Recommended Reading

As readers of this weblog know, one of my pet issues is how dysfunctional our court system is, especially with regard to crimes for which people receive the Death Penalty. I go back and forth on whether the Death Penalty is just, moral or even a good idea…but I do not waver on the belief that if we do have a Death Penalty, we should only be executing people who are definitely guilty. And I'm amazed how to some people, that seems to be a relatively-unimportant, even bothersome technicality.

I think there are some folks in this nation who really like the idea of the government putting Bad Guys to death. They like it so much that they don't want to hear that some of those Bad Guys might be innocent, lest that revelation make Capital Punishment less popular. How else to explain situations like that of a man named Darnell Williams?

Here's an op-ed piece by a lawyer who is upset that the state (Indiana, in this case) will not allow DNA testing that might prove that Williams, who is soon to be excuted, is innocent. You would think that would be a reasonable request. Does anyone really benefit if an innocent man is executed? You'd think people would want that, if only because it means the guilty party pulls off The Perfect Crime and gets away with murder. But the execution is still planned and the DNA test isn't.

And no, the lawyer who wrote this op-ed piece is not Darnell Williams' lawyer. He's the lawyer who prosecuted and convicted Darnell Williams. Even he thinks Williams may be innocent of the killings…

Update

Just fixed some typos and rewrote two badly-written sentences in the Bob Hope piece.

Also, in answer to Jerry Beck's question over at Cartoon Research, I understand Bob did have a complete collection of the Bob Hope comic book. In fact, there are some in this exhibit of his life at The Library of Congress. That website will show you more Hope memorabilia than you could ever want to peruse.

One other thought, perhaps a bit morbid: We seem to be suffering from a paucity of Elder Statesmen Comedians. It wasn't that long ago, we had Hope and Berle and Burns and Lucy and a couple of other folks in their eighties and nineties, all very visible and around to be interviewed. Now, the three biggies who come to mind are Jerry Lewis (age 77), Johnny Carson (age 78) and Sid Caesar (age 81).

Of those three, only Jer is really active and he doesn't seem to wear the mantle well. Carson's a hermit. Over on the David Letterman fan sites, there seems to be the recurring dream that Johnny will appear with Dave or even guest-host for him. But last year, one of Carson's closest associates told me that he couldn't imagine anything so important that it would get Johnny in front of a camera again. ("Maybe if it would cure cancer," the guy said. Then he added, "But maybe not even then.") Sid Caesar is in poor health and the last few times I've seen him speak, he fell back on the double-talk German and French, rather than really talk.

Are there any great, legendary comedians in their nineties? Or even in their mid-to-late eighties? I can't think of one. There's probably a reason for this gap but I haven't taken the time to puzzle out what it might be. Maybe something about the timing by which radio comedy shows came to prominence and then evolved into television.

Anyway, it's just a thought. And like I said, maybe a bit morbid. But I'd sure hate to see the day when the Great Elder Statesman of Comedy is Gallagher.

Recommended Reading

Over at Salon, Michelle Goldberg writes a thought-provoking article about the uneasiness some Republicans feel about where Bush is taking the country. This feels like an important issue to me.

Since this is Salon, you have to either be a subscriber or watch ads in order to read the entire article. If you've been thinking of subscribing, now would be a great time to do so. The price goes up in about four days.

But I Wanna Tell Ya…

bobhope09

Fans used to complain that DC Comics had misleading covers but this one sure was accurate: "America's Favorite Funnyman." Bob Hope was that, and he held the title far longer than anyone else ever has or will. I haven't really cruised the Internet much since I awoke to the news that he's passed away but I'd wager every current events/news website is making that point, probably under a banner that says "Thanks for the Memories."The obits were prepared long ago, and about all I can add to them is to recall a few times I had the honor — and he sure made you feel like it was one — of being in the presence of Mr. Robert Hope. He also made you feel like he excelled at being Bob Hope; that he knew precisely who and what he was, and that it was who and what he wanted to be: A very big, very busy star but eminently approachable in spite of the fact that you couldn't get near him. I felt this instantly the first time I met him…in, believe it or not, the bargain basement area of a May Company department store.

It was the one at the corner of Pico and Overland in West Los Angeles, a few blocks from where I then lived. It was January of '75 and Hope had just published The Last Christmas Show, a book about his overseas tours to entertain the troops. He was appearing at the store to sign copies and I was thinking of going, not so much to see him in person as to get an autographed book. But I figured the line would extend to around Bakersfield and I didn't want one that badly. As it happened, it was pouring rain that morning and it suddenly let up around a half-hour before the time of Mr. Hope's signing. "Aha," I thought wrongly, "There'll be a very low turnout."

So I threw on my raincoat and walked up to the May Company, all the time pondering what Bob "Mr. Topical Monologue" Hope might say or do.  At the time, Olympic swim champ Mark Spitz seemed to be the punchline to every joke so I imagined Hope saying something like, "I wouldn't say it's wet out there but on the escalator up, I passed a halibut, three salmon and Mark Spitz."

When I got there, I went up to the third level, where the line snaked all around the floor — hundreds and hundreds of people waiting for him. I decided not to wait in it. The signs said he was appearing for an hour and there was no way even "Rapid Robert," as some called him, could sign books for all those folks in that time. (Some people had already purchased and were holding three or four copies.)  He was due in twenty minutes so I decided to wander the store and return when he arrived to catch a glimpse of the man and — and this interested me more — see how he'd handle that huge crowd.

I went down to the store's basement where they sold cheap art supplies.  I'd been there about two minutes when some doors behind me flew open and an entourage of men stormed in from the parking garage. In the center of the group, flawlessly attired in a pale blue-grey suit, was Bob Hope. And by dumb luck, I was standing between him and the elevator to which they were leading him.

As if I mattered in the least, he walked up to me and shook my hand.  Then he took note of my damp raincoat and said, "Hey, looks like it's wet outside."  How had he not noticed that on his drive there?  In reply to him, I threw my line: "I wouldn't say it's wet out there but on the escalator up, I passed a halibut, three salmon and Mark Spitz."  He laughed…and I guess I thought, "Hey, I just made Bob Hope laugh."

Before I could grasp the significance (if any) of that, Hope's men swept him into the elevator and he was gone. I wasn't entirely sure he'd ever been there.  So I sprinted for the escalator and managed to make it up to the book-signing area just as he was arriving. The line of buyers broke into applause as he strode effortlessly to the front table and picked up a little microphone. "Hey, I wanna thank you all for coming," he said, and everyone laughed because he sounded just like Bob Hope. "Boy, it's wet around here," he continued. "On the escalator up, I passed a halibut, three salmon and Mark Spitz."  Everyone laughed again. Even I laughed a half-second before I realized: Hey, that's my line.

(It is perhaps worth noting that we all laughed in spite of the fact that we all knew he hadn't taken the escalator. It worked in the joke, and that was what mattered. There's an oft-quoted story about Hope appearing once in England and telling a joke where the punchline was something like, "They went to a motel." The audience howled even though at the time the word "motel" was largely unknown in England. An American journalist who was present asked one of the people who'd laughed if they knew what a motel was. The person said they didn't. The journalist asked them why they'd laughed then. The reply was, "Because we know he's funny and it seemed like the end of the joke.")

At the May Company, Hope sat down and began signing books and I suddenly decided that no matter how long I had to wait, I was going to get one. It took about ninety minutes — longer than the announced time of his appearance but still a lot less than I'd have guessed, given how many people were ahead of me.

They had it down to a science: One of Hope's helpers gave you a slip of paper on which you were to write what you wanted Bob to write.The helper would then look at it and edit it down or make you rewrite it to keep it brief or to remove things that Bob didn't want to write. They'd then pass your book to Bob with it open to the signing page and your slip placed just above where he signed, and he'd sign. The assistants were in control and they kept it moving so swiftly, you were almost afraid to try and say something to Hope. It disappointed a lot of people who'd come, hoping to exchange a few words or perhaps get a photo ("No pictures," the aides scolded) but you had to marvel at the efficiency: A ton of books were sold and signed, and Bob didn't look like the bad guy for not engaging you in a leisurely chat.

When it was my turn, I tried to remind him of our basement encounter, hoping he'd thank me for the joke or something.  He grinned and said thanks but I'm not sure he had any idea what either of us was talking about.  He just had to keep the line moving.  I went home, pleased to have an inscribed first edition, proud that I'd gotten even those few seconds of individual attention in the basement…and proud that I'd "written" something that fit Bob Hope so well, Bob Hope had used it.  I tried telling some of my friends about it but I wasn't a professional comedy writer back then and they obviously didn't believe me.

Back then, I was occasionally spending afternoons at NBC studios in Burbank where I had an almost-legal way to get in. Once you were in, if you acted like you belonged there and knew where you were going, no one ever stopped you from visiting tapings and rehearsals. In earlier years, I'd spent most of my time watching Laugh-In tape but that show was over by '75, so I'd go watch The Dean Martin Show rehearse (without Dean Martin) or watch The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (which sometimes even starred Johnny Carson). If Hope was there when I was, I'd watch from afar as he taped a sketch for one of his specials. My most vivid memories of those moments are of him yelling at his eternal cue card man, Barney McNulty, when the cards weren't in the right order or properly legible. Shortly after that day at the May Company, I was present when he was on with Johnny. I think it was a Friday show and he was plugging his latest special, which was to air Monday.

Poaching on the set, I managed to see how it was done: About thirty seconds before Johnny introduced him, Hope strode into Stage 1 with the inevitable entourage, perhaps even the same one. He was still reviewing a piece of paper with a couple of jokes on it as the band struck up his theme song. Then he handed the page to an aide, walked out to tumultuous applause, and sat down next to Carson, who expertly fed him the questions that elicited the just-studied jokes. The segment went about as well as such segments ever do, and my overall admiration was not so much at the wit but at the sheer expertise in the delivery. Bob and Johnny were both utterly in control and things went precisely the way both wanted them to.

At the first commercial break, Hope stepped out and told Johnny's studio audience that they were so good, he had decided to ask them to stick around after The Tonight Show was finished so that he could use them to tape the monologue for his special. The crowd almost gasped with delight. Hope explained that the rest of the special had been recorded a week or two back but he always did the monologue at the last minute so it could be more topical. He also explained that the stage we were in — Stage 1 — was his design. The steep rake was because when he was performing, he liked to be able to look up and see as many laughing faces as possible.

Sure enough, not one person budged from their seats as the Carson show concluded. A different curtain was flown in for Bob to perform in front of, and he took a few minutes to run through his cue cards with Barney McNulty. When all was in readiness, Hope stepped into position and did the monologue three times. The first time through, everyone laughed a lot. The second time through, they laughed a little less. And the third time through, they laughed more than the second time, because Hope began screwing with the wording and muttering things like, "We'll cut that one." Johnny Carson was just off-camera throughout and at one point in the middle of the third take, Bob stepped over to him and whispered something that I suspect was very dirty, and Carson got hysterical. Then Hope thanked everyone for sticking around — like they'd all done him a favor —and he and the entourage disappeared. Again, my overwhelming impression was of efficiency more than inspiration. The following Monday night, what aired was most of the first take with maybe five jokes cut, and perhaps one or two inserted from Take Two.

I met him one other time and actually got to talk to him when he appeared on The Barbara Mandrell Show when he did a guest appearance and one of the producers, Marty Krofft, introduced us. Among the things we discussed were that I told him I'd just been reading a book about Walter Winchell and asked him if he was ever going to make the long-rumored movie in which he would play the gossip columnist. He said, "Oh, definitely," though he never did. He started telling me what a fascinating son-of-a-bitch Winchell had been — though he chuckled when he told the following story, which I'd already heard.

One of his first screen appearances was in a dreadful short comedy called Going Spanish. Shortly after viewing it, Hope ran into Winchell who asked him how it was. "When they catch Dillinger, they're going to make him sit through it twice," the legend-to-be replied. Winchell printed the remark in his column and the movie studio dropped Hope's contract, proclaiming they had enough trouble selling his films without him knocking them in the press. I said to Hope, "Well, that sure hurt your career" and he grinned. He could grin because, I suspect, that was the last mistake he ever made.

Watergate Revisited

I just happened across this news item from May and was disappointed to learn that the experts who once thought they could recover the sound from the infamous Nixon tape have given up. What was said during the eighteen-and-a-half minute gap remains a mystery…at least for now.

Internet Forums

Several folks (including its proprietor, Jonah Weiland) have written to me concerning my comments on the website, Comic Book Resources. All have noted that one can avoid pop-ups by skipping the first page and going directly to, for instance, Scott Shaw!'s Oddball Comics Page. Or Augie DeBlieck Jr's Pipeline column. Or even Steven Grant's Permanent Damage commentaries. I suppose I should have thought of that. I don't begrudge Jonah whatever income the pop-up ads generate for him and I don't mind sneaking in the back door. (I do wonder how effective pop-up ads are, anywhere on the Internet, but that's not his fault.)

Regarding the message boards there: I guess I'm bothered that the wonderful tool of Free Speech and Communication that is the Internet isn't put to better use. I've had fine, informative exchanges on many conversation boards but sooner if not later, those forums all seem to be made dysfunctional by (generalization alert) loud folks who (another generalization alert) hide behind fake names and therefore feel empowered to be a little ruder than necessary. CBR is better than most but it seems to happen everywhere. Among folks who fit vaguely into the dubious category of "comic book professional," I am more tolerant than most but even I find myself lately avoiding public Internet forums. To participate means to eventually find yourself in a rather pointless slap-fight with some probably-anonymous soul who preempts meaningful discussion with hostility or sheer, unadulterated Attention-Getting.

I talked about this with a few industry professionals at the Comic-Con and heard every one of them utter a cliché about life being too short. As creative folks, we are (yet another generalization) usually reticent to suggest that anyone be made to shut up, so we just withdraw. Oddly enough, when I've done this in the past, I've sometimes been accused of advocating censorship. Apparently, some folks' definition of Free Speech requires that all parties stick around and participate in discussions they no longer enjoy…so, for emphasis: I am not suggesting anyone anywhere not be allowed to post whatever opinions they have, even anonymously, in any venue that welcomes that. I'm just wishing for some different kinds of venues. I've been thinking for some time about one that I want to set up, and this may get me off the dime to do so.

Anyway, I apologize if I was dumping on Comic Book Resources. It's one of the better comic book sites out there, especially if you can dodge the pop-up ads and certain people who post stupid messages. They have every right to post them and I have every right not to read them.

Recommended Reading

A former Nixon associate says he overheard Nixon order the Watergate break-in.

As a confirmed wallower in that scandal, I've always believed that Nixon either ordered the break-in or gave a non-specific order that that kind of thing be done. Still, this admission by Jeb Magruder comes so long after the event and is so unsubstantiated by hard evidence that I have a hard time believing it.

Recommended Reading

The dangers of wireless internet access.

By the way: This article is on the Washington Post website and like many to which I link, you have to register for the site in order to read the article. Some folks have informed me that they don't like to register for newspaper sites, mainly because they fear they'll wind up on even more spam mailing lists. I don't think the major newspapers do that but if you're worried about this, there's an easy solution. Get an extra e-mail address for sign-ups. Your Internet Service Provider may offer you extra screen names for no extra cost. If they don't, go to some service like Hotmail, get a new e-mail address for free and use it whenever you have to sign up for something. Very simple, very safe.

A Poor Correspondent, I

I've received (so far) exactly 50 e-mails commenting on my comments about William Bennett. What with deadlines, I don't think I have time to answer most of them, so I'm not going to answer any of them. Thank you all for writing and I did read them all. But a script awaits…

Bill Blogging

Bill Maher has started a weblog with hard-to-read graphics. I assume that will change.

One More Thing About Bill Bennett…

Last one for a while. But I wanted to point out that when the gambling scandal first broke, here's what the author of The Book of Virtues was saying in the press…

"Over 10 years, I'd say I've come out pretty close to even." [source]

And here's what he's saying now…

"I lost money. Overall, you lose money. And that's a — important lesson, I think — you can draw a lesson here. You will lose at the end of the day. They say it's not hard to win, it's hard to leave winning. And that's true, the house — the house will get you. I didn't lose what's been reported in the papers…I lost enough money to make a difference in terms of — you know — (CLEARS THROAT) counting up has made a difference in our lives. But I certainly know what I lost. I don't really think the amounts are anybody's business but the family's and the I.R.S. But, yeah, I lost. And over eight or ten years, you will lose." [source]

I didn't read all of The Book of Virtues. Anything in there about lying to try and cover up personal failings?

More on Bennett

George Guay sends the following thoughts, most of which I think are correct…

There's an additional, interesting wrinkle to Bennett's statements about not wanting to enforce the Texas sodomy law. From the mid60s, when the Supreme Court recognized that a right to privacy was implicit in the US Constitution (such that a state could not prohibit the sale of contraceptives to a husband and wife), people like Bennett have railed against subsequent Supreme Court decisions based on this right to privacy. Their so-called "strict constructionist" philosophy basically said that if a right isn't mentioned in the Constitution, then it isn't a right. So what happened to Bennett (and other conservatives) advocacy of a "strict constructionist" approach? How come they don't object to the Texas case on those grounds? Also, the Court's Texas decision was significant in that it didn't focus on the right to privacy as much as it was rooted in the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. So the Court was saying that, as a matter of fairness, the Texas law was unconstitutional. That's a second, separate legal basis for rejecting the law, and potentially, a stronger reason to extend most if not all other protections provided in the Constitution to gays and lesbians.

Whenever I hear someone claim to be a "strict constructionist," I think, "Ah, here's someone who's figured out a way to pass off his personal prejudices as Thomas Jefferson's." This is especially true if they also start muttering about "original intent." They're like those sleazy well-merchandised evangelists claiming that if you don't buy their whole worldview (and donate cash to support it), you're going against God's will. Always beware of anyone in the political arena who's hiding behind a "higher authority," whether it's The Lord or the Founding Fathers. It all makes for one of the things that most dismays me about public discourse, which is that no one stands up for principle over immediate gratification. When was the last time you saw anyone — liberal or conservative — say, "I don't like the result of this but we have to look at the larger principle"?

I don't know that so-called "strict constructionists" usually say that a right isn't a right unless it's spelled out in the Constitution. After all, the ninth amendment does say that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" and the tenth says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." I think such people simply look to the law for social engineering. They don't like the idea of two men having a loving, healthy relationship and they figure there must be a way to use the courts to stop it. Guys like Bennett cannot get off the subject of how they think everyone else should live. (Actually, they don't think; they know. It comes to them from God and the Constitution both and so must be enforced…)

The thing I don't think they "get" — or maybe they do, but they're making too much money to admit their cause is unwinnable in the long range — is that the country inevitably moves in the direction of liberation. You can slow it down, you can punish people for a time, you can clog the court system…but you cannot stop it or force it permanently back in the other direction, any more than you can get women back into bathing suits that cover their knees. For years, people who published or distributed sex books and movies were thrown in prison and had their lives ruined, but none of that stopped the eventual acceptance of pornography. You can buy it in supermarkets and airport gift shops and even download it onto your home computer now. Gays have been persecuted, beaten, ostracized and otherwise punished for following their hearts and libidos, but none of it has ever permanently stopped the drift towards gay rights and acceptance. It's not a battle fully won, of course, but it's farther along than it's ever been…and in interviews like the one I linked to, you can sense Bennett and some of the others bracing themselves to lose it altogether. Right now, I suspect right-wing leaders are viewing the issue of Gay Marriage as something they may be able to manipulate to energize their base and get lots of donations and activism for a time…but I don't think they seriously think they're going to be able to prevent Phil and Norman from someday joining in matrimony, maybe even of the holy variety.

Sorry if I awoke in a preachy mood myself this morning but I really think we give guys like Bill Bennett too much credit for adhering to long-range principle and too little for manipulating the public discourse for quick gains. There are no lofty ethics behind what he does; only a good awareness of what may enable social conservatives to win a few minor skirmishes, plus he also knows what will stir up the concerns of those who will buy his books or pay his lecture fees. Then it's probably back to Vegas to blow it all on the Megabucks Jackpot, which he has a better chance of winning than he has of seriously rolling back gay rights.

Comic Artist Website of the Day

I'm way behind in doing these. Sorry. Lynne Naylor is a terrific talent, especially when it comes to drawing cute ladies. She works primarily in animation where she's labored for almost every studio and won a lot of awards and you can see why if you browse her website.

Programming Note for Scott Shaw!

Tuesday night on Dog Eat Dog (NBC): People throwing fish at each other. Set your VCR.

(The reference is to the fact that Scott, in his wonderful Oddball Comics series, sometimes showcases "fish-in-the-face" covers. These are comic books where some editor or artist thought it would be really commercial to show someone on the cover being hit in the face with a fish. You'd be amazed how many of these there have been. Here's an example Scott posted on his page about a year ago.)

(While I've got you here: I should mention that if you go to Scott's site, you'll see that he's just completed a week featuring issues of Herbie, a wonderfully silly comic that is lovingly remembered by anyone who ever read an issue. I have cut down my visits to the parent website, Comic Book Resources, because of extremely-annoying pop-up ads and a couple of even-more-annoying folks on the message boards. But Scott's page is worth navigating through both kinds of obstacles.)