Bradley Bolke, R.I.P.

Voice actor Bradley Bolke has left us at the age of 95. He was heard in many cartoons and commercials produced out of New York and was probably best known for the role of Chumley in the 1963-1966 Saturday morning cartoon show, Tennessee Tuxedo and His Tales. Chumley was an amiable walrus who tagged along with his penguin pal voiced by Don Adams. The show may not be remembered much but Chumley was. That's where Chumlee, the fellow on Pawn Stars, got his nickname.

Bolke was the brother of the fine comedian and voice actor Dayton Allen, who was born Dayton Allen Bolke. Bradley did occasional on-camera work (he was in the 1964 film, Diary of a Bachelor) but was mostly heard, not seen. He was heard in The Wacky World of Mother Goose, The Year Without a Santa Claus and many other shows, plus no small number of commercials. Perhaps most impressive is that he was in the cast of The First Family, the John F. Kennedy spoof starring Vaughn Meader which may still hold the record as the fastest-selling comedy record of all time.

I never had the pleasure of meeting or working with this Mr. Bolke but those who did spoke well of him…so I'm sure it would have been a pleasure.

From the E-Mailbag…

Batton Lash, Jackie Estrada and me.
Photo by Bruce Guthrie

A friend whose name you may know but who doesn't want it published wrote me a long message which I'm condensing down to this…

The sudden news that we'd lost Batton Lash hit me like a tsunami. I am somewhat amazed because while I certainly knew Batt, neither of us would describe the other as a close friend. We never ate together. We never vacationed together. I don't think I ever saw him outside a convention and all we did there was to chat and exchange compliments and pleasantries. Still, I find myself unable to think about anything else and to not be quite depressed at the news.

Your site has had some wonderful advice especially after Carolyn died about coping with grief and death. Do you have anything now which might make it easier to deal with this?

Well, it may help to acknowledge that one of the reasons a loss like that of Bat hits us hard is that he was roughly our age and we can't help thinking, "Gee, that could have been me!" As I've been mentioning here lately, one of the things that irks me about being 66 is that while I have a lot of friends who don't show or act their age, I have some who are determined to think older and to mention their depleted mortality in every third sentence.

I know a guy who's 72 and every time he sees that someone he knows of has died at the age of 75, he announces, "Guess I've only got three years left." Because we all know that people die at the exact same age, regardless of their physical conditions.  (One time when he said it, I pointed out to him that the person had died in a traffic accident.)

Don't do that. Just don't. It's the worst kind of self-destructive negative thinking. As for being jolted by an unexpected death, remember the words of the recently-deceased author William Goldman. At the end of The Princess Bride, he wrote, "Life isn't fair. It's just fairer than death, that's all."

Yeah, it sucks that a great guy like Bat or [INSERT NAME HERE] is here one day, gone the next.  So what are you going to do about it?  You sure can't stop it.

So I'll tell you what you're going to do about it: You're going to learn to live with it.  You're not going to like it but we live with lots of things we don't like and we find ways to cope with them and to minimize the harm they do to us.

When Carolyn was in what her doctors knew with rather uncanny precision would be her last year, I spent much time with Palliative Care (and later, Hospice) people. Palliative Care deals with "the quality of life" of a very sick person and even though I was not their patient and was covered by completely different healthcare, they spent a lot of time with me, making sure I'd hold up, get through it and retain whatever sanity and powers of judgement I had to apply. That was because the quality of Carolyn's remaining life had so much to do with me handling all the responsibilities and duties that fell on my rounded shoulders.

No one said this exactly to me but taking in all that they did say, I formulated the following view: The trick in coping with the death of someone you care about — whether that death has occurred or is just imminent — is to find the sweet spot between accepting that death and being paralyzed by it.

You don't want to be unaffected or unmoved by someone dying because, well, what kind of human being would you be if they told you someone you know just passed and you said, "Who gives a shit?" But too much grief is not good for your health. It's stupid to screw up your own life just because someone else lost theirs.

Celebrate the deceased. Remember them and if it's at all possible, try to keep alive something positive they brought to the world. But don't let the loss of them cause you to lose any part of yourself. If the departed was a good person, they wouldn't want that for you. And if he or she wasn't a good person…well, why are you overmourning them, for God's sake? You've got better things to do.

You Too Can Be Attorney General!

If you read this article by Matt Yglesias, you will know what the emoluments clause of the United States Constitution is. This will put you one up on the man seeking to be our next Attorney General.

Today's Video Link

Yesterday's video link was another great parody by Randy Rainbow and it brought a message from someone (a young someone, I assume) asking me what the song was upon which Mr. Rainbow based his effort. It's "Nothing Like a Dame" from the Broadway musical, South Pacific.

Here's the scene from the 1958 movie and yes, that's Ray Walston as Luther. In the number, you may also notice a brawny sailor with "Stew Pot" on his shirt. That's Ken Clark, who had a pretty good career appearing in "sword and sandal" movies, including a number of them with "Hercules" in the title.

You may also notice in this clip that his speaking voice in no way matches his singing voice. That's because his singing voice was supplied by the ubiquitous Thurl Ravenscroft, who was heard on dozens (if not hundreds) of records and also in movies, commercials and cartoons. He is best remembered for playing the voice of Tony the Tiger in the Sugar Frosted Flakes commercials, for singing "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch" in the original Chuck Jones animation of How the Grinch Stole Christmas, and I think he's still heard in several attractions at Disneyland. You'll hear that distinctive basso profundo throughout much of this clip…

From the E-Mailbag…

Galen Fott just sent me this…

I enjoyed your obit on Carol Channing. In the summer of 1984, I saw Channing in Houston in Jerry's Girls, a revue of Jerry Herman's music. (Her costars were Leslie Uggams and Andrea McArdle.) So I'm guessing that's the event Channing was plugging on the same TV show you were on.

…and I'll bet Galen Fott is right. In fact, I'm pretty sure of it. Thanks, Galen!

Poll Dancing

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has called for a dramatic increase in taxes paid by really, really wealthy people. Republican leaders in government and the punditry have reacted like she's proposing that we dismantle the United States of America and turn the whole thing into a chain of Chipotle restaurants. But at least according to one poll, that idea fares well with Democratic voters and Independents, and doesn't even do so bad with Republicans.

Border Patrol

If you want to know what's really going down with illegals crossing our southern border — and clearly, some people don't want to know because accurate information fouls up their goals — Kevin Drum has some real data, most of it even in EZ chart form. (Caution: Contains facts.)

Carol Channing, R.I.P.

I was in the same room with Carol Channing three times. One was when she was doing a "farewell tour" (and maybe not the last one) of her legendary role in Hello, Dolly! Keep in mind when I say that that I have a new policy of using the word "legend" sparingly because I think it's been devalued almost to the point of worthlessness by being applied to everything and everyone these days. It just happens to be the only applicable term in this case. And while I have never been all that fond of the show itself, what she did in it was legendary — in the real sense of that word.

Second Time: I was in Houston (or maybe Dallas but I think it was Houston) as a guest at a comic book convention there. This was in the mid-eighties, I believe. The convention operators arranged to have one of their guests go to a local TV station one morning to appear on Good Morning, Houston — or whatever the name of the show and the city were — and plug the con. Every guest more important than me (i.e., all of them) begged off and I let myself get talked into being the one.

It meant getting up way early, making myself as presentable as possible at that hour, being driven to the TV station and waiting an awfully long time to get on the air. I was mad at myself for agreeing until I found out that one of the other guests on the program that morn was Ms. Carol Channing. She was in town in some sort of concert-type show and she was appearing on the TV program for promotional reasons. I found that among the many, many things Carol Channing did better than me was to be awake, alert and very scintillating at 7:30 AM.

We had a wonderful half-hour in the green room waiting to go on. I told her I'd seen her in the above-referenced tour when it played Los Angeles. She was delighted but said, "You know, eventually you'll be telling people that you saw me on Broadway in the original production. Everyone who attended those touring shows eventually does. I think that's why they went to them…so they could tell people "I saw Carol Channing in Hello, Dolly! and either they say it was in New York or they don't mention it was in Schenectady!"

Great lady. Great talker. I was so delighted to spend that time with her and find out for myself that she was just like that for real. I didn't want to spoil the moment by asking her about being in the movie, Skidoo!

I was the last guest that morning on AM Houston or Good Morning, Dallas or whatever the hell it was. They gave me about 45 seconds to plug the con because Carol had been such a great guest, they'd gone way over talking to her. If I'd been the producer, I'd have dumped the clown from the comic book convention and all the other guests and just let her fill the whole danged show.

Third time I was in the same room as Carol Channing: In early 2009, the Magic Castle in Hollywood experimented with hosting cabaret shows in one of its performing spaces. The Board later decided to just stick with magic and they stopped the experiment but before they did, they had some wonderful shows there. Stan Freberg did a couple of nights there as did many singers of show tunes…including Carol. I went with my friend Shelly Goldstein, who herself sold out that showroom for a few evenings.

Carol was dynamic and funny and charming and very energetic. Of course, she was a much younger woman then. She was 88. She did an awful lot of magic of her own kind without pulling a rabbit out of a hat, sawing anyone in half or hauling out the linking rings. She just sat and talked and sang.

It was one of the best evenings I ever spent listening to someone just be legendary. See? There's that word again.

My Latest Tweet

  • White House says Trump "is personally paying for" event with National Champions Clemson tonight "to be catered with some of everyone's favorite fast foods." Yes, because what's a celebration without 5-hour old Big Macs, Whoppers and fries?

Today's Video Link

It's Randy Rainbow Time! It's Randy Rainbow Time! It's Randy Rainbow Time! It's Randy Rainbow Time! It's Randy Rainbow Time!

ASK me

Here's the other question I received from Richard Pontius…

My other question relates to cartoons. How are decisions regarding a series cancellation made these days? Do ratings play less of a role? I've been quite impressed and enjoyed many modern-day shows like Batman: TAS and Batman: Brave and Bold, Superman: TAS, Avengers: Earth Mightiest Heroes, etc. but all get pulled from production before they seem to have run their course. In the case of The Avengers, I assume it was because Marvel/Disney wanted to retool the show to align with the movies. In other cases, I'm guessing somewhat arbitrary decisions from above, unless people like Paul Dini just get burned out after a while.

Well, Paul never gets burned out but I hope someday he does. As fine a writer as he is, he's an even better cook. I'd like him to give up writing — he can leave all those assignments to me — and open a restaurant, preferably one near my house. But that's not what you wrote to ask about. Sorry.

The decision to cancel a cartoon show these days always has at least something to do with ratings but generally more with how the show fits in with the over-all plans for merchandising and marketing the characters or property. Naturally, when a company or some division undergoes a major change in management personnel, that usually triggers a change in plans or priorities…and sometimes, what's currently being produced doesn't fit in with the plans of the new bosses.

Not long ago, I got a call inquiring about my availability to serve in some capacity on a new cartoon show based on an old, largely-dormant property that a company was planning to resuscitate. They were planning (and may still be, for all I know), this big promotional putsch to drive the characters back into public awareness with new toys and t-shirts and other merchandise and the advertising thereof. They had, they seemed certain, the funding to produce some double-digit number of episodes of a cartoon show that would display the "new look" for the characters.

For reasons they didn't tell me, the whole resurrection has been stalled-out so the cartoon show is on hold, perhaps forever. If it were to get on the air, the length of time it would be on would have a lot to do with whether it was aiding the overall fame and popularity of the characters and how many action figures of them were being sold.

Keeping a show in production can also have a lot to do with how many episodes have been produced…and this is where the ratings may really be important. If a show is still pulling down strong numbers on its sixth reruns, that can be an argument that new episodes aren't needed; that the company is better off investing that dough in the production of a new series rather than in more of a series that they think will continue to attract decent numbers without the expense of new episodes.

A friend of mine who signed on to work on a series once said, "I hope it does well in the ratings…but not too well."

If a show has made, say, 36 episodes, someone might say, "Hey, if we can get this up to 65, that will make this a much stronger package for reruns and overseas sales." Or if they've done 65 (or some other particular number), they might figure that exceeding that number will not be cost-effective in terms of raising the value of the rerun package. That was part of the reason we stopped making Garfield and Friends after 121 half-hours.

Also, some shows also get more episodes because they want to introduce new elements into the show (characters, props, etc.) that will be a part of the future merchandising. This is especially the case with shows that are financed, in whole or part by toy companies. They have new toys coming out that tie in with the franchise. They want the new toys to appear in the cartoon. That's why there were so many episodes made of properties like G.I. Joe and Transformers.

What may make the decisions seem arbitrary is that this is not an exact science and sometimes, one executive's rationale for ordering more episodes of a show is the same as another exec's reason for stopping a series. In the old days when TV networks bought shows for Saturday morning, all they really cared about were the ratings because the networks rarely shared in other sources of revenue like merchandising or overseas sales. Nowadays, most cartoon shows are funded by companies that do benefit from the merchandising and foreign sales so that has to figure into the decision-making.

Basically, that's your answer: It's not an exact science. These days, as far as some people are concerned, neither is science.

ASK me

Today's Video Link

The FX Network has a new limited series (eight episodes) in the works called Fosse/Verdon. It stars Sam Rockwell as superstar director Bob Fosse, Michelle Williams as Gwen Verdon and other people as known performers and personalities. I haven't seen a bit of it other than what's below but I can tell you that, unlike Stan & Ollie, there will be no need to make up anything to have conflict in the story. The trailer looks like someone's done a good job of replicating Fosse's unique styles of dancing and cinematography so I'm curious to see what else they'll do right. Episode 1 is expected in April..

ASK me

Richard Pontius sent two questions and I'm going to answer one here today and one here tomorrow. Here's today's…

Back in the days before residuals, how did television character actors support themselves between jobs? Not the Charles Lanes, Burt Mustins or Vito Scottis who seemed to appear in every single network series every single season from the 50s to early 70s, but the folks without a recurring role who we might recognize but who weren't in as high demand.

In television, there weren't many days "before residuals" for actors because they started in 1952 and most of the shows before that were live and not rerun.

Residuals weren't a lot at first…then they were raised but they were finite. After a certain number of reruns, the performers got bupkis. That changed during the 1973-1974 season and if you were on a show after that, you get residuals in perpetuity. (Don Knotts made a lot more money off the residuals from his five years on Three's Company than he made for his five years on The Andy Griffith Show even though the latter has rerun many, many more times. He, like most, was quite sore about not being paid for the rerunning of his earlier work.)

Anyway, the answer to your question is that acting is not a lucrative profession for most of its practitioners. Never has been, never will be. Residuals from TV appearances help but regardless, a large percentage of actors always need some sort of supplemental income. I know a lady who did a fair amount of television in the sixties but was never a regular on a series. She acted under her stage name while selling real estate under her real name…and when she met clients as a realtor, she would put on a wig, do different make-up, change her voice a bit and hope few people said, "Hey, didn't I see you last night on Mannix?"

In the seventies, her agent left the business and since she wasn't working a lot then, she couldn't get another. So what she did was to invent her own agent. She put in an extra phone line in her home. Then she made up the name of a mythical manager and listed it with SAG and AFTRA. If you called one of those unions wanting to hire her, you got that name and number. And if you called that number, you got her using a fake voice and she'd arrange an audition or booking for her client.

Also, there are a lot of acting jobs you never hear about. I'm thinking now of an actor friend who managed to get four or five days of scale work per year on TV shows and from the infrequency of seeing him, you might wonder how he was able to pay his rent. He was lucky: He got picked to do a series of regional commercials that were filmed in Hollywood but never run on this coast. He made way more from those than he did from guesting on national TV programs. There are also voiceover jobs, industrial films, stage work, stand-in jobs and other sources of income. Some try teaching their craft.

But acting has never been the steadiest of occupations and I guess the answer to your question is that some of them didn't support themselves between jobs…or had to live very frugal lives. It will probably always be like that.

ASK me

My Latest Tweet

  • Press reports say there's no detailed record, even in classified files, of Trump's face-to-face interactions with Putin over the past two years. Maybe there is and it's in a file somewhere with Hillary's e-mails.

Batton Lash, R.I.P.

What an awful, awful piece of news today: Batton Lash — cartoonist, writer, friend and usually the best-dressed guy at Comic-Con — died this morning at the age of 65.  He'd been battling brain cancer for a couple of years.

Bat was a charming, gracious man who was disliked by absolutely no one and our hearts ache for his beloved wife of a quarter-century, Jackie Estrada. Together, they produced and promoted some wonderful comics and creations, most notably Wolff & Byrd, Counselors of the Macabre and Supernatural Law. You never saw a more perfectly matched couple.

We knew he was sick but he was also one of those people you couldn't imagine not having in your world. It had a lot to do with a love of comics that extended to all the people around him in the comic book community, along with a laugh that made you want to hang around the guy, just to hear it. If anything could make that big hall at Comic-Con seem empty, it's this.