Speaking of Mr. Kimmel's show, here's a link to a news story on his first week's ratings which, as mentioned here, are being spun as encouraging. (And they kind of are, though I hear that given the amount of promotion the show had, ABC was expecting a bit better.) The current version of this story over on Zap2It has a funny typo in it. Take a look at the screen grab above and see if you can spot the error.
How bad does a Marx Brothers movie have to be that even the Marx Brothers didn't want to admit to having made it? Most of the early books by — or authorized by — the brothers didn't acknowledge the existence of the last movie in which Groucho, Harpo and Chico appeared more-or-less together. In interviews, Groucho always referred to A Night in Casablanca (1946) as their last movie, ignoring the 1950 Love Happy. Okay, maybe Groucho had an excuse. His role was more of a glorified cameo, remembered mainly because he played opposite a then-unknown lady named Marilyn Monroe. But Harpo carried the bulk of the plot and even received credit for coming up with the story, which was originally intended as a Harpo-only movie. When he wrote his 1961 autobiography, Harpo Speaks!, he chose to forget about the film. Why? Well, you might get a clue if you watch the thing. Turner Classic Movies is airing it very early Saturday morning — 4 AM on the East Coast. At 4 AM, it might even be funny.
Those of you worried that Hollywood is not taking the prospects of war and loss of human life seriously can take comfort in the following news item…
LOVE+PEACE+HOPE While Secretary of State Colin Powell Makes His Case for War
HOLLYWOOD — (BUSINESS WIRE) — Feb 5. 2003 — "American Idol's" Paula Abdul brought some extra love, peace and hope to the hit TV show this past Wednesday, Feb. 5, on the Fox Network. On the same day that Secretary of State Colin Powell presented his case for war before the United Nations, Ms. Abdul made her "statement" for Peace by both wearing a necklace from the LOVE+PEACE+HOPE jewelry collection, designed by Udi Behr for Oro Alexander, Inc., and presenting these symbols of peace to the contestants.
Ms. Abdul is one of numerous celebrities who have made a statement for peace with this beautiful collection, featuring eye-catching symbols of freedom, envisioned by New York artist Udi Behr for Oro Alexander, Inc. The collection signifies the resilience, optimism and determination of the human spirit.
You can read the rest of the story by clicking here. But just this much should be very reassuring.
When anyone in the field of cartoon voices is asked who the good teachers are for studying that craft, the answer — whatever it is — is usually preceded by, "Well, the best was the late Daws Butler but…"
Daws was not only one of the most talented actors (voice or otherwise) but an exceptional tutor, as well. You can't study with him but you can absorb some of his teachings in a forthcoming book called Scenes for Actors and Voices. Ben Ohmart and Joe Bevilacqua have collected many of his scripts, exercises and theories in what will surely be a must-have item for anyone interested in acting for animation — and probably acting anywhere. It's scheduled for a June release but you can get your order in now by visiting their website.
I haven't made my mind up about Iraq or Colin Powell's speech. But I did laugh out loud at Neal Pollock's minute-by-minute analysis.
The voice cast of The Simpsons goes Inside the Actors Studio this Sunday on Bravo.
The answer: This photo of this attractive lady appears on the back cover of the new DVD release of the classic Mel Brooks film, The Producers. Now, the next question is "Why?" Is this individual even in the film? The only attractive blonde in the whole movie is Lee Meredith, who plays the Swedish-speaking Ulla. That doesn't look like her to me, and nowhere in the movie does Ulla wear an outfit even vaguely like that. She wears a raincoat, an elegant gown and a bikini. The "Truth in Advertising" part of me thinks that it's dumb to put this photo on the cover since what they're selling is a zany, hip comedy, and potential buyers need to be reminded of its brilliant performances and legendary bad taste. Is anyone really going to purchase this movie based on sex appeal? And if they do, won't they be really, really disappointed? Or conversely, let's say I'm wrong and there are guys who will check out the packaging of The Producers to see if there might be any hot babes in the film. Wouldn't it then make more sense to use one of the photos of Lee Meredith in her bikini? There are plenty of those around (some even in the DVD's photo gallery) and they actually depict what's in the movie.
Should you wish to ponder these questions further, you can order a copy of The Producers from the Amazon folks by clicking here. But I didn't bring this up just to sell DVDs for them. Honest.
Over in Slate, there's another article that argues — persuasively — that the whole Space Shuttle project is just a lot of showing-off for no good purpose. I would love to see a persuasive argument (I'm assuming there is one) as to why it should continue. I mean, I understand about the national character, and how Americans never give up, and "Where would we be if Columbus had given up?" and all that, and I'm not saying none of that matters. But has anyone seen a good article explaining why it advances technology and improves the quality of life on this planet to keep sending human beings up there? This is one of those cases where I'm quite willing to be convinced, but I'm not yet. And since it will doubtlessly continue, I'd kinda like to be.
The best internet comment I saw about the Space Shuttle disaster — and I'm being at least half-serious — was from Eric Alterman…
Nothing about the space shuttle blowing up from me; what the hell do I know about why space shuttles blow up? And since I don't work for a network or cable news network, I don't have to pretend.
Neither do I. But I do know that the seven astronauts are no more or less dead than the four U.S. soldiers killed last week in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan, or the Coast Guard soldier killed in an auto accident in Qatar. Somehow, the non-astronauts did not merit the same kind of grief, flags at half-staff, talks of enduring tributes, etc. We seem to be very selective with the mourning of those who die in service of our nation, and I think that's a shame. If we're going to be sending more men and women off to war, we'd better shake the notion that some deaths are more tragic than others.
And I think I also agree with this Paul Krugman column. It says, basically, that almost everything good that comes out of the space program can be done better and cheaper by machines, and that we send human beings out there mainly for show. It's a pretty dangerous show but Americans will never buy the notion that it should be curtailed. We all want to believe Star Trek is just over the horizon.
Who is the woman? I got this photo of a lady with great legs and figure off the back cover of a recently-released DVD of a classic motion picture — one that you've probably seen if you're the kind of person who'd be likely to come to this website. Actually, forget who the woman is. I don't even know. Your mission is just to identify the movie in which she's so prominent that they put this photo on the back cover of the DVD. I'll post the answer here in a day or so.
My friend, TV critic Aaron Barnhart, reviewed the first week of Jimmy Kimmel Live! Aaron and I don't always agree but we agree on this.
A jury recently found a man named Ed Rosenthal guilty of growing marijuana. Right after the trial, the jury learned some facts about the case that had been withheld from them in court, and several members of that jury immediately decided their verdict was wrong. For a frightening portrait of how the law works in John Ashcroft's America, read this news account. And this New York Times editorial properly expresses the outrage this kind of thing warrants.
I still don't understand the Amazon sales rankings but I see that my new book, Mad Art, has jumped way up in them. Last Saturday, they finally changed its status to "Usually ships in 24 hours." On Sunday, it jumped from #34,735 to #4,211, then down to #4,971 on Monday, which I guess is still good.
The sequel to my other book, Comic Books and Other Necessities of Life is on the way. It will be another batch of old funnybook-oriented columns plus some new ones, and it'll be out in time for this year's Comic-Con International in San Diego. So start saving up those bucks for…
I still have nothing but the obvious to say about the Shuttle Disaster, except that — after 9/11 — I wonder if we aren't getting numb to this kind of thing. Or maybe (better) we're more conscious of our own resiliency and so are less inclined to see catastrophes through that "nothing will ever be the same again" mindset.
We've been pushing the Time-Life videos of The Dick Van Dyke Show on this site. Five volumes are presently available on DVD or VHS, each containing four of the best episodes of the show, plus a number of special features. The DVDs have great picture quality and the shows are well-chosen, and the only negative, as I noted earlier, was that some of us would really like the complete run of the show in chronological order. That, alas, is not currently available. But it may be in the not-too-distant future, to those of us who have $800 to spend. The place to visit, if you're interested, is www.dickvandykeshow.com, an enterprise run by Doug Denoff, son of Sam Denoff.
Sam, of course, was one of the show's key writer-producers. As detailed over there, they are prepping but have been delayed in offering "The Ottoman Edition," which will be the complete run of The Dick Van Dyke Show, in sequence, and with some different special features included. There's no release date yet, and Denoff doesn't expect us to wait for it. So I bought (and will continue to purchase) the Time-Life releases until his comes along. This is one of the things on video I don't mind buying twice.
At long last, Amazon has Mad Art available with 24 hour shipping. Availability seems to be helping its sales, which is a relief. I was expecting a massive drop in orders once people found out they could actually get it.
Interview with comic book legend Joe Kubert. Right here.
The ratings for Jimmy Kimmel Live! got screwed-up last night somehow. Once they're all straightened out, ABC should have something they can spin as demonstrating night-to-night growth, though he seems to have gotten a pretty consistent 6-7 share every night. If that doesn't drop when he's up against new Letterman episodes — as opposed to reruns the past week — Jimmy might stick around long enough to develop into a first-rate host, and find something to do on his show that every talk show in history hasn't run into the ground. I thought the last few nights were much, much better, at least in terms of him looking like he wasn't embarrassed by his own program. They are, however, resorting to the stock talk show staples — a cooking demo, an audience quiz where the audience member can't possibly know any of the answers, pre-tapes that send someone to an inappropriate place (Snoop Dogg to a garage sale, Jimmy's uncle to a Def Jam party), etc. And I love "Super" Dave Osborne but his appearance the other night, doing the exact same bit that Leno and Letterman long since stopped wanting from him, confirmed reports that the Kimmel show is pretty desperate for guests.