Fat Cat News

garfieldshow05

As you might know from this blog, I'm the Supervising Producer of The Garfield Show, which is seen (last I heard) in 110 countries around the globe. I also write and voice-direct and it's a show that's an enormous pleasure to work on. We're presently on hiatus, having done four full seasons plus one special, and the fourth season easily has the best episodes…with some of the best animation I've ever seen done for television.

I keep getting e-mailed questions from Americans who ask when it'll be on. Cartoon Network has the right to run them here or to air them on its sister network, Boomerang. Despite what I'm told are solid, consistent ratings, it comes and goes from both in different time slots. At the moment — and for at least the next month or two — it's airing for three hours a day Monday through Friday and two hours a day on the weekend. That's a lot of Garfield.

But they're still only running the first three seasons. They've had the fourth season episodes for a year or more and have yet to broadcast them. What are they waiting for? How should I know? I'm only the Supervising Producer.

Today's Video Link

You probably saw John Oliver's Last Week Tonight last week. But just in case you didn't, here's the terrific segment they did on the Miss America pageant…

My Latest Tweet

  • Sweeney Todd on PBS is such a sick individual that his singing even has bleeps in it.

My Latest Tweet

  • If Obama wants G.O.P. Senators to confirm Eric Holder's replacement quickly, it's easy: Have Holder start prosecuting Wall St. criminals.

Today's Political Rant

In a speech the other day, Sarah Palin referred to the White House as "1400 Pennsylvania Avenue" and way too much is being made of it. This is one of my beefs with political discourse these days. It's the folks who lie in wait for The Opposition to misspeak or have a momentary brain fart, and then try to sell it as proof that the person is stupid, addled or otherwise not to be taken seriously. Ms. Palin says plenty of things intentionally I believe are wrong or disingenuous. This kind of "gaffe" is like a writer hitting the wrong keys on a keyboard and spelling a word wrong.

I felt the same way about some of George W. Bush's clumsier phrasing or Barack Obama saying he'd visited 57 states or the time Jimmy Carter referred to Hubert Horatio Humphrey as Hubert Horatio Hornblower or…

Well, they all do it at one time or another and to exploit it as more than an amusing blooper is real schoolyard. How about if we hold people responsible for what they meant, rather than their verbal slip-ups?

Today's Video Link

Shelly Goldstein, Beatles fan/expert supreme, found this: How to make Beatles pancakes. For some reason, I feel like Ringo should be a waffle…

Wheeling and Dealing

The last few days, the crevices of the Internet that deal with comic books have seen a flurry of essays on the question, "Is it worth it for professionals to attend comic book conventions?" The flurry seems to have been kicked off by this essay by Denise Dorman, who's the wife of artist Dave Dorman.

She says that balancing what it costs them to attend a con against what they gross in sales, it doesn't pay. Her piece spawned many replies including those from Corey Blake, Ryan L. Schrodt and Thom Zahler. There are others if you want to search.

Obviously, anyone's experience is valid to some extent for them. If you go to make money and you don't make money…well, maybe you shouldn't go. Whether it's because of some specific trend like the incursion of media stars and/or the cosplayers is more arguable…though at the Phoenix Comic Con, I did hear one dealer loudly cursing out the cosplayers. There were an awful lot of them there and his complaints were (a) they constitute a large part of the attendance but they don't buy stuff and (b) they were always blocking the aisles, limiting others' access to his display.

I do have a problem with cosplayers at conventions and it's not that they're there. Most are quite ingenious with their costuming and they add to the overall fun and color of cons. No, my problem is that when you dress up as a super-hero or a Wookie or a Conan wanna-be and someone asks, "Can I take your picture?", it too often makes you oblivious to the discourtesies and dangers of blocking aisles or swinging your plastic sword in the vicinity of someone's face. (And no, it's not everyone…but it's enough to create some genuine problems. Any con now, someone's going to be genuinely injured in a way that will demand serious regulation of cosplayers.)

But let's leave that aside now. I don't know the Dormans at all, except to admire Dave's work from afar, so let's leave them out of this, too. Let's just ask, "Is something wrong with a comic convention where professional guests can't make enough dough to make it worth their time to go?" My answer: I don't think so. Is there something wrong with a strip-mall where every store can't turn a profit?

All a convention can do for exhibitors is to bring in a crowd that has some money on them. If they're not interested in what you're offering or if they are and don't like the price you've placed on it, you won't sell anything. The long waiting list to get a table at the Comic-Con in San Diego is proof that someone is making money down there. Not everyone can.

I'll tell you who really can't make money selling at conventions: Me. But then, I've never tried; not once in my 44 (!) years of going to comic book conventions and a few science-fiction ones, have I set up a table and tried to sell anything. I mean no criticism of anyone who enjoys it or depends on it when I say I personally choose not to do that. At most, if a publisher or merchant is selling my new book, I'll sit at their table for an hour or so and sign to help them move some product.

I have begun turning down most invites to guest at cons because, basically, they offer me nothing but the chance to sell stuff I bring. I do go to WonderCon and Comic-Con International because I usually enjoy every minute I spend at those cons. Apart from the eighty quadrillion panels I do at each, there are tons of people to see and other programming to enjoy. There are also business-type meetings relating to my work.

(I do not, by the way, recommend going to any con — except just maybe one in your own zip code — in the belief that the time and expense are a good investment because you'll score a great, well-paying job. That usually doesn't happen and it's a good way to eliminate any possible other enjoyment or benefits you might derive from that trip. But if you want to work in comics or animation or gaming or any other industry that a particular con embraces, there may be some value to mingling with and listening to folks actively working in that area. If nothing else, it could be educational. I'm a big believer in trying to really understand the business in which you want to be.)

So is going to conventions to sell things a bad investment for professionals? For some, certainly…just as opening a sushi bar down at the corner may be a terrible investment. I'm just going to suggest that some of my friends and colleagues consider that there might be other reasons, besides sitting at a table hawking your output, to attend certain conventions. And in some cases, there might well be no reason whatsoever.

Friday Afternoon

jackkirby08

It was announced this morning that the family of Jack Kirby has settled with Marvel Comics (i.e., Disney) ending a very long dispute. The Supreme Court was only days from considering whether to take on the case and obviously, the timing of this settlement has much to do with both sides' concern with what would get decided there.

If you're coming to this page in search of details and commentary, you've come to the wrong place. I will be saying nothing about it other that I am real, real happy. And I'm sure Jack and his wife Roz, if they're watching this from wherever they are, are real, real, real happy.

Regular posting — on other topics — will resume here shortly.

Friday Morning

Well, I guess I can finally finish that big biography on Jack Kirby…

It's a Mushroom Soup Thursday!

mushroomsoup153

So much stuff to do today so I'm posting the traditional can of Campbell's to let you all know I don't expect to post a lot here 'til tomorrow morning.

I am having lunch today with a friend I haven't seen in a while, a fine screenwriter named Adam Rodman. Adam's father was a fine writer, as well…and the creator of the TV series, Harry O, which I've been watching lately. That's not why Adam and I are lunching — we were just way overdue. But I may hit him up with some questions.

Before and after, I'll be here at the computer writing stuff that I expect to pay. I'm also way behind in answering e-mails. I have a "to be answered" folder containing entries that somehow seem to date back to before there was e-mail. I have no idea how that's possible but there they are. Back soon.

Go Read It!

Molly Fitzpatrick does not believe in psychic powers or the paranormal or E.S.P. or anything of the sort. For the record, neither do I. She went to five psychics for palm readings and she reports on her experiences.

Recommended Reading

Fred Kaplan thinks the airstrikes we're conducting in Syria may be more effective than most people think. As one who suspects most people are right that they won't be, I sure hope we're wrong and Fred's right.

Name That Thing!

The final cast.
The final cast.

The other day here, I linked to some photos of actors auditioning for roles on the 1964-1966 TV series, The Addams Family. The article, which was from photos shot then for Life magazine, did not identify the auditioners so some of us have been trying to. This message from John Glenn Taylor covers all the answers that sound credible to me…

I did a little research into the Addams Family matter. The photos have been circulating a while, at least since 2009. Someone found them in the online Life archive and started a speculation thread at this forum.

Several sharp-eyed commenters on that thread positively identified several of the actors, although the Morticias proved more difficult. I've arranged their findings to match the numbering of the photos in the current slideshow.

The Uncle Fester in Photos #2 and #15 is probably Stanley Adams, the character actor probably best known for playing Cyrano Jones in the Star Trek episode, "The Trouble With Tribbles."

The Morticia on the far right of Photo #3 seems to be Eileen O'Neill, known for her work on the series, Burke's Law.

Photo #5 is almost definitely Paul Wexler, the longtime character actor.

Tracy Stratford is the Wednesday on the far right of Photo #6. Tracy appeared on The Loretta Young Show, the "Living Doll" episode of The Twilight Zone, and was Lucy Van Pelt's voice for A Charlie Brown Christmas.

The older gentleman playing lurch in Photo #9 is none other than John Dierkes, who can also be seen in the films The Alamo and Shane.

In photo #10, we have three Lurches. From left to right, it's John Dierkes, Paul Wexler, and Josip Elic, who would go on to play the part of Bancini in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest.

In Photo #14, one of the Pugsleys is Jimmy Garrett from The Lucy Show. Another may or may not be Kim Tyler, who was one of the kids in the television series, Please Don't Eat The Daisies.

The Grandmama in Photo #19 is almost certainly Minerva Urecal.

There were several guesses as to the identities of the actresses trying out for the role of Morticia. Some of the names mentioned were Debra Paget, Charlene Holt and Jan Harrison.

Curiously, this new Life article does not present all the photos that exist in the Life archives of the Addams Family alternates. There are other photos, including some showing actor Percy Helton as Lurch, and others showing actress Joan Huntington as Morticia.

Hope this info is helpful.

Very helpful…though I think you meant Percy Helton as Uncle Fester.

I decided to just list the other guesses made by two or more people who wrote in. Two of them guessed Carol Lynley as one of the Morticias and quite a few thought one of the men trying out for Lurch was James Cromwell. I'm not saying they're right or wrong. Among those who sent in guesses, many of whom agreed with the above were John Nelson, Suzanne Stone, Bob Casinelli, David Simmons, Anthony Tollin, Roger Green, Ed O'Toole, Kevin Blackford, Bruce Hannum, Brad Ferguson, Sid Friedfertig, Michael Kirby, Jack Lechner, John Graham, Gary Rafferty and Lee Spilberg. Thank you all.

Go Read It!

Sarah Larson on how Sesame Street has changed over the years.

There's little mention in it of Elmo. The last few times I tried watching Sesame Street — a few years ago, before the puppeteer who played Elmo got into serious legal and moral trouble — it had basically turned into The Elmo Show. I guess it's not that these days but I sure didn't see much of The People In His Neighborhood.