Today's Video Link

I think most of us agree on the wonderfulness of Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol, the 1962 adaptation of Charles Dickens' timeless tale. It may also have been the best of the many adaptations of Mr. Dickens' timeless tale and one of the reasons was the great score by Broadway pros Bob Merrill and Jule Styne. I guess it was inevitable that someone would think of putting this version on the stage — which the Actor's Fund did as a special event back in 2014.

And guess what! They're doing it again for one night, that night being next Monday, December 16 at the Gerald W. Lynch Theater at John Jay College. That's in New York, New York. Since I won't be in New York, New York then, I won't be there but if you are and want to go, tickets can be purchased here. Proceeds from the evening will finance some of the programs and services of The Actors Fund, which does many good deeds to aid folks performing in the arts and entertainment.

Gavin Lee, who was so good as Bert in the Broadway version of Mary Poppins, is playing Scrooge. Or maybe he's playing Quincy Magoo playing Scrooge, however it works. Anyway, I'd love to go see this but that ain't gonna happen. You probably won't be there either so we'll just have to settle for a quick video with snippets of the version mounted for the Actor's Fund in 2014. Makes you wanna see the whole show, doesn't it? Thanks to Bob Elisberg for telling me about this video…

Time for a Trump Dump

First of all, as a proud half-Jewish person, I'm looking at this

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday to interpret Judaism as a nationality and not just a religion, a move that the Trump administration believes will fight what they perceive as anti-Semitism on college campuses, a White House official said.

I understand neither the reasons nor the possible ramifications for this and as far as I can see on the Internet, that quandary's kind of unanimous. The folks in favor of it are in favor of it because Trump's in favor of it. The ones opposing it are opposing it because Trump's in favor of it. And an insufficient number of Jews seem to have been consulted before the decision was made.

Meanwhile, you may have heard that two articles of impeachment are in Mr. Trump's future. Daniel Larison of the American Conservative explains why they are not only valid but necessary. Here's an excerpt…

The case for Trump's impeachment seemed quite strong more than two months ago, and the evidence provided to the House's impeachment inquiry has strengthened it further. The president's abuse of power is not in dispute. It is clear that he used the powers of his office in an attempt to extract a corrupt favor for his personal benefit, and this is precisely the sort of offense that impeachment was designed to keep in check. It doesn't matter if the attempt succeeded. All that matters is that the attempt was made. It is also undeniable that he has sought to impede the investigation into his misconduct. The president has committed the offenses he is accused of committing, and the House should approve both articles of impeachment.

No, they probably have no chance of passing the Senate…but then the articles voted against Bill Clinton had no chance of passing that Senate and were about a lesser matter and not one Republican thought that was a reason not to go to trial. My guess is this is not the only time this president will be impeached. My guess is the narrative will become "He commits crimes, Republicans protect him, he commits more crimes…" And the 2020 election becomes about only whether the country is fine with that.

As Jonathan Chait points out, when the charges against Trump were first made, prominent Republicans assumed they could never be proven with any certainty so they said, "That would be troubling if true." Now that the charges have been proven with as much certainty as there is about anything in Washington, they've had to switch to "No, that is not troubling."

Meanwhile: The Justice Department has released a 434-page inspector general's report on the origin of the FBI probe into the Trump campaign's possible ties to Russia. It's a something-for-everyone bonanza and everyone's out there spinning whatever they can spin to their advantage. It's amazing how one report could be so right about everything bad it says the other side did and so wrong when it says my side did anything bad. Glenn Kessler straightens out a lot of the spin for us. And so it goes…

Good News, Bad News and Pogo News

The sixth volume of The Complete Syndicated Pogo has been printed and somewhere below, you'll see a photo of another famous cartoonist paging through a copy and enjoying the brilliant work of Mr. Walt Kelly. That's the good news.

The bad news is that many retailers — including probably Amazon — will not have their copies until around this time next month. How could this be? Well, you may not believe this but I'm blaming it on Donald J. Trump. Allow me to explain…

Many of the books that are coming out these days about comic books and strips are printed in China. If you can connect with the right printer over there, you can get great quality at a low, low price…or you could before Mr. Trump began imposing and escalating tariffs on imports from China. I'm not clear on what these fees are supposed to accomplish nor am I clear on how well they're accomplishing that. All I know is that it has thrown sections of the Chinese printing industry into chaos.

That creates chaos for the American publishers who use those printers and you can expect price increases on many of their books shortly. A number of announced books will be coming out late and some may not come out at all…or at least until things stabilize in this marketplace. If we still had Tom Spurgeon covering the comics industry, he would have done an in-depth report on this by now. You should hear more about this in the fan press after the December 15 announcement about how the tariffs will be modified or extended or whatever that guy in the White House is going to do.

Volume 6 of The Complete Syndicated Pogo — subtitled Clean as a Weasel — was originally going to be printed in China and the materials got to the printer over there in plenty of time. At some point, it became necessary to pull the book from that printer and it was moved to a printer in Korea — the one that handled earlier volumes in the series. They've printed it but when you print over there, most copies get over here via the cheapest/slowest freight. A few retailers have copies and a few more will have them in the next week or two but everyone won't have them until around the second week in January. You have no idea how sorry (and frustrated) we are about this.

But it'll be worth whatever you have to wait. This volume reprints the entirety of the Pogo newspaper strip for 1959 and 1960 — two years where so much was happening in America that Walt Kelly had too much to work with. The book also contains a foreword by Jim Davis of Garfield fame, R.C. Harvey's fine annotations, Maggie Thompson's pull quotes feature, an article on the late Don Morgan (who worked with Kelly on the later strips) by Jim Korkis and — what? You want more than that?

And here's some happy news: Volume 7, which will be subtitled Pockets Full of Pie, will be out sooner than you might expect. We actually have all the strips for that book in hand and we're going to send everything to press way before the release date. I'll announce that date here shortly. Nothing will stop us unless Trump slaps a 500% tariff on books about possums who dress like basketball referees — which, come to think of it…

Recommended Reading

Well, this is troubling. The Washington Post has a long article up with many supporting sidebars. It's by Craig Whitlock that says — well, here. Just read the first paragraph or two…

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.

The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.

I always thought what Vietnam proved was that our wars are sometimes kept going not in the interests of America but because those conducting the war don't want to admit to misjudgement and failure. If that was the lesson of 'Nam, it apparently went unlearned.

Today's Video Link

John Oliver is on hiatus 'til February but he left this Christmas gift for us…

ASK me: College

I do not know if J. Williamson is male, female or "other" but I do know J. Williamson wrote to ask…

You've written about how you went to U.C.L.A. but I'm under the impression you didn't graduate. If so, why? And do you think it was valuable to your career to go to college? Some people think it's a necessity if someone is to have a successful career.

I'm only an expert on me and for me, it was a total waste of time. When I realized how total, I quit and have never regretted it for a moment. I am not suggesting that this move would be right for everyone; just that it was right for me when it was right for me. I'm sure there are professions where college is a necessity. Writing the kinds of things I write, it was not.

Why did I go to college at all? Four reasons, one being that my father desperately wanted that. Given his underprivileged childhood, he felt that merely getting into any college — let alone, one as prestigious as U.C.L.A. — was a major achievement. When I was accepted, he walked around like his kid had just won the Nobel Prize. In my family, we did a lot of things just to please each other.

Another reason was that there was this thing happening then…this war in Vietnam. My father desperately did not want me to be drafted and I wasn't fond of the notion. We didn't have the money to bribe some doctor to write me a medical excuse saying I had bone spurs but there were these things called student exemptions. They might save me.

At the time, I thought those were my only reasons but I later realized there were two other subconscious ones…and one of them was this: I always knew I wanted to make my living as a writer and I'd long figured, "As soon as I get out of high school, I'll start seriously pursuing that." Going on to college was kind of a way to not throw myself immediately into the deep end on a swim-or-sink basis. I would start trying to make my way in the world as a professional writer but if I didn't succeed right away…well, it wasn't a now-or-never thing. Going to college meant I was still in school. Without realizing it, I think I was giving myself an excuse for possible failure.

As it happened, in the few months after I graduated from University High but before I started at U.C.L.A., I began getting work. I wasn't yet writing for television or even comic books. I was writing magazine pieces and press releases and one semi-dirty book and other oddments and my confidence was growing that I could make a living as a writer. Suddenly, college was a distraction from the career I wanted to have, not a help.

What I was learning there was largely useless to me because I couldn't get into any classes that had anything to do with my chosen vocation. My first quarter, I found myself studying Anthropology, Economics and Portuguese. I don't know if I've mentioned it here but on that long, long list of things at which I am terrible, learning a foreign language is not far from the top. You could teach ballroom dancing to a snail before you could teach me more than about two sentences in any tongue other than English.

I wasn't that much better at the Anthropology or the Economics. I might have mastered one of them if I had studied a few hours each night but I'd landed a job working for a firm that did mail order merchandise for Marvel Comics and soon, I began working for Jack Kirby and then writing Disney comic books for the foreign market.

The latter job led to writing Disney comic books for the American market, which meant for Gold Key Comics. Gold Key also published the comics featuring the Warner Brothers characters like Bugs Bunny and Porky Pig, the Walter Lantz characters like Woody Woodpecker, some Hanna-Barbera properties like Scooby Doo and others. Soon, I was writing for them as well, thereby trapping myself in the following conundrum: I was going to college to get an education and degree that might (might!) help me succeed as a professional writer…but doing college right would have meant turning down all this professional writing work I was being offered.

Two things happened in close proximity that led to me quitting U.C.L.A. I do not now recall which came first but I think they occurred in this sequence…

My editor at Gold Key was a lovely (to me) man named Chase Craig. One day when I was delivering scripts to his office, he leaned back in his chair, put one foot up against his desk and said to me, "You know, I could use a lot more scripts from you. I could probably use as many as you can write." It's a big moment in the life of any beginning writer when he hears something like that. All the work I can handle? And on something I love writing?

The other thing: U.C.L.A. was then the scene of frequent protests of the Vietnam War and, at that moment, especially the bombing in Cambodia. On other college campuses, there were general strikes — students and some faculty members declaring they would stop attending or conducting classes and instead demonstrate against U.S. involvement and actions.

I had finally gotten into an English Literature class — a class that had at least something to do with my chosen profession. It wasn't a very good class. I thought the professor was a bore and none of his lecturing was of any more use to me than those classes in Portuguese. But I attended, my mind often drifting off to the Daffy Duck story I would be putting onto paper as soon as I got home.

Then one day, he opened class by announcing he was closing class; he'd decided to go on strike. He would teach no more that quarter, we'd all receive credit for the class — I think he said that — and he encouraged us to use the time he'd freed up in our lives to become more politically active, whatever our views.

Within a week of the second of those two events, I quit U.C.L.A. I took on more assignments from Chase but I also did become more politically active. I think I've written about that here before. Having recently made that long, slow change-of-mind from generally supporting that war in which I did not wish to fight, I began participating in protests against it. Mostly, I became a spokesperson for a group that pushed the non-violent, non-confrontational approach.

My father, who was aware of and thrilled with how well my writing career was going, was kinda okay with me quitting college. He couldn't very well argue that staying in would lead to a better career since I was making more money than he was…and I was a lot happier doing it than he'd ever been in his work. But he did feel I should have waited until I got some sort of degree to do it. To give him hope that that might someday happen, I enrolled for part-time studies at Santa Monica College.

S.M.C., perhaps because it was about five miles closer to the ocean than the U.C.L.A. campus, then felt like going to school in a beach party movie. When it was sunny, students came to class in swimwear with perhaps a t-shirt or caftan covering. It was there that I realized the fourth reason I'd had for going to college at all, a reason that I hadn't explicitly realized before. You could meet a lot more girls going to college than you could sitting home in your bedroom in your parents' house, pounding a typewriter day and night. Call me shallow if you like but that mattered a lot to me at the time.

I went to S.M.C. for about a year and a half. I did not earn a degree of any kind, nor did I learn anything that in any way enhanced my writing career. I did though get some girl friends and I did get the whole idea of college out of my system…so going there was not without its value. Basically though, I learned whatever I learned about writing from on-the-job experience, not by sitting in a college classroom. I didn't even learn one friggin' sentence in Portuguese sitting in a college classroom. But I'm willing to admit and even emphasize that my case may be the exception. Just about everything in my career has been an exception of some kind or another.

ASK me

Caroll Spinney, R.I.P.

This is a message for Caroll Spinney. I don't know what the Wi-Fi is like where he is now but just in case he searches Google for his name and finds this page…

Mr. Spinney, we never met but I admired your work for a long time. Very few people in this world manage to be responsible for even one beloved, iconic character but you gave us two: Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch. And I know you were a humble man and will insist that others created those characters and built them and wrote for them and even assisted you with the physical feats necessary to manipulate them. But they both shared a humanity and a spirit and a sense of humor that could only have come from the warm body inside them. They will live on with talented people doing fine Caroll Spinney imitations but for so many of us, they just won't be the same. Thank you for being so good at what you did. And give our regards to Mr. Hooper.

Today's Video Link

The MeTV folks whipped up this little video tribute to one of my favorite (and much-missed) friends, the late Howard Morris. It's about all the voices that Howie supplied on The Flintstones — although I believe at least one that they think was Howie — the bird blowing up the balloons — was actually Mel Blanc.

I directed Howie for many years on Garfield and Friends and a few other shows. He was an amazing talent. If you made him do a line six times, he would give you six completely different interpretations. Sometimes, I'd give him no direction. I'd just let him do a speech over and over until he came up with something I liked and it was rarely something I (or anyone) could have coached him into doing. His talent as an actor was that organic and natural. He was hilarious off-camera or off-mike as well.

The Flintstones didn't use him to his full potential but as you watch this montage, note how he manages to make every line a little funnier and more colorful than what was on the script before him…

A Weekend Trump Dump

I'm not sure which I'm getting more tired of: People who are sure Donald Trump will win a second term or people who are sure he won't. One group will see their expected outcome but I think the "being sure" part is foolish.

This is such an unconventional, volatile presidency that I wouldn't wager he'll even be president by my birthday, which is next March. You know what I do feel certain of? That the current Ukraine mess won't drive him from the White House but that there will be more scandals of equal or greater magnitude that will emerge before Election Day…probably many more if/when some arm of government gets its mitts on his tax records. There was a time we never thought Nixon supporters would abandon him but eventually, it looked like he'd bring down his entire party…and they did.

Here are a few articles worth reading, starting with Daniel Larison, who notes that for all his self-promoted rep as a "great negotiator," Trump has done nothing in the area of foreign relations but fail, fail, fail. Here's an excerpt in case you're too feeble to click on the link…

He has no respect for diplomacy, and he doesn't understand how diplomacy works, so it is not surprising that he is so bad at it. Instead of securing new agreements, he has squandered a real opportunity with North Korea, and he has deliberately stoked tensions with Iran. He foolishly took ownership of a regime change effort in Venezuela that has yielded nothing but more suffering for people in Venezuela. For all of his empty blather about building a better relationship with Russia, he has scuttled one arms control treaty with Moscow and seems determined to scrap New START as well. His signature move of reneging on agreements in an attempt to force more concessions from other parties has consistently backfired and left the U.S. in a worse position than when he started. Trump has shown that he can burn down the diplomatic achievements of others, but all that the U.S. has to show for his efforts is ashes and smoke.

Meanwhile, as Republicans come up with new explanations of how Trump did nothing wrong vis-à-vis Ukraine, William Saletan keeps pointing out how these explanations are themselves damning to the guy in the Oval Office. The new justification for his actions is that Ukraine was out to bring him down. And how were they doing that? By cooperating with legitimate U.S. investigations of the Trump administration. Quote…

The revenge theory starts with a May 23 meeting at the White House. A delegation of Trump appointees and a Republican senator, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, had just returned from Ukraine. They told Trump that Zelensky, who had just been inaugurated, was launching an unprecedented campaign against corruption. If Trump had cared about corruption, the delegation's report would have moved him. It didn't. He fixated instead on the idea that Ukraine was out to get him.

Lastly, Rudy Giuliani may have stopped inflicting friendly-fire damage on his client Donald Trump by staying off TV talk shows but "America's Mayor" still has a Twitter account. As Aaron Rupar notes, the Bizarro version of Perry Mason is doing Trump damage with his latest tweets. Lovely.

Today's Video Link

Here from 1971 is one of the most famous, talked-about commercials ever made. It's a whole bunch of kids standing on a mountaintop in Italy, which means most of them probably didn't speak English and they're lip-syncing to a vocal track that was probably recorded in some other country with other people singing. What is the message of this commercial? It's to tell us it's The Real Thing…

You Don't Know Jack

Back here, we were talking about a 1967 special Hanna-Barbera produced for NBC — a retelling of the story of Jack and the Beanstalk. A new part was written in for Gene Kelly, who was also credited as director, though it's doubtful he had a lot to do with the animated characters that were combined with the live-action performers. I thought it was a pretty decent special for what it was but recognize that there are many who did not agree.

My pal Greg Ehrbar is one of the best of the many experts now writing about cartoon history. He is quite familiar with this special and he sent me this…

Master Hanna-Barbera art director and effects animator Ron Dias talked at length about Jack and the Beanstalk. In his experience, Hanna and Barbera usually began a project with very grand plans but when the money was running out, they scrambled to get it done, just as you explained.

Of course, there was nowhere near the budget for a 1967 NBC hour special compared to a 1945 MGM extravaganza like Anchors Aweigh. What frustrated Dias was that H-B used a dry "just add water" blue paint for the blue screen rather than the more expensive liquid paint, which did things like flake off on Gene Kelly's knees if he did a kneeling slide in his dancing, making them disappear.

He also said that he was not thrilled that they hired a less competent processing house to do the compositing, so that is why you can occasionally see the mattes (look for the staircase on the goose). However, he was still fond of the special, and we have to keep in mind that it was the first of its kind and very ambitious, perhaps too ambitious.

I've had the soundtrack album for years and listened to it more times than you've sent back cole slaw after you told them not to include it. I am certain that Leo DeLyon (a singer by trade) and Cliff Norton (who mostly talk sings) are doing the singing in "The Woggle-Bird Song," which by the way, was originally written for Filmation's Journey Back to Oz (which began production in 1962) by Sammy Cahn and Jimmy Van Heusen as "The Woggle-Bug Song."

Dick Beals told me that after he sang for Bobby Riha, Bobby's mother was furious when she learned that Beals took out an ad in Variety, revealing this fact (with H-B's blessing). She wanted to establish Bobby as an all-around talent who could sing, dance and act (he appeared in Disney's The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band the following year, mostly danced and said, "The British are coming! The British are coming!"

According to Joe Barbera's autobiography, Gene Kelly was unhappy with the final show and asked that NBC pull it from the schedule, which was impossible. It turned out to be a huge ratings and critical success (paving the way for The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the first TV series to combine live-action with animation unless you count Clutch Cargo). When it won an Emmy for Outstanding Children's Program, It was Kelly who received the award as the producer of Jack and the Beanstalk (Hanna and Barbera never received any award until Last of the Curlews in 1972 — even the seven Oscars they won for Tom and Jerry and the Emmy for The Huckleberry Hound Show were not given to them, but to those with the "producer" title).

When Kelly accepted the award, he did not mention Hanna and Barbera but instead said that he could not take full credit for the success because there were also a lot of "little hands" also involved. Barbera learned to deal with that because of the Hollywood's precarious effect on people's psyches (perhaps Kelly needed the recognition more than they did) and took it in stride.

Kelly later appeared in the CBS TV salute to H-B, The Happy World of Hanna-Barbera. Their animation also appeared in MGM's That's Entertainment, Part 2 co-starring Kelly and Fred Astaire, which could very well have been by Kelly's recommendation.

Thanks, Greg. (And those of you who want to check out Greg's fine writing about cartoons need only frequent — assuming you don't already — this cranny of the Cartoon Research website.

My Latest Tweet

  • The main talking point of Trump defenders lately seems to be that it's undemocratic to impeach a president, thereby overturning the last election. I'd be more impressed if any of them felt that way about overturning the two elections that put Bill Clinton in office.

Today's Video Link

I wish we had commercials these days like this one. This is Stubby Kaye selling Corn Chex…

Biased About Hatred

The new word being trampled to death in our public discourse is "biased." It used to mean "unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something." Now, it seems to mean "having a different opinion than me." If I think my Congressperson is good and you don't, I can say your view doesn't count because you're biased. Only people who think my Congressperson is good are unbiased and therefore have valid opinions.

This is especially true when those biased people who don't like my Congressperson have held that opinion for any length of time. In fact, the longer you believe something, the greater your bias. For quite a while, I've believed that Charles Manson was a dangerous psychotic. But you can't take that opinion seriously because, obviously, I'm biased against him.

"Hate" is also starting to get warped, especially when used in the phrase, "He hates America." It's become one of those insults you use when you want to condemn a person and don't have anything of substance. As I think I've said here before, I don't think it's fair to throw that put-down at anyone unless that person has actually said "I hate America" or "I despise America" or "I loathe America" or something like that.

If you don't agree with me, you're biased and you clearly hate America. No, I can't prove you do but you can't prove you don't. That's what's so great about it as an insult.

From the E-Mailbag…

Robert Rose has a follow-up question to this installment of Rejection which I recently posted…

You mention: "…I think I usually managed to hit that sweet spot between being Too Cooperative and Not Cooperative Enough. Writers often lose work by being one or the other." This got me curious as to how you would define "too cooperative." My guess is that it might be that the writer is writing exactly what he or she is told and not bringing anything original to the project. There might be times and places where that is useful, but generally when you're hiring someone for a creative position you expect them to be creative.

Obviously a writer who insists he's right about everything and is overly resistant to editing and input from the buyer is going to have problems. But I can imagine that perhaps a writer who never pushes back at all at proposed changes might be seen as lacking any confidence in their own ideas and work. Is it something along those lines, or were you thinking in a different direction?

You pretty much nailed it. One piece of sage advice I got in different forms from any number of older writers was, "Your job is to write, not take dictation." Some writers think the "safe" thing to do is to take whatever the producer or editor says, embellish it a little and give them back their own words and ideas. I suppose that works at times but the usual result is a bad script for which the writer gets blamed. Being too cooperative can also involve being a "yes man" or being unwilling to stand up and defend your own work.

Generally speaking, the people who hire you expect you to hand in something in which you take great pride. If you're too willing to change it, they think, "Gee, he doesn't care about it." That is not a good thing to have them think of you.

Right this moment, I can't think of a story about a writer being too cooperative but I will. I have way more stories about writers being too unwilling to rewrite or change things. Of course.

ASK me