Recommended Reading

Over on Slate, David Greenberg has a couple of interesting essays (here and here) about "patriotism" as a campaign weapon…one that's being deployed in the current match-up and which we're likely to see, ad nauseam, in the months ahead.

My particular problem with that is that this kind of debate always revolves around a particularly shallow kind of patriotism — waving the flag, reciting the pledge, standing for the anthem, etc. After 9/11, patriots of that depth all bought those $3.95 plastic flags (Made in Taiwan), put them on their cars and were satisfied that they had done their part as Americans fighting The War on Terror. Bill Maher described that as "pretty much the dictionary definition of 'the least you could do,'" and I think he was right. There's nothing wrong with singing of the rocket's red glare…and you can certainly be a Patriot without spilling blood or making some serious sacrifice. I just don't think you're a better American because you say so in a louder voice.

Lydia News

From "Chelsea Girl" (a reader of this site) comes a worried e-mail: "Please assure me that though you're in Minnesota, Lydia is being properly fed." Lydia, you may recall, is the cat who hangs out in my back yard — the one I had to trap and take in for spaying and a kitty abortion a few months back.

Correction: "…one of the cats who hangs out in my back yard." We're up to five now. Five feral felines — try saying that fast — feed at the dishes I leave out on the rear porch. Usually in the evening, it's Lydia plus one guest. Years ago, I fed a cat we named Jackie out there…and Jackie was quite territorial, claiming my yard as her own. If another pussycat even entered, let alone approached The Dish, Jackie would leap to defend her turf, chasing off the intruder like one of Sinatra's bodyguards protecting The Chairman of the Board. Lydia is unthreatened by others and even acts as hostess. She's awfully generous with the food I pay for. As long as she gets her fill, all are welcome.

In the last week or so, the clientele out there has included a silvery/spotted cat of enormous size and appetite. Both of those qualities have been enhanced because this one looks ready to deliver a litter any day now…and may have, by the time I return. I made the layman's diagnosis that she was too far along to be trapped and hauled out to the vet, especially when I was about to leave town. She may even be too big to fit in that trap I bought. So I have the feeling Lydia will have plenty of new customers for the little Free Buffet she's operating on my stoop.

Fear not, Chelsea Girl. It's operational in my absence. I left plenty of food in the bins and a housesitter to dole it out. We've come too far with Lydia to abandon her now.

Today's Video Link

I'm staying on the topic of the magic trick, "Metamorphosis" for one more day. A couple of folks who wrote me think that I was unaware that many others had done this illusion before the Pendragons. I never thought that and I don't think I could have made that clearer than when I described it as — and I quote myself — "a classic illusion but one that they perform better than anyone."

Others pointed out that when Doug Henning did the trick, he also did a costume change. Okay, fine. Others have, as well. But look at what Henning's wearing before and after and then look at what Charlotte Pendragon does. He could have easily been wearing one outfit over the other and just discarded the outer one. She deliberately wears outfits that couldn't have worked like that.

Which is not to take anything away from the late Mr. Henning. Here's his version of the same trick, as performed on some special with actress Didi Conn. One should note that since Ms. Conn was a transient partner, she and Henning probably practiced 'n' rehearsed for a week or two, whereas Jonathan and Charlotte Pendragon have been perfecting their timing for a decade or two. Given that, Henning's version is pretty good.

Airplane Blogging

Hello from way up in the sky, en route to Minnesota. I'll post this when I hit the hotel room but I'm writing it from seat D-10 on a Northwest Airlines flight. A nice flight attendant lady is prowling the aisle with a bottle of H2O and a stack of nested plastic cups, asking everyone, "Water? Water? Anyone want water?" She makes it sound like we're not likely to get any in Minneapolis so we'd better tank up now.

The flight left right on time and they're saying we'll be in 10-15 minutes early. I like that. If I ran an airline, I think I'd pad the schedule so every flight would get in 10-15 minutes earlier than we say. It might take us just as long as any other airline to get you where you're going (or longer) but when you thought of us, you'd think, "Boy, they're good…they're usually 10-15 minutes early."

Security at LAX was the usual drag, made draggier by a raging debate ahead of me in my line. A lady who looked a lot like Paris Hilton (but wasn't) was refusing to remove her footwear…and getting very loud and strident about it. On one hand, she had a point. They were sandals — and I could have hidden a lot more weaponry or explosives in my wallet, which I did not have to put on the conveyor belt, than she could have secreted in her flip-flops. On the other hand, it was not like she had a prayer of winning the argument and having one lowly Security Agent reverse TSA policy.

"You're required to put your shoes through the x-ray," said a man of steadily-diminishing patience while behind us, we could all hear voices crying out, "My plane leaves in ten minutes" or similar pleas. For some reason, no one thought to move her to one side and debate the issue while others passed on through. Paris kept responding, as if someone was paying her to say it as many times as possible, "But these are not shoes." She was right on some theoretical level but wrong to think she was getting on her plane without complying. By the time she did as ordered, the line behind her was the length of the Nile and at least a few people had probably missed their flights.

The pilot just said we're at 31,000 feet and we'll be starting our descent shortly. He'll "have us on the ground" (isn't there a nicer way to put that?) in about 25 minutes and then there's 5-10 minutes to taxi to our gate. I think the "10-15 minutes early" didn't include taxi time so maybe we're not as far ahead of schedule as they suggested.

I'm going to wrap this up and spend the rest of the flight paging through the in-flight magazine, getting up to speed on the Great Steakhouses of America. How is it that I never get to vote on what gets onto those lists? It couldn't be because they're just a cheap advertising ploy and that the restaurants listed are the ones that paid to be included, could it? If it turns out that's the case, I'm going to stop wagering on these things.

Duck Soup

If you're anywhere near Mission Viejo, California, this will be of interest to you: Frank Ferrante, who you're all sick of seeing me rave about on this here blog, will be Grouchoing all over the stage at the Saddleback McKinney Theater this coming Tuesday, July 8. Frank's one-man show as the Magnificent Marx is, like the man he replicates, a treasure. Click the link for more details.

Today's Video Link

Yesterday, I linked to a video from America's Got Talent with The Pendragons performing "Metamorphosis" — a classic illusion but one that they perform better than anyone. As a couple of you wrote me, the show's director broke a fundamental rule by doing cutaways during the trick, showing the audience and the judges.

That's usually a no-no. Even if the home audience sees everything significant that they'd see if they were there watching it live, cutaways disrupt the flow and the sense of "this is actually happening." On magic specials, they often announce during an incredible feat that "the camera will not cut away" because they know it makes viewers suspicious. You can hide a lot of chicanery, and make a trick go much faster than it did in reality, if you cut away. A number of magicians on television (not the Pendragons) have been criticized because though they boast of no camera trickery, they do edit together multiple takes of a trick or edit a six minute act down to three.

It's part of the odd code of Truth Telling in magic. If you say "no camera tricks are being used," then you're lying if the levitation is accomplished by Chromakey. But it's perfectly okay to say, "I'm going to put the three of clubs in my pocket" when in fact, the three of clubs is in your other hand and it's the jack of diamonds you're putting in your pocket. It's dishonest to edit out the moment when you actually snuck your assistant off stage…but if it really takes three minutes to make the elephant "vanish," some think it's okay to edit that down and make it look like they did it in thirty seconds.

Usually, it's injurious to the viewers' appreciation of an illusion to do cutaways. I'm guessing that the director or producers of America's Got Talent know that and decided to do it anyway. Their show is more about the judge's (and audience's) reaction to a performance than it is about the performance…so they felt the cutaways were important. Today's link is Jonathan and Charlotte doing the same feat on another show that didn't cut to reaction shots.

Again, you'll notice that Charlotte changes her outfit in the process. It's the most amazing part of the trick but many people are so dazzled by the main switch that they don't notice it. I asked her once why she why she did it and she smiled and said, "To make the trick more difficult." Good reason.

VIDEO MISSING

Recommended Reading

Hey, I'm linking to a Fred Kaplan article! There's a novelty. This one was about Wesley Clark's comments the other day about John McCain's military service. It sounded to me like the kind of argument that, while perhaps technically accurate, was a blunder as campaign fodder. Clark didn't make one person in America less likely to vote for McCain. All he did was to force Obama to disavow him and praise his opponent's service record.

The Brothers Are Back!

Here's what's up with my occasional employers, Sid and Marty Krofft. As noted, there's a huge-budget Land of the Lost movie in the works (I was on the set two weeks ago) and other projects in the offing. I've worked for them on and off for thirty years and one thing I learned early-on was never to write them off or count them out. Along with their other talents, they're darned good at just bouncing back. If this new movie were to fail — and I'll betcha it won't — they'd be back a year later with something successful.

Second-Stringers

Cookie Monster with avocado. Just kinda seems wrong, doesn't it?

I am assured by half the Muppet Experts in the world that Cookie Monster, as seen on The Colbert Report, was performed by a gent named David Rudman. Frank Oz began cutting back on his Muppeteering in the nineties due to age and other career opportunities, and others began imitating him. Around 2001, Mr. Rudman emerged as the primary Cookie Monster manipulator and it's easy to see why. He's darn good at it.

A month or two ago, I spent a few hours on the set of a Muppet shoot with Kermit, Gonzo, Fozzie, Piggy, The Swedish Chef, Pepe the King Prawn and a few others. Four Muppeteers were handling the cast…with a few more providing hands and such. The four were Dave Goelz, Steve Whitmire, Eric Jacobson and Bill Barretta. Dave originated and still plays Gonzo and Bunsen Honeydew, and Bill started Pepe and a few other recent characters.

But for most of the stars, we're on to second (and third) generation Muppet Wranglers. When Jim Henson died in 1990, he willed the role of Kermit to Steve. Eric is the specialist in the roles Frank Oz no longer does — Bert, Grover, Fozzie, etc. For a while, he did Cookie Monster on Sesame Street but Rudman took it over, in part because it was easier to have Bert and C.M. interact if they weren't done by the same performer. I don't watch Sesame Street often and haven't since it essentially turned into The Elmo Hour. But when I've caught new Muppet segments, I am impressed with how faithful they are…and how well they integrate with scenes rerun from the era of Henson, Oz, Hunt, Nelson, et al.

Having been deeply critical of some cast replacements on animated shows, I'm impressed that someone knows the difference between a good Muppet imitation and a bad one…and hires accordingly. The four men I saw on that set a few months ago were as good as you could reasonably expect; maybe a little better than one would dare hope for. I wish more people cared that much about keeping classic characters sounding and behaving like themselves.

Today's Video Link

We return to the theme of "Brilliantly Talented People Mark Has Met." In September of '06, I told you about how the great magician Jonathan Pendragon had been seriously injured. He fell onto an arrow which pierced his chest and for a while there, the magic community figured him for a goner. But Jonathan is an amazing human and I'm happy to say that he and his lovely partner/spouse Charlotte are performing again. I think they're at the Magic Castle this week and if I wasn't leaving for Minnesota on Wednesday, I'd scurry up and see them in action.

You saw them in action recently if you've been watching America's Got Talent. In case you missed it, here's how it went, including a brief discussion of Jonathan's near-fatal accident. And when they do the trick — which is even more impressive when you see it in person — pay attention to Charlotte's outfit. Most people are so boggled by the illusion, they don't even notice she changes clothes.

Commoner Misconception

I just saw a man on MSNBC say he's going to vote for John McCain because Barack Obama is an "elitist" who doesn't understand the problems of the average American. This is the same John McCain who admits that he doesn't know the price of gas, is chauffeured everywhere he goes, has no idea how to use a computer, has had free medical care for most of his life and who owns more homes than most people have toilets.

Logrolling in Cyberspace

I use a program to scan my e-mail and flag possible spam. The company that makes this program just sent me an e-mail to announce an upgrade. And their program flagged this e-mail as possible spam.

Today's Video Link

Stephen Silk pointed me to this one. It's a gent named Michael Moschen who has a new kind of juggling that is quite impressive and ingenious. Give it a look.

Recommended Reading

Gosh, I hope Matt Taibbi is wrong about the message the John McCain campaign will be spreading and counting on between now and November. But I'm afraid Taibbi's right…indelicate but right.