Today's Political Comment

People are blasting Trump for saying that Kamala Harris is "mentally disabled" but my thought is "Well, that one's not gonna stick." It just reeks of desperation…and really, he'd be saying that about anyone who opposed him. If someone isn't blindly loyal to the guy, they're ugly and communist and fascist and their business is failing and they're weird and crooked and lazy and they hate America and they're rude and dishonest and headed for prison and any other insult that pops into that panicked mind of his.

I think one of the reasons he's not doing better now is that even a lot of his loyal supporters don't take this kind of thing seriously. They may still want the kind of anti-immigrant government he promises. They may have been snookered into believing certain lies about how the economy did under him versus how it is under Biden/Harris. But they don't think all his insults are literal. They're just enjoying the hatred.

Meanwhile, Jonathan V. Last takes us through the scam that is the new Trump watch.

And Steve Benen takes us through a real assessment of how the economy is doing.

Since Trump couldn't win my state if he gave every Californian one of those $100,000 watches and a neck massage, I don't see a lot of political ads on TV. But I see 'em online and don't see a lot that I think will move votes. This one, narrated by Sam Elliott, might…

Today's Video Link

Here's a terrific interview with John Oliver. I was reminded how when he left The Daily Show, I and a lot of my friends thought, "Well, that sounds like a dumb career move" and how wrong we were. He now has a popular, award-winning show which may go on indefinitely and it's one that we (a lot of my friends and I) all love and respect. I think one of the reasons the show works is how honest Mr. Oliver is. I don't mean that he gets everything right but he sure tries hard and not just because there's a good living to be made there.

If you watch/listen to this, stick around for the whole thing. The last ten minutes are the best part…

Saturday Afternoon

If The Internet has taught me nothing — and I readily admit that's possible — it's that some people get angry when you don't like something they like or when you like something they don't. I can kinda understand when it's something like me liking Kamala Harris and them liking Donald Trump. After all, the vote in California might be so close that my one vote (for some reason, I only get one) might cause her to win the state, thereby denying its 54 electoral votes and therefore the Presidency to Donald.

But some folks in my e-mailbox and online forums get really upset when my tastes don't line up precisely with theirs on matters where mine don't make a bit of difference to their lives. It's well known that I think cole slaw is the single most repulsive thing anyone could possibly put in their mouths and this bothers some people who love it as if I'm about to make it illegal and get it banned. This is not likely to happen and, believe me, I've tried. Lord, how I've tried.

Someone is really, really upset with me because I have a low opinion of the 1966 Marvel Superheroes Cartoons. And someone else is really, really, really bothered that I don't love all those old movie serials about heroes like Captain America. The latter accused me of not respecting the creative genius of Captain America's creators, Joe Simon and Jack Kirby, even though I pointed out that they didn't like that serial either. Maybe he thinks that Joe Simon and Jack Kirby didn't respect the creative genius of Joe Simon and Jack Kirby.

I think some people need to learn to live in a world where other people have other opinions. Some others — or maybe some of the same people — need to learn to live in a world where others have different skin colors or religions or maybe don't even conform to certain rigid ideas about genders. Life is so much easier when you don't let differences make you furious.

Today's Video Link

Hey, I've got a great one here…one of my favorite movies, The Comic starring Dick Van Dyke and Michele Lee. Van Dyke plays a comedian from the silent days whose story has elements of the lives of Stan Laurel and Buster Keaton and a few others. Billy Bright is the name of the comedian that Dick plays and he's not a nice man. That may be one of the reasons why this film didn't go great at the box office when it came out in 1969.

Van Dyke gives a great performance and there are a lot of good character actors in here including Carl Reiner (who directed and co-wrote), Ed Peck, Pert Kelton, Gavin MacLeod, Barbara Heller, Fritz Feld and even Mickey Rooney. (See if you can figure out which actor in this film was dubbed by June Foray and you'll probably notice at least three separate voiceovers by Paul Frees.)

There are a lot of riches in here including a look at one of my favorite places in the world, the Silent Movie Theater on Fairfax — which was still open and operating when this movie was made. I thought it was a great film and I hope you do too…

Today's Political Comment

As Heather Digby Parton notes, Trump is really hammering this McDonald's thing hard and I can't believe it's going to move many (maybe any) votes. The folks who'll believe it matters are the ones who would never not vote for him. I can understand scaring people into thinking Kamala Harris is going to import billions of illegal aliens into your neighborhood but who would feel personally threatened if she fibbed about making fries at McDonald's four decades ago?

I actually don't believe anyone thinks any political candidates tell the truth 100% of the time, not even Trumpers who claim their guy does. If you're for a given candidate, you rationalize their omissions or exaggerations as "This is what they have to say to get elected."  And you want them to get elected so you excuse it because their opponent is a bigger liar and one must fight fire with fire.  I don't think I've ever for voted for someone who didn't at least color the truth a little. Maybe Jimmy Carter didn't but that might also explain why he lost in 1980.

I have a number of e-mails about this. Bruce Jones wrote me that Harris might be able to dig up Social Security records to show that she was paid by some McDonald's franchisee. Garth Gersten wrote me to say, in part…

Trump got his McDonald's talking point from someone (I forget who) that says Harris did not list McDonald's on her resume when she applied to be a prosecutor, nor at any other time. But, most people don't list fast food jobs they had in high school when they are applying for a job after graduate school, unless they were relevant. And working at a McDonald's for a summer during high school is not relevant to 99% of the jobs out there – unless, perhaps, you were a "manager."

I do not think she would have been required to list it on her application to take the California State Bar, either. I don't recall listing my high school job on my application to the California State Bar.

Yeah. And I never had a McDonald's-type job but my résumé omits about 80% of the things I've done — mostly stuff I didn't think would impress anyone or because it was something I'd like to forget.

As Will Saletan notes in this video listing the Top 10 Stupidest Trump Lines, Trump is now claiming that "someone" (no name given) tracked down the manager of the McDonald's (again, unnamed) where Harris claims she worked and this person remembered that 40+ years ago, she didn't work there. The other nine stupid things are also pretty stupid…

By the way: I'm not following the Eric Adams matter much but if he dunnit — and it's sure sounding like he did — this is another one of those cases where two things would be true of a scandal involving a public official. One falls under the general category of "Gosh, that person broke the law" and the other falls under the heading of "Gosh, that person was stupid to think they could get away with this." Either one is a perfectly fine reason they shouldn't be in power.

Those Who Know Him Best

91 people who worked for and with Donald Trump explain why he is unfit to be President of the United States.

Today's Video Link

Let's check in on Everything You Need To Know About Saturday Night Live as it takes us through Season 13 — a pretty good season as I recall…

From the E-Mailbag…

My old pal Pat O'Neill just wrote me with a good point…

As you probably know, most McDonald's restaurants are not owned nor operated by the McD's corporation. Rather, they are owned and operated by franchisees who pay a fee to McD's for use of the name and its products and trademarks.

Therefore, when VP Harris says she worked for McDonald's when she was in college, she does not mean the parent company. She means a local businessman who held the franchise in her town (and who may very likely no longer hold said franchise, since we are talking about some three decades ago).

Trump's challenge on this matter is beyond ridiculous; it is meaningless.

Right. And Trump probably knows that…or someone pointed that out to him. Unless Harris held onto some pay stub from a long time ago or has a photo of her in a McDonald's uniform, there's probably no way she can prove she worked at one. And even if she did, Trump would just say it was a forgery…you know, like Barack Obama's birth certificate. He does have this blanket argument that every statistic, witness, video clip or anything that proves he's wrong about anything is fake. If Harris said today was Thursday, he'd accuse her of using a fake calendar.

Today's Political Comment

I'm back "live" and what I'm seeing online is a number of polls that say Kamala Harris is ahead 3-5 points and a number of polls that say it's about even. I'm going to believe the former but act like the latter is true.

And it's another good day to not be Rudy Giuliani. I would love to know if this man ever pauses, looks back over his actions since 9/11 and wonders how he possibly could have taken that wrong turn at Albuquerque.

Donald Trump keeps screaming that Kamala Harris is lying when she says she once worked at a McDonald's. I wish someone would ask him how he knows this. The McDonald's company has made no statement whatsoever about this and we don't even know if they have records that would settle the matter either way. Without that, I can't begin to imagine how anyone could prove someone did or didn't work at a McDonald's several decades ago.

I don't believe Trump really has a health care plan for this nation. But to the extent he does, here's what is known about it.

Finally, here's another blast from the past reminding us why Donald Trump should not be President again…

Today's Video Link

The Marvel Comics Group began in 1939 (not under that name) and published zillions of comic books. It was not, however, until around 1966 that they made any real money doing anything besides publishing comic books. For long stretches of time in there, they didn't have many continuing characters who could be licensed or merchandised. One of the very few outside deals they made was in 1944 when publisher Martin Goodman licensed Republic Studios to make a fifteen-chapter serial of Captain America. Wikipedia notes…

It stands as the first theatrical release connected to a Marvel character; the next theatrical release featuring a Marvel hero would not occur for more than 40 years. It was the last live-action rendition of a Marvel character in any medium until Spider-Man appeared in the Spidey Super Stories segment of the children's television series The Electric Company in 1974.

The serial was reportedly the most expensive one Republic ever made but apparently almost none of that money went to Mr. Goodman's company. Joe Simon, the co-creator of the character along with Jack Kirby, told me Goodman made the deal for "almost nothing" just to get one of his characters on the screen. The deal also apparently did not include any requirement that Republic adhere to anything in the comic books or even mention in the titles that there were Captain America comic books. They were though mentioned in some of the advertising.

Those who know more about serials than I do have said that the script was not even written with Captain America in mind. There are several theories as to who the hero of the serial was originally intended to be but it does not seem to be in dispute that Republic couldn't close the deal for some other property they wanted. Thus, the script was switched to Captain America because Goodman was so eager to sell. Captain America in it is not Steve Rogers the super-soldier. He's District Attorney Grant Gardner and he uses a gun, not a shield.

I know some folks love these old serials but I find them unwatchable for more than a chapter or so. Someone has posted all fifteen chapters to YouTube and I've embedded Chapter One below. If you enjoy it, it shouldn't be hard to find and watch the other fourteen installments but I doubt a lot of you will. Neither Simon nor Kirby ever watched the whole thing…

Tales of My Childhood #26

When I was a kid, I never went away to camp. No, let me make that stronger: When I was a kid, I never even thought of going away to camp. Not for an hour, not for a minute, not for a second, not for a nano-second. Leave my wonderful home and all my comic books and go away for even a few days to a camp where I'd bunk with strangers and we'd hike and do exercises and have to eat whatever the camp served? Are you outta your ever-lovin' mind suggesting that? It's hard to think of something I would less want to do.

And my parents sure didn't ever seem to want a vacation from my presence. The first time I ever stayed overnight at a friend's house, my father was a nervous wreck.

I had seen camp in TV shows and movies. Not one thing in any of those programs or films looked like anything resembling "fun" to me, especially the pranks. I didn't even like the part in The Parent Trap where one Hayley Mills cut off the back of the other Hayley Mills' dress. Even as a child, I thought most pranks were…well, childish.

So I did not attend Mel Pierson's "Sleep Over Camp" advertised in the ad above.  I did however take swimming lessons at Mel Pierson's Swim Club, a small office complex with a pool in which kids could learn to dive, swim and generally not drown. It was located at the address in the above ad…and all this, of course, raises the question, "Who the hell was Mel Pierson?"  I don't think I ever met him and I certainly never heard anything about the man.

I had to wait until they invented The Internet and I could use our dear friend Google to find out that Mr. Pierson was a leading figure in the Los Angeles Parks and Recreations community and that then-Mayor Sam Yorty appointed him to the commission governing such matters for the city.  I also found online lots of news clippings about Pierson losing that position and being indicted on various allegations of bribery and financial improprieties.

Makes sense. That was exactly the kind of person Sam Yorty tended to elevate to positions of trust. Personally, I would have indicted Mr. Pierson for having a not-very-clean, not-very-private dressing room situated so as to not give children like myself a secure place to change in and out of our swimwear.

For a year or two, my parents took me weekly to Mr. Pierson's Swim Club where an array of teenage "instructors" taught us to swim in Mr. Pierson's aggressively-chlorinated pool.  Later, for reasons I don't recall, we switched to the Tocaloma Swim Club that was over on Santa Monica Boulevard near Westwood.  It had an Indian motif that would probably now seem racially-insensitive.  When my mother passed away and we cleaned out her house, I found my Tocaloma Swim Club membership card and my diploma and some sort of Red Cross certification.

But Mel Pierson's was where I learned how to swim and I was okay at it, I guess. Most of my lessons were handled by an instructor there named Beverly who seemed like a grown-up to me but was probably in her late teens…maybe early twenties. I remember her being very nice and very pretty and I remember one moment in particular. It was one of those things you don't forget when it happens at that age.

We — the dozen other students, Beverly and I — got out of the pool at the end of the lesson and toweled-off. Beverly had some sort of pamphlet or brochure she wanted to give me and she told me to go get dressed and then to come to the office. I had about fifteen minutes before one or both of my parents would be by to pick me up.

I went into the crummy little boys' locker area which I recall as something made out of cinder blocks with a shower, a bench and a row of unlockable lockers.  It was not inside a building and it had no roof on it.  Anyone upstairs in the office building could have looked out a window and seen us changing.   I quickly showered off the chlorine, dried myself, put on my clothes and then I went into the office where Beverly was waiting for me. She was all alone in there and had taken off her swimsuit. She had not though put on anything else.

I had seen girls without anything on before but they were all around my age. Beverly was most definitely a woman. She acted embarrassed and I acted embarrassed and I later concluded that I was but she really was not. The way she had not immediately tried to cover up made me decide she'd planned it, as did the fact that…well, what the heck was she doing naked in the office anyway? And no, I can't tell you why she arranged this. You can make up a reason that's just as likely as anything I could offer. But she sure took her own sweet time about putting on some clothing and she couldn't find the pamphlet she's said she wanted to give me.

I can tell you why I was embarrassed. I had no idea how to react or what to do or what not to do. I felt like I'd done something wrong but I couldn't figure out what. I can also tell you it never happened again and that it was not why we soon took our business to the Tocaloma Swim Club. I didn't tell my parents about what had happened. In fact, I didn't tell anyone about it and Beverly never mentioned it or any pamphlets in subsequent swimming lessons.

This was the closest thing to a sexual impropriety I was involved in during my childhood. These days, you hear a lot about kids being molested or touched inappropriately or prematurely sexualized and that's, of course, awful as well as illegal. It just never happened to me and if it ever happened to any of my friends, I never heard about it. I wonder if it was occurring and it was just kept more of a secret.

Well, let me walk back one thing: I did tell one person about my encounter with naked Beverly. I told my mother…but I told her in 2011, a year before she died. I was 59 years old at the time.

In her last years, my mother and I talked on a lot of topics we'd never raised before. She asked me about various girl friends I'd had, especially the ones she'd met. She asked me if I'd ever tried recreational drugs or alcohol and was unsurprised to hear I hadn't. She asked me what went on at our house when she and my father went off for a few days in Vegas and I had the place to myself.

She also told me some things — like details of her first marriage — that they'd kept from me. They were things they thought I was too young to hear and then they forget to tell me when I was older. All that frank, "no secrets" conversation led to a remarkable bonding of mother and "child."

I told her the story about Beverly and she thanked me for not telling her about it at the time. This was because — and I think these were her exact words — "I would have had to do something about it and I'm not sure I would have done the right thing." My parents had a pretty easy time raising me since I never got into trouble and she, at least, liked it that way. (My father, I suspect, might have appreciated more opportunities to feel like a father by disciplining his son or getting him out of jams. I just never required either.)

She did say one thing that I thought was funny. She asked me if I was still as good a swimmer as I was at those two swim clubs. I said yes. I have a swimming pool at my house and while it isn't large enough to do serious laps and long-distance, I can still swim. She said, "Good. And I would hope that every so often, you also get to see what a naked woman looks like."

Tales of My Father #15

Still trying to get some sleep and some pages done. Here's a rerun from 4/6/15…

As I've mentioned here many times, my father spent most of his adult life working for the Internal Revenue Service. It was a job and here were the good things about it:

The weekly paycheck was an absolute certainty. He and his family received very good health insurance. If he didn't do anything stupid, he would receive tiny raises from time to time and be able to retire when he reached 60 years of age. And when he did retire, he would receive a modest pension until he died and if his wife survived him — which she did — she would receive that pension until she died — which she did.

I cannot tell you how important and wonderful that health plan was for her. Without it, she would probably have died 5-10 years sooner, suffered more while she was alive, and worried constantly about medical bills costing her that lovely house he'd left her.

Those were the good things. Note that none of them had to do with what he would do each day when he went to work. All that, he hated. He especially hated answering to unqualified or bossy bosses. Obviously, I am giving you his description of his workplace here. He believed many of the policies he was ordered to almost blindly enforce were foolish, pernicious and unfair. Particularly during the presidency of Richard M. Nixon, my father was sent forth to wring every possible dime out of poor people (especially single parents) but to kiss the derrieres of wealthy folks and to not make too much of a fuss when a rich guy didn't want to pay what the law said he was supposed to pay.

According to my father, some of that was a matter of certain people in Washington rewarding their friends and campaign donors. And some of it was because affluent people could afford good lawyers and accountants. It was simply easier to collect from folks who couldn't…even when they didn't have the money.

The single parent thing really got to him. He did not have the power to waive or prune the tax bill of a delinquent taxpayer. At most, he could negotiate payment plans within predefined department guidelines and he needed the blessing of his superiors to go beyond those guidelines. More than once, he went to his bosses and said something like, "I'd like to forgive a part of this woman's tax bill and give her longer than usual to pay the rest. She was recently widowed. She has five children to feed and clothe and her husband left her in serious debt, above and beyond her taxes, and she has no source of income at the moment."

The reply to that kind of request was usually along the lines of, "Denied. Tell her that if she cares about those kids, she'll hurry up and find a new husband who can support them." Single male parents fared a little better but not by much.

That was one example of many reasons he hated to go to work most mornings. Even though he blamed the stress for causing his bleeding ulcer and many sleepless nights, he did the job. To men of his generation — he was born in 1910 — there was nothing more important than providing for your family both in life and death. He provided well when he was alive. There was never anything I really needed we could not afford, though I recall wishing when I got braces on my teeth, that my orthodonture had not been affordable. My father left my mother a home, a pension and that all-important health insurance.  Oh, yeah: And me but she was half-responsible for that.

It was around 1951 when he married the one and only love of his life. And it was no coincidence that was the year he committed to the I.R.S. job for the rest of his life.

Prior to that, he had worked in a number of different jobs. He worked as a copy boy at the Hartford Courant, then as now the largest newspaper in Connecticut. He worked as the Night Clerk at Mount Sinai Hospital in Hartford. He worked on and off for the I.R.S. division in Hartford. He was originally hired, in part because of his limited experience at the Courant, to work in Press Relations. That was not a bad position, he said, but then they reorganized the division and moved him, much against his will, into being a Revenue Officer. He didn't like it but he did it there and later, he signed on to do it in Los Angeles for the rest of his working days.

Notice I use the word "job" here. My father had jobs. He never had a "career," at least the way he defined it. Once I began to work steadily as a professional writer, he'd sometimes say to me, "You've got a career." He always had a big grin on his face when he said it.

Don't write to me about the real definitions of these words. Around my father, the difference was simple: A job was something you did to buy groceries and pay the mortgage. A career was something you wanted to do. Not one child in all of America has ever said, "I want to grow up to be a Revenue Officer for the Internal Revenue Service."

In '51 when he took that job in L.A., he not only abandoned any hope of ever having a career, he gave up one other important thing. He gave up the dream of ever being rich.

He would henceforth receive a steady paycheck and a pension but the amounts involved would never buy much more than the necessities of life and an occasional vacation. You could not get rich working for the I.R.S.; not even if you took bribes. His best friend at the office tried that and even if he hadn't been caught and sent to prison, he would never have owned a mansion and a yacht. My father, who was so honest he returned found wallets with all the cash intact, would never have even tried it.

Most people in my line of work (writing) never achieve anything even vaguely resembling a steady paycheck. A good many never earn half as much money as my father did at the job he hated. But in writing, there is at least the theoretical possibility of wealth. It may be unlikely but it's not utterly impossible that your next writing job will lead to you publishing a best-selling novel or writing a screenplay that will bring in millions.

That's not why most of us do it. I do it because I never came across any profession that seemed preferable or within my limited skill set. I sometimes pause to consider that fundamental difference between what I do and what my father decided to do. I've never had the job security he had but I've also never had a cap on my potential earnings. There's the trade-off.

As you might imagine, I know a lot of writers. I know writers who are unsuccessful and happy. I know writers who are unsuccessful and unhappy. I know writers who are successful and happy. And I know writers who are successful and unhappy. That last group is generally the saddest of the four.

I suspect some of the unhappy ones (successful or otherwise) would be happier if they had a job instead of a career. Not knowing what your income will be next month — or even if you'll have one — can cause stress and bleeding ulcers and sleepless nights. My father's problem was not that he had a job. It was that he had the wrong job and was never able to find a better one — and once he had the responsibility as the Bread Winner, unwilling to risk the security he'd found.

He retired at the age of 63, just in time to watch and cheer the televised Watergate hearings. There were many revelations in them about how the Nixon Administration had used the I.R.S. to reward its friends and punish its enemies and he was so, so happy to see much of that exposed even if it didn't lead to total reform. Mostly though, he was happy to be out of that damned job.

His last few years at it, he looked more like he was in his eighties than his sixties. The day he retired, he dropped the extra twenty years from his face and maybe five or ten more just out of sheer relief. He lived another 20.5 years in fairly good health. They were not free of stress as he could always find something to worry about but it was never as bad as his years at the I.R.S.

Which is not to say retirement did not have its downsides. The main one was that he was bored out of his mind.

He followed a couple of stocks he owned, more for the hobby than for the money. He rooted for the Lakers and never understood how it was possible for them to win a game if it wasn't televised and he wasn't in front of his TV yelling at the screen. He prayed for jury duty, got it a few times but discovered that his past profession disqualified him from ever actually getting on a jury. At times, I would find busy work for him, giving him errands to run for me. They usually did not turn out well as I've explained here before.

He never wished for a second he was back at his job. But he did wish he had something to do all day and really feel like he was doing something.

I turned 63 last month. Only about a week ago did this dawn on me: I am now the age my father was when he retired. It has never for a second occurred to me to do that.

I consider myself fortunate that I have a career and that every morning, I not only have something to do…I have something I want to do. That's another difference between a job and a career…and it may be the reason I don't feel 63 except sometimes around the knees.

Another Obit I Missed…

Alex is the one on the left.

Alex Hassilev — the last surviving member of the original lineup of the folk group, The Limeliters — died last April. I always liked those guys and still play their old records once in a while. (Well, to be accurate: I still play MP3s of their old records…)

He was also in one of my favorite movies — The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming — and he produced a helluva lot of great record albums. There are still Limeliters but he was the last of my Limeliters.