Food, Inglorious Food

I've occasionally mentioned my food allergies on this site and each mention brings e-mails from kindred spirits who've related their own social-type problems in this area. It's amazing how many people have trouble with the concept that some folks simply cannot eat certain things without harming themselves. I had a lady friend once who loved asparagus and wanted badly to cook it for me despite my repeated explanations that it could well put me in a hospital somewhere. She'd listen to that, nod as if she utterly understood then say, "Well, what if I put a sauce on the asparagus?

Sometimes, it helps to invoke rat poison analogies. Someone will say, "I can prepare the pecan pie so it doesn't taste anything like pecans." I often reply, "Supposing someone wanted to serve you rat poison but they said, 'Don't worry…I can prepare it so it doesn't taste anything like rat poison."

Or a well-meaning friend will try to serve you a dessert that's sprinkled with coconut. You explain as politely as possible that you're allergic to coconut. They say, "Well, just pick the coconut off…or I can do it for you." You have to say, "If someone came to you with a dessert covered with rat poison, would you just pick the rat poison off and eat the dessert?" There actually are times when I feel I can remove or eat around the offending ingredient but there are times when a little voice within me says not to take the risk. When I don't listen to that voice, I have almost always regretted it.

Actually, if you get medical about it, most of what I have are not food allergies but food intolerances. There is a difference but I learned that if I tried to make that distinction, it confused people even more. So I just say "food allergies" for both and that makes life simpler…but only a little.

Both can create vast social problems along with the health ones. I have occasionally found myself in a group at a restaurant where there was literally nothing on the menu I thought I could or should eat. You would be amazed how uncomfortable some friends can make you in that situation. Some treat you like you're making trouble in order to ruin their evening. Others feel that now they're not allowed to eat and enjoy themselves. The worst is probably when they make a huge fuss on your behalf and start scolding waiters and the restaurant management, and that makes everyone uncomfy. I accept the fact that there are just going to be times when the available food doesn't correspond to what I can eat. I would usually prefer to sit there and go hungry for the time being than to have people declare a national emergency around me or act like an alien dines among them.

It was worse when I was younger and in less control of where I ate. Today, if the whole gang's going out for lunch, I can usually speak up in time to genially steer the expedition away from the Indian or Mexican restaurant. I've had especially bad luck in the Mexican ones. I've probably gone through the menus of fifty of them without seeing an entree I could eat without serious modification…and it's sometimes difficult to get things altered to my specifications. One day years ago, I was among a bunch of TV people who lunched at Acapulco, a popular Mexican eatery then across the street from NBC in Burbank. The one item they had that seemed like it might be edible to me was the hamburger…but only if they omitted the guacamole.

That was how I ordered it…and I've learned over the years to be explicit about it. I'll say, "I'd like a hamburger with nothing on it. Just meat and bun and nothing else." I asked for it that way but when it came, there was guacamole aplenty. In fact, I think the chef had interpreted "no guacamole" to mean "extra guacamole." You'd be amazed how often that happens.

I sent the burger back and it was returned to me a few minutes later with most (not all) of the guacamole scraped off. The patty was still a lovely shade of green and when I explained that wouldn't do, the server gave me a sigh that implied I was just doing this to make his life harder. He went off to have them cook me another and I sat there, not eating while all my friends did. Every so often, one of them would offer me part of their tostada which I couldn't eat or part of their burrito which I couldn't eat. Finally, about the time everyone was ready to leave, my new burger arrived…lovingly slathered with guacamole. They told me the chef applied it out of "force of habit."

Some of this is my fault. There are times when everyone else wants to go for Thai food. Since I want to be with my friends and since I occasionally have gotten something edible in a Thai place, I decide not to play Bad Guy and try to hijack the party to where I'll feel safer. I have to learn to decline. Forced to appear at a luncheon where the cuisine seems dubious, I'll sometimes opt to dine before I get there and to tell everyone I had a late breakfast and can't eat a thing. I need to think that way more often. The Internet has helped a lot, enabling me to check out the menu of most restaurants before I commit to dine within.

Saturday Evening

I haven't been posting much lately (or when I have, it's been messages I wrote a few days ago) owing to a mother in the hospital. She's home now and doing better but I still have "son" stuff to do, plus I'm behind on a few things…so it may be a day or three before new things are appearing here at the usual pace.

Nothing ever happens in my life without a funny anecdote or two materializing. The best one this time probably was the one that occurred when a nurse at the hospital told me I needed to go down to the Admitting Office and sign some papers and she started to tell me how to find it. "I know where it is," I told her. My mother has been in this hospital a lot and I know where everything is, including a couple of secret doors I'm not supposed to know about. I told the nurse — and this has actually happened a couple of times — "I'm here so much, the cashier in the cafeteria gives me the employee discount."

The nurse looked surprised. "There's an employee discount in the cafeteria?"

Another nurse told her, yes there is: "If you go in there in uniform, they probably just give it to you automatically."

The first nurse thought a second then said, "I sometimes go in there in my street clothes…like when I come to work and stop in there for breakfast on the way in."

The second nurse: "Well, if you don't show them your employee I.D. or they don't recognize you, you're probably paying more than you have to."

The first turned to me and said, "Life isn't fair. I've worked here five years and you get the employee discount and I don't."

Today's Video Link

I don't think this one needs any explanation…

Fantastic Forewarning

The new issue of The Jack Kirby Collector, #58, is a special one devoted to a long essay (more like a book) subtitled Lee & Kirby: The Wonder Years. It was the work of a gentleman named Mark Alexander who passed away last year at the age of 56, having just completed the manuscript for this look at the history of the Fantastic Four comic book as done by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

Given the obvious effort that he put into it and the fact that it was Mark's last work, I would love to be able to recommend it strongly. To Mark's credit, his research did unearth a lot of previously-unpublished history…but there are quite a few places where I disagree with his conclusions and even more where I disagree with his factual recital. I even disagree with a number of places where he quoted me. He says in it my "information contributed enormously to this book" but he doesn't seem to have understood a lot of what I told him.

I am not suggesting you not buy it. A lot of Mark's opinions about the work of Lee and Kirby are interesting and thought-provoking if not perceptive. Just don't believe all the history, especially the nuggets attributed to me.

The Gatekeeper

A portrait of Eddie Brill, who does the warm-ups for David Letterman's show and books the comedians.

A lot of folks seem to lament that none of the current late night shows have the star-making power for comedians that Mr. Carson once had. I think that time has passed and is unlikely to return…and Johnny's show didn't even have much power in that area its last few years. People forget that when Carson's Tonight Show booked new stand-ups, it was one of the very few programs on TV that did that. He kind of had the "introducing new comedians" market to himself. Now, in the era of cable and Comedy Central and so many other shows, there are other avenues…and a hot new stand-up in the club circuit no longer has to wait a year or two until the late night bookers decide he's "ready."

Recommended Reading

Michael Kinsley asks some tough questions of Mitt Romney about how "Romneycare" differs from "Obamacare." Near as I can tell, the biggest difference is that "Romneycare" is one letter longer.

Today's Video Link

Haven't I told you before that my friend Christine Pedi does the best Liza Minnelli impression in the world?

Daily Discourse

Night before last on The Daily Show, Jon Stewart had Senator Jim DeMint on for one of those conversations that goes along and just when it gets interesting, it cuts off and Stewart says, "We're going to throw the whole thing up on the web." I have to remember not to watch those when they're on in truncated form and to wait until the next day and watch them online.

The one with DeMint was fascinating. The Senator said a lot of rational, common sense things that I suspect he said because of where he was and who was in the audience…things he would not say, and might in fact contradict in front of a Tea Party crowd. He also looked a bit embarrassed at times when he called for calmer rhetoric and then Stewart cited non-calm rhetoric from the book the Senator was there to promote.

Still, it was the kind of interview that no one else but Jon Stewart does, groping for common ground instead of barbecuing red meat and wrestling. And DeMint came off as less the demagogue and slave to those of great wealth than he usually does.

I thought of embedding the whole thing here but Comedy Central embeds are kind of screwy and can do odd things to your site. Mine has had enough tsuris lately so I'm just going to give you this link to go to their website and watch the entire conversation. Both parties frame their positions in ways you never hear on MSNBC or Fox. It's so odd that you have to go to a comedy show to hear a political discussion between two people acting like human beings.

I only caught a little of Stephen Colbert's presidential announcement last night but it seemed to be a brilliant slam at the notion that a candidate's non-coordinated Super PAC is an independent entity. As I understand, Colbert can't really run for President on the South Carolina ballot. It's too late to get his name on there and the state doesn't count write-ins. But he can sure milk the effort for material.

Hi, Bob!

bob01

It is now possible to advance-order the DVD set of the TV series, Bob…which, by the way, turns out to be the most difficult TV show ever to locate on an Internet search engine. It comes out April 3, they say, and you can lock in Amazon's lowest price between now and then by clicking here. If enough of you order via that link, I might make enough in commissions to purchase my own copy. It's annoying when you have to cough up money to buy a copy of something you worked on but you usually do.

SOPA and PIPA

Yeah, I know: They sound like the names of Scandinavian clowns. But as you probably know, we're talking about the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act, two pieces of legislation that are designed to do what they say they'll do. And they might. But then going after cockroaches with a flame thrower might also get rid of them at a pretty high price.

The problem I see with both proposals is in their default position. The putative owner of the intellectual property will get nuclear weapons to stop infringements…and that happens to be the side that already has most of the money and therefore most of the lawyers. It's kinda like someone said, "Hmm…there needs to be a balance here that protects Fair Use. Let's give everything to the rich and powerful guys and see how much they decide they have to give away. And however much that turns out to be, that'll be Fair Use."

I am all for stopping online piracy. I just worry about defining it in a way that works for all, not just those with the most aggressive attorneys. I've worked for companies that owned intellectual property and won battles they should not have won against Little Guys. They threatened…the Little Guy had to fold. In fact, the lawyers usually did a great job intimidating the Little Guys into surrender that way, all the time ignoring the real, harder-to-police threats.

For more on how I feel about this, read how Tom Spurgeon feels about this. What he said.

Today's Political Comment

Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich are each airing factually-challenged commercials accusing the other of being insufficiently "pro-life." In truth, neither one of them has a track record for condoning abortions, though Romney was once pro-choice and then converted.

The thing that bothers me about this is that I don't think either one of these guys particularly cares about the issue except that if you want Republicans to vote for you, you have to say these things. The premise is that the social conservatives of the party elect you to eliminate abortions…then you do just enough in that area to keep them happy and use most of the clout they've given you to try and eliminate the capital gains tax or the inheritance tax or any regulation that gets in the way of rich folks getting richer.

This is the reason a Rick Santorum or a Michele Bachmann couldn't possibly win the nomination. The party is controlled by the Newt/Mitt kind, the ones who wouldn't object to banning abortion or gay marriage…but they sure don't want a candidate who'd place those goals above union-busting or protecting CEO salaries. And of course, they won't let Ron Paul get the nomination because he doesn't seem eager enough to bomb other countries.

It's odd how we're now hearing talk about how Romney just about has the nomination sewn up. Not that long ago, we were hearing that this was going to be a battle that might rage on until just before the convention which is at the end of August. We've had one caucus and one primary and in neither one was the winner unexpected…but suddenly, Mitt's about to rake in all the chips.

Barring some stunning scandal or some really, really stupid gaffes, I think Romney will be the nominee. But I also don't think the losers in this contest are going to sit there for seven months and accept that. It used to be that folks who lost would quote the eminent man of aphorisms, Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra and say, "It ain't over 'til it's over," then fight on. These says, it's more like "It ain't over 'til it's over and it ain't even over then." Besides, we still have the campaign to get Romney to pick a running mate who'll make Sarah Palin look like a Commie wimp.