Exactly what did George W. Bush do on 9/11/01?  I'm not sure I endorse all the research involved, but this piece lays out his day in comic strip format.  And it sure is an effective way of summarizing the facts.

I think I've decided what bothers me about this whole "going to war" business…I mean, besides the fact that we may be going to war.  It's that the public debate has a certain air of Disconnect about it.  Those opposing Bush's plan are making some valid points which are not being refuted or addressed.  The modus operandi seems to be that when someone raises a fact that contradicts their worldview, they simply ignore it.  They figure they've got the votes so they don't have to refute it or even acknowledge it.  They can merely change the subject.  At most, they pause to impugn the patriotism or motives of the person who asks the questions they don't want to address.

An example?  Of course.  The Los Angeles Times is reporting (as are other papers) that much of the info we're being given by the White House contradicts what the Central Intelligence Agency believes.  Here's the lede…

Senior Bush administration officials are pressuring CIA analysts to tailor their assessments of the Iraqi threat to help build a case against Saddam Hussein, intelligence and congressional sources said.  In what sources described as an escalating "war," top officials at the Pentagon and elsewhere have bombarded CIA analysts with criticism and calls for revisions on such key questions as whether Iraq has ties to the Al Qaeda terrorist network, sources said.  [Here's a link to the entire article.]

Now, since the CIA has not denied these reports, I presume it's true that such a rift exists.  That means that the only two other possibilities are that (a) our nation's chief intelligence system is wrong or (b) the White House is lying to us.  Those are both pretty frightening possibilities, and I don't know that America can truly get behind a war until these disparate views are reconciled, especially if the war doesn't turn out to be a slam-dunk or if it has some sort of ripple effect, destabilizing relations elsewhere.  Way too many intelligent people, including many of our nation's leaders in past military actions, don't seem to be on the same page as George W. on this one.  Some pretty experienced folks are saying Hussein isn't that big a threat, or that he'll be a bigger threat if we attack, or that there are ancillary consequences.  The response from the Oval Office is to snub or dismiss the criticisms, not to address them.  The Johnson Administration made that mistake with Vietnam and eventually lost the trust of the nation.

So that's why I'm uneasy about what the White House is doing.  But the Democrats, especially in the Senate, are also not connecting with the reality of a war.  The prevailing motive of those who voted "yea" seems to be to not to be on record against a war which just might prove successful.  The votes in favor of granting Bush carte blanche to drop bombs on our behalf seem uncertain and timid, and some are even hedged with the rationale that they're votes against killing; that giving G.W.B. this strong vote of confidence will stampede Hussein to concessions that will make bloodshed unnecessary.  Maybe.  The statement of one of my senators, Dianne Feinstein, pretty much boiled down to, "I'm voting to authorize a war in order to scare Hussein, but if he won't be scared, then I don't think we should go to war like I just voted to authorize."  At least, that's what it sounded like to me.  She seems to think that War With Iraq comes with a free, ten-day home trial and that, if it looks like it's actually going to happen, she can retract her vote.

I don't know which side is right or even if any side is right.  I just know this is a pretty sloppy way to go to war.

And while you're surfing, go read this article by Terry Jones.  (Yes, this is the same Terry Jones from Monty Python.)  The Cliff Notes version of this one is that Tony Blair is extremely unpopular in Great Britain and has turned himself into a puppet of George W., ramming through an unpopular position.

You know, I get the feeling that there's a decent, coherent argument for why we should attack Hussein, but we're not getting it.  I also feel like a certain segment of the population is dying for the U.S. to go beat up somebody, and would almost prefer that we don't waste time with logical explanations.

Another must-read by Michael Kinsley column has just been posted here.  For those of you without the time for another click, I'll summarize: George W. Bush's explanation of why we must go to war against Iraq is disingenuous, ambiguous and full of holes.  This may all be moot since Congress seems to be caving on the issue.  But you'd think if we'd learned nothing else from Vietnam, it would have been that when you go to war, the Chief Exec ought to be able to give you a solid explanation of why.

Forgive me for dwelling on this but I find this story amazing.  Here's the latest development (possibly, the final one) in the matter of Bill Simon's accusation against his opponent, California governor Gray Davis…

A group that accused Gov. Gray Davis of illegal fund-raising has retracted the allegation, which Republican opponent Bill Simon briefly made an issue in his campaign then conceded was incorrect.  "It now appears that our original belief was erroneous," the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs said in a statement late Wednesday.

Please note: This is the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs that accused the governor of a crime based on faulty evidence.  It would be bad enough if a bunch of Krispy Kreme donut makers did it but this is a law enforcement organization that was out peddling bogus "proof" of a crime.  And though they were about to accuse the most powerful elected official in the state, they didn't bother with the relatively-easy step of finding out where and when the alleged crime was committed.  (The governor's calendar is hardly classified information.)

So how much care do we think our lawmen are taking when they build a case against, say, an unemployed kid who lives in East L.A.?  Do we think the same sloppy standard prevails?  Or that maybe they're even less responsible there?  One of the reasons O.J. Simpson is out on the golf course today is that it's very, very easy to convince folks in California that the police are inept at handling evidence and are not above doctoring or inventing it.  Is anyone wondering why people think that?

I received a call this evening from a friend of mine who used to write comic books. As you may know, the business has undergone some downsizing (to put it mildly) and a lot of folks who used to get all the work they wanted have found themselves unable to get any sort of job in comics. The friend who called this evening is so far out of the industry, he isn't even suing Todd McFarlane.

At first, he says, he felt great anger and frustration, and had no idea what he could do in lieu of writing comics. But he said to tell everyone who reads my site that once he did find something, life got better in a hurry. "The trick was to turn loose of comics and burn that emotional bridge. Once I managed that, I was able to get a new and better career going."

So consider yourself told.

George S. Kaufman wrote or co-wrote a staggering number of successful plays. After almost every one, some failed playwright would crawl out of the woodwork and sue Kaufman for plagiarism, charging that somehow Kaufman had seen and purloined their unproduced work.

In each case, the claimant was so lacking in funds that Kaufman could have had his lawyer maneuver to run up the court costs, thereby forcing the plaintiff to drop the suit for lack of funds. This, Kaufman refused to do. He knew he was innocent and wanted to have a court say so. So no such tricks were employed and every time he went to court, he won on the merits of his case.

But of course, he was annoyed at having to go through the suits at all, and his annoyance led to a fantasy. It was to invite all the litigants to a gourmet dinner. Around a huge table, he would serve them fine food and fine wine. Then, when the dishes were cleared away, he would stand and proclaim, "I asked you all here tonight because I would like to ask each of you a question."

He would point to the first person and ask, "You say you wrote Of Thee I Sing. What else have you written?"

Then he'd look at the second and ask, "You say you wrote The Man Who Came to Dinner. What else have you written?"

Then the third: "You say you wrote Stage Door. What else have you written?"

And on and on around the table…

The photo above shows you what our old pal Garfield the Cat's been up to, lately.  He's been lounging on the beach at Cannes, tanning his stripes and waiting for lasagna to wash up on shore.  I guess when you have that kind of money, you can take it easy.  If he's waiting for Edy Williams though, he's going to have a long wait.  She doesn't turn up at Cannes any more.

Actually, this picture appeared on the front page of today's Hollywood Reporter with the following caption:

Comic strip star 'Garfield' poses for photographers for the launch of a television special Garfield 25th Anniversary, an animated series Garfield & Friends and Garfield primetime specials, during the MIPCOM 2002 (International Film and Programme market for TV, video, cable and satellite), Monday Oct. 7, 2002, in Cannes, southeastern France.

This has prompted a whole mess of e-mailed questions to me.  The answers to these questions are (a) yes, I'm involved with these new projects and (b) it's way too early to talk about when they'll appear or who else will be involved.  The minute either of these things changes, I'll post something here.

Could Bill Simon possibly be doing a worse job as a gubernatorial candidate?  The latest is that he accused his opponent, incumbent Gray Davis, of accepting a campaign contribution in his government office, which is illegal.  To "substantiate" this, Simon released a photo taken of Davis receiving the check and…oops.  Turns out, it was easily proven that the photo wasn't taken where Simon said it was taken.  He was reduced to saying, "Whether or not it's the lieutenant governor's office, it may or may not be.  That can be determined. That's not my job to determine that."  This came a day after he said the picture was taken in the lieutenant governor's office and therefore "proved wrongdoing."

I've long had a pretty low opinion of Gray Davis and was prepared to vote for just about anybody else.  But the Blooper Reel that passes for Simon's campaign has me ready to punch the chad next to Davis's name.  Maybe it's not too late for the Republicans to get Simon out of the race and substitute Robert Torricelli…

While we're at it: Dark Horse has released the Groo PVC set — a nice, long box that contains seven (7) little statuettes of characters from that fabulous funnybook.  I received mine yesterday and they're quite delightful.  Sergio did the designs, though someone else (whose identity unknown to us) did the sculptures and if you love or even tolerate the comic, you probably can't live without a set of these.  Some of us need two: One to display, one to fondle.  You can get a set or two from a fine company called Things From Another World.  Here's a link to the page of their website where you can see the whole magilla and place an order.  I'm sure you all want to do this immediately.

If you get The Biography Channel on your TV (unlikely but possible), the following may be of interest to you.  October 18, 19 and 21, they're rerunning the Biography episode that tells about Marvel Comics' Stan Lee.  I am not mentioning this because I am among the folks interviewed in it.  I am mentioning it because it's a nice portrait of Stan Lee.  If you don't get the Biography Channel, ignore this item.

Would you like a nice Groo screen saver for your computer?  They have one (in both Windows and Mac versions) over at the website for Dark Horse Comics.  Click here to go get one.

While the hit counter on this site was lapping a quarter-million, my friend Carolyn and I were visiting Victoria, British Columbia, tooling around in the harbor in a little ferry boat like the one above  The skipper (that's what you're supposed to call him) takes you around, pointing out items of interest.  Then he lets you out for a while on a dock where you can eat great fish-and-chips while you feed seals.  Enormous fun.

We were up there so I could sign comics at the Victoria Comic, Movie & VideoFest 2002, a friendly little convention in a friendly little city.  The convention organizer, Bill Code, couldn't do enough for us, getting us chauffeured about, forcing expense money on us, and so on.  We stayed in a very nice room in a Traveller's Inn, a chain of hotels in Victoria that are ubiquitous in their outlets and advertising.  As two separate grumbling cab drivers explained to us, this one company bought up half the hotels in town and — here's the reason for the grumbling — renamed them all "Traveller's Inn."  This has led to no end of confusion, such as when someone says, "Take me to the Traveller's Inn on Douglas."  There are several on Douglas Street, including one that is officially titled "Traveller's Inn Douglas Street," and the one we stayed in, which was on Douglas but wasn't "Traveller's Inn Douglas Street."  In fact, our Traveller's Inn on Douglas had a very nice view of another Traveller's Inn on Douglas Street, which also wasn't "Traveller's Inn Douglas Street."

So that's why the cab drivers are grumbling.

I also found it funny that Traveller's Inn advertises everywhere.  They have an ad on every third page of the Victoria Yellow Pages, regardless of heading.  So under "Pest Control," there's an ad for Traveller's Inn, under "Mausoleums," there's an ad for Traveller's Inn, under "Firewood," you get the concept…

Best part of the convention was spending a little quality time with the other guests, who included three of the best artists in and around the comic book field — Steve Lieber, Ken Steacy and Mike Kaluta.  Steve, I really didn't know as a person before; only as a very dedicated, talented illustrator.  A graduate of the Joe Kubert School, Steve has worked for DC and Marvel, but is best represented by Whiteout (from Oni Press) and the small-press Me and Edith Head.  You can find out more about Steve over at this website.  You can even order those books from him, which you really ought to do.

By the way: I'll tell you how small Victoria is.  Steve left for the airport about four hours before Carolyn and I did, but we got the same cab driver.  The driver was telling us how, earlier in the day, he'd had this comic artist named Steve Lieber in his cab…and he said, "That guy's a real comic artist.  Not one of those kids who works on a computer.  He does it the real way.  On paper."

Not much more to say about the trip, other than that Alaska Airlines performed flawlessly, if you can overlook meals that really warrant the little printed prayer that accompanies each one.  And that we want to go back to Victoria real soon…if not sooner.

Sorry, I've been away for a few days, having a wonderful time in the bee-yootiful city of Victoria, British Columbia.  Only problem: The modem line at the hotel didn't work, so I couldn't update this site or tend to e-mail.  I'll be doing both in the next day or so.

Bill Clinton gave a speech the other day at the Labor Party's annual conference in Great Britain and was quite the sensation.  After reading the text online (which you can do by clicking here), I was curious to hear how he delivered the first part.  So I logged over to the C-SPAN site, found an online video feed…and got hooked.  Never mind the politics, some of which I agree with, some of which I don't.  Never mind the self-serving stuff that every politician does.  The man is such a good speaker that I wound up watching the whole thing…admittedly, while doing other things on the computer.  It's a little under an hour and if you want to view at least the beginning, click here (RealPlayer required) — and do so soon because C-SPAN doesn't keep this stuff online forever.