Tales of My Father #5

My father was a very honest man. Absolutely, utterly honest. Once, he found a wallet in the street with a few hundred dollars in it. He took it home, looked up the number of the person it belonged to and arranged to return it to them…with every buck still in it. He did things like that all the time. All the time.

In his role as an officer for the Internal Revenue Service, he was occasionally — very occasionally — offered bribes. The offerers of those bribes were foolish to try this. My father was not the kind of guy to go along with something like that…and even if he had been, there was very little he could do to "help" the offerer. He didn't have the power to tear up your tax bill or waive penalties or anything. About all he could do was to try extra-hard to not have his supervisors be too rough on you…and he did that anyway for most people.

There were, he heard, other I.R.S. agents who occasionally took bribes anyway. They'd grab the cash or, more often, some item of considerable value and tell the briber, "No promises but I'll see what I can do." And then they wouldn't do anything because, at least for those at or around my father's level in the operation, they couldn't do anything.

Once, a fellow who owed the Internal Revenue a few hundred thousand bucks offered my father a new car. It was not stated overtly as a quid pro quo. My father didn't have to do anything to get this new car but accept. Then, if he wanted to, (ahem!) he could maybe do whatever seemed appropriate to aid the fellow with his tax dilemma. Nudge, nudge.

My father said no. Even if there were no strings attached, he could not and would not accept anything of value from someone he had a case against. When the man tried to force the gift on him, my father reported it to his superiors and they took the appropriate action. This kind of thing happened three or four times in his career with the I.R.S. and he was not unique. No one in his office had ever been accused of accepting a bribe. Until one day, he was.

It came out of nowhere. He'd had a case against some guy who'd swindled the government out of millions. My father took it as far as he could, then it was reassigned to lawyers (my father was not a lawyer) higher-up in the I.R.S. to handle. At some point, the deadbeat began throwing out allegations that several I.R.S. agents, my father among them, had accepted large sums of cash or merchandise. I guess the premise here was that he'd drag the department through the mud until they agreed to drop the charges against him…or something.

taxform

My father was shocked, angered and even a bit worried. He knew he'd done no such thing but until it could be verified, he didn't sleep too well.

Vindication took about two months. A special investigator was appointed and he went through all my father's finances — checking account, bank account, etc. It was a much more thorough audit than the I.R.S. ever performed on a civilian and it even extended to me. To make sure that no bribe money had been paid to him via his spouse or son, they had us turn over all of our records, as well. A forensic accountant (I think that's what he called himself) at an outside agency received the data, then phoned me up several times to ask questions like, "What was this $300 you earned the first week of August for?" I told him in that instance, "That was for an issue I wrote of the Daffy Duck comic book." He was amused by my sources of income but it all checked out.

All of the accused Internal Revenue employees were cleared and their accuser wound up doing hard time. The matter was over but my father had a hard time letting it be over.

A few weeks later, he was talking about having some work done on his car and he said, "Guess I'll have to postpone it until I have the dough." Making a joke I immediately wished I could take back, I said, "Hey, why don't you use some of that bribe money you have stashed away?" He gave me a look that clearly indicated he didn't find that funny. I apologized and never made reference to it again.

But he'd bring the matter up every so often. He had been totally cleared but somehow, that wasn't enough. I think he wanted the investigators to do more than say, "There is no evidence that Bernard Evanier ever accepted cash or any item of value from his accuser." He wanted them to issue a statement that said something like, "Not only didn't Bernie Evanier take a bribe but our investigation has determined he is the most honest I.R.S. agent ever and anyone who thinks he'd do something like that is out of their friggin' mind!" I'm not sure even that would have gotten him to stop talking about it.

I don't mean he spoke of it all the time but it had a way of coming up, even after he retired from the agency. He'd be discussing the Lakers and what a lousy season they were having and suddenly, out of nowhere, he'd make some odd connection like, "People keep accusing Kareem Abdul-Jabbar of not doing more on defense. That's as ridiculous as that guy accusing me of taking a bribe."

My father's best friend in that I.R.S. office was a fellow named Howard…a real nice man, I thought. They had lunch almost every day when my father worked in the office and they switched to every Wednesday after he retired. Howard, who still worked there, would come by and pick him up and off they'd go to some deli or sometimes for Chinese. Howard would report on the latest doings in the office and my father would mutter something about that crook who'd accused several of them. Howard, who had not been among those accused, would tell him to drop it, forget it, get over it. This went on through years and years of Wednesday lunches.

Then one Wednesday, Howard didn't show up for their usual date: No Howard. No call. No nothing. I had moved out of the family home by then but I happened to be there visiting. I asked him, "Are you sure he didn't tell you he had to skip this week for some reason?"

"No, no," my father said. "Last Wednesday when he dropped me off, I distinctly remember him saying, 'See you next week!'" I suggested he call the office and he did. He called and reached a secretary there he knew very well, then asked if Howard had come into work that morning.

"Didn't he tell you?" she asked. "Didn't anyone tell you?"

"Tell me what?"

She said, "Howard was fired after he was convicted last year of taking a bribe. We heard he surrendered on Monday and began serving his prison sentence."

"Stunned" does not begin to describe my father's reaction. He practically went into a sensory coma. Howard had been indicted almost two years before and placed on suspension. He'd been through a trial where he was found guilty, then been through a few unsuccessful appeals before giving up and telling people, "Yeah, I did it."

For the last few months, he'd been well aware of the date when he would be tossed in the slammer for two-to-five years. And still, every Wednesday, he came by, took my father to lunch and told him what was up with the folks at the office where he actually hadn't worked in over a year. Not a word about being on trial, being convicted, being sentenced to prison…any of it. They just sat at Nate n' Al's Delicatessen and talked about the Lakers.

We found out Howard was doing his stretch in the California Institute for Men in Chino. That's about an hour's drive east of Los Angeles. I told my father that if he wanted to go visit Howard, I'd drive him out there some day, maybe even a Wednesday. He thought about it for a second and then said, "No…I'm not sure I could look him in the face. And with my luck, he's probably sharing a cell with that prick who accused me of taking a bribe!"

Today's Video Link

Here's another one of those National Press Club Luncheons. This one's from 1995, the guest speaker is Bob Newhart and he's awfully funny…

Sunday Morning

Got about a half-dozen e-mails this morning from folks who are pleased with the verdict in the Zimmerman case. Two made a decent (for me) case that we don't know exactly what happened and that the prosecution couldn't prove the scenario that Zimmerman was the aggressor. The other four seem to know exactly what happened and are sure that the victim was wholly to blame for what happened and didn't give Zimmerman any choice but to kill him. I'm sure the next time an armed man kills an unarmed black kid, they'll feel the same way.

Saturday Evening

I find myself caring more about the George Zimmerman case now than I did before the verdict. I'm not sure I understand it and would love to hear the jury's theory — if indeed they have one — of what happened between the two men. Did they think the kid with the candy had threatened the life of the guy with the loaded gun? Or was it just their interpretation of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law…which sure strikes me as an invitation for paranoid people to claim "I felt threatened" after they blow away anyone who causes them to feel that way. I dunno.

I see a lot of folks cheering the verdict on Twitter and Facebook and even two in my own e-mail. I'm sure there are people celebrating this who aren't showing an ugly streak of racism but I haven't seen them yet. I see people who feel an injustice was done to George Zimmerman for even questioning that he was right to kill a young black male.

Years ago, I found myself one evening engaged in a friendly (I thought) debate with a fellow writer of comic books. We were discussing the Death Penalty, a topic on which I have a raft of conflicting feelings…but one clear one is this: If we're going to execute people, we ought to do an airtight job of making sure we execute only guilty people. I felt this way before we had the avalanche of DNA tests that proved a lot of folks on Death Row were innocent of the crimes for which they were convicted. My faith in our judicial system went down further after those exonerations…and it's taking another hit tonight. Anyway, it seemed to me that "we shouldn't execute innocent people" was one of those obvious truths — the kind of which you say, "Who could possibly argue with that?"

Well, this fellow did. He said to me, "No one on Death Row is ever innocent." I asked about the many exonerations. He said, "Oh, those people may not have committed those specific crimes but everyone on Death Row is a loser who probably hasn't been caught for the crimes he has committed." And then to further shock me, he added, "Especially if they're poor and black or Hispanic."

I remember that. I also remember the sound of my jaw hitting the linoleum. The fellow realized he'd let his racist side show and he quickly tried to back-pedal from what he'd said but there was no unringing that bell. I heard it loud and clear. It's made it difficult to associate with the guy ever since.

I got those two e-mails tonight from folks I know who were pleased about the Zimmerman verdict. One believes the prosecutors simply didn't make a sufficient case…and that may be true. I think there probably was a sufficient case to be made but not having been in the courtroom, I don't presume the jury heard one. This correspondent of mine considered the whole matter tragic, especially the loss of a young man's life. I respect that way of thinking. Tragic indeed, regardless of who was at fault.

The other e-mail was from someone who seems pretty happy Trayvon Martin is dead because, you know, he was a druggy gang member who probably deserved it. Martin may not have been guilty of something at that moment but he was foolish enough to go up against an armed man so he brought his death on himself. Or so this guy believes. I don't think I'm going to consider him a friend any longer.

My Latest Tweet

  • Lesson for Today: If you go on trial for shooting an unarmed man, make sure your attorney starts your defense with a knock-knock joke.

Taking It On The Chin #9

A very smart friend of mine in the teevee biz sent me the following with the request that I leave his name out of it…

I agree with you that Jay Leno did nothing wrong in taking back the Tonight Show, but I think the animus against him was that he did something wrong as a showman. He had the misjudgment, maybe even hubris, to think that he could slide into primetime without any heavy lifting or even re-thinking what he was presenting to the public. He wasn't even expected to be number one in the ratings. He was expected to be second best. He would still be there if he had hit second place half the time.

He became part of a corporate numbers game in a network's cynical move to curtail production costs, and in doing so The Jay Leno Show was viewed as the cable-ization of a broadcast network. The Hollywood community hated it because it meant the loss of five hours of precious primetime production, and the public grew quickly disenchanted because it was nothing special. (I'm being kind here.)

Leno returned to Tonight with a tarnished image and a tarnished show, only to be sent out the door again. He may have done nothing wrong, but you have to wonder, What did he do right?

Well, he has a pretty good track record for winning the 11:35 ratings period. That's something right. At least, it's something that a lot of guys can't do.

As I started to mention, I think the core problem with the 10 PM show was that they went ahead and scheduled five prime-time hours a week of The Jay Leno Show, then everyone kind of looked at each other and asked, "Uh, exactly what is The Jay Leno Show?" Jay seems to have believed it would just be The Tonight Show with a different name at an earlier hour…but NBC wasn't about to let him infringe on what Conan was going to do. So Jay couldn't have a desk because, you know, America will only watch so many shows per day about people behind desks. And he couldn't have more than one interview guest (at first, they didn't want him to have any) and he couldn't do his Second Act comedy pieces (Headlines, Jaywalking, etc.) in the second act. And no one seemed to have a good idea of how to fill the time, which is why we had Drew Barrymore driving in the Green Car Challenge.

They wound up relying on remote pieces, mostly planned by and/or starring unknowns without much TV experience, and they clearly didn't have the proper personnel to generate spots worthy of such exposure. Maybe if the segments had aired at 2 AM on Comedy Central, they might have found an audience…but prime-time on NBC? I could certainly buy an argument that Leno was to blame for agreeing to all this and also for flying off to do stand-up gigs every weekend while his prime-time series was starved for material. But I don't hear anyone making that argument at all.

You may be right, Anonymous Friend of Mine, about an animus in Hollywood. I have heard people in the industry complaining that they would have sold their series if Jay hadn't sucked up so many hours on NBC. Given NBC's desire to have X number of hours in their schedule that cost as little as Deal or No Deal or Identity, I'm not sure how valid it is but it's there. I'm also not sure it relates to the main thing I wanted to discuss here, which is this accusation no one seems able to explain to me in fact-based specifics that Jay did something unethical to Conan O'Brien.

Anyway, thanks, Anonymous Friend of Mine. One of us owes the other a lunch.

Today's Video Link

This is real good. It's a speech and Q-and-A George Carlin did at the National Press Club in May of '99. It runs close to an hour and it's worth it. Mr. Carlin speaks mainly of the corruption of the English language and while some of it may be familiar to you from his albums and specials, much of it is not…

Recommended Reading

Roberto Martinez has an interesting way of looking at the George Zimmerman case. At least, it makes me think that maybe everyone is overthinking this case…

Famous Funnybooks

You all know Todd Klein as an award-winning letterer but he's also quite the comic historian. He's recently compiled a great historical record of the early days of DC Comics which covers not only what happened but where it happened. I could summarize it but it'll be better for you if you just go read it. Here's a link to Part One. Here's a link to Part Two. Here's a link to Part Three. Here's a link to Part Four. And here's a link to Part Five.

I learned a number of things in it, not the least of which was the role a man named Sheldon Stark played in the early days of DC Comics. I knew Sheldon Stark. He was a writer at the Ruby-Spears animation studio when I worked there and we collaborated on an ABC Weekend Special. Nice, clever man. I lunched with him a few times and for some reason, it never occurred to me to ask him if he by any chance had been the Cartoon Editor of the first comic book published in America featuring new material. Wish I had.

Friday Morning

I'm slightly revising my weather forecast for Comic-Con International. Our whole time there, we'll be looking at highs around 72° and lows around 66° but the remnants of a storm will be drifting through Arizona and backing up into the lower portions of California. So there'll be some humidity and a fair amount of clouds and a minor chance of some rain sprinkles by the weekend of the con. Not as perfect as our usual Comic-Con weather.

Hard to believe it all starts next Wednesday night. Everyone I know who's going is rushing to get things done and when I tell them, as I do, "Don't worry…I've arranged for the con to be postponed two weeks," they don't believe me of course but there's that faint glimmer of "Oh, if only you could…"

For those who've asked: My knee is healing but not as fast as I'd hoped. Right now, it's kind of unpredictable. Feels fine for an hour, then hurts for half an hour, then feels fine for three hours, then aches for one, etc. There doesn't seem to be any pattern, any particular thing I'm doing that brings on pain or makes it go away. I'm working with a Physical Therapist and I think that's doing me some good but I couldn't tell you how. Anyway, I will be at the con though I may be scootering around now and then, and I haven't ruled out piggyback-rides from Tony Isabella. Tony may have ruled that out but I haven't.

And speaking of transportation, a lot of folks who attend the con get around via San Diego's peachy trolley system. Scott Marinoff suggests I tell you that some changes have been made since last year so you might want to consult this page. You might also want to consult this one that details some of the ongoing construction work.

I am off to the Physical Therapist. If I can't get rid of this limp, maybe he can show me how to look more graceful in my hobbling…

Today's Video Link

Nine minutes with my favorite folk-singing group of the sixties, The Limeliters…

My Only Post (probably) About the George Zimmerman Trial…

I'm going to postpone the Leno/Conan stuff a day because I feel like writing about the Trayvon Martin case here. Like more of you than will admit it, I don't know exactly what happened that night. George Zimmerman does seem to have gone after Martin based on some sort of personal assumption that a black guy walking in a high-crime neighborhood was suspicous just because he was a black guy. For all the attempts by some to portray Martin as a bad person, he seems to have been utterly innocent of anything but being the kind of person who'd arouse Zimmerman's suspicions…and then there was a confrontation in which Zimmerman claims he was forced to shoot in self-defense. His story sounds fishy to me but we don't convict people in this country because their stories sound fishy.

Guilty people do get off because there just plain isn't enough hard evidence. Reporters and pundits who've been following the trial closer than I have mostly seem to think that's what's going to happen here. Maybe so…though I can't help but note that the results of other recent trials have surprised the commentators. The judge is now allowing the jury to consider Manslaughter as a possible verdict and that may be of value if the six jurors are on the fence. Perhaps one of those civil "wrongful death" suits will follow, regardless.

Here's kind of what's on my mind here…

Back when this incident happened, an acquaintance of mine — notice the absence of the noun, "friend" — told me he prayed Zimmerman would be acquitted. The acquaintance, who is white, didn't really know the details of the case but he lived with a constant fear of violence from minorities — an excessive one, I thought. He admitted to me that he identified with Zimmerman. He was naturally suspicious of non-Caucasians. When I pointed out that even Zimmerman admitted that when he started following Martin, Martin had not done one thing to warrant suspicion, the acquaintance said, "He didn't have to. He was black." And out of his mouth then tumbled all sorts of dubious stats about how a random black guy is X% more likely than a random white guy to be guilty of something. That, to this guy, was good and sufficient cause to treat Martin as a suspect.

The acquaintance then noted, "If a suspect is stopped by the police and he doesn't cooperate, he could be hurt or killed." I pointed out George Zimmerman was not a policeman. Just because a guy acts like a cop doesn't mean we have to treat him like one. The acquaintance said, "If he has a gun, you'd damn well better treat him like one." You can imagine where the discussion went from there.

We (of course) didn't resolve anything but it bothered me that the reason this fellow wanted to see Zimmerman walk is because, you know, if he treated a black guy as a criminal, his heart and mind were in the right place. That he was confronting an innocent black guy was irrelevant. The acquaintance's attitude was that we need to reward people who do that kind of thing, not scare them into not stopping other black guys. He thinks we need more George Zimmermans out there.

If Zimmerman walks and he walks because there isn't enough evidence to prove he broke the law, okay. That's how the system sometimes works and I would hope people would see that as the reason he went free. What I would really hope is that most folks wouldn't interpret it the way that acquaintance of mine will. Frankly, I see more to be scared of from the George Zimmermans than from the Trayvon Martins.

The List You've Been Waiting For…

mepanels2013

Thursday, July 18 – 1 PM to 2 PM in Room 5AB
SUPERMAN: THE JULIUS SCHWARTZ ERA

In celebration of Superman's 75th Birthday, we look back at the Man of Steel in Comics' Bronze Age. In 1970, veteran editor Julius Schwartz assumed command of the primal hero and charted a course for a new generation. To discuss it, we assemble many of the writers who worked with him in keeping Superman flying high: GERRY CONWAY, MARTIN PASKO, MARV WOLFMAN, ELLIOTT S! MAGGIN and Moderator MARK EVANIER!

Thursday, July 18 – 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM in Room 8
THE SERGIO AND MARK SHOW

Same guys, same panel, same stupid barbarian. The folks who've brought you Groo the Wanderer (and vow to do so again soon) will tell you what's up with that and what's up with all their other silly projects. Featuring the world's most honored cartoonist, SERGIO ARAGONÉS and his faithful sidekick, MARK EVANIER, plus the creator of Usagi Yojimbo, STAN SAKAI, and the world's hardest-working colorist, TOM LUTH.

Friday, July 19 – 10 AM to 11 AM in Room 9
SPOTLIGHT ON TONY ISABELLA

Comic-Con Special Guest TONY ISABELLA is the man who brought you Black Lightning, It the Living Colossus, The Shadow War of Hawkman, The Champions and so many more memorable comics, plus his long-running column in Comic Buyer's Guide. He will be ruthlessly interrogated about them and other milestones of his career by his longtime friend, MARK EVANIER.

Friday, July 19 – 5:30 PM – 6:30 PM in Room 8
A CELEBRATION OF WALT KELLY'S 100th BIRTHDAY

The creator of one of comics' great newspaper strips, Walt Kelly, would have been 100 years old on August 25th of this year. His magnum opus, Pogo, is now receiving its first ever complete reprinting in an Eisner-nominated series from Fantagraphics Books. So it's a good time to remember him with Kelly fans JEFF SMITH (Bone), Paul Dini (Batman), comic historian R.C. HARVEY, MAGGIE THOMPSON (Comic Buyer's Guide), CAROLYN KELLY (co-editor of the Complete Pogo series and Walt's daughter) and Moderator MARK EVANIER (Groo the Wanderer).

Saturday, July 20 – 10 AM – 11 AM in Room 4
REMEMBERING JOE KUBERT

We lost one of comics' most beloved and respected creators in August of '12. Joe Kubert started drawing comics when he was twelve years old and didn't stop until he'd inspired and taught a couple generations how it was done. Come hear all about this extraordinary man from folks who knew and worked with him: SERGIO ARAGONÉS, NEAL ADAMS, PAUL LEVITZ, RUSS HEATH, TOM YEATES, JON COOKE and your Moderator, MARK EVANIER.

Saturday, July 20 – 11:45 AM to 1 PM in Room 6BCF
QUICK DRAW!

It's the fastest, funniest panel in the whole convention! (Well, some folks think it is — mainly Sergio and Mark..) Once again, your Quick Draw Quizmaster MARK EVANIER pits three super-speedy cartoonists against one another as they go mano a mano to create great cartoon art right before your very eyes. Competing this year are SERGIO ARAGONÉS (MAD Magazine, Groo the Wanderer), SCOTT SHAW! (The Simpsons) and this year's Special Guest Quick Draw-er, NEAL ADAMS (Batman, X-Men). Plus a couple of surprising surprises!

Saturday, July 20 – 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM in Room 6BCF
CARTOON VOICES I

Each year, Moderator MARK EVANIER gathers together a bevy of the most talented cartoon voice actors working today and invites them to explain and demonstrate their artistry! This year's lineup includes SCOTT MENVILLE (Teen Titans Go, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), GREY DeLISLE (Scooby Doo, Pound Puppies), CHRISTOPHER COX (Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes, Family Guy), DAVID BOAT (Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Family Guy), MICHAEL LEON-WOOLEY (The Princess and the Frog) and KARI WAHLGREN (Bolt, Tangled).

Saturday, July 20 – 4:30 PM to 6:00 PM in Room 5AB
THAT 70'S PANEL

It was a time of change in comics with a new generation intermingling with the old and taking command. Hear what it was like from MARTIN PASKO (Superman, Swamp Thing), TONY ISABELLA (Black Lightning, The Champions), VAL MAYERIK (Man-Thing, Howard the Duck), ELLIOTT S! MAGGIN (Superman, Green Arrow), GEORGE PEREZ (Teen Titans, Justice League) and Moderator MARK EVANIER (Groo the Wanderer, Blackhawk).

Saturday, July 20 – 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM in Room 5AB
SPOTLIGHT ON LEONARD MALTIN

He's been called America's most knowledgeable film critic and historian, and he's the author of more than a dozen books of motion pictures, in addition to his annual (and best-selling) Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, a book no lover of film can be without. This year, he's a Comic-Con Special Guest and for this hour, he'll be interviewed by his longtime friend, MARK EVANIER.

Sunday, July 21 – 10:00 AM – 11:15 PM in Room 5AB
THE ANNUAL JACK KIRBY TRIBUTE PANEL

Each year, we set aside time to talk about Comic-Con's first superstar guest and the man they call The King of the Comics, Jack Kirby. Jack left us in 1994 but his influence on comics, film and this convention has never been greater. Discussing the man and his work this year are NEIL GAIMAN, TONY ISABELLA and Kirby family attorney PAUL S. LEVINE. And of course, it's moderated by MARK EVANIER.

Sunday, July 21 – 11:30 AM – 12:45 PM in Room 6A
CARTOON VOICES II

Yesterday's Cartoon Voices Panel will have been such a hit that we'll have to do another one with different but equally talented actors from the world of animation voicing. Once again, Moderator MARK EVANIER has assembled an all-star dais that will include BOB BERGEN (Porky Pig), ALICYN PACKARD (The Mr. Men Show, Poppy Cat), MAURICE LaMARCHE (Futurama, Pinky and the Brain), CANDI MILO (Dexter's Laboratory, Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends), NEIL ROSS (G.I. Joe, Transformers) and maybe someone else.

Sunday, July 21 – 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM in Room 25ABC
COVER STORY: THE ART OF THE COVER

What does it take to make a great cover for a comic book? Let's ask four of the top artists…all folks who've created some of the best. Come hear the "shop talk" of JERRY ORDWAY (Superman, The Power of Shazam), GARY FRANK (Action Comics, DC Universe: Legacies), DAN JURGENS (Superman, Booster Gold) and CHRIS SAMNEE (Daredevil, Thor). Moderated by MARK EVANIER.

Sunday, July 21 – 3:00 PM – 4:30 PM in Room 25ABC
THE BUSINESS OF CARTOON VOICES

Interested in a career doing voices for animation and video games? There are plenty of people around who'll take your money and tell you how to go about it…but here's 90 minutes of absolutely free advice from folks who work in the field. Come hear cartoon voice actors GREGG BERGER and CANDI MILO, agents PAT BRADY (C.E.S.D.) and HEATHER VERGO (Atlas Talent) and your moderator, voice director MARK EVANIER (The Garfield Show).

As always, participants and times and everything is subject to change. I suggest that if you want to get into the Cartoon Voices panels or Quick Draw!, you get there well before their start times.

Today's Video Link

Another example of the magic of René Lavand…