Today's Political Thought

Here are some snippets from various news stories I've read this morning. See if you can find a logical connect…

  • "President Bush declares 'We do not torture.'"
  • "Over White House opposition, the Senate has passed legislation banning torture."
  • "With Vice President Dick Cheney as the point man, the administration is seeking an exemption for the CIA."
  • "It was recently disclosed by the Washington Post that the CIA maintains a network of prisons in eastern Europe and Asia, where it holds terrorist suspects."
  • "George W. Bush's administration ordered an internal inquiry into how classified data was leaked to The Washington Post and Human Rights Watch, a New York-based group."
  • "The Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider a challenge to the administration's handling of military tribunals for foreign terror suspects."
  • "Bush has urged swift confirmation of his nominee Samuel Alito, an appeals court judge, to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court."
  • "In his lower court decisions, Alito has generally been deferential to government."

So let me see if I have this straight: We have to find out whoever it was who revealed that we do torture, but of course we don't torture but we still oppose legislation that says we can't torture…

Weiners and Losers

Recently, I added a new section to this website entitled Great Los Angeles Restaurants That Ain't There No More.* It's all about great Los Angeles restaurants that ain't there no more…and I guess I should have made clear that I was talking about restaurants in which I'd dined. An awful lot of people have written me to suggest I include their favorite eateries and have named quite a few places I never went inside and in most cases, never heard of.

To the ones listed there, I may soon be adding Tail o' the Pup, the infamous hot dog stand in the shape of a big hot dog that's been seen in about two-thirds of the movies set in Los Angeles the last few decades. It used to be located near the corner of Beverly Boulevard and La Cienega and when the proprietor lost his lease, there was much wailing and protest…a lot of it, I suspect, from people who never cared about the Tail o' the Pup enough to stop by and buy a chili dog. But they somehow lamented its passing and the owner wasn't ready to give in, so he finally found new land a few blocks away, over on San Vicente Boulevard. A fancy hotel was erected on its former site and snippy critics haven't been able to resist comparing its restaurant unfavorably to the hot dog stand it displaced.

Rumor has it that the present location of Tail o' the Pup is now to be developed for some fancier building not shaped like a meat product, and that this may be it for the kitsch landmark. If I owned Universal City Walk or Hollywood and Highland or some other tourist mecca, I think I'd buy the thing and move it there, with or without the business inside it. But I own no such place to put it and I don't think it would fit in my yard.

I haven't eaten at Tail o' the Pup for about twenty years. If the rumors of its demise are true, I may try to get by there in the next month (which is how long my source says they'll remain open) and scarf down a frankfurter, just to say I was there. If you hear anything about it going or staying, let me know.

[*Update, years later: That section of my weblog was converted to a separate blog which is no longer online.]

Late Night Loyalties

Yours truly is quoted in this Associated Press article about why Jay Leno is increasing his lead over David Letterman in late night. I said what I said but I wish I'd said it a bit more eloquently.

I don't think Jay's show is "different every night." I think both shows have become more repetitive than I'd like. I just find Letterman has gotten a bit too predictable for me to watch it as often as I once did. I TiVo both programs, fast-forward through certain segments of both and enjoy Dave when he seems truly engaged in an interview, which lately is like one guest per week. I don't like at all that Jay so often delegates Act Two of his show — the comedy bit after the first commercial break — to others, and I can't stand the bits based on the utter stupidity of people on the street or in the audience. (I feel the same way about Letterman's use of stagehands and Rupert, the guy with the deli around the corner.)

But night after night, Leno comes out with a first-rate topical monologue and unlike Letterman, always seems happy to be there, happy to see his guests. I go back and forth but these days, I find myself watching more of Jay, less of Dave. What I should have told that reporter is that what I really wish is that those guys had more competition than each other.

Recommended Reading

Albert Brooks on his (and I guess, my) generation getting older. Thanks for the link, Bruce Reznick.

Talk, Talk, Talk…

Every so often, I find myself listening to talk radio until at some point, I decide that I'd prefer music. Or the din of jackhammers. Or car alarms or the sound of orangutans mating or anything but talk radio. This week, whenever I've been in the car, it's somehow been talk radio. For the next few — at least until I forget why I'm giving it up forever — it'll be music, jackhammers or the orangutans. Heard some Limbaugh. Heard some Air America. Didn't much care for either and, oddly enough, not because of politics.

I liked Al Franken's show its first few months when (I have the feeling) it was all new and exciting to him. I think the filling of three hours per day is getting to the guy and the loss of his co-host has made it more evident that he lacks certain broadcasting skills. Say what you will about Rush but he's been at it for a long time and if he gets bored with his own program — and I'm sure he does — he's learned not to let it show. Franken's great as a guest on talk shows and he was especially good with Leno the other night. I've enjoyed his past books and based on this week's New York Times best seller list, I'm obviously not the only one. But there are certain skills one needs to sustain on the radio, especially when you have to fill 15 hours a week, and I don't think Al has them. Maybe he'll make a better senator.

One hears mixed things about how Air America is doing. When I wrote here last April that I was enjoying Franken, I began hearing from those who didn't…and I don't think they were even listening to him. They just didn't like the fact that he was on. One of those folks began bombarding me with links to articles on right-wing sites that proclaimed, not as predictions but as allegedly verified news items, that the network would be off within the week. Months later, those reports look about as accurate as Colin Powell at the U.N.

Still, unlike Powell's presentation, they may be not so much wrong as premature. I don't think "Liberal Radio" will ever catch on big; not unless they solve two problems, one being the limitations of the on-air talent. Never mind the issues. Conservative hosts are just, with some exceptions, more fun to listen to. They're fiery and colorful and generally angrier, which makes for more compelling chatter. And most significant is that if you agree with some or most of what they say, I suspect you come away with solid reinforcement of the rightness of your worldview and satisfaction that you are mainstream and will prevail. "Progressive Talk," as they call the local Air America offerings, is just depressing. If you're a conservative, it depresses you because they're trashing all that you hold sacred. If you're a liberal, it's even worse. I sampled an hour or three of Randi Rhodes on Air America this week and all I heard was how horrible everything is under Bush, how terrible Cheney is, how badly the war in Iraq is going, etc. And even though I agree to some extent with all of that, it was enough to depress Ed McMahon in the middle of a Carson monologue. Someone — please — tell this woman that when you preach to the converted, you ought to send them out with some nugget of hope.

During the Clinton years, Rush and his kind spent a lot of time bemoaning darn near every itch and scratch of Bill and Hillary…but it was always in the context of, "We have them on the run and we shall triumph." In particular, he has long had a flair for taking every bit of bad news for conservatives and assiduously explaining how it isn't really bad news. You'd think, with Bush's popularity rating nearing that of strep throat and polls showing an electorate more eager to elect Democrats than they've been in years, Ms. Rhodes could find some scintilla of optimism somewhere. Maybe when I wasn't listening, she did…but while my car radio was on, she was wailing like a bad road company of Hecuba.

So I guess my problem with Conservative Talk Radio is that it's all about telling conservatives what conservatives want to hear, regardless of the truth. And my problem with Liberal Talk Radio is that it's all about telling liberals what liberals don't want to hear, regardless of the truth. Every time I listen to either, I soon realize what it is that I want to hear. It's music. Or those jackhammers or the orangutans or —

Wait. Maybe jackhammers and orangutans mating sound too much like talk radio. I think I'll stick with music.

Allen Sherman – My Son, The Box

I've been talking here about the new 6-CD Allan Sherman collection — My Son, the Box — and about how interesting it is for me to re-visit these songs I loved so in my teen years. Not only am I hearing lyrics I'd never understood before but I'm noting things that bother me now that didn't bother me then. As I've become a connoisseur of the great lyric writers, I've come to wince at near-rhymes, like when someone thinks "moon" rhymes with "room" or "unsatisfactory" with "factory." Sherman has some nice joke rhymes in his writing, coupling "home in" with "abdomen" and "belt, sir" with "seltzer" but he also has a lot more of those awkward near-rhymes than I'd remembered. The two I cited are both on his albums. They didn't bother me then but they bother me (a little) now.

It's also struck me, listening to his work in roughly chronological work, that Sherman ran out of steam on his later albums. Every one has some gems but the last few records have a quite a few tunes that suggest a certain paucity of ideas, especially when he gets into the "laundry list" songs that just itemize food items or states or parts of the body. Even some of these are rather pleasant because the arrangements are good and Sherman sings with great enthusiasm and warmth, but he sure seems to run out of creative steam here and there. Once upon a time, the notion of a new Allan Sherman record was such a happy thing that the drop-off in quality didn't bother me a lot. Again, it does now…though not so much that I won't be playing all six CDs over and over for quite a while.

The boxed set contains excellent liner notes by Mark Cohen and they deserve better presentation (like, a larger font) than they get here. Cohen wrote me that he is considering a full-scale biography of the man and I hope he goes ahead with it. It's way overdue and it should be done before any more Sherman associates pass away, uninterviewed.

The set also includes Sherman's previously-unreleased parody of My Fair Lady. At the time Lerner and Loewe refused him permission to spoof their classic Broadway show, he probably thought it was a bad break but it was the best thing that ever happened to Allan Sherman's career. For one thing, it isn't all that wonderful. For another, it has those kind of "inside" Jewish references that would have gotten him typed as a comedian catering mainly to the Catskills crowd, a la the kind of material Myron Cohen did when he wasn't on The Ed Sullivan Show. One of the selling points of Sherman's breakthrough album, My Son, the Folk Singer, was that it was Jewish but not too Jewish. You could laugh at it without knowing what a pupik was, and Warner Brothers Records managed to get it into stores in non-Jewish neighborhoods, which didn't happen much with Mickey Katz records.

Someone at the company was also smart enough to lead off Side One with "The Ballad of Harry Lewis" and not "The Streets of Miami," which was the first number Sherman performed at the recording session/party. They also wisely put "Sarah Jackman" as the first song on Side Two. Back in the days of vinyl albums, the first song on each side was all some buyers and radio people played. Both songs were funny. Neither played mainly to the Jews in the audience.

It probably also helped that Allan Sherman's name wasn't Izzy Schwartz or something of the sort; not that Anti-Semitism per se would have been a factor but some people would have figured, "Oh, that'll be full of Jewish references I won't get." I'm Jewish and even I could never understand a couple of Jackie Mason's early bits. I remember once having to ask my Aunt what a shidach was. (It's an arranged marriage, and Mason was catering to people who knew that. By the way, pupik is Yiddish for navel.) Sherman made Jewish humor accessible to folks who lived in…I don't know. Name some state without a lot of Jews at the time. His records sold there, too. That was why he was able to move so many of them.

One other thing that occurred to me about Allan Sherman: In 1965, he wrote a very funny autobiography called A Gift of Laughter, which is long outta-print but which I highly recommend as a joy to read. You'd especially love the last chapter, which is about a show he did with Harpo Marx which turned out to be Harpo's final performance. (Here's an online scan of an abridged version that ran in Reader's Digest. It's better in the actual book.)

I don't necessarily recommend the book as actual history, however. You may have seen me mention my high school buddy, Bruce Reznick, who occasionally sends in items I post on this weblog. Bruce's father is the great comedy writer, Sidney Reznick, and he was a featured player in one anecdote in A Gift of Laughter. Sidney says it ain't so. A number of other Sherman friends and co-workers I've encountered have suggested that what he wrote is not exactly what they remembered…and notably, Sherman omits one key verifiable fact from his life story. He tells the rags-to-riches tale of how he went from unemployed, unemployable TV producer to Big Comedy Star practically overnight…but fails to mention that My Son, the Folk Singer was his second record. He had previously done a much less successful — perhaps because it was "too Jewish" — single of "Jake's Song" and "A Satchel and a Seck." I guess it would have cluttered his life story and made it seem less exciting to know that he wasn't a smash hit with his first attempt at a comedy record.

This is not uncommon in autobiographies. When Moss Hart wrote Act One, he told the tale of his maiden success as a playwright, making Once in a Lifetime sound like his first work to make it to Broadway. It wasn't. His friend, Alan Jay Lerner, also left some early failures out of his autobiography, The Street Where I Live. There are many other examples. What's odd (and oddly endearing) about Sherman's book is that it's filled with flops and humiliations as a comedy writer and producer. He owns up to an awful lot of them but pretends like when he finally tried recording song parodies, he struck gold his first time out. I don't fault him for that. I just think it's…well, kind of strange. It doesn't make me love his work any less, though.

That Kid

Jerry Lewis has written (with co-author James Kaplan) a book about his relationship with Dean Martin. I've only had the time to skim it but a lot of the details seem to be at odds with previous accounts by others…which is not to say Jerry's might not be the truth or at least closer to the truth. I'll write more about it after I have the time to give it a good read but in the meantime, you can order a copy from Amazon by clicking here.

I didn't get my copy that way. Last evening, I went to an event where Mr. Lewis appeared. Producer George Schlatter interviewed him, Jerry took questions from a loving audience, and pre-signed copies (signed almost illegibly, "Jerry") were available for the purchasing. Jerry was funny and generally self-effacing, and he also looked to be in very good health for a man who's close to eighty and whose body has been through all that his has endured. Once or twice, he launched into condemnations of today's comedians — his big problem with most of them is that they don't move enough on stage — and of shows like those of Jerry Springer and Maury Povich. But he also spoke well of Dean, referring to him often as "my partner" and making clear what a great performer he thought Martin was…and he didn't mean just as a singer. In particular, he emphasized how fast Dean could pick up on a new routine and go right out and perform it, letter-perfect every time.

Speaking of the breakup, Jerry said — I'm quoting from memory here — "There were outside forces working against us…people who'd tell Dean, 'You're a great singer. You could do a solo. You don't need the monkey.' And there were people telling me, 'You don't need him.' You try not to listen to people like that but late at night, when you're lying in bed, you hear them saying those things over and over. That contributed to it. It became like a cancer on our partnership and one way or another, you have to remove a cancer."

The conversation veered towards Jerry's career and he was asked about his infamous unreleased film, The Day the Clown Cried. He said — again, this is from memory — "I did my job as an actor. I did not do my job as a director. The film is not worthy of being seen and it will never be seen. I won't allow it." The questioner asked him if it had ever been completed or if it was still in a rough cut form and Jerry shrugged and said, "What difference does it make?"

He praised some of today's performers, singling out Robin Williams, Martin Short, Steve Martin, Billy Crystal and Paul Reiser. He said his TV viewing is confined to Bravo, A&E, The Discovery Channel, The History Channel and other similar stations and that he does not watch sitcoms. Asked about the white sweatsocks that he usually wears, sometimes even with formal garb, he said, "I wear them because I like them. They feel comfortable to me. I change socks about four times a day, always putting on a brand new, never-before-worn pair. Each year, I send hundreds of pairs of socks to –" and he gave the name of some charitable organization in Las Vegas. "There are people in Hollywood who spend just as much money each year on something else that's white but they put it up their noses."

There were two brief outpourings of the fabled Lewis anger. One was when he got on the subject of critics. The other occurred because in ticking off a list of great comedians of the past, he pointedly mentioned "The Marx Brothers without Groucho." Later, someone in the audience asked about that odd omission and he told a story that didn't quite make sense. He said it occurred in 1978 or 1979 at a comedy festival in Canada. Groucho, he said, appeared the day before him and said bad things about "my best friend in the world, Stan Laurel." As Jerry told the story, he got up there the next day and "took him apart," telling the world that Groucho was an untalented thief of old jokes. Lewis then pointed out that Groucho's son Arthur wrote a book about Martin and Lewis that…well, I'm not sure if he read it but he sure didn't like it, and that had something to do with his low opinion of Groucho.

As I said, the tale didn't quite compute for me or, I suspect, most of those present. For one thing, by 1978, Groucho was in no shape to make a public appearance, having died in 1977. I don't think he made any speeches anywhere after about '74 and in earlier times, had expressed naught but admiration for Laurel and Hardy. Even assuming Groucho appeared somewhere at some time and said something negative about Laurel, that of course has little to do with whether or not he was a great comedian…and the fact that his son wrote a book has even less. So I'm not sure what was happening there.

Apart from those odd digressions into acrimony, the evening was most enjoyable for the folks who turned out for it. On the way out, there was a younger person repeating over and over, like it did not seem humanly possible, "That's the guy who made The Nutty Professor." Yes, it was. There's an awful lot of history in that man and even if he was there to push a book, it was nice of him to share some of it with us.

Ballot Boxing

We have an election in California next Tuesday. A small portion of the electorate, I'm guessing, will trudge to their polling places and punch chads on eight propositions.

Earlier this evening, I spent some time with my sample ballot and read some online articles, and I decided to vote for Propositions 79 and 80 and to vote against the others. I began composing a post to put up here explaining why when I suddenly received an e-mail from Dawna Kaufmann directing me to the L.A. Weekly ballot recommendations. Dawna, of course, suggests that I vote accordingly. I don't often agree with that newspaper but I went over to read their views to see if they changed my mind about anything…and they did. They changed my mind about writing my own post. Instead, I'm linking to theirs because their critiques of the propostions mirror my own.

The only one that was a close call for me was 77, which sets up a panel of retired judges to redraw districts in (theoretically) a non-partisan manner. If it just did that, I'd probably go for it as the gerrymandering is pretty stark and not conducive to democracy. But the proposition would open up the process with no guarantee that politics wouldn't enter into it a hundred different ways and it could easily make things worse instead of better. Right problem, wrong solution.

Governor Schwarzenegger, whose popularity is plunging towards that of the man he replaced, is behind four of the propositions — 74, 75, 76 and 77. The pollsters, who don't have the greatest track record in this state, are saying that of these, only 74 (which seeks to roll back teacher tenure) is close, while the other three are running between 11 and 22 points behind. I have the awful feeling that when they fail, and they could all fail, Arnold will give a speech, promise to try again and announce, "I'll be back." I don't know what kind of advisors the man has but surely there's someone in Sacramento who can tell him that Californians are really tired of hearing him recycle his old movie lines and work some conjugation of "to terminate" into every other sentence. It was cute when he first did it but the quotes are starting to sound like replacements for actual policies. Even Ronald Reagan knew enough to limit the Gipper dialogue.

Caution!

If you have anything important to do for the next half-hour, do not go to this site and start playing the game you'll find there. You have been warned.

Recommended Reading

You may have heard about the New Yorker article by Jeffrey Goldberg in which Brent Scowcroft explains why he thinks the Iraq War is a huge mistake. That article is now available for your online perusal.

Shazam!

I can't believe I just learned about Walt Grogan's terrific Marvel Family website devoted to the Fawcett Captain Marvel and friends. Walt's a bit more interested in the later versions of those characters than I am but it's a wonderful resource with fine graphics. There was a wonderful simplicity to the material published by Fawcett in the forties and midway into the fifties, and just enough self-parody to not be silly. When I was younger and read the books, I didn't quite get why Captain Marvel was more popular than Superman but in later years, after I'd read enough of both, I think I got it. Walt's site reminds me of a lot of what I like about those books.

Today's Political Comment

From an editorial in tomorrow morning's New York Times

Americans are long overdue for an answer to why they were told there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Well, maybe one reason was that they read The New York Times.

Hail to Thee, Fat Person!

I've received and am enjoying My Son, the Box, which is the 6-disc collection of darn near everything Allan Sherman ever recorded in his short but wonderful career singing song parodies. I hope in the next week or so to compile and post a list here of everything that isn't in this collection. It's not a long list.

Rumor has it that the 4,000 limited edition copies that have been issued by Rhino Handmade are going fast. If you'd like to order one, you can use this Amazon link but you'll actually save money at some other sites. CD Universe, for instance, has it for $98.

Allan Sherman's records were very important to me when I was a lad. I played them over and over and over again to the point where I have most of them committed to memory — though perhaps not as well as I'd thought. These new CDs are clearer than my old records and I'm noticing a few lyrics that I'd previously misunderstood. I'm also noticing that Mr. Sherman didn't know some of his lyrics as well as he should have. On My Son, the Folk Singer, there's a short tune that goes, "Mammy's little baby loves matzoh, matzoh / Mammy's little baby loves matzoh balls." In it, Sherman sings…

Stole the skillet
Stole the lead
Stole a lotta balls
Made of Pesach bread
Stole the chicken
Out of the soup
Stole the pot
And made a lot of chicken soup

I always thought it was "Made a Pesach bread." Then again, I'll bet the line after next was written as "out of the coop" and Sherman sang it wrong at the recording. There are a couple of those on his early albums and with someone obviously deciding that the over-all performance was too good to correct.

I'm also learning a few lyrics I had wrong from Robert Sherman's site. Robbie is Allan Sherman's son and we have him to thank for this wonderful boxed set of CDs, and for the fact that it's so complete and so everything Allan Sherman fans could have wanted. Over at www.campgranada.com, he's posted the lyrics to most of the songs in his father's repertoire. Again, I'm discovering that I had a few lines wrong all these years.

And here's one other link of note. You can purchase an Allan Sherman ringtone for your cellular phone here.

For the most part, the material holds up very well. Yes, a lot of the references are dated. But when I first heard and loved My Son, the Folk Singer, I was ten and I didn't get some of the references then, either. David Dubinsky? Olga San Juan? Sherman was just a funny man and we don't have to understand everything he was talking about to enjoy his work. I never have, anyway. I'm very happy with this new collection.

Brits and Bilko

It won't be there much longer but the BBC Radio website is currently offering a half-hour audio documentary on the Sgt. Bilko TV show. To find it, go to this link and look down to where it says You'll Never Get Rich: The Bilko Story. That's where you want to click.

The broadcast makes the not-infrequent error of identifying Larry Gelbart (who is among the interviewed) as having written for Your Show of Shows. It has a quote from a daughter of Phil Silvers who claims her father made up all his dialogue, which I don't believe for a second. I also don't believe the claim that anyone affiliated with the show ever thought of recasting the lead role when Mr. Silvers asked for more money. Otherwise, if one can get past the host's theatrics, it's pretty good. Thanks to Miles Curtis for telling me about it.

It's interesting that You'll Never Get Rich (aka Sgt. Bilko, aka The Phil Silvers Show) was even more popular in England than it was here. It was popular here but not the way it was over there. I am of the opinion that one of the reasons for this is that often when it's been aired on American TV the last few decades, it's been with bad prints that are full of splices and awkward edits. When an old black-and-white show fails to get ratings, execs have a tendency to blame the lack of color and say, "Audiences today won't watch black-and-white." But they do. I Love Lucy has never been off and the early seasons of The Andy Griffith Show are on several times a day in some cities. Those shows have been well-preserved and when it's been necessary to lop a few minutes out to accommodate more commercials, it's generally been done without being obvious or destructive. I think Bilko would play just fine over here if whoever owns the show would treat the episodes like they're worth watching.