Groucho Day

Forty years ago today, Julius "Groucho" Marx died at the age of 86. His passing got way less notice than the death of Elvis Presley, who'd passed three days earlier — a source of great frustration to those of us who were way more influenced by Mr. Marx than we ever were by Mr. Presley. Then again, maybe it's understandable that Elvis's death at the age of 42 was far more unexpected and shocking and therefore newsworthy. Groucho, at more than double that age, had been in poor health for some time and was sadly past his performing years.

I met him three times and saw him perform (sort of) on stage once. I wrote about these brushes in this column and the one that follows it. A few years ago, I realized that I got the dates and sequence wrong and I've finally revised the columns so they're right.

The last encounter took place at Groucho's home on Hillcrest Road in the Trousdale section of Los Angeles. The visit was short — a friend and I were there about a half-hour — and Groucho didn't say much. It occurred a month or two after he showed up on the set of Welcome Back, Kotter when I was working on that show so it was around Christmas of '76. He was in such poor shape that I'm still amazed he lasted another eight months.

The friend who took me there had me along because he thought Groucho would enjoy being with a relatively young person (I was 24) who knew everything about his films and career. This seemed to be true. Groucho wasn't able to muster much in the way of answers to the questions I asked him but he liked that I knew all the names and all the films.

The most interesting thing I recall of that afternoon was that I got to see Erin Fleming in her native environment. She was the controversial actress (largely of the aspiring variety) who kept company with Groucho in his last years, doing some good for him and some bad as she attempted to do a lot of good for herself. She'd accompanied Mr. Marx to the set of Kotter where he was supposed to tape a cameo appearance but was too ill to do more than pose listlessly for some photographs. It was pretty obvious that the show's invite to appear was accepted not by Groucho, who couldn't have cared much less, but by Erin, who thought it might somehow lead to her making an appearance on a (then) hit TV show.

In Groucho's home, she stage-managed a series of celebrity drop-ins, getting stars (including Groucho) to get up and perform. At least during the thirty minutes or so I was at one of them, Groucho looked like he'd rather be in his bedroom, sound asleep. I suppose though there were times when he appreciated the company and attention.

That day, I did not meet a young man who worked in the house as a kind of secretary-archivist. His name was Steve Stoliar and if he was there, no one introduced us. A few decades later, we encountered one another and became good friends. If you're curious about what went on in The Last Days of Groucho, I recommend an utterly-accurate and quite entertaining book by Steve called Raised Eyebrows — My Years Inside Groucho's House. And if you're the kind of person who follows my recommendations — God help you — here's an Amazon link for it.

In a way, I wish my memories of Groucho stopped with the first time I met him. He was still lucid then, still able to stand on his own, still able to say witty things in a way that reminded you of the smartass in the movies and on the game show. That smartass was highly influential in a lot of our lives. He emboldened us. He inspired us. And he made us laugh to an extent that would make him a legend even if he hadn't emboldened and inspired us. He sure mattered a lot more to me than Elvis ever did.

Today's Non-Surprise

Stephen Colbert's show for tonight was recorded last night but he recorded a new monologue for it today.

[UPDATE, LATER: I'm told he did record a new monologue for tonight's show — a show otherwise cobbled together from segments earlier in the week. But the new monologue was recorded last night so no mention of Steve Bannon's ouster or other developments from today's news.]

Friday Morning

The Drudge Report and The New York Times are both saying Steve Bannon is out at the White House. When you get it from both of those sources, that's all the proof you could ask for. Stephen Colbert is probably upset that they recorded tonight's show yesterday and it wouldn't surprise me if they're scrambling to do something new and insert it. Bill Maher, on the other hand, is probably delighted with the timing. (Tonight, his guests include Al Franken, Penn Jillette and Gavin Newsom. If you're outside California and you don't know our lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom, you might want to get familiar with him. That man is going to be a serious contender for president some day.)

In light of Bannon's ouster, it is worth re-reading (or just plain reading) the Matt Taibbi column I linked to yesterday.

We have a busy day here so I'll be back later with…something. It'll probably be about why I still don't think Trump is a racist but it's getting harder and harder to believe that. Then I'm going to shoot for a Trump-free weekend on this site but it's getting harder and harder to aim the part of my brain that blogs at anything else.

Today's Video Link

The theme from The Bugs Bunny Show — as performed by a player piano…

A Quick Thursday Trump Dump

Matt Taibbi insists that Steve Bannon has to go. According to Taibbi, Bannon is the guy who knows how to make racism work on a political level. A lot of people think the defense of Nazis we've heard out of Trump lately was put there by Bannon. Taibbi thinks it's the opposite; that it wasn't because Bannon would have made it work.

Fred Kaplan reminds us that Germany knows how to do war memorials that recall what happened without glorifying it. You know, there's another way to remove the reverence about most statues besides tearing them down. We could just release more pigeons into the vicinity.

Among the many leaders who rebuked Trump for his recent remarks were the chiefs of all four U.S. military services — the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marines. Remember when Trump said that his main military policy would be to listen to the generals? Well, he's not listening now. Fred Kaplan (it's a two-fer!) tells us what it all means.

Trump keeps telling a story about General Pershing having terrorists executed with bullets dipped in pig blood. I guess the premise is that some people don't particularly mind being shot to death but they're really intimidated at the thought of being shot to death by bullets dipped in pig blood. That's when execution starts to be unpleasant. Anyway, Matt Yglesias notes that the story doesn't make a lot of sense and that historians seriously doubt it ever happened. Trump probably got it from a movie…you know, the same place Ronald Reagan learned history.

Today's Non-Surprise

Donald Trump, the man who likes to get all the facts before he comments on anything, said that the counter-protesters in Charlottesville did not have a permit to march. Guess what.

Today's Audio Link

David Letterman sat down the other day with Howard Stern…

Today's Political Thought

So we're talking today about statues commemorating the Civil War and its leaders…and some cities are doing more than talking. They're taking down those statues, which prompted You-Know-Who to tweet, "Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments." Somehow, when he says they're "beautiful," I don't think he's talking about the artistry of the sculptors.

Frankly, I don't care that much as long as they don't pull down any monuments to Jubilation T. Cornpone. That's that beloved man a'sittin' up there on that even more beloved horse.

Kevin Drum has made a pretty good argument that those statues not of General Cornpone were erected to sell the idea that those who fought to preserve slavery were heroes. In some cases, the statues were kind of a rebuttal or pushback to civil rights gains. To that extent, great, fine, take 'em down. I'd rather though that those cities do more to improve the way their police officers treat minorities. Unless a statue of Robert E. Lee falls on a black guy, it can't hurt him anywhere near as much as a cop who is way too quick to use his gun or even a choke-hold.

My Trump Cynicism tells me that our Chief Exec doesn't care about any statues that are not of him. In saying what he does, he thinks he's pleasing those who bolster his popularity and wealth…and he may not be wrong about that. He's only wrong if he thinks that group isn't shrinking and wishing they had a leader who didn't keep shooting his own toes off.

I may start a daily feature here: "Today's Watergate Analogy." As I've mentioned here, there was a time during that scandal when an outta-left-field man — a rabbi named Baruch Korff — emerged as Richard Nixon's principle defender. The rabbi, who knew little about Washington and less about how to defend someone, got that "position" because no one else wanted it. Not a single Republican official or leader wanted to go on camera and defend President Nixon. This morning, I read this online…

Chuck Todd of MSNBC said all 52 Republican Senators turned down an invitation to appear on his show, while CNN's Wolf Blitzer of "The Situation Room" said his efforts were also unsuccessful.

"We invited every single Republican senator on this program tonight, all 52," Todd said. "We asked roughly a dozen house Republicans including a bunch of committee chairs, and we asked a half-dozen officials and none of them agreed to discuss this issue with us [Wednesday]."

They'll still vote with the guy. They'll still back most of his agenda because most of it is their agenda, and because they can vote as a crowd and there's safety in numbers. But very few of those lawmakers are going to stand up and lend whatever personal integrity they have to his cause. And it's not so much because they can't defend what he said yesterday as it is the fear of what he's going to say tomorrow.

Worth Waiting For?

In 1970, I saw a British-made comedy-drama called The Man Who Had Power Over Women, which starred Rod Taylor and Carol White.  I recall liking parts of it and not liking others but being really, really fascinated by the film.  It was about a man named Peter Reaney, a successful talent agent (or maybe a publicist) who doesn't understand women except in a very shallow, hormone-driven way. He also doesn't know much about personal morality except that it sometimes gets in the way of his profession and income.

Taylor, I recall, was wonderful in the role and whoever wrote it had a very wicked sense of humor. I left the theater wanting to see it again, if only so I could decide if I really loved it or really hated it.  I felt there was the potential for either verdict…or maybe even both.

So now it's 47 years later and I still haven't seen it a second time.  If it was ever on TV, I managed to miss it.  I did miss its brief release as a Beta tape and maybe on VHS.  I once asked on this site if anyone had a copy of it and a nice person mailed me a homemade DVD since I don't think there's ever been an official release.  Alas, it arrived at a time when I was busy and unable to give it my immediate attention.

The homemade DVD laid around on a table for a week or so before it was spotted by a lady friend who was visiting.  She asked what the movie was.  I told her more or less what I just told you.  "Oh, I love Rod Taylor," she grinned.  "Could I borrow it?  I'll watch it and get it back to you right away."  Somehow, she lost it and also the accompanying letter. Thus, I also lost the name and contact info for the kindly samaritan who sent it to me. If you were that person, thank you.

In January of 2015, shortly after Mr. Taylor passed away, I appealed to the folks at Turner Classic Movies to get it and run it. They're finally doing that this Friday evening and I'd like to think it just took them 32 months to get around to granting my wish. On my set, it'll be on at 9:15 PM. Check your guide if you want to record or watch it.

This is not really a recommendation since my mind's not made up as to whether I liked it or not…but I recall thinking it was full of very inventive scenes, including the one with the truckload of toilets. I won't tell you what happens in it but it was very…odd.

The film may interest some of you just because it's so rare and unseen, and I'm pretty sure you'll think that Rod Taylor is great in it. He was great in everything. I do not guarantee you'll like it. Heck, I can't even guarantee that I'll like it but I'll try to watch it before next weekend is over and I'll report back here.

My Latest Tweet

  • The Broadway musical of "Groundhog Day" is closing after 176 performances. The cast got tired of doing the same thing again and again…

Today's Video Link

Late night TV hosts were not kind to Donald Trump. They all had strong, funny responses — I'm even warming to Jimmy Kimmel — and it may be some measure of the depths to which Trump has sunk that he finally managed to radicalize Jimmy Fallon. My favorite may have been Jim Jefferies…

One Other Trump Note…

Trump just hit 58% disapproval in the Rasmussen Poll with 35% approval.  This is horrible.  Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Obama and the first Bush never got to 60% disapproval and it took the second Geo. Bush 1,756 days and taking us to war on false premises to do it.

Trump already set a world's record for a U.S. President achieving a negative approval rating in most polls less than two weeks after he took office.  But as I recall it, that was "fake news" to him even if he didn't use that term, because the Rasmussen Poll still had his positives above his negatives.  I don't think much of the Rasmussen Poll but Trump usually cited it because it leaned a bit more in his direction.  Well, now the poll he always cites has him at 58%.

That's based on polling from a few days ago.  He'll be at 60%, which is where some other polls have him, before he reaches his 150th day in office.

The 538 Aggregate, which is what we watch on this site, has him at 55% disapproval with 37% approval.  I'm sure if someone asked him, he'd insist that all those polls are fake and that his real approval rating is very, very high…the highest ever, some unidentified people tell him.  It's scary to think he believes he can sell that lie and even scarier to consider that he might really believe it.

Your Wednesday Trump Dump

And boy, there's a lot of dumping to do. I think the scariest thing about Trump's walk back of his Nazi condemnation is this: A lot of folks thought he was erratic and uninformed but found enough things about him to like. The rationale for supporting someone like that was "He'll surround himself with good, level-headed experienced people and they'll stop him from nuking Kathy Griffin's house or whatever nutty thing he seemed like he might do."

What happened yesterday proved that even if does have good, level-headed experienced people, they can't even stop him from undoing their work. They couldn't even prevent him from saying, more or less, that there are good people among the Neo-Nazis.

The thing I always wonder about with politicians — and not just Trump — is how much of their odd behavior is because of one or two powerful (i.e., wealthy) people they're trying to impress. Every so often, you'll see some Congressperson suddenly, out of nowhere, declare something like, "We need to investigate the robots that are sneaking into our homes and stealing all our yogurt!" And you wonder where the hell that came from.

I find myself imagining a dinner with a very rich potential campaign donor who says, "Well, Congressman…I'd like to help you out with a few million but what I'm looking for is a guy who's going to get serious about all these thousands of reports of yogurt-stealing robots."  And the Congressguy instantly says, "Oh, I'm right on top of that, sir. I've been researching that shocking situation and…well, just wait'll you see my press conference tomorrow about it."

It just seems to me that a lot more of our illogical governance is caused by one or two phone calls that we never know about and can't possibly factor in when we try to figure out the mindset of our leaders. Wonder if someone Trump didn't want to piss off called and told him, "You had it right on Saturday and wrong on Monday. Go back to Saturday!" And now this…

  • Jonathan Chait writes of the White House aides who have done so much to shield the public from Trump's racist beliefs. I'm still sticking to my position that Trump is not a racist but I'm having more and more trouble convincing myself.
  • German Lopez says that Trump's talking points on Charlottesville are coming right off of Fox News. We'll know for sure if he starts selling gold — the kind of you buy for investment — for five or ten times its actual value.
  • Trump tried the silly "slippery slope" argument about how if we get rid of all the statues of Robert E. Lee, is George Washington next? To me, those are usually like "If we get rid of the traffic light at Elm and 3rd Street, where does that lead? Do we get rid of all the traffic lights everywhere?" Matt Yglesias has more on Trump's ridiculous manipulation of history.
  • And Kevin Drum addresses the claim that to lose Confederate War statues is to lose a piece of history. Those statues weren't put up to remind all of history. They were put up to remind black people who's in charge.
  • Trump was supposed to call the Mayor of Charlottesville but as of now, he hasn't. Actually, I was under the impression that Trump never called anyone; that his working premise was that since he was the most powerful man in the world, he didn't call people. They had to call him.
  • Ryan Lizza thinks that firing Steve Bannon, as has been called "imminent" for several months now, won't change much of anything. I think hope this is a growing sentiment.
  • The prominent Conservative Jonah Goldberg does not like how "his side" has embraced the alt-right to gain power.

As we all know, Trump has been threatening to discontinue the Cost Sharing Reduction Subsidies that the Federal government makes to keep Obamacare viable. Trump seems to want to destroy Obamacare that way on the questionable premise that no one will then blame him and everyone will blame Obama and his care. But as Kevin Drum (him again!) notes, that could mean that the federal government will spend more, not less on medical care for poor people. This is not something that Trump's base should like. (This just in: A White House aide says the payments will continue.)

Today's Video Link

Jim Jefferies is one of my current favorite stand-up comedians. The other night, he was on with Colbert but the show ran long and this anecdote was edited out of the telecast…

Tuesday Morning

Back when Jackie Mason was funny — yes, there was such a time — he had a line about Richard Nixon during the time of Watergate. He said, "I get up every morning and check to see if my furniture is still there." There really was this ongoing sense of, "What's he going to do to us next?"

I now wake up, reach for my iPhone and check to see what news headline awaits: What's Trump done this morning while I was asleep? This morning, there was no headline and I gave out with a sigh of relief you may have heard, wherever you are. I do not enjoy living in interesting times, especially when what makes the interesting is a question like "What is the President of the United States going to do today to protect his support from racists?"

One of my pet peeves, mentioned many times before on this blog, is people who make what is to me a silly, deceptive analogy. It's when anyone in politics makes any kind of concession or compromise and they liken that to Neville Chamberlain trying to appease Hitler by giving up chunks of Czechoslovakia. It's usually ridiculous because not every enemy is Hitler and not every compromise is surrender. Most problems in this world are not settled by killing the other guy.

I'm surprised no one's compared Trump to Chamberlain lately though. He sure wants to appease those boys with the tiki torches in Charlottesville.

Last night, Stephen Colbert had Anthony Scaramucci on his show for a kind of exit interview. Colbert was a bit too aggressive in his questioning, occasionally talking over his guest, but he did wring some interesting responses out of "The Mooch"…

Colbert: Are there elements of white supremacy in the White House?

Scaramucci: No. But I don't like the tolerance of it.

I wish Colbert had then asked, "Is it tolerated because some of them agree with it or do they just want those votes?" I assume Scaramucci would have said, "The latter," then Colbert could have asked, "So Donald Trump — this man you say is so compassionate and so media-savvy — is tolerating white supremacist views in his White House because he doesn't want to lose the support of racists?" I wonder what the response to that would have been.