my Christmasy Mel Tormé anecdote. The recent Larry Hagman tale may eventually top it but the Tormé piece is much-linked…and also stolen. I've seen at least a dozen websites just copy the whole thing and post it with no credit or link to me. A couple of sites — including a blog run by someone who claims to be an intellectual property lawyer — did that with the Hagman essay, too.

Anyway, here is a link to the Mel Tormé story. It's also brought me a lot of mail including separate messages from two of his five children, one of whom remembered him telling them about the incident. I liked those messages a lot.

Oh — in case you haven't figured it out, the above photo is a recent one I took at the scene where the story took place — Farmers Market. The table in the foreground is roughly in the position where I recall the one at which Mr. Tormé was seated.

The JibJab folks have a pretty good "year end" video…and if you remember, I used to complain about what they passed off as rhymes in their songs, pretending certain words rhymed when they didn't. Well, this one was written with a lot more thought and care. They try to rhyme "child" with "style" and then "mom" with "along" and "wrong." But most of it's quite fine…

A lot of folks have sent me links to articles that they hope will convince me that it is possible (or even likely) that Congress will pass meaningful Gun Control legislation. I remain unconvinced…but really, folks. If there really is a chance, my skepticism won't stop it. Convincing me won't make it any more likely.

And I never doubted it was possible. I doubt they'll do it.

Hey, here's another prediction on this: The N.R.A. will say all sorts of things about responsible gun use and how they certainly want to stop incidents like the one in Newtown. And then they'll throw every possible roadblock in front of anything that might make a difference. Anyone want to argue that one?

I mentioned a moment ago that people at CBS seem absolutely terrified of doing anything to displease David Letterman. It's another thing he has in common with Johnny Carson who scared the hell out of everyone at NBC. He scared people outside NBC, too. The best example I can give you is back from 2005 when he passed away. An article moved by the Associated Press included the following…

Carson often had a cigarette in hand in the early years of "Tonight," eventually dropping the on-air habit when smoking on TV became frowned on. But he remained a heavy smoker for some years afterward, said a former associate who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Get that. Johnny is dead and yet someone who once worked for him is still afraid to be quoted directly saying that Johnny didn't quit smoking when his viewers thought he had. This is not atypical. There are lots of stories you hear about Carson that have somehow never made it to print. A new book that's coming out soon may change that.

Henry Bushkin was Johnny's lawyer and business partner for many years. You may recall Mr. Carson making reference to his business manager, "Bombastic Bushkin," who got him into some odd business deals like a Big Man's Shop in Tokyo or a tanning salon for albinos. Jokes like that. In reality, Mr. Bushkin was involved in some very good deals with Johnny…although I seem to recall that the relationship did not end well and that they parted company at some point. Since then, Bushkin has been one of the few real Carson associates willing to be quoted about him in less than glowing terms.

Around the time of Carson's passing, Bushkin was shopping around a "warts and all" book about his one-time client. The book seems to be emerging via the Carson360 website. (Quick explanation: The license plate on Carson's BMW was 360 GUY, i.e., "all-around guy." And it was not a personalized, made-to-order plate. It was just the one the state randomly assigned to him.)

The site appears to be operated by Bushkin's co-author to herald and take pre-orders for the forthcoming book, A Hard Act to Follow. I couldn't find anything there that told me how forthcoming it might be but there are some excerpts there you can read right now. As soon as it looks like it's about to come out, I'm going to order one and I'll let you know how it is.

Here's a CBS interview of a CBS star that everyone at CBS is terrified of pissing off. Still, Mr. Letterman does say some interesting things about his stature and deals briefly with comparisons between him and Johnny Carson. One key difference is that during most of Carson's tenure, his show held a near-monopoly on the making of young comedians' careers, whereas there are now many routes. So you can make a long list of comedians who became stars after a few good appearances with Johnny, whereas very few have soared because Dave or Jay had them on. Even Carson didn't (or couldn't) do that for very many during his final years.

I used to be a huge fan of both Letterman and Leno, and both were TiVoed every night. At some point, Dave's crankiness got to me and I now only record him when he has on a guest (like Albert Brooks, recently) I especially want to see. Nothing on those episodes causes me to want to retake my Season Pass. I still record Leno every night but I fast forward through any bit built on the foundation of people being willing to look foolish on camera — there are a lot of them — and I usually don't stick around for the second guest interview and sometimes not for the first.

I still like the monologues and Jay's general attitude. The guy likes his work and he likes his guests and he likes performing. I assume some or all of that is true of Dave but he sure tries to hide it. As I get older, I find myself less inclined to view a snide, sardonic attitude as cool or sophisticated. I like people who are unafraid to like things.

You may have heard the rumor that it's been decided that when Leno's current contract runs out in 2014, he'll step aside for Jimmy Fallon. It's not impossible this has been set but I'm more inclined to believe it's something that's currently under discussion, to perhaps be activated if the ratings continue on their current trajectory. And why before deciding that, wouldn't they wait to see how Jimmy Kimmel's relocation to 11:35 impacts everything in that time slot? NBC got in trouble once before by deciding (wrongly) that Jay's ratings would be going down so they'd better commit now to replacing him later. Are they really prepared to make that same mistake again? Maybe.

Anyway, here's Dave. You may have to watch a 30 second spot to get to the interview…

Here's a good profile of Jerry Seinfeld, among other things a man who owns "a few dozen" Porsches.

Seinfeld and Jay Leno are among the few comedians I've ever read about who seem to genuinely enjoy the stand-up life, jetting from town to town to do their acts. A great many comics enjoy it in the short-run but see it as a means to an end: A way of showcasing one's self to get a movie deal, a sitcom, a role on a series, etc. They don't do it much if at all once the other things kick in and start paying off. Leno is big on the "use it or lose it" philosophy and doesn't count his nightly Tonight Show monologues as batting practice. He has to get out and perform his well-honed stand-up act several times a week. So, apparently does the guy with all the Porsches.

Up in the Hollywood & Highland complex in Hollywood, there's this great theater that used to be called the Kodak but is now called the Dolby. It's where they do the Academy Awards and lately, the only other thing in the place has been a Cirque du Soleil show called Iris. For some reason, that seems to be pronounced "ear-reese."

The show cost a fortune to open there, some of which came in the form of a loan from the city. We'll be hearing more about that. it was supposed to stay there 'til just past forever but recently announced a closing date of January 19. Why the disappointing run? Most folks seem to be blaming high ticket prices and I think that's likely it. Cirque du Soleil shows, as wonderful as they can be, do have a way of making you feel someone is picking your pocket. Atop steep costs to buy tix often come pushy V.I.P. upgrade offers, expensive refreshments, more expensive souvenirs and sometimes parking prices that are higher than any Cirque acrobat. In a fragile economy, it's gotta be tough for many families to justify the expense.

Carolyn got tickets for last night as a bonus for making a donation to Public Radio. Obviously, since biz is bad, the Cirque folks are making deals to sell them in bulk. We had pretty good seats and the place was not packed.

Price tag aside, there's nothing wrong with Iris except that it's a lot of the usual physical feats woven awkwardly into some sort of vague salute to moviemaking. People fly on trapeze-like contraptions and fabric ropes over your heads. Others do impossible leaps and flips. There is music by Danny Elfman. There are great sets and costumes that truly do range from the sublime to the ridiculous. There are clowns. Some of this has something to do with movies.

I could have done with less of the clowns and more of the amazing women who literally bend over backwards to please us, doing impossible balancing feats with impossible postures. I also really liked a troupe of men, some of whom balanced others on their feet.

But in terms of physical wonders, there didn't seem to be anything I hadn't seen before, making me wonder (again) if the Cirque folks just aren't spreading themselves wafer-thin. They still have the ability to dazzle me but they've lost that wonderful capability they once had to surprise. If you're in L.A. before it stops, look around and see if you can score some great discount tickets. If you can, it's a great show.

[P.S., added hours later: Yes, I know Cirque Du Soleil is French-Canadian, based in Quebec, not French as in "French surrender monkeys."  The headline was just a joke.]

Christmas wouldn't be Christmas without this, maybe my favorite short piece of holiday animation ever…