Sparky Moore, R.I.P.

sparkymoore02

One of the most prolific comic book artists of all time, Richard T. Moore died in his sleep September 7 at his home in Templeton, California. Known professionally as Sparky Moore, he worked in comics, comic strips and animation from 1951 until shortly before his death at the age of 91. "Sparky" was also the nickname of Charles Schulz of Peanuts fame but unlike Schulz, who got his handle because of Sparkplug, the horse in the Barney Google newspaper strip, Moore became "Sparky" because he was a radio operator in the military.

Sparky Moore was born in Philadelphia in 1925. As a kid, he had two passions: Drawing and horses. He raised and bred horses for much of his adult life while drawing in a nearby stable. Sometimes, he combined his two interests. He drew hundreds of western comic books and he also carved intricate wooden rocking horses. Soon after serving in World War II, Moore met and married Helen Sheedy and they had a family that included one set of twin boys and one set of twin girls. They were married until her death in 2005.

Moore's professional art career began in the late forties but really took off in 1951 when he began drawing for Western Publishing Company, producing work that appeared in Dell Comics and also in Western's activity books, childrens books, puzzles and toys. He was extremely versatile, able to adopt an adventure style to draw movies and TV tie-in comics or characters like Rin Tin Tin, Lassie or Tarzan, or to switch and do funny animals and Disney characters. In his later years, he did mainly the latter. For Western's Gold Key and Whitman lines, he drew Disney's Robin Hood, The Aristokittens, Scamp and Winnie the Pooh, among others. For Disney studios, he did long stints on the Scamp and Winnie the Pooh newspaper strips.

sparkymoore01

During the sixties, he worked often in animation for Grantray-Lawrence on the Marvel Super Heroes cartoons, and for Hanna-Barbera on shows like Jonny Quest, Mightor and Space Ghost. He also drew comic books of the H-B super-heroes for Gold Key. He was very good at drawing in other artists' styles and I have seen Sparky Moore animation drawings for the Marvel show sold and represented as the work of Gene Colan, and drawings Moore did for Hanna-Barbera sold as Alex Toth's work.

For the most part, he was anonymous but very good…and very reliable. At Grantray-Lawrence, he met a young artist named Mike Royer and he gave Mike some of his first work in comic books and one vital piece of advice. I just phoned Mike for background and he told me, "The best piece of advice I ever got as an artist came from Sparky. He said, 'You get your first job based on your ability and all the rest based on your dependability.'"

Mike added, "Whatever success I've had professionally as an artist…I owe a lot of that to Sparky Moore."

I was a fan of Sparky Moore's art long before I could put a name to that style. He drew a lot of comics based on TV westerns for Dell in the late fifties, including Elfego Baca, Wyatt Earp, Texas John Slaughter and Rex Allen. For a change of tone, he also drew The Three Stooges and many of the Disney movie adaptations for the company. When I was in a position years later to hire artists for comic books, I kept trying to get him but he always declined gratefully, citing a full plate of other assignments. He was well-liked by editors for delivering superior work on time and by his colleagues for helping other artists. Royer said, "I got an awful lot of work because Sparky recommended me for things and everyone took his recommendations."

Most comic book fans reading this are probably not familiar with his name but if you're anywhere near my age and liked Dell Comics, you read a lot of books he did — and I haven't even gotten into the many times he ghosted books or strips allegedly by other artists to help out a friend. I doubt anyone could even assemble a checklist of his work and make it reasonably complete. But he was real good at what he did and he sure did a lot of it.

Today's Video Link

Millicent Martin, David Kernan and Gemma Craven sing a medley of songs with lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner. Lerner gets overlooked a lot when people speak of great Broadway lyricists but he sure wrote a lot of memorable numbers…

Andy Candy

Someone wrote to ask me about this post, which was placed here on 3/25/07 and I figured I might as well rerun it here…

encore02

So about forty minutes ago, I'm in my friendly neighborhood CVS Pharmacy and a lady shopper comes up to me. She says her "favorite actor in the whole world" is over in the next aisle…and I guess she's so excited about it that she has to tell someone. So she tells me and naturally, I ask, "And who might that be?"

She says, "John Candy," and my immediate thought is just what yours would be in this situation: "I don't think so." As I'm thinking that, she's telling me how much she loved him in Planes, Trains and Automobiles.

Let's leave aside the question of how someone could be your "favorite actor in the whole world" and yet you're unaware they died thirteen years ago. Let's just focus on what I should do. Should I tell this young woman (she's about forty, I'd guess) that she didn't just spot John Candy in the Toothpaste Section, across from where they sell the Just For Men hair color? Or should I let her keep her little fantasy of having seen her fave in person? She'll probably find out one of these days…but is it my business to shatter her happiness?

Just then, she points to a gap in the aisles and says, "There he is," and I can see the person she thinks is John Candy. There, wearing a green t-shirt and shorts, is Andy Richter. "Do you think it would be okay if I went up to him and asked for an autograph?" she asks me.

I think to myself, "Hmm…I wonder if Andy Richter would enjoy being mistaken for John Candy. He might get a great anecdote out of it, one he could tell on his next talk show appearance. Or he might just feel insulted…I don't know." I decide to save the lady the embarrassment and I break it to her, as kindly as I can, that John Candy passed away some time ago.

She asks me, "Are you sure?"

I tell her I'm sure.

She turns and walks off, looking very sad indeed. I don't know if she's sad just because her "favorite actor in the whole world" is dead or if she's sad because she feels humiliated by her mistake. Either way, it sure doesn't feel like I've done this woman a favor. I should have let her go up and tell Andy Richter how good he was in Planes, Trains and Automobiles. If he was insulted, too bad. He could handle it.

Coke Is It!

howarddean01

This election frequently presents some of us with a great dilemma: When, if ever, is it okay to stoop to the other side's low standards? We now have Howard Dean — who let's remember was a doctor before he was a politician — is out there suggesting that Donald Trump's sniffling during the debate "might" be an indicator of a bad cocaine habit. Now, before I decide what I think about that, I have a few things to consider…

  • I've always thought it was unseemly to try and do a medical diagnosis on a person from afar. It's unfair when a layman does it and much worse (and maybe unethical) when it's done by someone who's entitled to put "Doctor" before his or her name. Back when a woman named Terry Schiavo was on life support and this whole country took an abnormal interest in her situation, the Republican Senate majority leader was a man named Bill Frist, who was also a heart surgeon. He started spouting off medical opinions about her condition based on a few videotapes he'd seen of this woman he'd never examined. I thought that was very wrong — wrong for a leader to do that and wrong for a doctor to do that.
  • I felt the same way when Hillary's enemies were recently out there claiming they had incontrovertible proof that her medical problem was not pneumonia but Parkinson's Disease. They did not have proof of that, no matter how desperately they wanted to believe that and make others believe it. They had unnamed sources and wild speculation.
  • It also bothers me when people make an accusation without accepting responsibility for it. Trump does that a lot. It would be one thing if he said, "I believe my opponent kills puppies." It's more his style to say "Some people are saying my opponent kills puppies" without ever saying who those people are or why their accusation is worthy of considering. I mean, thanks to the Internet, we can find "some people" who think Elvis is living on Neptune with Hitler. That doesn't mean that needs to be part of a public discussion.

So there are two possible reactions to Howard Dean suggesting Trump is a coke freak and that someone should look into that. One is that it's just plain wrong the same way the Parkinson's thing was wrong and it's craven to hide behind "I'm not saying it's true…I'm just asking questions." That's another weasely Trump trick.

And the other, of course, is that it's nice to see Trump getting a dose of his own medicine. It's turnabout, it's fair play, it's fighting fire with fire. And it exposes hypocrisy when he screams "Foul!" about his own tactics being used against him.

I'm sorry. I don't like it. I understand it but I don't like it. There's an awful lot in this election I understand but I don't like…to say nothing of all the things I don't understand and don't like. It scares me that this might be what Politics will be like for the rest of my life.

Recommended Reading

In case you're one of those rare Americans who cares about the issues in this election — as opposed to the real issue of who can look tougher — here's a nice rundown of where Clinton and Trump stand on most of the key topics. I say "most" because there's nothing in there about what each would do about protecting me from cole slaw.

Today's Video Link

This video is wrong. You can vote naked. You just have to do it absentee…

Instant Replay

National Public Radio has posted a transcript of the entire debate — with fact-checking and annotations. Give it a read.

Recommended Reading

Matthew Yglesias explains that even in the areas where he's supposed to be an expert, Trump doesn't know what he's talking about.

The Morning After

I awoke to find Donald J. Trump making the rounds, yelling insults at a Hispanic woman who once won his stupid Miss Universe pageant. Clever of Hillary Clinton to bring up an issue where Trump's behavior will remind both women and Hispanics why they don't like the man.

Last night, Trump said Lester Holt did a great job as moderator. Today, he and his surrogates are out there saying Holt was hostile and biased. Make up your mind, Donald. Also, he's complaining his microphone was defective. Was there anyone who couldn't hear this guy? I not only heard him every time he was talking, I heard him every time anyone else was talking.

I'm thinking that one of the things that really hurt Trump was his insistence that he never said that Global Warming was a hoax concocted by the Chinese. It was real easy for everyone to find that Tweet where he said exactly that. Sometimes, there's wiggle room where you can say, "Well, I didn't say exactly that." Not this time. His supporters have been able to deny or rationalize a lot of fibs but there's no way around this one.

In the debate, I don't believe an important topic was mentioned and it certainly wasn't discussed. That would be the Supreme Court. Jeffrey Toobin reminds us what's at stake there.

Anyone expecting a massive jump in Hillary's poll numbers will probably be quite disappointed. Numbers don't move that fast anymore. But last night sure changed the dynamic of this election.

Live From New York…

I liked Stephen Colbert's live show that followed the Great Debate…and I'm wondering how much of it was actually done live. The cold opening certainly wasn't but after that, it seemed like it was all in real time. When he did those "live" shows following the conventions, a lot of the interviews were recorded earlier in the evening. This one was pretty good, though I am still not enjoying Colbert's Late Show as much as I should or even as much as I did his first few months on the air.

By the way: Two different people wrote me in the last few days to ask who the new female announcer is. One wrote, "And why doesn't she get her name in the end credit?" Well, she does but as one of the writers. It's Jen Spyra, who also has a nice career as a performer and who also does the voice of the cartoon Hillary Clinton who sometimes appears on the program.

Monday Evening

I watched the debate about a half-hour behind real time. I kept thinking of another "safe" prediction I should have made; that even if one person clearly "won," it would not be such a rout that the other side couldn't claim victory. Anyone thinking tonight would knock one candidate clean out of the race was destined to be disappointed.

For whatever it's worth, I thought Trump did poorly, if only because he didn't show any positive side of him we all hadn't seen. If you thought he was a blustery racist-leaning demagogue who lies a lot, you probably just went, "Yep!" If you were on the fence about voting for the guy, I think you're less likely to leap over to his side.

Hillary seemed calm, unflappable and in command of the issues. I think she may have buried the idea that she doesn't have the stamina to do the job, especially since Trump was sniffing enough to start up Internet Speculation about a massive cocaine problem. There's no evidence of that of course but if it had been Hillary doing it, she'd be Cokehead Clinton on a thousand websites by now.

What this will do to the polls is anyone's guess. I can't see a lot of Trump supporters jumping ship, though some of them are probably mad that he didn't deliver on the Hillary-shredding they've long awaited. I just noticed this Tweet from Noah Rothman, who's the very Conservative editor of Commentary

Trump fans are attacking the moderator. Think everyone knows what that means.

And just as I typed that, I see Rudy Giuliani on my TV, saying Trump did great but the moderator was biased so Trump should skip the other two debates. He must've been promised a helluva job in the Trump Administration.

Today's Video Link

Here's an interview with Eric Idle and John Cleese from when they were touring Australia. This obviously was done before the announcement that their colleague Terry Jones is suffering from a form of dementia…

Monday Morning

I doubt anyone is coming to this site today just to read what I think is going to happen in tonight's first debate between Hillary Clinton and You-Know-Who.  If you are such a person, you're not going to find anything meaningful here and I doubt you'll find it anywhere.  I have two predictions….

  1. This will be the most-watched Presidential Debate ever.
  2. Anything else can happen.

This whole election has been one unprecedented occurrence after another.  Pundits can sit there and say, "Well, in eight of the last twelve debates, the candidate with the reddest tie has gained a 1.7% bump in the polls" but clearly when so much is happening that's never happened before, all bets are off.

Well, maybe I can eke out two more predictions…

  1. An awful lot of America is going to sit there, mimicking the facial expressions of opening night audience at Springtime for Hitler and thinking, "I can't believe anyone would vote for that person."
  2. An awful lot of America is going to sit there, mimicking the facial expressions of opening night audience at Springtime for Hitler and thinking, "I can't believe anyone would vote for either of those two people."

And I suppose there will be a lot about lying and fact-checking and who's tougher.  As I've said here, I think "talking tough" is a false value, especially since it's so often unconnected to doing anything in particular or actually being tough.  But a lot of folks out there don't care what a candidate says he or she will do.  They just want someone in the Oval Office they can pretend is Daddy or maybe even Mommy.

I'm not sure if I'll watch live or if I'll wait 'til it's over.  Sometimes, watching after makes it easier because it gives you a little emotional detachment.  You're not sitting there wondering if the stage will blow up within the next ten seconds.  Then again, you miss out on real-time Tweeting and blogging…and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.  I'll see how I feel.

I already know one thing about this election that's real depressing, which is that even if Trump loses, Trumpism ain't going away.  He'll get enough votes that his supporters will say, "We came close!  All we need next time is to find a guy with the same views who doesn't lie so blatantly and doesn't come across as quite as much of a misogynist." A few months ago, some of us could imagine an outcome where Hillary not only won but did so by a wide-enough margin that the saner Republicans could seize control of their party.  Now, it's getting harder to be confident of her winning at all.

Oh, I just thought of one more fairly-safe prediction…

  1. No matter who says what, after it's over (or even before it is), both sides will be out there saying their guy or gal won a smashing victory and totally humiliated their opponent.

Sometimes, I think that's the most depressing thing about these events — the fact that grown men and women will say anything in support of their candidate, hoping someone out there is stupid enough to believe it. There will be people out there lying about how the opposition candidate was lying. And then there will be lying about the lying about the lying…and lying about the lying about the lying about the lying about the lying…

Enjoy the show.