Dark Blogging

Here I sit, blogging on my iPad because power in my neighborhood is out. There must be a way to blame this on Donald Trump.

I've spent way too much time today reading ‘n' thinking about the insensitivity of that phone call he placed to the woman who'd lost her husband in Niger. How could anybody say such a thing? I have me a theory…

Seems to me Mr. Trump prides himself on his gift o' gab…on his ability to wing it and talk his way outta any conversational corner. Sometimes, he does it via charm, sometimes by bullshittery, sometimes by pure unadulterated salesmanship…and don't tell me he isn't good at it. Look where he is today!

Winning the presidency has to have convinced him he's darn near infallible in this regard. At times, he knows so little about the topic at hand that he accepts the need to just read what's on a TelePrompter. But most of the time, someone tells him the message and he says "Got it!" and trusts his natural ability to connect with the listeners and get him through. It usually works.

But I'm guessing this time, he had close to zero knowledge and even less interest in phoning up a Gold Star Widow and trying to wax poetic and compassionate, so he turned to some aide he expects to know this stuff, asked what you say in these situations, and heard something like this…

I'm so sorry for your husband's sacrifice but I am in awe of his courage and heroism. All our fine fighting men are heroes because they volunteer for these jobs, knowing full well of the danger. Your husband was a hero the moment he placed helping others and defending his country ahead of any concern for his personal safety.

If Trump had said something like that, he would have been praised…but this is a man without a molecule of poetry in his soul. And being the kind of person who thinks in terms of business transactions and haggling, what he'd get from a briefing like that is "Knew the deal going in." And when he put that into Trumpspeak, it came out "knew what he signed up for." Which is what Trump would say if someone entered into a real estate deal and it didn't turn out well for the other guy. "Hey, it's your fault! You signed the deal!"

Because he's not the kind of guy who could ever understand that part about putting the helping of others and the well-being of the country ahead of your own interests.

And if you think I'm off-base on this: Well, maybe. Don't forget I'm writing this by flashlight.

Today's Video Link

I've featured a number of videos here of Barbershop Quartets and they were all male. Are there female Barbershop Quartets? Yes! Here's Sweet Lucy with a very familiar tune…

In Pursuit

There were two high-speed chases on Los Angeles TV yesterday — one in the afternoon, one in the evening. I think the evening one dragged my favorite reporter-in-the-sky Stu Mundel away from shooting aerial shots of celebrating Dodgers fans.

I find it hard to not watch these things when they're on live. Some of that is my fascination with live TV and what it's like when the folks shooting and transmitting something truly have no idea what's about to happen. You sometimes get that with reality shows and sporting events but reality shows are recorded and edited for broadcast, and with both kinds of shows, they have a pretty good idea of the different kinds of things that might happen. They just don't know which one.

That interests me and so does the plight of the poor reporter who has nothing to say but has to say something. I like Mr. Mundel because he usually finds something to say besides "This guy is driving with absolutely no regard for anyone else" or "This is an extremely dangerous situation." Lately, they always seem to say, "Police believe this driver is possibly armed." If someone is driving like crazy to get away from the cops, don't the cops always assume the driver is "possibly armed?" Why would they ever be even reasonably certain he was not? Hell, these days, they should probably assume that anyone over the age of six, driving or walking or just sitting on a bench is "possibly armed."

Like you, I sometimes wonder what's going on in the minds of these drivers who have nine cop cars behind them and a couple of choppers overhead…and still flee like they think there's a chance in a zillion of getting away. Like you, I usually decide there's nothing going on in those minds — nothing rational, anyway. I guess they just figure that if they can stay out of cops' clutches a little while longer, lightning may strike all eight of those sheriffs' cars or the police may run into someone else's car and be disabled…or something. They only seem to get away once in a very great while, usually when they can get a lead on their pursuers and then duck into a covered parking lot or somewhere the helicopter can't see. And even that doesn't work most of the time. Still, it's damn hard not to watch.

My Latest Tweet

  • If the Dodgers win a pennant without Vin Scully in the booth, does it make a noise?

My Latest Tweet

  • John Kelly: "I miss the days when women were held sacred." Which is why he serves a man who just holds them whether they like it or not.

Today's Video Link

Here's another number from a musical performed on a morning TV show. It's Norm Lewis and Carolee Carmello getting up way too early to perform "A Little Priest" from that intimate production of Sweeney Todd I've been praising on this blog — here, for instance. By the time I saw it, Mr. Lewis had been replaced by Hugh Panaro, who was very, very good and who played a Sweeney who seemed somewhat more mad and dangerous. Hope you like it…

VIDEO MISSING

Saying One Thing…

Matt Yglesias explains the problem Trump seems to be making for himself with this issue of phoning the families of U.S. servicemen killed in the line of duty. Seems to me the problem flows from the disconnect Trump seems to have between What He Says and What He Does. What He Says is what works for him at that very moment, regardless of reality.

You and I, being much better people, would never say "I have proof" of something unless we actually had it because we'd know it would make us look worse to then not be able to deliver it. Trump says he has proof of something because he's trying to nuke whoever he's arguing with and doesn't consider the ramifications of not being able to back that up.

Or let's say we were on the phone to the father of a fallen soldier who was bemoaning his financial situation. We might blurt out a promise to send him $25,000. We might even regret saying it five minutes later. But I think we'd then say, "Well, I said it. I have to do it. Might as well do it now." Trump says it and doesn't link that to the actual issuance of a check. That can come later if it proves to be necessary.

There are some obvious benefits to having your mind work like that. You're on the campaign trail. You want the votes of those who watch Fox News and have become convinced that there's nothing more horrible than Obamacare, what with it providing affordable health insurance to people in need. But you also want the votes of those who think it's a pretty good idea working pretty well…so what do you do? You promise to replace it with something better, something cheaper, something more efficient and wonderful, etc. That plays to both sides. What you don't do is ask yourself, "How the hell am I going to do that?" because in your mind, saying it and doing it are two separate, unrelated things.

I'm beginning to think that's one of the things his supporters like about the guy. It's certainly calming to think that when he says something that threatens to start World War III, that doesn't necessarily mean he's going to start World War III. And once you accept the premise that that's how he rolls, you can tell yourself your guy isn't lying. He's just not allowing his actions to be dictated by what he said he was going to do.

It's That Time Again…

…and that of course means time to start thinking about Comic-Con International in San Diego next year! It runs July 19-22 so it's only 273 days until Preview Night! And this message is to let you know that Returning Registration opens on Saturday, October 28 at 8:00 in the morning, PDT. The stuff you need to know about this is here.

Before that, we have WonderCon, which is March 23-25 at the Anaheim Convention Center. What you need to know about this is here.

And, very important: Do not rely on this blog for info on either con. If you're interested in attending one or both, keep your eye on this page. Thank you.

And While We're At It…

Here's a commercial for that production of Young Frankenstein with scenes from it. I have no financial interest in this show…

Today's Video Link (Not Counting The One I Posted Earlier)

Back here, I raved about a local production of Young Frankenstein that I saw last Saturday night. That company has now moved to the Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts for the next few weekends and you can get info and tickets here. And to further sell you locals on the idea of going, here's a brief, truncated number from the show as performed on Good Day L.A. by Dino Nicandros, who plays the title role, and Erik Scott Romney who plays Igor — or Eyegore, if you prefer…

Letterman in Semi-Retirement

Here's a profile of David Letterman in his current "What do I do now?" mode. He was also on with Jimmy Kimmel last night — a spot which mostly consisted of Jimmy fawning like the other late night Jimmy and Dave belittling Dave.

The article seemed awkward to me. Folks writing about Dave rarely seem able to avoid mentioning the Velcro suit and the Monkey-Cam, which were a long, long time ago and were of a style of comedy he abandoned. They were also bits that were funny largely because of the writers' ideas, not so much because of Dave. The evolution of his comedy was to move largely from things his staff devised to him just talking about his life…a trend I think he took too far. I remember my mother telling me she'd stopped watching because "That man makes millions of dollars a month and his audience worships him and all he does is complain."

He's still a brilliant, witty guy. I'm glad he has a new show coming on but I'm discouraged that the only announced guest so far is Howard Stern. It would be nice to see Letterman working in unexplored territory…and come to think of it, the same could be said about Stern. (Earlier this year when Trump started having those televised cabinet meetings where everyone has to talk about how great he is and what a fabulous job he's doing, they reminded me of something and it took me a while to figure out what. It was The Howard Stern Show. I kept expecting Trump to ask some lady to take off her top.)

This Sunday night, Letterman receives the Mark Twain Prize for Humor, which of course never goes to anyone who puts humor on paper the way Mark Twain did. The list of those saluting Dave is fairly predictable: Kimmel, Steve Martin, Martin Short, Bill Murray, etc. It doesn't air until November 20 so we'll have to wait 'til then to hear Dave tell us how he's not worthy. But he is. In fact, he's more worthy than about half of the people who already got this. Here's a montage of past ceremonies…

Your Wednesday Trump Dump

Trump is suddenly all about calling and sending out letters of condolence to the families of soldiers who died in the line of duty. He claims he did not say the insensitive thing he is supposed to have said to one widow and that he has proof. But of course, when Donald Trump claims to have proof of something, we never ever see it.

Eric Levitz says that even with a Republican House and Senate, it's looking like Trump's tax plan is not going to make it. Wasn't one of the selling points for his candidacy that he was this great deal-maker who could negotiate anything and everything and get things done?

It looks like the U.S. has just about won the war against ISIS by following the strategies laid out during the Obama administration. This presents a problem for Trump since he has to take credit for everything good, can't give any to his predecessor and can't point to anything he did differently. What's the answer? According to Kevin Drum, Trump has started claiming that ISIS gave up just because they knew Donald Trump was president. Right.

Remember when John McCain was a maverick who didn't automatically side with his own party? Then remember when he wanted to be president so he became something else? Well, Jonathan Chait thinks the old John McCain is back…and is offering serious opposition to his party's leader, D.J.T.

And lastly: Chait thinks that all of Trump's ranting about how Obamacare is dead and defunct is prelude to Trump getting a few fixes made to it, rebranding it (maybe even as Trumpcare) and declaring it the cheaper, better health care plan that he promised everyone. You know, just like the wall he promised has turned into other, more possible variations.

This Month's ONLY Crowdfunding Plug

My pal Pete Von Sholly likes monsters and monster magazines a lot more than I do but otherwise, we have many of the same tastes. I also like Pete's sense of humor and artistry and the fact that he writes, draws and publishes work he enjoys doing and which I enjoy reading. So I'm going to suggest you consider backing his Kickstarter for Son of Ugh, his latest collection of weird stories about weird things. I'm sure he ain't gonna get rich doing these but let's see if we can help him make a few bucks or at least break even on fine work done out of passion and the sheer joy of entertaining others. Go take a look and see if he doesn't feel like "one of us" to you.

Disclaimer: This blog receives dozens, if not hundreds of requests to plug crowdfunded projects each month. If I ran them all, I would be posting nothing else and I would also be directing you to a lot of unworthy causes and products. Please do not ask me to plug yours.

ASK me: Sexual Predators

Well, maybe I do have something more to post about the Harvey Weinstein matter. The same wishes-to-be-anonymous person who sent me this question just sent me this question…

In your most informative reply, you said you've known a lot of actresses who endured harassment like Weinstein is reported to have committed and that your friends did not want to report it. Could you elaborate on this? I've never been in a situation like that. I think I would report it no matter what the personal cost. I still don't understand why someone wouldn't.

Generally, it's because of some combination of two beliefs. One is that they don't expect it to do much good. The other is that they expect that what they will endure if they do report the incident will be as bad or worse than the incident. And I suppose also some people deal with traumatic situations by just trying to put them in the past and forget about them.

Here's a true tale not about a producer with the power of a Harvey Weinstein but about one who was producing low-budget B-grade movies. (Actually, "B-grade" is too high. His were more like "W" — non-union pics made on a soup kitchen budget with the kinds of sex 'n' violence that earn you an "R" rating.) I could call him all sorts of names but for now, I will just call him The Producer. His victim in this incident was a lady I dated briefly in the mid-eighties when I was around 34 and she was around 25.

She had been in a number of such movies and was called in to audition for a large role in one that was then called "Dark Forces." It seems to never actually have come out and certainly not under that name. She told me once that every film she'd done had a classy title when she'd been cast and maybe even all the time the film was in production. But when they were released, they all seemed to be retitled "Cheerleaders Taking Showers" or something like that. She wasn't wild about such parts and she occasionally managed to get something where she was covered by clothing and/or the production was covered by the Screen Actors Guild…but most of the jobs available to her were on things like what The Producer was producing.

She showed up at an office on Sunset Boulevard near San Vicente. In the casting session were The Producer and several staff members — about five people, two of them female. She read a few scenes with one of the men and took some direction from The Producer. No one seemed to be present who had the title of Director but that was not uncommon and The Producer said that they were still in talks with a couple of directors. If none of those worked out, he said, he might direct the film himself.

After she read some scenes and answered some questions, one of the women there told her that since the role involved nudity, she would have to disrobe for them. This was not unexpected — it was clear in the script she'd been sent — and she'd done such scenes in other films. She had no problem with that. She did have a problem with what happened next.

She was told she could go into the bathroom and strip down to her panties, then come out. The bathroom was around a little corner in the room they were in. She went into it, took off everything but her briefs and came out. She later told me that she thought the room's layout had been designed with what then happened in mind. Because she had to then come around the corner, the bathroom door would swing shut behind her — it closed automatically — before she stepped back into the main room. When she did step back into the main room, she found that everyone had left except The Producer. And — surprise, surprise — he had no pants on.

She ran back to the bathroom. The door had locked behind her with her clothing inside.

She struggled with the door. Behind her, she could hear The Producer saying things like, "Come on. Everyone does this. You've been around. You know how this works." She told me she said, "Not with me it doesn't."

The Producer was stalking about, nude from the waist down. She eluded him, ran out of the room, found an empty office nearby and locked herself in it. There was a phone so she quickly dialed the first phone number she could think of for someone who lived fairly close by and was likely to be home. That was mine. She blurted out where she was, what had happened and who was pursuing her. I said, "I'm going to call the police" but she said, "No, please don't. That would make things worse. Just come and get me." I figured that was her call to make so I grabbed up something she could wear, hopped in my car and was there in ten minutes.

I found her outside, fully-dressed and crying. One of the ladies who'd been in the casting session — the one who'd told her to go take her clothes off — had knocked on the door and told her her clothes were outside and she could take them and get out. She did, in a hurry. I took her someplace where we could talk and she calmed down and told me that while this was the worst such experience she'd had, it was not the first such experience she'd had.

She absolutely resisted the idea of going to the cops. She knew women who in similar situations had done that and it made things worse. "You get treated like a whore because you've done nudity. They'll say, 'You went to his office. You took your clothes off. Why the hell didn't you think that might happen?' If it's going to go to court, they'll investigate me and my sex life and twist it all to make me look like a whore, plus I'll have to see that bastard again and he'll have some bullshit story about how I offered to have sex with him. The best thing for me to do is just forget about it. I got past the last few times and I can get past this."

And she did…which does not mean it was not a shitty thing to do to another human being. (And I don't just mean what The Producer did. How about that lady who worked for him? How about everyone else in that room who cleared out on cue? How proud would you be if your job description included being an enabler of rape?)

Sadly, I've heard a lot of these stories from women I've known, sometimes involving predators with fame, fortune and sterling reputations. Most of the details were different but they all had this in common: Someone who had power thought they could use it to force someone to do something they didn't want to do, usually of a sexual nature. I do not understand how a putative human being could do that to someone.

Hell, I don't even understand how anyone could enjoy physical contact on that basis. To me, the best part of consensual sex is the consensual part. Out of sheer curiosity, I would love to hear Bill Cosby explain why sex is better when the woman is unconscious and has no say in what you do to her.

Getting back to the lady who had that ugly encounter with The Producer: We've stayed friends. She's no longer acting. She's happily married with a family. I called her last night to tell her I wanted to post this story — minus her name, of course — and she was not only fine with it, she encouraged me. "My daughter's taking up acting," she said. "The more Harvey Weinsteins who learn that they can't get away with this kind of crap, the better it will be for my daughter and everyone!"

ASK me

Today's Video Link

Here we have Penn & Teller taking a magic trick that I could do when I was seven, putting their own spin on it and turning it into a pretty entertaining presentation…