Why I Gave Up Drawing – Part 5

To begin reading at the start of this long, long rambling essay, click here.

In the last part, I wrote about how being around professional magicians who'd devoted almost every waking moment to their craft had made me more or less give up on trying to be good at magic. This chapter and the next are about me being around some of the best comic book artists in the business…people who just seemed born to do that and had an amazing and organic flair for it. Obviously, the first person who comes to mind in that category would be Jack Kirby.

I met Jack in July of 1969, less than a month after I graduated high school and embarked on my mission to become a Professional Writer Person. Jack was not the first amazing artist I met. Some months earlier, Sergio Aragonés was a guest speaker at the comic book club I was in. He came in with a big pad of drawing paper and an easel and gave us a real-time demonstration of what he did. If you've ever seen Sergio draw…well, it's in the same category as Richard Turner and the great magicians I've seen at the Magic Castle. You know it's not magic in the cosmic sense. You know it's a human being bound by all the laws of Reality making that happen…

…and you also know you can't do it. Not as well or as naturally as that guy.

When I worked for Jack, I sometimes watched him draw. There was absolutely nothing you could learn about drawing by seeing him do it. That is, except for the fact that you couldn't do it…not the way he did, at least. It was like the image he was out to create on the paper was already there in some sort of invisible ink that only he could see and he was just tracing it to make it visible to others. Sometimes, he'd sketch a few light pencil lines on the paper just to clarify for himself what was going to go where.

And then he'd draw the image. Suddenly, there would be a finished pencil drawing on the paper where, only minutes before, there had been no finished pencil drawing.

It would usually be perfect, at least for his purposes. If he decided it wasn't, Jack would either erase it or if I was around, he might hand the page to me and say, "Take out that panel!" It was usually a gorgeous panel and it felt odd to me to be destroying it — but I did it. This should not be confused with what one of his inkers did, erasing parts of what Jack drew because he didn't want to ink all those lines. I was erasing Jack Kirby art because Jack Kirby wanted it erased so he could put something better in its place.

And what he put in its place would not be the same drawing, only done better. The erasure was for story reasons. Jack had decided he'd drawn the wrong thing or maybe the right thing from the wrong angle. The obliterated drawing had to go because it didn't tell the story properly. That was the only reason.

While working with Jack, I didn't make much use of whatever drawing skills I had. When he did a comic for DC with Superman in it, there was a problem.  The folks in the DC offices didn't like the way he drew Superman because it didn't look like Curt Swan had drawn it. I couldn't help with Superman's face but on some issues, Jack had me pencil or re-pencil Superman's chest insignia. It was the only — believe me, the only — thing I drew better than Jack Kirby. There were a few other times he made use of the fact that I could draw…a little.

When I began writing comic books for Disney and then for Gold Key, I sketched out some covers, as mentioned earlier. Also occasionally I'd decide explaining a scene or a new character to the artist in typed words was insufficient so I'd add in a little sketch of what I had in mind. The artist might or might not follow it but at least he had a clearer sense of what I, the writer, had in mind.

Later when I became the editor of the Hanna-Barbera comic book department, I occasionally hired myself to draw a puzzle page or a cover or something. I did rough sketches for the artist to follow on some covers and was technically the penciler and letterer of a few like these two…

I say "technically" because when I penciled these, I was copying and tracing parts of drawings done by others. Then I guaranteed the covers would look professional by having them inked by my pal Scott Shaw! He trued up and adjusted whatever was necessary.

My interest in drawing faded each year I worked in comics as a writer and sometimes editor. I had stories of mine drawn by — this is a partial list in no particular order — Kay Wright, Pete Alvarado, Warren Tufts, Dan Spiegle, Tony Strobl, Joe Messerli, John Carey, Owen Fitzgerald, Roman Arambula, Scott Shaw!, Paul Norris, Roger Armstrong, Dick Bickenbach, Will Meugniot, Doug Wildey, Tom McKimson, Lee Holley, Pat Boyette, Alex Toth, Mike Royer, Ric Estrada, Carol Lay, Erik Larsen, Steve Rude, Rick Hoberg, Mitch Schauer, Chuck Patton, Jerry Ordway, Dan Jurgens, Richard Howell, Rick Hoppe and Jack Manning.

Even if you're an avid follower of comic books of the previous century, you might not recognize all those names. The ones you don't know are probably folks who specialized in "cartoony" comic books like funny animal comics for Disney, Gold Key or the H-B comic book department.

And as I worked with all the artists I worked with — and got to meet and know a lot of great ones I never worked with — I became increasingly aware that what I was doing when I was drawing was not really drawing. It was more like forgery.

As I mentioned, I used to be a world-class forger. I have no idea where that skill came from and I was not unhappy when, as I got older, it seemed to disappear on me.  It was just like no longer being able to do certain magic tricks that required sleight-of-hand moves. But forgery had come in handy now and then. I'll tell you about some of those ways in the next installment in this series. I'll also try to tell you about the comic book artist I worked with who influenced me to pretty much stop drawing. His name does not appear anywhere in what you have just read.

A Killer Play

Assassins was — and I guess still is — a Stephen Sondheim musical that a lot of Sondheim fans seem to forget about. They also forget that it was written by John Weidman, whose name rarely makes it onto the posters and ads when the show is now produced.

And it's produced a lot because it's good for small theaters or theatrical companies that have a lot of young actors who want to get on the stage. I've seen three mountings of the show in my lifetime and none of them had elaborate costuming or sets or more than a few musicians. It's not Sondheim's best show but it might be the cheapest to produce.

If you ever decide to do this, this video might be of value to you. It's Sondheim and Weidman basically telling you what to keep in mind…

Three in the Morning

Here's a clip from a year or so ago on The Daily Show.  It made me laugh at three in the morning…

In Honor of the Holy Days

The Park Avenue Synagogue is located on East 87th Street in the Upper East Side of Manhattan and it often incorporates show tunes into its services. Here is part of what they did last year for Rosh Hashanah…

A CD You May Want…

We have here a look at a recording of My Fair Lady that came out last year.  It is of special interest because its makers put back some things that were cut from My Fair Lady as you and I know it…

A 9/11-related Memory

I apologize for the bad audio and video here — and if you know of better copies, please let me know and I'll swap them in. But one of the many destructive things about the 9/11 tragedy is how it was compounded by much of this country shutting down. Restaurants were empty. Theaters were empty. Businesses were suffering and jobs were being lost.

Hit Broadway shows were playing to too many empty seats and something had to be done. A bunch of theater folks got together and something was done. Just about all of Broadway gathered in Times Square to shoot a 30-second commercial reminding people that it was time to "go on with the show." Here's a link to an article about how it was put together, here's a little "making of…" video and then below, there's the finished commercial. There's a great "Where's Waldo?" game in all this and a very strong emotional point. After 9/11, we did a lot of damage to ourselves — which I suppose is one of the goals of terrorism. I just love the spirit of fighting back in these videos…

Dictatorshit

Every time I see even part of a speech by Donald Trump lately, I think of this scene from the Woody Allen movie, Bananas…

Twenty-Five Years Later

Each year on 9/11, some of us — and I've done this — feel the need to get into the time machine that YouTube and other online sources give us and return to that morning. One friend of mine feels it's his patriotic duty, as well as being disrespectful to the memory of those who died or suffered on that day in 2001 not to revisit that morning.

I won't this year. If I feel the need to be horrified and outraged, there are plenty of recent events I can use for that. But if you feel the need for a spin in the WABAC Machine, here's a working portal to take you back to that awful day. No one should fault you if you don't…

Fred Sez

Fred Kaplan — my guide to where we stand with Iraq — was appalled at the speech Trump gave at his campaign rally the other night. Here's an excerpt but go read the whole thing…

…the lesson that any world leader -— friend, foe, or in between — would draw from this speech is simpler still: I need to get some nuclear weapons as quickly as possible. Trump is telling the world's leaders that he might bomb the crap out of them at any moment, or treat them like crap as a whim — but he would kiss the hems of their garments, bestow them with whatever favors they request, if they got themselves some nukes.

Everyone has their own theory or bewilderment as to why Trump has as many loyalists as he has. I think his main skill is to look at the kind of people who would attend a Trump rally and tell them what will get them frightened and fired-up. The truth doesn't matter. What he promises doesn't matter. What he said yesterday doesn't matter. All that matters is getting them to cheer him and fear a world in which he is not King. That power hasn't served him well lately but he has no other tools in his toolbox.

Even More SNL History

Here's another installment of Everything You Need to Know About Saturday Night Live. This time, they're speed-dating Season 29 — for me, another year when I don't think I watched the show once, not even a day-after YouTube highlight. Nothing in this video makes me think I missed anything. If you want to watch the earlier episodes of Everything You Need to Know About Saturday Night Live, click right here.

More on CookUnity

A reader of this site, Nelson Ho, did me a large favor. He sent me a link I was unable to locate on the CookUnity website. With it, I could browse the selection of meals they offer without making a financial commitment to their service or sending them a lot of personal info. I just browsed through way more than a hundred of their entrees and found even fewer meals I could eat than I'd expected — mostly pasta marinara or pasta bolognese. I can get great pasta from a place near me that delivers in a flash for about the same price or less.

So the favor Nelson did me is that I can put these meal services completely out of consideration. I'm sure this one and some of the others are fine for folks who can eat all or most things. They just aren't for a guy with my dining limitations. The link, by the way, is here. Thanks, Nelson.

The Value of Pie

I was going to write something about Donald Trump's new promise to give every American a big check if the Republicans keep the House and Senate in the upcoming election. I needn't bother. Jonathan Pie has just delivered the definitive response to that act of desperation…

Russian Roulette Restaurants

Surfing the 'net lately, I see an awful lot of ads for new food items that are tempting to try.  Im'peccable Chicken looks like something I might like but I haven't tried it yet.  Why?  Because at the moment, it seems like the only way to do that is to order a big package of them for $86.00. And I'm the kind o' guy who sometimes tries something new to eat, takes one bite, spits it out and never lets that substance near me again.

As I've mentioned before on this blog, I have a load of food allergies. I've developed a little spidey-sense that sometimes, when I put something in my mouth, I get a little warning signal throughout my body that screams, "Get rid of that immediately!" I can't always tell the difference between that Red Alert and simply not liking the taste of something.

I just plain don't like a lot of foods, especially ones that are spicy and/or smoked. The trend in barbecue restaurants these days seems to be to amp up the spice 'n' smoke so I've pretty much given up that cuisine. Avocado Oil also seems to be trending so I avoid that too. Actually, there are a lot of foods that might (might!) give me a problem but it's kind of a matter of "Why take the chance?"

I'd probably try some of these food items like Im'peccable Chicken if I could do it without gambling eighty bucks. And yes, I know they offer some sort of Money Back Guarantee but that's a hassle I don't need. I did gamble on True Nature Meats, a company that will send you steaks, chicken and pork that are cooked, then frozen. I was happy with the steaks but the chicken and pork are spicy and/or smoked.

In the same vein, I see numerous ads for firms that will send you fully-prepped meals you can heat in the microwave and eat. Their ads and websites give you an idea of a few of the meals they offer and the ones they show all contain foods to which I know I'm allergic. They say something like "We have X [a large number] different and delicious entrees from which you can pick" and they probably have some I could eat…but the sites I've investigated all expect me to sign up for a meal plan and give them lots of personal info and probably my credit card info before I can browse their many different and allegedly-scrumptious entrees.

I just looked at CookUnity, one of the more popular meal services. They say they have 300+ meals from which I can choose…but if there's a way to browse those 300+ meals before they charge my credit card, I haven't found it. And the fact that I must make any commitment to them before I can taste or even see a meal there I could perhaps eat makes me…well, let's say "suspicious." There's plenty of stuff in this world I can make or have Doordashed to my door that involves minimal risk. It's been over ten years since I had a full-out attack and I'd like to keep my streak going.

Something You May Wanna Watch…

It's almost an hour of segments that 60 Minutes did on Jon Stewart, John Oliver and Trevor Noah. The first interview with Jon Stewart is from February of 2002 and it's especially interesting to see how he and The Daily Show evolved from there…

Fred Sez

Why is there no end in sight for our war — it's a WAR, people! — with Iran? Or for that matter, the WAR between Russia and Ukraine? Fred Kaplan thinks it's because Trump's diplomat-negotiators don't know what the hell they're doing. Here's an excerpt of the whole article which you oughta read…

Yes, Trump doesn't trust the professional diplomatic corps or experts of any kind. But, as a self-proclaimed businessman, he must notice when aides don't get the job done, and the Kushner-Witkoff duo have not lured the combatants one step closer to peace; in fact, they've arguably intensified the war in Ukraine.

Their utter incompetence was on full display over the weekend, as they met with Vladimir Putin in Moscow, then — in their first trip to the Ukrainian capital — Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv. They carried what Trump touted ahead of time as new peace proposals, and concluded both sets of talks with boilerplate adjectives ("productive," "meaningful," "positive," "businesslike"). But in fact, they came away with zilch — and, once again, proved themselves far short of the task.

I'm guessing that Trump fears that if experienced diplomats bring an end to either conflict, they might get some of the credit…but who knows? He may not have any perceptible reason. He does so many things that don't.