Tony Baloney

Ratings for Sunday night's Tony Awards were pretty bad. Some will fault the host or the production but I think that's ridiculous. People watch or don't watch the Tonys based on how they care about the shows that are nominated and want to see the excerpts. It really isn't all that different from sports. If you have two top teams with players that are in the news a lot and those teams meet in a game that might determine who wins the pennant, that game will have more tune-in than a game between two last-place teams with unknown players. No one complains that low ratings are because the crew that covers the game — the sportscasters, the director, etc. — didn't do a good job.

In past years, the Tonys got more tune-in because people had heard about The Producers or heard about The Book of Mormon. Some probably watched last year because the Spider-Man musical was so notorious at the time and there was a number from it. Even though there was a performance from Spider-Man this time, it's old news now. And Newsies and Once may be fine shows but they just haven't generated the excitement outside Times Square of past leading contenders.

I thought the telecast was fine and the worst thing you can say about it is that Neil Patrick Harris's opening song wasn't quite as exceptional as his opening song last year. Also, some people are reportedly complaining that the "In Memoriam" segment was presented during a commercial break and not televised. I still think N.P.H. is the best awards show host I've ever seen…and yes, that includes Johnny and Bob and Billy and everyone else. Hope he does it next year and the year after and the year after…

The Ray Bradbury-Julius Schwartz-Al Feldstein Story – Part 1

In the early fifties, EC Comics adapted a number of Ray Bradbury's short stories into comic book form with his permission. Before that, they adapted a number of them without his permission. The way most of their science-fiction, horror and crime comics were written was that publisher William M. Gaines would come up with what they called "springboards." A springboard was a rough plot and Gaines, who was not a writer but thought he knew a good story, would come up with dozens of them.

Some were original and some came from movies he'd seen, books he'd read, radio shows he'd listened to, etc. In other words, plagiarism. But it was usually that soft kind of plagiarism in which you take some, not all of the source material and you change it a lot and by the time it's completed, it isn't that much like the material you ripped-off. Sometimes though, it was more obvious.

Several days a week, Gaines's main editor-writer Al Feldstein would have to write a story for one of the comics he produced and Gaines would "pitch" springboard after springboard to Feldstein, hoping to interest Al in one of them. Al was fussy but he usually found one he liked and he'd go off and write it and then a fine artist like Jack Davis or Wally Wood would draw it. Once, he wrote one without realizing it was stolen from not one but two of Ray Bradbury's short stories. EC took "The Rocket Man" and "Kaleidoscope" and merged them into a story for Weird Fantasy #13 that wound up being called "Home to Stay."

Not long after its publication, the burglary was noticed by Mr. Bradbury but he did not go screaming to lawyers. He noted that the adaptation was well-done and that the two stories had been rather cleverly intertwined, the whole being greater than the sum of its parts, so to speak. Suing might cost a lot, he knew, and there probably wasn't much money to be collected…so he tried another approach. He wrote Gaines a letter that said, in essence, "You seem to have neglected to pay me for the adaptation of my work." Gaines sent a modest check, a brief correspondence ensued and EC wound up adapting many of Ray's stories on an official basis.

It was a mutually-beneficial relationship. Bradbury loved what they did with his work and he protected his copyrights and probably attracted some new readers to his books. EC got the prestige of his name on its covers. That seemed to boost sales a bit but it was probably more valuable that it gave EC a thin film of moral cover. The company was then under some volume of siege for the content of its comics and it helped a bit to tie their product in with Bradbury. He was, after all, a popular writer whose books were turning up in libraries and who had works in prestigious mainstream magazines. How could you dismiss EC's Tales from the Crypt as "trash" when one of its stories was being read in another form in schools? To say nothing of the fact that a lot of the non-Bradbury stories were not all that different in tone and taste from the Bradbury ones.

That didn't save EC's line from extinction, nor was it intended to. But Gaines thought it helped a little for a time.

During this period, Bradbury had little contact with Gaines and none whatsoever with Al Feldstein. When EC Comics ended in the mid-fifties, Feldstein and Bradbury had never met. They didn't meet in the sixties or the seventies or for the rest of that century.

In 2002, they finally met. It will probably take me three parts to tell this story but bear with me. It will be worth it.

Click here to jump to the next chapter of this story.

Recommended Reading

Michael Kinsley on the current U.S. attitude about going to war in or against other countries. A lot of folks on both sides of the political aisle are "fur it" or "agin' it."

Nixon's Five Wars

Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein have their first joint-byline in 36 years on this article that looks back on the Watergate Scandal and what that was all about. I'm afraid that the overriding lesson of Watergate was "Don't get caught."

Recommended Reading

Frank Bruni discusses the growing support for Gay Marriage among not just Republicans but more importantly, the kind of Republicans who control the G.O.P. agenda by donating large sums of cash to candidates. If you want to read an article that will convince you that same-sex couples will be freely marrying in a lot more states soon, this is the one.

Late-Breaking Stooge News

I'm still in Full-Press-Deadline Soup-Can Mode but I always come back from those for an important obit or an important bargain.  Our pal Vince Waldron calls to my attention that Amazon is now selling The Three Stooges: The Ultimate Collection for 45 bucks.  That's the complete run of their 190 Columbia shorts plus a mess of other appearances, features, etc. on 20 DVDs…so it works out to something like three cents for each poke-in-the-eyes and a dime for every time a Stooge found a live clam in his chowder.

Most of these DVDs were put out as solo releases but three, which mainly feature solo shorts of Shemp, Joe Besser and Curly Joe DeRita, are "bonus" discs not presently available as a standalone purchase.  So in a scenario all-too-familiar to those who've collected other film or TV series on DVD, those who purchased the individual releases are now feeling collectors' pressure to buy the boxed set, duplicating all their previous acquisitions, to get the bonus discs.  Makes you feel like a Stooge, don't it?

Even if you already have some of this material, $45 is quite a bargain.  Order here.  I don't think this is a one-day deal but if you're gonna buy, you might as well buy now. I wouldn't expect the price to get any lower.

Soup Time!

mushroomsoup117

Mark is very busy now and I expect this condition to persist for a few days…too many to even spend the few minutes I spend on my breaks writing things for this site. There won't be much here for a while but perhaps you'll find something else on the Internet to read. There are, after all, other sites.

The Other Jon Stewart Show

Some nights, The Daily Show is bifurcated. Jon Stewart does his usual funny job of pointing out hypocrisy and insanity in the news…and by the way, after the last week or so, those who argue that he only slams Republicans and Conservatives really need to stop trying to "game the ref" by claiming that. Anyway, some nights, his interview segment runs so long that it turns into another, almost-as-long-if-not-longer show of its own.

Last night, the chat was with Edward Conard, a former Bain Capital exec who's out selling his book about how we need more of the Bain way, not less. The part of the conversation that ran on Comedy Central lasted seven minutes and then it continues on the Daily Show website for an additional 34 minutes. I won't embed them but here's Part One, here's Part Two and here's Part Three.

I find these little discussions fascinating on two levels, one being the content. This one loses its way in Part Three and peters out…but before that, Stewart manages to get to the core of the critical question facing our nation's economy: Do we run it for the money managers or do we run it for the small investors whose money those managers are pumping into high-risk, high-return slot machines? And there's the ancillary question, as well: In that model, who are the risk-takers? Mr. Conard thinks we need to "incentivize" the next Mark Zuckerberg and that a difference of a few percentage points in that person's tax rate will make a difference. I think Stewart "wins" that debate here partly because he has Home Court Advantage and a friendly audience but mainly because he manages to point out essential contradictions in Conard's argument.

The other way I find these one-on-ones of interest is that no one else does them. No one but Jon Stewart, at least on TV, sits down with folks of opposing viewpoints and has a friendly discussion largely free of pre-scripted talking points — plus, he also manages to be funny and entertaining. When I watch or listen to other political-type debates on TV and radio, each guy parrots arguments he's made before and there's no real attempt to arrive at a consensus. Stewart's in there looking for common ground, trying to dig out the points on which both sides can agree…and when he can't find any, he crystalizes the illogic on the other side of the table while still making his guest comfy. It's not Pro Wrestling. It's two intelligent people talking. We don't get enough of that. Boy, do we not get enough of that.

Today's Video Links

Every few years, Cathy Rigby retires from touring as Peter Pan and every few years, she goes out again with the musical. This woman has actually quit that role more times than I quit Hanna-Barbera. But I'm happy to lose to her in the resignation derby because she's wonderful in the part…and I'll bet you that a lot of the adult theater-goers of the future will cite her as the reason they go to plays. We usually have one show we saw as a kid that struck a chord…and thereafter, we're like druggies staggering about, trying to recapture the glorious sensation of that first high.

I assume her new tour is like her last few…with a set made deliberately simple so it could be trucked from town to town and with a cast low on overhead. (If you look carefully, a couple of the Lost Boys in the troupe are girls, thereby putting the female understudies to good use when they're not needed to play women.) I've seen Cathy several times and I actually prefer her version of the show to the Mary Martin one I watched year after year on TV when I was a lad. They tossed out that weird number where Peter (played by a woman, remember) impersonates a woman with an operatic voice to entice Captain Hook…who in the Martin version was so gay, his feet touched the floor less than Peter's. The Rigby version butches Hook up a tad, thereby making him more of a real villain and they also got rid of that pointless ballet with the dancers trying to dance in bad animal costumes.

Mary Martin was a great star of the musical theater but when she played Peter, at least on TV, she didn't become him for me nor did she fly. She looked like someone's very sweet grandmother dangling on a wire. Cathy Rigby, on the other hand, makes me forget about Cathy Rigby and the wires.

This time out, her Hook is Brent Barrett, who has a magnificent singing voice and stage presence — or at least he has in other shows I've seen. I haven't shlepped down to La Mirada to see this go-round of Pan and might not, as all the good seats seem to be sold. Which makes me wonder why Rigby, Barrett and other members of the company arose early enough to do a couple of live spots on the KTLA Morning News the other day.

They give you a good look at how the flying is done and it's a lot simpler than people think. They imagine computers and winches and intricate programming. Nope. It's just a couple of stagehands pulling ropes and you'll see one in the background as Ms. Rigby, defying gravity and age, soars over the La Mirada stage. But most of all, I'm embedding these to tout the production — which may come near you — and because I admire the effort of the folks who got up in the middle of the night to do these segments for the TV audience. I thought a few more people should see them…and that someone should mention the name of Brent Barrett since the reporter didn't…

This is a link to Part One, in which KTLA reporter Allie McKay interviews Captain Hook and he and some of his crew perform a brief number from the show.

This is a link to Part Two, in which Cathy Rigby demonstrates how she flies.

And this is a link to Part Three, in which Allie McKay gets her chance to fly around as Wendy.

I originally embedded the three videos in this page as I usually do but found that one of them has an "auto" commercial built into it. In other words, the commercial would play immediately if you came to this page. I don't like websites that make noise without being asked so I stripped out the embeds and you can click on the links and see the videos on the KTLA site if you care.

June in June

June Foray's hometown newspaper celebrates her first-ever Emmy nomination at age 94.

The Daytime Emmys are announced in two separate ceremonies — one that favors the technical and backstage awards and one that favors the on-camera stars. June's category will be presented at the tech/backstage one which they call the Daytime Creative Arts Emmy Awards gala. It's on Sunday, June 17th, 2012 and as far as I know, it will not be televised…but you'll hear all about it since I'm June's date for the evening. Hope we both get lucky.

Know Thyself

Facebook just sent me an e-mail telling me that Mark Evanier is on Facebook and suggesting I might want to connect with him.