There's a movie I've mentioned here a number of times called The Night They Raided Minsky's. It was made in 1968, produced by Norman Lear and Bud Yorkin, and directed by William Friedkin. The releasing company, United Artists, declared it a disaster and Mr. Friedkin more or less disowned it. It was then heavily recut in the editing room, making it into quite a different and somewhat successful movie. I like it a lot despite some odd continuity and some hokey moments.

I saw it with some friends at the old Fox Venice Theater on Lincoln Boulevard out in Venice. Some time in the eighties, that theater went outta business and the building — shabby but still somewhat identifiable — is now an indoor swap meet.

Okay now, I hope you read the Trivia Warning above because you won't believe how insignificant this is…but when I saw the movie in early 1969, I noticed something that no one else on this planet would have noticed.

The movie is about the attempts of a local censor to shut down the Minsky's Burlesque house. At one point, the house comics (played wonderfully by Jason Robards and Norman Wisdom) work a ruse on the guy. There's a "naughty" book sold in and around the theater — one which, when held up to the light, shows some scandalous pictures about a harlot named Mademoiselle Fifi. Robards and Wisdom convince the censor guy played by Denholm Elliott that Fifi is soon to dance on the Minsky stage.

Here is a still from the scene in which they do this. That's (left to right) Robards, Elliott and Wisdom. As you can see, Mr. Elliott is holding the booklet up to the light…

It was at this moment in the Fox Venice Theater that young M.E. spotted this thing that no one else would have noticed or if they did, mentioned. I whispered to my friends, "That booklet was made out of a copy of MAD Magazine #115!"

My friends looked at me like I was crazy. How could I have known that? Well, I recognized the insides of the booklet which were visible for a few seconds on the screen. Here's a close-up of the booklet as seen in the above still…

And here's a two-page spread from MAD #115, which by the way was dated December of 1967. Obviously, the prop guy had a copy lying around and used it when it came time to construct the Mademoiselle Fifi book. This article was written for MAD by Stan Hart and illustrated by Bob Clarke…

That's really all there is to this. No one else has ever cared about this. You surely don't. But this is my blog and you were warned this was going to be ridiculously unimportant so you have no one to blame but yourself for the time you just wasted reading it.

• Many folks writing of who was not at the SNL40 bash are ignoring that someone could be ill, employed or not interested.

If I had more than 140 characters, I might have also added (1) unable to afford the trip and (2) not wild about trying to get in and out of New York between blizzards.

I'm hearing today of two cast members of whom people are saying, "How scandalous that this person wasn't there and featured" when the truth is that the person has not been well and either couldn't be there or didn't want to be there and look old and sick.

There were performers who were there and didn't get much (if any) attention: Victoria Jackson, Gilbert Gottfried, Rob Schneider, et al. If there's a snub, it's that the special placed more focus on current movie stars who once hosted than on cast members who were only cast members. But hell, they placed a ton more emphasis on cast members than on writers who were only writers.

• Lesley Gore has died. And I'll cry if I want to.

Shortly — probably within the next twenty-four hours — I will post to this blog the single most unimportant, pointless, "who the hell cares?" piece of movie trivia you've ever seen in your life. If you read it, and I'm not suggesting you do, you will be aghast that a theoretically-grown man could waste ten seconds of his life thinking about it and almost twice as along writing a blog post about it.

Hint: It involves the movie, The Night They Raided Minsky's. This will be utterly meaningless to those who have seen that film and even less important to those who haven't. You have been warned.

Back in the early sixties, former heavyweight boxing champ Rocky Marciano had a syndicated interview show called Main Event. Each episode consisted of several conversations which drifted in and out of talking about boxing and show business. I believe the show was offered to stations in multiple formats: A half-hour version, an hour version and the option of using the interviews individually to fill holes in the schedule, say after a movie or during a baseball rain delay.

Marciano was a great fighter I suppose but he was not a champion interviewer. Still, he had on a lot of the kind of guests no one can make uninteresting. Here are chats with Jersey Joe Walcott, Zsa Zsa Gabor and Jackie Gleason. The Gleason is the main reason I'm posting this…

The wickedly clever Merrill Markoe examines the "FAQ" page on the McDonald's website and comes away less likely to eat at one than before she waded through all those answers to tough questions and culinary transparency.

McDonald's is attempting to stop its declining sales by being more open about what's in their food and how they prepare it…and I suppose that's a good thing for consumers. It may not, however, be a good thing for their revenue. (I found this link, by the way, on the most excellent blog of the fine broadcaster, Mr. Paul Harris.)

The SNL40 special killed in the ratings. The "day after" reaction seems to be quite mixed and everyone is outraged about some omission. The more I think about it, the more annoying it is to me that the only way a writer seems to get any recognition is if they also became well-known as a performer. But then the show has too often measured the success of its creators by what they did after they were part of Saturday Night Live.

---

Registration for this year's Comic-Con International in San Diego begins this week. If you want to attend, I suggest you hustle your cursor over to comic-con.org and make sure you know what you have to do and when you have to do it. Understand that con will sell out and it will sell out quickly and that many folks who want to go will not get in. He who hesitates is badgeless.

---

The second issue of Groo: Friends and Foes comes out this week. If you didn't get #1, you may still be able to find a copy. It's very silly stuff. I'm spending today working on #8.

Steve Daly wrote this article which is sort of a defense of Brian Williams, though not a particularly flattering one. I'm not sure I buy it but I'm also not sure I care that much about this whole scandal.

Boy, that was long and self-congratulatory.

Gee, some people haven't aged well, either in terms of age or comedic ability. I was pleased that Laraine Newman looked so good because she's the same age I am. (Well, actually I'm about twenty minutes older.)

I think there were more technical errors in this special than they have in an entire season. It must have been a nightmare to service all those celebs, rehearse the ones who did things that needed rehearsal, get the ones who needed hair and makeup through hair and makeup, etc…

I'm not sure why they felt they needed musical numbers from Kanye West, Miley Cyrus, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon and a few others. I hope the Pauls were just having a bad night and that's not what their voices are like these days.

Shelly Goldstein messaged me that if anyone needs proof that Sarah Palin is focused on celebrity (as opposed to holding public office), you needed only to look at her participation and especially her gown.

You get the feeling Eddie Murphy had the limo double-parked outside with the engine running?

They gave about as little attention as possible to the period when Jean Doumanian produced the show…and Eddie Murphy aside, to the Dick Ebersol years. I think they missed a bet: Bring Gilbert Gottfried out and let him spend three minutes yelling about the period he was on the show. He would have stolen the evening.

I'll bet a lot of the folks who've written for this program weren't amused at the joke about not devoting any time to the writers. The inattention to them was really a slap in the puss.

Some of the clip packages remind you how highly SNL has always valued catch phrases. To some extent, the measure of a cast member is how many they manage to accumulate.

I kept waiting for them to bring Jon Lovitz out as his liar character and introduce himself as Brian Williams. But Seinfeld got to do the Brian Williams joke.

Some odd picks as to who got camera time and who didn't. There are folks who did 5+ seasons who got less attention than Jerry Seinfeld, Betty White, Louis C.K. and a dozen other stars who haven't been a particularly important part of the show.

I actually kept thinking about this: They reportedly invited everyone who was ever a cast member to be in the audience. For some, that was an invite to spend their own money for travel and lodging, plus expenses for dressing up and grooming, to sit in the back, be mostly ignored and maybe experience the awkwardness of being asked, "So, what are you doing these days?" Some of them had to be sitting there during the obit reel thinking, "I would have gotten mentioned if I'd died." (Which reminds me: Uh, Jim Henson?)

A friend of mine who was a regular on Laugh-In once told me (Oh, hell, I'll tell you who it was. It was Larry Hovis.) that those reunions were uncomfortable in the same way high school reunions can be uncomfy but ten times as much. Once upon a time, you were all more or less equal and making the same money. Now, one of you is getting a million bucks a movie and one of you is auditioning for laxative commercials.

Careers in show business can be capricious things having a lot to do with management and timing and factors that have little to do with how good you are. After Larry was off Laugh-In and Hogan's Heroes, he actually made a very good living for himself as a producer and writer and was in many ways happier…but he said there were folks who treated him like he was a derelict because he was no longer on a series. That must be the case with many former cast members of SNL. I'm sure some didn't show up for the special because they didn't want to subject themselves to an evening that made it clear the show didn't rate them as worthy of a mention, especially if they did their best work during the years Lorne Michaels wasn't in charge.

I understand why the special did that. Show Business does involve a kind of Natural Selection. When those folks were on SNL, they had to battle for screen time against peers who seemed to be eclipsing them in heat, if not in talent.

Still, I just have to wonder. Some former cast members weren't there because they're working. (Hey, did you know Tim Kazurinsky is playing The Wizard in the national touring company of Wicked that's still at the Pantages in Hollywood?) I wonder how many who weren't there weren't there because they're actively employed or happily retired…and how many weren't there because they didn't need the reminder that they're no longer a part of the most important comedy show ever on television?

I've been writing a lot about Gary Owens, who died the other day. I probably didn't post enough about the other fixture of Los Angeles media who died the other day, Stan Chambers. Here's Keith Olbermann with an excellent (and a bit emotional) farewell to that man…

A little over two years ago here, I posted this story about how my mother, not long before she left this world, was victimized by two separate caregivers. Both charged items to her credit card without her knowledge and one forged three checks on her checking account. My mother was at the time legally-blind but she had me monitoring her bank accounts.

I caught the crimes, got the caregivers fired by their agency and went to the police with what the detectives there described as "open and shut proof." Alas, as thievery goes, this was one of the less-pressing cases for them. My mother was not out on the street. She was not really hurting because of the financial loss, especially because she had me…so our cases went to the bottom of a very tall pile. As far as I know, they're still there.

Still, these outrages have something of an ending. The police may be too swamped and short-handed to go after the two ladies but I had my demon attorney, Paul S. Levine, go after the caregiver agency. I believe they lied to me when they told me this had never happened before in the history of their business, and that they also did not do enough to prosecute the thieves. They had been advertised as "bonded" and I believed this entitled me to reimbursement even though they told me it did not.

Since I told you the first part of this tale, I felt I should report that we just settled out of court for an amount of money I would describe as satisfactory. I would gladly give it back if that meant the two criminals would be properly prosecuted but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

For all I know, they are still caregiving and perhaps even stealing from the aged and ill. If you have an aged or ill person in your life and they have a caregiver, you might do them a big favor by monitoring their financial transactions. Based on my experiences, about 97% of caregivers do not steal from their clients but that 3% can do a great deal of damage…and the victims are usually not in any position to realize it until that damage is done.

Oliver Morrison wonders why there's no Conservative Jon Stewart. I think the answer, as the piece suggests, dovetails with why there's no Liberal Rush Limbaugh.

New York Times reporter David Carr died the other day of lung cancer. His last essay for that publication was this piece comparing what's happening with Brian Williams and what's happening with Jon Stewart.

When this was first posted on April 31, 2002, the E! Network was about to rerun the first episode of Saturday Night Live. Well, NBC is rerunning it tonight in the show's usual time slot so that's a good time for me to rerun this post…

The E! Network is rerunning the very first episode of Saturday Night Live on Monday. Actually, it wasn't even called that on its first broadcast in October 11, 1975. The now-forgotten Saturday Night Live With Howard Cosell had prior claim on the title so the new late night program was called NBC Saturday Night. Didn't matter. For some reason, everyone — fans, TV critics, everyone — just started calling it Saturday Night Live and a few months after the Cosell show evaporated, the SNL name went on the NBC show officially. (I believe some prints of some of the reruns were altered to slap the name on them.)

What I find most interesting about that first NBC Saturday Night is that the idea seemed to be to throw everything at the wall and then see what stuck. Today, we think of the show as 90 minutes of sketch comedy with one guest host and one musical act. But when they started out, the sketch comedy was but one of many elements and not even the most important. In addition to comedy sketches, the first episode featured…

• Stand-up comedy. George Carlin hosted and he did three stand-up spots. There was a monologue by Valri Bromfield and Andy Kaufman did his record pantomime to the theme from "Mighty Mouse." (An additional stand-up spot didn't get in. Just before airtime, a kid named Billy Crystal was told he'd have to trim his routine to the bone and at the advice of his managers, he walked.)
• Two musical acts: Janis Ian and Billy Preston performing two numbers apiece.
• "The Land of Gorch" featuring the Muppets.
• A film by Albert Brooks.
• A spot with Paul Simon plugging his appearance the following week.
• Five pre-recorded parody commercials.
• Weekend Update with Chevy Chase.

The Chevy Chase spot was probably the biggest hit. The other sketches — the kind of material that would become the core of Saturday Night Live — were few in number and short in length. There was the cold opening with Chase, Michael O'Donoghue, and John Belushi. (Although he would not be counted as a member of the original cast, O'Donoghue had more to do in the first episode than some who were and was billed as one of the "Not Ready for Prime Time Players." So was character actor George Coe, who quietly disappeared from the troupe soon after.) There were a few other short skits, the longest of which — a courtroom scene — was an old routine that had been done almost precisely the same way on Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In.

Then the second week, Paul Simon hosted and the show was devoted primarily to music. In addition to Simon, they had Art Garfunkel, Phoebe Snow, Randy Newman and the Jesse Dixon Singers. Add in another Muppets spot and another film by Albert Brooks and there wasn't much time for sketches.

It wasn't until the third week, hosted by Rob Reiner, that sketch comedy had a significant chunk of the show. Even then, the longest comedy segment was the Albert Brooks film, which was so long they had to insert a commercial break in the middle of it.

Producer Lorne Michaels was later quoted as saying something like, "I had the ingredients from the start but it took me a while to figure out how much of each to include." If you watched the episodes in sequence, you'd see it take around four episodes (over five weeks) before they decided they had a sketch show, and a while longer before they began to subordinate everything else to that. That was a quick discovery process. Michaels had originally negotiated a deal with NBC that gave them 17 shows and with it, an understanding that they'd tinker with the format and probably not solidify things until around Show Ten. Ordinarily, one of the great lies of network television is when they say, "We won't even look at the ratings for the first few weeks" but in this case, they seem to have at least been sincere about giving the show room to develop.

That would probably not happen today. Despite the history of shows like SNL and Seinfeld that were given time to grow and which became insanely profitable, a TV show is now expected to debut in pretty much its finished form. Not long ago, a producer sent the following to me in an e-mail. It's from an article he was writing about a recent, unhappy experience…

What I learned was that nowadays, a show goes on the air and based on the ratings of the first one, it's declared a provisional success (if they're good) or a provisional flop (if not). If you're a provisional flop and your ratings go up the second week, you might have a fighting chance at proving yourself. If you're a provisional flop and you go down the second week, it's pretty much over. You're a bomb and the smell of death rises into the air. Your promotion disappears, your guest stars drift away, and advertisers write you off. It's a premature verdict but it has a way of coming true from its own momentum.

Lorne Michaels' new show had some things going for it when it debuted. For one thing, it had no competition. For another, NBC was looking to open up that time slot for new programming and it would have been embarrassing and injurious to that effort not to stick with the new show for a time. They also had nothing else to put on.

As it happens, the first Saturday Night did pretty well and it was hailed as something innovative. Looking back on that first episode, it's hard to see why. So much of the show was George Carlin's stand-up act…funny but hardly a major breakthrough in television programming. Apart from Weekend Update, the freshest bit of material on the first broadcast was probably Andy Kaufman's "Mighty Mouse" routine…and he wasn't even a regular.

No matter. The show appealed to a generally-neglected, younger audience. It felt new, even if it wasn't, and in TV, that can be the hard part. In a few more weeks, it would actually start to be innovative. One can only wonder how many hastily-cancelled shows might have managed that if they'd had a few more weeks.

Most of the obits aren't mentioning a short-lived series that Gary Owens hosted for NBC. It was a daytime show called Letters to Laugh-In that replaced the original Match Game on the afternoon schedule. Each episode, a few stars from the evening Laugh-In show plus a few guest celebs would read jokes sent in by viewers and those viewers were eligible for unimpressive prizes.

This is the second episode, which was obviously taped during the one week in America when Nehru jackets were in style. The show was not a hit, debuting on September 29, 1969 and leaving the air the day after Christmas. I think you can see the problem with the format but you may also see that Gary was a good, genial emcee. (Sorry about the poor video but it's amazing that this show exists at all. I believe Gary thought that no tapes at all had survived…or maybe he hoped.)