Today's Video Link

Many years ago, I dated a lady who had a videotape I desperately wanted to copy but never did. It was a tape of about thirty Albert Brooks appearances, all done back in the days when he used to show up on talk shows with routines. Sometimes, they took the form of stand-up. Sometimes, he was sitting down with the host. They were always fresh and outrageously funny…and he rarely repeated. He'd do a bit once, get huge laughs with it…then retire it forever.

I used to watch the tape at her place when I went over to pick her up and she wasn't ready to leave. When she emerged, ready to head out to dinner or a show or whatever, she'd say, "How do I look?" Usually, when your date asks you that, you say "Great," because…well, if she doesn't, going back and putting on a different top is not going to make a bit of difference. With this lady, I used to say, "Uh, I don't think that's a good color for you," because I wanted to see the rest of whatever Albert Brooks routine I was watching. When we finally broke up, I thought of calling and asking her if I could take the tape out for an evening.

Our clip today is from Mr. Carson's Tonight Show…and the best part of it is watching Johnny's delight. He obviously had not seen Albert's routine in advance…though in that skillful way that neither Leno nor Letterman are able to do, he helped Brooks set up the premise of the bit and clarified it slightly to make sure the audience understood it. Here's Albert Brooks demonstrating his new kit that allows you to do impressions at home…

VIDEO MISSING

Recommended Reading

Frank Rich discusses the historic moment of Barack Obama's nomination…and how his competitors didn't get what it was all about.

Backing Up On You

Several writers on the 'net (including Ken Levine) are discussing this matter. Long story short: A wanna-be screenwriter, a guy who'd never sold anything, had three spec screenplays on his computer. A technician from SBC did a little work on the fellow's computer and innocently deleted what were, for some reason, the only copies of those screenplays. The writer sued SBC because he believed he was close to selling the three scripts for 2.7 million.

The court didn't agree the sale was likely but did award the writer $27,000 in compensatory damages and $33,000 in punitive damages. Both the writer and SBC appealed and the California state appeals court dismissed the punitive part of the award. The compensatory damages were upheld but the writer was ordered to reimburse SBC for its legal fees in the appeal, which pretty well wipes out any gain on his part. It might even mean he loses on the deal.

For professional writers — heck, even for non-pros — there are a couple of issues raised by this case. One is how non-professionals — heck, even pros — usually delude themselves into believing that a big sale is Almost There, certain to happen, virtually a done deal. Go to any gathering of aspiring writers and you'll hear an endless loop of such tales; of deals that were "99% set" but somehow, due to treachery or some caprice of nature, didn't happen or haven't yet.

It's possible the writer in the above-described lawsuit was an exception. After all, there are scripts that do sell and at some point, all those deals were "close." Still, a lot of us though hear of so many "done deals" that don't get all the way done that we develop a skepticism to all such claims. If you disbelieve them all, you'll be right at least 95% of the time and that estimate is, if anything, low.

The other issue, of course, is summarized by the phrase, "Why the hell didn't you have backups?"

Back when working on computers was somewhat new, the Writers Guild computer room used to get panic calls from members. The computer room had nothing to do with PCs or Macs — it was the operations center for the WGA computer which stored members' records and processed residual payments — but members in distress would phone there and ask for (or demand) aid. The folks there didn't know from PCs so many of those calls were referred to me.

One was from a woman who'd put in (she said) five years on what she called "The most important novel of our generation." She hadn't sold it (or anything, ever) but there was no doubt in her mind it was Hemingway-like in its greatness and importance. She kept telling me how "important" it was. She'd written the first half on paper. Then she got a computer and she'd dutifully typed that material onto a disc, then discarded the paper and finished the manuscript on her PC. You smell where this is going?

The computer, she insisted, had malfunctioned and deleted her life's work, all on its own. It was definitely not anything she'd done. Now, she demanded — like I was her paid employee — that I drive out to Chatsworth (45+ minutes) and get it back for her. I asked her if she had a recent backup. She said — this is verbatim or close to it — "I don't have time to learn that technical crap. I have a book to write!"

You can guess how much help I gave the lady. I did refer her to a friend who handled such matters for a fee. He trotted out to Chatsworth and managed to salvage a little of it…a service for which she ultimately refused to pay since he hadn't saved it all. She also refused to listen to him when he tried to explain to her about routine backups…or any of that technical crap. My friend still makes snide comments about the favor I did him with that referral.

Anyway, us sane people need to back stuff up so let me tell you what I do…

First off, my two non-laptop computers have mirrored harddisks, so when I write a file to disk, I'm making two copies of it.

Then I use a filesync utility to synchronize between computers. The one I use is SmartSync Pro, which I've been using for some time and which works fine. I haven't investigated to see if there are better ones…and I know there are now some free ones out there that are supposed to be pretty good. I paid a few years ago for SmartSync Pro so I keep using it…to, for example, sync my two desktop computers' data directories. So if something gets lost on one, it may be on the other. (I have SmartSync set, by the way, to retain the last three versions of everything.)

Plus, any time I'm about to travel or back from travel or otherwise using my laptop, I employ SmartSync to sync the data directories on the laptop with the others. They're all networked so this doesn't take a lot of time.

No matter which computer I'm using, I have an 8gb Flash Drive plugged into it. I wrote a special SmartSync profile and I have a shortcut to it on my desktop. One click and it backs up my "current" working directory to the Flash Drive. Every time I finish a few pages of something or leave the computer for a while, I click that shortcut.

About once every six months, I burn a data DVD with whatever data files strike me at that moment as recent and irreplaceable. This is not a formalized procedure; just something I do on an occasional whim.

Beyond all that, I do the following: Every month or so, I zip all my data directories into a file and e-mail them to a special address I set up on the server that hosts my websites. You could do this with a GMail account, too. The idea is to just have a copy of it all that's off-premises.

Finally, I routinely back the entirety of all three computers up to external hard drives. I have a number of these and I rotate them, doing both full and incremental backups. Originally, I did these with Norton Ghost but found that too buggy and clunky. Now, I use Acronis True Image, which seems much better…although I haven't yet had to use it for a restore so my recommendation can go only so far.

And even with all that, would you believe it? I still sometimes lose something. Fortunately, it's never been anything in the professional work category…but don't worry. It'll happen someday, probably as soon as someone offers me 2.7 million for three unsold screenplays. Just my damn luck.

Today's Video Link

From the era when cigarettes were advertised on television, we have this one minute spot for Chesterfields. Why am I showing you this? Because all the voices in it were done by the late, great Daws Butler…who, by the way, didn't smoke.

The person who posted this to YouTube claims that it's a reunion of Daws with his old partner, Stan Freberg. It is not. It's all Daws.

VIDEO MISSING

Henrietta Gets Stupid

Henrietta used to know her way around…but now she's become somewhat unreliable.

Henrietta is the name I gave to the female voice that emanates from my Magellan Roadmate 2000, a Global Positioning System I installed in my car in January of '07. As I mentioned here and here, I found her generally helpful and in some cases, extremely useful. You can't follow the instructions mindlessly but she's handy to have in the car, especially when one is venturing into new frontiers. Or at least, she was.

Recently, I ordered and received their new software upgrade for the unit, and I had my assistant install it. The graphics are better, there are a few new features and there are updated maps…but in the process, Henrietta got stupid on me. I've used her to guide me on seven trips since the upgrade. Twice, she was fine. Twice, the route she suggested would have gotten me to my destination but not at all by the swiftest, most direct route. And three times, she simply pointed me in the wrong direction, thinking addresses were not where they truly are. This is not a passable batting average. She seems to be especially bad — and she wasn't before — at avoiding situations where I'd have to cross a busy eight-lane boulevard at an intersection without a traffic light. Also, her voice has gotten a bit surly and defensive…like she knows she's screwing up but is determined to make it my fault.

I am mentioning this here because I recommended the Magellan and a number of you bought one on my say-so. In fact, some of you bought yours via one of my Amazon links so I feel especially responsible. Beware. Newer and fancier is not always better.

Soon as I have time, I'm going to phone the Magellan folks and ask them if others have complained to the point where the company is scurrying to upgrade the upgrade. If the answer is no, I'm going to see about rolling back to the old software…and if that can't be done, I'll probably dump Henrietta for someone else. I know it sounds cruel but a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.

Saturday Morning

I tuned into Hillary Clinton's concession speech in the middle…at a point where the rhetoric was all about "Me, me, me," with the subtext that a vote for anyone but Hillary was a vote against women's rights. You can imagine my disappointment…the latest in a long line of Clinton-related disappointments I've had during this campaign. But then I rolled the TiVo back, watched the speech in its entirety, and got a different impression. Keith Olbermann, who's been slamming Hillary as badly as any Republican has or would, is saying she had 6-8 great minutes in there, and that sounds about right. If you only catch the sound bites, depending on how they're chosen, you might get an erroneous impression, either way. You could edit this thing down to make her look very good or very bad. Catch the whole thing if you get a chance.

Today's Video Link

Okay, let's watch a commercial I saw incessantly when I was a kid — a spot for Andersen's Split Pea Soup. In fact, let's discuss pea soup in some depth.

I didn't know it when I was seeing this commercial every eight minutes on my TV but the voices were done by the great Bob and Ray. Bob Elliott had the lead role and then he and Ray Goulding played the chefs. The commercial was designed by Paul Kim, who was responsible for a lot of ads produced in New York in the fifties.

I used to love Andersen's Split Pea Soup…or at least the version served in their signature restaurant in the little town of Buellton, California. Buellton is (I just Mapquested it) 138 miles northwest of Los Angeles and is known for that restaurant and almost nothing else. The restaurant used to be alongside Highway 101 and there was a California tradition: When one was driving from L.A. to San Francisco or vice-versa, one would stop off in Buellton for a bowl of guess what at Pea Soup Andersen's. A lot of people would also spend a few hours in Solvang, a nearby city with a Danish motif and wonderful gift shops and bakeries.

Split Pea Andersen's is a bit farther off the 101 than it used to be but it hasn't moved. The 101 did. In the early sixties, the freeway was rerouted and the old 101 is now the main street of Buellton. Still, people hop off the 101 to eat pea soup. It's been years since I've been there but I'll bet people still do. I remember a couple of trips with my parents in the sixties where we wasted an hour of vacation time waiting for a table there. The menu was coffee shop standard and a common meal was to order a sandwich and "all you can eat" pea soup. Your waitress would roll a little soup cart to your table and fill or top off your bowl.

The pea soup was great and I assume it's still great. On the other hand, the canned version of it, which this commercial promotes, always disappointed me.

What I really liked was the version of it my mother made. Someone gave her what was alleged to be the Pea Soup Andersen recipe. I doubt it was that but it was pretty good…and quite labor-intensive so she didn't make it as often as I would have liked. These days, my favorite Split Pea Soup is served at Canter's Delicatessen on Fairfax in Los Angeles, but they only have it on Wednesdays.

Okay, that's a lot more about Split Pea Soup than you could possibly want to know. Here's the commercial that got me to thinking about it…

VIDEO MISSING

Sid Said

Last weekend at the Book Expo in L.A., I had the honor/pleasure (it was both) to interview Sid Jacobson, who was the editor and creative heart at Harvey Comics for more years than he'd admit. Sid was one of the key players who brought you Casper the Friendly Ghost, Richie Rich, Little Lotta, Sad Sack, Hot Stuff, Wendy the Good Little Witch, Little Dot and a lot of other popular characters that we don't talk about much in this interview.

Mostly, we talked about Sid's latest career (he's had several). He and artist Ernie Colón, created the graphic album version of the 9/11 Commission Report. Here's a linky-poo to order one. While you're at it, you can also pre-order their follow-up, which looks very good.

The interview, which runs a smidgen under 26 minutes, was videotaped and I have no idea where or if the video will be available. But they also turned it into a podcast and you can hear it by clicking in the right place below.

AUDIO MISSING

What Hump?

And, speaking on Young Frankenstein on Broadway: This report says that the cast members are being offered a deal: "Your contract's up in August. You can either take a 50% salary cut or go find other work." Stars Roger Bart and Megan Mullally have both been out recently while they filmed pilots so they may have other jobs, and Sutton Foster is leaving soon anyway to star in that Shrek musical.

As we've noted here, this show seems to be performing waaaay under expectations, box office wise…and I guess its makers expected a lot more attention from the Tony Awards than they're getting. How low the grosses are is unknown because in a break with Broadway custom, the show is not releasing its numbers to the press.

This is a shame because as I said last November here, I enjoyed the show a lot. It's not up to The Producers but there were enough great moments that I'm glad I went to see it…and might do so again next time I'm in New York if (and this is looking unlikely) it's still running and hasn't lost all its best cast members. If you've been thinking of seeing it and you're in the vicinity, you might want to do so before they have their big half-off sale on performers. The production is so elaborate, and success has been so lukewarm, that it's unlikely this show is going to have a huge after-Broadway life. I actually think that with a few weeks of earnest work and rewriting a few numbers and the ending, they could turn it into what everyone expected. But I can sure understand that its backers aren't eager to throw more money at the problem.

Today's Video Link

Here's a brief (3.5 minutes) handheld home video of Mel Brooks doing a curtain speech on opening night of Young Frankenstein. This was allegedly shot by either Rosie O'Donnell or her companion that evening, and there's a brief shot of Rosie in there. More interesting is the surprise guest star that Mel brings on to take a bow. Have a look.

VIDEO MISSING

Why Can't the English?

As reported here, Columbia Pictures is fixing to do a remake of My Fair Lady with Keira Knightley as Eliza Doolittle. That doesn't sound like a very commercial idea to me. With a lot of musicals that were translated to film, there's plenty of room for improvement…and stars who aren't so identified with the roles that it seems wrong to do the show with someone else. I don't think My Fair Lady is in either category but who knows? If they can make something wonderful, it might be justify its own existence.

They plan to shoot the whole thing in England in, wherever possible, the original locations. That sounds promising. There were two things that always bothered me about the 1964 movie and one was how it really looked like it was all done inside a soundstage. (The other thing is how "dubbed" Audrey Hepburn feels.)

What caught my eye in the above-linked article was this…

The filmmakers plan to adapt Alan Jay Lerner's book more fully for the screen by drawing additional material from George Bernard Shaw's play "Pygmalion," which served as the source material for the musical.

What they oughta do — and I'll bet they've already thought of this — is to not go back to the play so much as to the 1938 movie. Shaw did the screenplay and it's full of good cuts and richer scenes. The Broadway musical was officially based on the play but I've long felt it was really based on the movie. Maybe the new movie will be based on the old movie.

Today's Political Scorecard

On June 7, 2005, I posted the following item on this weblog…

George W. Bush's approval rating is now a full twenty points lower than Bill Clinton's was on the day he was impeached.

At the time, many e-mailers found that stunning and unlikely and wrote to ask how I figured that because it couldn't possibly be so. I replied to all with citations that Bush's approval rating was then at 48%. Clinton's, on the day he was impeached, varied between 68% and 73%.

On March 24, 2006, I noted that the gap was now thirty points. Bush was at 38%.

On April 27, 2007, I noted that the gap was at forty points. Bush was at 28%.

I thought he couldn't go much lower than that; that we wouldn't see forty-five. There are people in this world — Democrats and Republicans — who wouldn't change their minds about the guy they backed if he confessed to masterminding 9/11. You also have a lot of people, I suspect, who think Bush has been a terrible prez but aren't going to say that to a pollster. They still believe in an agenda they think or thought he represented — banning abortions, slashing taxes, being "tough" with our enemies, etc. — and they're afraid that to not support Bush now is to give a leg up to those with the opposing wishlist.

Still, Bush is at 25% in the latest CBS poll (with 67% disapproval) and today, we have the release of a couple of Senate reports that prompt the headline, "Senate committee: Bush knew Iraq claims weren't true." True, it's largely the Democrats on the Senate Select Intelligence Committee saying that with the G.O.P. members dissenting…but that oughta be good for another point off Bush's score. And then at some point, McCain's going to have to ratchet up his criticisms of Bush to try and convince voters he's not running for George's third term…

So I'm thinking we will get to 45 points below Clinton's impeachment numbers in at least a couple of the major polls. Heck, we might even see fifty.

Today's Video Link

Today's clip runs three minutes and I like the first half best. It's footage shot around Los Angeles in the forties or early fifties. Of special note to me is a shot of a place called Owl Drugs. Owl Drugs was located at the corner of Westwood Boulevard and Kinross in Westwood Village, up near UCLA. A lot of the comic books in my collection were purchased in the sixties, right off the newsrack at Owl Drugs.

The rest of the video is footage of J. Edgar Hoover and other Washington-types in, I believe, the late fifties. This is interesting, too…but not as interesting as the shot of Owl Drugs.

VIDEO MISSING

Signs of the Times

Those of you who live in Los Angeles who are yearning for a signed copy of Kirby: King of Comics (signed by me, that is) have two opportunities in the next seven days…

This coming Saturday, I'll be scribbling my name in copies at Meltdown Comics, which is located at 7522 Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood. I'll be there from 2 PM 'til 4 PM, assuming anyone shows up. At some point in there, there will be a Q-and-A hosted by Animation Producer/Director Jon Schnepp.

Then on Wednesday, June 11, I'll be out in Santa Monica at Hi-De-Ho Comics, which is at 525 Santa Monica Boulevard, near Lincoln. I can't find the piece of paper that tells me what time I'm supposed to show up but I think it's around Noon. No formal Q-and-A is planned but if you buy a book, I'll tell you darn near anything you want to know.

Hey, if you don't want my autograph, this might interest you. This Sunday, William Shatner will be signing his new book, Up Till Now, at the Los Angeles Comic Book and Science Fiction Convention, which is that one-day monthly con down at the Shrine Auditorium. Mr. Shatner, they say, will be there at 2 PM and will sign all copies purchased at the show…and nothing else. All proceeds will be donated to William Shatner's Hollywood Charity Horse Show. I might go down and get one if he promises not to sing "Rocket Man." If you come to either of my signings, rest assured I won't.

Recommended Reading

Fred Kaplan on what Barack Obama said about meeting with countries we consider hostile or dangerous to us.