Today's Video Link

He's coming back February 18. Not soon enough for me…

Your Thursday Trump Dump

One way or the other, I think we're going to be talking about the Donald Trump presidency for the rest of our lives…which Trump would probably consider a "win" for him, even if we're all saying what a monster he was.   He strikes me as the kind of guy who would prefer that to not being mentioned at all.

You may find this hard to believe but there are moments lately when I kinda feel sorry for the guy.  I know he's the cause of a lot of his woes and I know he gleefully did the same things to his opponents but, for example, I didn't think any pundit or commenter from afar knew as much about the Clintons' marriage as they pretended they did.  I didn't think any pundit or commenter from afar knew as much about the Obamas' marriage as they pretended they did.  And I don't think any pundit or commenter from afar knows as much about the Trumps' marriage as they pretend they do.

I also think there is such a thirst out there for jokes and insults of Trump that the Stephen Colberts and Seth Meyerses of the world are faulting him for every stupid thing he says (which is fair) and a lot of picayune, arguable ones (which is not).  There are plenty of the legit kind, guys.

The other night, Michael Wolff was on with Trevor Noah, and I didn't get that Mr. Noah had a high opinion of Mr. Wolff.  He kept pressing Wolff on his new allegation that Trump is currently having an affair with someone on the White House staff and that you can figure this out if you "read between the lines" of Wolff's new book.  It sure sounded like Wolff has insufficient proof to say it out loud but he's suggesting it anyway because, hey, the idea is to sell books, right?

I haven't made it all the way through Wolff's Fire and Fury yet and I may not.  Much of it feels a little too National Enquirer for me…and by the way, I flipped through the latest Enquirer while waiting in the supermarket check-out line lately and I think their new Mission Statement is to make Fox News look fair and balanced by comparison.  Did you know that every bad thing you hear about Trump is a lie planted by Barack Obama?  Apparently, he's even found a way to make Trump say stupid, racist things.  If Obama could do that, how come he couldn't get us real, bulletproof Universal Health Care?  Now this…

  • Fred Kaplan has one of those Good News/Bad News columns.  The good news is that with regard to foreign action and military operations, Trump is doing what the generals tell him to do.  The bad news is what the generals are telling him to do.
  • Trump has been tossing red meat to his base, warning them that to let one immigrant in is to let in dozens.  Politifact explains how it really works and — surprise, surprise! — it's not the way Trump says it does. Also, immigrants have a much lower crime rate than he'd like you to believe.
  • Here's two views on the same matter.  Zack Beauchamp says the Obstruction of Justice case against Trump is pretty strong.  Andrew Prokop thinks otherwise.
  • Jonathan Chait makes a good case that "Trump Hasn't Destroyed Obama's Legacy. He's Revealed How Impressive It Was."  Part of the reason Trump's approval rating isn't in the twenties is that most of the economic news is fairly good.  But if you look at any chart of any indicator, I don't think there's one that doesn't show the good news is all continuing some trend from the Obama years or before.
  • Matt Taibbi discusses the Trump News Cycle, where it's All Donald, All the Time.
  • And finally: Evangelical leaders are still standing behind their boy Trump despite the story about him cheating on his wife with a porn star and paying hush bucks to cover it up.  I'm sure they'll apply the same standards of judgment to the next Democrat who gets enmeshed in a sex scandal.

Speaking of that scandal: The porn star, Stormy Daniels, was out of the business but she's back now, touring strip clubs with her "Make America Horny Again" tour.  Donald always was a great Job Creator.

Today's Video Link

This is the work of Michael Zajkov. Stunning…

Track Meat — The Results

Well now!  According to my Meater probe, my Butterball Frozen Turkey Roast, which I'd thawed a few days in the refrigerator before cooking, hit an internal temperature of 168° and then Meater told me to remove it from the heat and let it rest ten minutes before cutting into it. I checked it with another thermometer which said it was at 163° so I took it out and rested it for the prescribed time. At the end of the ten minutes, both thermometers told me I was at 170°.

The turkey came out great. Then I mixed the drippings with the little gravy packet that was included with my bird and that came out pretty good. I added chicken stock instead of water and tossed in a tablespoon of flour and I'd give the resultant gravy a B+. I am enormously impressed with both the Meater probe and the Butterball product. Total cooking time was three hours and eleven minutes.

I phoned the Butterball Hot-Line, told a nice lady what I'd done and asked her, "Aren't these supposed to take seven hours?" She said, "You must have a newer slow cooker. Their low temperatures all seem to be higher." My Rival Slow Cooker is about eight years old and the Meater probe, which measures the internal temperature of the oven along with what you cook in it, said the temps inside the cooker got up to 210° near the end…but for most of the cooking time, it was below 190°

So I don't know what to think except that I'm going to do this again. You don't get golden, crispy skin in a slow cooker but the meat itself would not be outta place in a fine restaurant…or at least the kind I go to. If you wanna try it, check your local market for Butterball items and you can pick up a Meater over at their website — and apparently nowhere else. They have oodles of videos there explaining how the thing works.

In my first experience, it worked exactly the way they said it would so I'm going to give it a try soon on steak. If that comes out as well as this did, Amber may never get her Benihana Fried Rice again.

Track Meat

At this very moment, I'm trying a cooking experiment…and have I ever mentioned here what a lousy cook I am? I usually botch up anything more complicated than Campbell's Bean with Bacon Soup…and even that doesn't always come out the way I want it to. Beans undercooked, bacon overcooked…

So I'm trying a new device called a Meater. It's a meat thermometer that works on your wi-fi connection. At this very moment, a three-pound Butterball Turkey Roast is in a Rival Crockpot in my kitchen downstairs. As you can see, I am upstairs working on my computer. My iPad sits downstairs next to the Rival Crockpot and the Meater probe is in the Turkey Roast which is in the Rival Crockpot, which is set to "low." Via a bluetooth connection, the probe relays the internal temperature of the Turkey Roast to the Meater app in the iPad…

…and the Meater app on my iPhone is connected via my home wi-fi to the Meater app on the iPad. Is that too complicated? Basically, I can sit here upstairs and look at the Meater app on my iPhone and it can tell me the progress of the Turkey Roast downstairs. Everything is supposed to beep and my Turkey Roast is supposed to be done when it reaches an internal temperature of 170°.

So here's the problem.  I started this thing around 10:45.  The Butterball website says it's supposed to take seven hours and it won't hurt anything if I overcook by an hour or two.  They also say that the roast must reach an internal temperature of 140° in the first four hours.

That, it did.  Based on the first half-hour of cooking, the Meater timer estimated a total cook time of almost eight hours, which seemed right in line with the instructions…but since then, the internal temp has shot up, the timer estimate has gone down and as I write this, I'm getting an internal temperature of 144° in the Turkey Roast and an ambient temperature (the temp inside the slow cooker) of 202°. A setting of "low" on a slow cooker is supposed to be 190-200° so that doesn't seem terribly wrong.

Anyway, I'm now being told that my Turkey Roast will hit 170° in 35 minutes — for a total cook time of not seven hours but around three hours and fifteen minutes. Something here is not right.

When the time's up, I'm going to check the Turkey Roast with a conventional meat thermometer and maybe I'll figure out what it is that's not right. Stay tuned.

Today's Political Theory

Here's another of my silly theories about politics. Give this as much or as little respect as you think it deserves…

Every so often, an elected official does something that we as spectators can't understand. Like, let's say a Congressman comes out one day and announces he has information that a band of radical scientists has bred a mutated species of gopher that is capable of pressing the levers of a voting machine and they've already got thousands of them secretly registered to vote. He wants to hold Congressional hearings into the scandal he is now calling Gophergate.

This demand goes nowhere but for a time, analysts try to explain it. Some poll somewhere says that a certain voting bloc has a deep, tribal distrust of gophers so he's probably trying to appeal to them. Or maybe a rogue official within the C.I.A. has leaked information to the Congressman. Or maybe the Congressfella is confusing a now-defunct attempt to train gerbils to help register voters. They come up with all sorts of explanations for why he said such a wacky thing but they overlook the most obvious explanation. It involves a conversation over dinner in the past week…

CONGRESSMAN: So, my staff and I were hoping you could help us on our crusade with a small donation…or at least what would be a small donation to someone in your position. Maybe two million…

SCREWY RICH PERSON: Well, I'd like to help you because I like a lot of the things you're saying…especially that stuff about how it'll be better for the economy if screwy rich people like me don't pay taxes. But I haven't heard you address the single most important matter facing this country today…

CONGRESSMAN: Uh, which single most important matter facing this country today would that be?

SCREWY RICH PERSON: Gophers voting, of course.

CONGRESSMAN: "Gophers voting?"

SCREWY RICH PERSON: Of course. Don't tell me you haven't heard all about it! I thought you were the kind of representative who was on top of all these threats to our American way of life!

CONGRESSMAN: Oh, yes, yes. (lowering voice) It's just that some things are supposed to be, you know, top secret. I'm impressed that you heard about it. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, what with you being so perceptive and connected to everything that's going on in this country. Now, about that donation…

SCREWY RICH PERSON: I'm not donating a dollar to anyone unless I see they're doing something to stop those damn gophers. They're not only going to destroy democracy but my front lawn is full of holes.

CONGRESSMAN: Well, I guess it's safe to tell you that I've planned a major address about the problem next week. It's time to alert the public to this insidious menace.

SCREWY RICH PERSON: You're damned right it is. Way past time. I know for a fact that's how my dear friend Roy Moore lost that election down in Alabama. They say his opponent got 673,896 votes. Ridiculous! I know for a fact that more than 588,000 of those were cast illegally by gophers.

CONGRESSMAN: My sources tell me more than that…and it wasn't just gophers. Raccoons, too. I'm going to hold off dropping that particular part of the bombshell until I have more solid proof but I will be going public with what I like to call "Gophergate" next week.

SCREWY RICH PERSON: Good. I'll be watching for it.

CONGRESSMAN: I'll call you right after the speech because I'll want to get your reaction…oh, and maybe we can talk more about that donation. Before I go though, I'm curious. What else have you heard about the gophers?

I often think it must be something like that. We underestimate what even the politicians we like will do to extract support from one wealthy person. This is assuming the other possible explanation isn't true; that there really are mutant gophers voting. It would explain Trump.

Bill Harris, R.I.P.

Comic book writer-editor Bill Harris died January 8 at the age of 84. Harris started and ended his career in the field of advertising and promotion, moving from company to company for many years. When he secured a post doing promotional work for Dell Publishing, he took a special interest in their comic book line and wound up moving into editorial work on it. That meant leaving Dell and going to work for Western Publishing, which produced Dell's comic book line until 1962. (If anyone isn't clear on the relationship between Western, Dell and Gold Key, I explained it here.)

Harris continued working for Western. He was proudest of his editorial work on Western's Bullwinkle comics and of his writing work on the comic starring Lee Falk's classic character, The Phantom. In 1966 when the King Features newspaper syndicate attempted to start their own line of comics, Bill was hired as editor of its small list of titles which included Flash Gordon, Mandrake the Magician, The Phantom, Blondie, Beetle Bailey and Popeye. The line was not successful, lasting a little over a year and while Bill briefly did editorial work for Warren's Creepy and Eerie, he did not work much more in comics. Most of his career thereafter was spent working in the promotional department of the New York Times.

One of his innovations when he was in comics was that he was one of the first editors to recognize that there was a promotional value in comic book fanzines. Many of the early zines of the sixties featured letters from Bill, telling fandom what would be forthcoming in the comics he edited. Few others in comics at the time saw any value in that but Harris predicted correctly the growing impact that fanzines and comic conventions would have on the field. For that and for writing some pretty good Phantom comics, he certainly deserves to be remembered.

Funnybook Memories

I'm going to date myself here: When I started collecting comic books, there was absolutely no investment potential in them. New comics sold for ten cents. Once one was no longer new, the only place it would be sold was in a second-hand book shop and there, the going price was usually a nickel and most stores would sell you six for twenty-five cents.

In the mid-sixties, a soon-to-be-thriving market for old issues began to thrive. Shops and dealers began to sell old comics for more than their face value. I remember being up at Cherokee Books up on Hollywood Boulevard where its impresario Burt Blum would fan out a "poker hand" of five mint condition copies of Superman #1 he had for sale. I think they were twenty bucks apiece and that seemed outrageous at the time.

There was vast interest in old comics and most of the collectors I knew were way more interested in the content of the books, as opposed to their investment potential. Still, it was easier to rationalize spending money on what some then called "junk" if the "junk" you were buying was going up in value. Then again, I used to get annoyed when people thought that was the sole reason I was buying 'em.

me, back when I was in better condition than my collection.

I had a truly-impressive collection in my bedroom when I was fourteen or so — one whole wall had a bookcase that was filled with old comics. When my parents had visitors over, it was somehow required that the guests go in and see what Mark had. Almost invariably, the comment I heard was, "Wow, you should open a store!" They probably thought I was nuts when I'd reply, "I don't want to sell them. I want to read them."

Sometimes, I'd say, "I will never sell my comic collection" — a vow I kept for close to half-a-century. Actually, somewhere along the way, I modified it to "I will never sell my comic collection unless I really need the money" and I never really needed the money. But eventually, I needed the space and I realized it had been, literally, more than a decade since I'd looked at any of them. When I wanted to revisit an old issue, I almost always had some recently-published reprint that was easier and safer to handle and maybe even had better reproduction. There are also scans of many of them on my computer here.

What I loved about them was the content, not so much the physical (deteriorating) paper…so I turned a lot of them over to an auction house and they are now residing in someone else's collection, in some cases probably "slabbed" for future resale.

As I'm writing this, it dawns on me that I sold off most of the comic books in these photos about the same time I sold the house in which these photos were taken. It would be ironic if I'd gotten close to the same money for the comics as I did for the house but I didn't. However, if I'd bought even one of those first issues of Superman from Burt Blum back in 1967, I would have gotten more for the comics.

Today's Video Link

I don't want to scare you but any day now, robots could be making your pizza…

Testing…Testing…

In a post here in January of 2009, I wrote that I'd been part of an audience on which the pilot for the series I Dream of Jeannie was tested before NBC decided to put it on the air every week. That led to this follow-up…

A couple of folks wrote to ask what else I remembered about going to the audience testing for I Dream of Jeannie and Camp Runamuck. As I recall, it was early in 1965, several weeks before either was announced as a series, so our reaction may have been a factor in them landing on the NBC fall schedule. I'm pretty sure both pilots that were shown to us that afternoon were longer than what aired the following September and different in a number of ways.

The venue for the testing was a place called Preview House up on Sunset Boulevard, a few blocks east of Fairfax. I went with a friend of mine named Steve Hopkins and we had to wait in line for quite a bit. Through some confusion, we were actually a bit too old to be there — the testing was of kids 12 and under, and we were thirteen, but they let us in. We were shown to seats equipped with little handheld dials on cords. You could turn the dial all the way to the left to indicate you didn't like what you were seeing or rotate it to the right to show approval. Steve and I took our assignments seriously but a lot of boys and girls around us seemed to be just randomly spinning the thing because it was fun. As I recall, the place held around 200 of us.

A gentleman came out and talked a while, making it sound like the entire future of commercial broadcast television was in our hot little hands. Then he taught us how to use our dials and showed us a Mr. Magoo cartoon. I'm not sure if the man said this or if I read it somewhere later but the idea was that the Magoo film was the "control." It was shown at every Preview House screening and our responses to it would be measured against the responses of other test audiences to see how we weighed in against them. When we were asked if we had any questions, Steve wanted to know if our responses were individually recorded. Did they register that the person in Seat A-7 liked this or that? Or did they just record the responses of the audience as a whole? The host said he couldn't get into technical things like that and so we never found out. I might have felt a lot less self-conscious if I'd known.

Questionnaires were then passed out. We'd been promised that there'd be a drawing later for prizes and we were now asked to decide which items we'd select if we were the lucky ones. For instance, someone was going to win a case of cookies. In the booklet were photos of about ten popular brands of cookies and you had to check off which kind you'd like if you won. You then had to pick which candy bar you'd want if you won the case of candy bars and which kind of cereal you'd want if you won the case of cereal and so on. It seemed rather odd to me to have everyone fill out their choices this way. Why couldn't they do the drawing and then ask just the winner which brand of soft drink he or she wanted? Hmm…

After we all filled out the forms and passed them in, we were shown the Camp Runamuck pilot, which we kinda liked. It took place at a summer camp where the counselors were more childish than the youthful campers, and there was a lot of physical comedy and food fighting. I remember thinking that it was copied from the Disney movie, The Parent Trap, even to the point of having the same actor (Frank DeVol) play the camp supervisor. As I later learned, self-plagiarism was at work. The Parent Trap was written and directed by a man named David Swift…and David Swift was also the creator of Camp Runamuck. (Frank DeVol, by the way, was replaced when the series debuted the following fall. I hope my clumsy dialing wasn't the reason.)

We filled out some forms about how we liked what we'd seen, then it came time for the second pilot, which was preceded by several commercials — one for cookies, one for candy bars, one for cereal and so on. Then came the I Dream of Jeannie pilot, which we liked a lot. I darn near broke the dial, whirling it clockwise every time Barbara Eden was on the screen. Forms were passed out for our comments on Jeannie, and if there'd been a place I could have written something in, I'd have been the first person to ever demand they show Barbara Eden's navel.

As these packets were collected, someone called our host away and informed him of some dire news which he then passed on to us. Apparently, there was a problem with those questionnaires we'd filled out earlier — the ones where we picked the kind of cookie we'd want if we won the case of cookies, the kind of candy bar we'd want if we won the case of candy bars, etc. "We accidentally gave some of you the wrong questionnaire so just to be fair, we're going to ask you all to fill them out again!" New forms were passed about, though they looked like the exact same forms to Steve and me. We both noted that in each category, one possible selection was a product which had been in one of those commercials we'd seen and…

Hey, you don't suppose it was all a test to see if those commercials had caused us to change our minds, do you? Naah, they couldn't have been that sneaky.

That was about it. We were told that if we won the prizes, we'd be notified…and of course, we weren't. Given how sneaky these people were about getting us to fill out the prize form a second time, I'm skeptical that anyone got a case of anything. The host thanked us for coming and out we went. I suppose we should have felt somewhat exploited but it was kind of cool. The next week at school, we could tell our classmates that NBC had tested its new shows on us…and of course, we made it sound like the Head of Programming had called us into his offices and said, "Mark…Steve…I value your judgment so much that I'm going to let you program Friday night at 7:30!" Soon after, when Camp Runamuck and I Dream of Jeannie were announced, we could flaunt that we'd seen them, whereas the commoners had to wait 'til September. (Runamuck was a quick flop but managed to last all of one season. Jeannie was a hit for five years.)

Whatever "specialness" we'd felt at being a part of a select testing audience pretty much evaporated over the next year or so. Preview House got very active, I guess, because everywhere you went in L.A., there were teenagers handing out passes to go there and watch pilots and win valuable prizes. I declined at least one a week.

A friend of mine went once and reported back that he'd seen the pilot for a Batman TV show starring someone named Adam West. He'd also seen the same Mr. Magoo cartoon plus some pilot that never made it to series, and they'd done the same stunt about redoing the questionnaires that told them which prizes you wanted if you won the drawing, which I still don't think anyone ever did. I don't know how much the networks paid them to run this operation but I'll bet it was enough that they could have afforded to send someone a case of cereal once in a while. If anyone who was ever involved with Preview House reads this, I still want Cheerios.

Monday Evening

If you ever want to hear from half the people you ever met, just guest on Gilbert Gottfried's Amazing Colossal Podcast. Yow. They're going to have me back soon so maybe then I'll hear from the other half.

Well, the shutdown's over — for now. Hope you enjoyed it because they're going to rerun this thing more often than A Charlie Brown Christmas. But it's nice that they're no longer arguing over what the deal should be and are instead arguing over which party screwed the other. I am reminded of an animation studio that I stopped working for. My lawyer, who twice had to go to them and explain their own contracts to them, once said "They aren't interested in a deal that leaves both sides happy. They only want the deal that leaves their side happy and other side, crying, humiliated and begging for mercy."

Went to see my fave local musical group Big Daddy performing last night and boy, were they great. They had a lot of new material even though everyone in the place would have been quite satisfied with the old stuff. I won't tip any of the new mash-ups but I'll never be able to hear Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah" again without thinking of what Big Daddy did to it.

Coming soon to this blog: An article about why my support for the #MeToo movement is growing and so is my belief that Woody Allen is innocent.

Listening to me on the radio

I recorded my interview for Gilbert Gottfried's Amazing Colossal Podcast some time ago and I'm listening to it now. Why did I say that Allan Melvin was the voice of Droopalong on the Ricochet Rabbit cartoons? I know darned well that Mel Blanc was the voice of Droopalong on the Ricochet Rabbit cartoons.

me on the radio

That's Gilbert Gottfried, one of the funniest people on this hemisphere — and who knows? He may be equally funny on the other hemisphere. I haven't bothered to check. Each week, he and his co-host Frank Santopadre bring us Gilbert Gottfried's Amazing Colossal Podcast. They've been doing this for some time and it's really an amazing and colossal podcast that I always enjoy.

Usually they have as their guests the Great and the Near-Great. I guess no one in either group was available because this week their guest is me.

Today's Video Link

My favorite day last year may have been September 19. On that evening, a bunch of us filled the Goldwyn Theater at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in Beverly Hills — more than a thousand lovers of great cartoons and of a great cartoon voice actress convened to celebrate the life and times of June Foray. We wanted to do it the evening before but the theater was booked. The evening before would have placed it on her 100th birthday.

It was a helluva lot of work but I'm still hearing from people who'll say it was an experience they'll never forget. Alas, I'm also still hearing from people who are pissed that they weren't there and/or on stage. I've been telling them, "If we let everyone who loved June get up there, we'd still be there" and now, months later, that may still be true. I even have one person who says he reads this blog all the time, somehow didn't know about the event and is upset that I didn't call and tell him about it. Well, you all saw how infrequently I mentioned it here.

And I have people who want to know when a video of the whole thing will be posted so they can watch it. Answer: Never. The evening contained too many cartoons and videos that we don't have the right to put online…but we may be posting some clips from the speeches.

What you can watch below is a slightly-abridged version of what was projected on the screen that evening as everyone came in and took their seats. It ran in a loop over and over but there was so much happy conversation and hugging in that room, even a lot of the attendees didn't get the chance to view it. Now, they can. You'll need to take this full screen to see everything…

Sunday Afternoon

Yes, it's a beautiful Sunday…a day when everything is open except the banks, Chick-fil-A and the United States government. Guess which of these is not likely to be open tomorrow.

The news tells me that Chief-o'-Staff John Kelly is negotiating on behalf of the White House — and why not? It's not like we have a president who's experienced at negotiations.

Meanwhile, the Democrats and Republicans seem to be arguing about whether to call it the Trump Shutdown or the Schumer Shutdown…and that's about all they seem to be arguing about. Hey, they can call it the Evanier Shutdown if that'll move them on to actually settling this thing. Last I heard, the only proposal out there was something like how we will build Trump's border wall but only if DACA kids do it. Maybe I misheard.

For me, the fascinating guy to watch during all is Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who seems to be kissing Trump butt and telling him he's the greatest prez ever on even-numbered days and treating him like a moron on odd-numbered days. What's more, he seems to be getting away with this.

Today, he also went after Trump's creepiest aide saying "As long as Steven Miller is in charge of negotiating immigration we are going no where. He's been an outlier for years." Miller's the kind of guy who back in high school, ran for Student Body President on a platform of "More homework, fewer proms" and got one vote, counting his own.

I hear that despite the shutdown, the Grand Canyon is still open. When I was seven or so, there was an item on the news that the Grand Canyon would be closed for a few days for some reason and I wondered if that meant men with shovels had to go out and fill it in — and then when it was open again, they had to go back and dig it out. That sounded like a lot of work…but how else do you "close" a huge hole in the ground? At the age of seven, that made a certain amount of sense…about as much as this whole shutdown does today.